You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 8, 2022

Thailand Tightens Definition of SMEs Eligible for Special Protection from Unfair Credit Terms

Subscribe to Updates

Thailand’s Trade Competition Commission has amended the guidelines prohibiting large purchasers from setting unfair credit terms for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The new guidelines, which were published in the Government Gazette on August 17, 2022, revise the definition of SMEs and clarify the duties of concerned parties.

The original guidelines, which took effect in December 2021, set a favorable maximum period for credit terms for SMEs selling products or services to a third-party purchaser. Prescribing longer credit terms than the mandatory period would constitute an unfair trade practice in violation of the Trade Competition Act B.E. 2560 (2017).

In defining what businesses are considered SMEs, the guidelines set thresholds for the number of employees and amount of annual turnover. The amended guidelines maintain these thresholds, but the new guidelines require that both employee-number and turnover thresholds be met in order for a business to be considered an SME. In contrast, the original guidelines only required either the employee-number threshold or the turnover threshold to be met. This amendment will likely mean that fewer business operators qualify as SMEs.

Accordingly, two types of businesses are defined as SMEs under the guidelines:

  • Manufacturers of goods with up to 200 employees and an annual turnover of no more than THB 500 million (approximately USD 13.5 million); or
  • Service providers or wholesale or retail businesses with up to 100 employees and an annual turnover of no more than THB 300 million (approximately USD 8.1 million).

To benefit from protection under the new guidelines against unfair credit terms, SMEs must provide documents proving the number of employees and the amount of annual turnover to trade partners that purchase goods or services from them.

The new guidelines come into force on September 16, 2022.

For more information on the unfair credit term guidelines, or on any aspect of compliance with Thailand’s antitrust and competition laws, please contact Kobkit Thienpreecha at [email protected] or +66 2056 5534, Nutavit Sirikan at [email protected] or +66 2056 5510, or Suphitsara Jaturaphitjaroen at [email protected] or +66 2056 5645.

Related Professionals

Practices

Antitrust and Competition

Corporate/M&A

Customs and International Trade

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 3, 2021
Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Phnom Penh has contributed the Cambodia chapter to the Foreign Investment Review 2021, a global guide to the legal and regulatory environment for foreign investment in 25 jurisdictions worldwide. Published and distributed by Getting the Deal Through (GTDT), the guide discusses law and policy on oversight of foreign investment, regulatory frameworks, procedural requirements, and other important stipulations for foreign investors. The Cambodia chapter was authored by Jay Cohen, partner and director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Phnom Penh office. The chapter focuses most closely on the law and policy section, which lays out the government’s policies and practices, the main investment laws and their scope of application, and the relevant authorities responsible for regulating mergers and similar transactions. Also discussed are some key recent and ongoing developments—particularly the drafting of a law to address competition issues and introduce greater scrutiny of mergers and acquisitions. The Cambodia chapter is available below as a PDF. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Laos, Myanmar, and Vietnam chapters to Foreign Investment Review 2021. To browse all 25 jurisdictions covered by the guide, please visit the Getting the Deal Through website.
Read More
February 1, 2021
Attorneys from Tilleke & Gibbins in Myanmar have contributed to the latest edition of Practical Law’s online Life Sciences Global Guide. The guide is a Q&A-style overview of the regulatory frameworks for the life sciences industry across multiple jurisdictions worldwide, and this year the Myanmar chapter includes two sections, one of which is “Pharmaceutical IP and Competition Law in Myanmar.” This section runs through the country’s legal and regulatory environment for patents and trademarks—particularly as they relate to pharmaceutical business in the jurisdiction. The section then turns to IP and competition law issues, with questions and answers focusing on how the country’s competition laws and regulations affect the pharmaceutical sector. Readers are also given information on how to properly comply with Myanmar law on competition, including when it comes to licensing of medicines and pharmaceutical technology. The full Pharmaceutical Intellectual Property and Competition Law in Myanmar guide can be accessed on the Practical Law website. Practical Law, produced by Thomson Reuters, is the world’s leading legal know-how resource for business lawyers, publishing a huge range of guides covering hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. Tilleke & Gibbins also supplied the “Medicinal Product Regulation and Product Liability in Myanmar,” which Practical Law published in its Life Sciences Global Guide  at the same time.
Read More
January 27, 2021
In 2019, Thailand introduced an online system for payment of stamp duty (e-Stamp Duty) and a requirement for e-Stamp Duty to be paid on the following five instruments when executed electronically (e-Instruments): hire of work service instrument; loan instrument or bank overdraft instrument; powers of attorney (POA); proxy letters for voting at company meetings; and guarantee instrument. However, given the strict financial penalties on those who fail to pay stamp duty, the government implemented a grace period until December 31, 2020, to allow people to become familiar with the e-Stamp Duty system before the requirement is strictly enforced. During the grace period, taxpayers could pay stamp duty for the five e-Instruments at an area revenue office, rather than via the e-Stamp Duty system, and could also pay stamp duty for traditional paper versions of those five instruments through the e-Stamp Duty system. On January 19, 2021, the Revenue Department issued Notifications of the Director-General of Revenue Re: Stamp Duty (Nos. 61 and 62) B.E. 2564 (2021) further extending that grace period until December 31, 2021. The following table summarizes the revised methods of stamp duty payments available for the five instrument categories mentioned above under the new notifications. The e-Stamp Duty system allows taxpayers to pay stamp duty online by filing the prescribed form (Form Or.Sor.9) through (i) the website of the Revenue Department (www.rd.go.th), or (ii) the Application Programming Interface (API) of the Revenue Department before or within 15 days from the date of instrument execution. Taxpayers can currently file a request to pay for e-Stamp Duty no earlier than 30 days before the date of instrument execution. Taxpayers should note that the e-Stamp Duty system does not currently support late payment. Therefore, late filing and stamp duty payments will have to be made at an area revenue
Read More
January 15, 2021
Thailand’s Department of Business Development (DBD) has released a new notification to emphasize and encourage the online issuance of company affidavits and certification of corporate documents, in an effort to prevent further spread of COVID-19 in Thailand. This notification, which was announced on January 7, came into effect on January 11, 2021. The new notification repeals and replaces a similar DBD notification issued on April 10, 2020, during the first wave of the pandemic, and notes that requests to issue company affidavits and certify corporate documents can be processed through the DBD’s e-service system via the DBD website (www.dbd.go.th). In using this online system, applicants can choose to receive the documents either as PDF e-certificates or in paper form. The digital signature of the relevant DBD official will appear on the documents using a public key infrastructure (PKI) encryption—an accepted cryptographic practice that binds digital identifiers to people and organizations and verifies any amendments to the information or digital signature. In accordance with Thailand’s laws on electronic signatures, a digital signature by a DBD official is deemed as legitimate as an ink signature on paper. The authenticity of both electronic and paper documents issued by the DBD can be verified via the document’s QR code and through the reference number at the bottom of the document. For paper documents, the authenticity can also be verified by checking the micro-text (which is illegible when photocopied), and the DBD watermark (which disappears or becomes obscured when photocopied). Anyone can verify a legal entity’s current information on the DBD’s website through the “DBD DataWarehouse+” or “DBD Service” portals. The DBD e-certificate service described in the new notification is now available for public use. Even though the DBD had already introduced an online system for this service in 2020, the new notification highlights this
Read More