You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 7, 2026

Thailand Seeks Input on Competition Guidelines for Digital Platforms, Modern Trade, and On-Demand Delivery

Subscribe to Updates

On July 31, 2026, the Trade Competition Commission of Thailand (TCCT) launched a one-month public consultation period on proposed regulatory guidelines for competition in three business segments: (1) digital platforms; (2) modern trade and credit terms; and (3) ride-hailing and on-demand delivery, including food delivery and mart/quick commerce. At the same time, the TCCT released a market report on ride hailing and on-demand delivery that is likely to influence the guidelines and their interpretation and enforcement.

The consultation runs until August 31, 2026. Stakeholders have a limited window to submit practical, evidence-based input that may shape the next phase of Thailand’s regulatory framework for competition.

Scope of the Consultation

The public consultation targets updating existing guidance in three business sectors that have experienced transformative growth and structural change:

  • Digital platforms: The TCCT has actively monitored this sector in recent years and has coordinated with other regulators, primarily the Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) and the Ministry of Commerce. In March 2026 the TCCT’s Guidelines on Multi-Sided Platforms and E-Commerce Businesses took effect, and in July the TCCT established a digital platform subcommittee to regulate and prevent unfair trade practices in digital platform businesses. This activity followed a TCCT market report on e-marketplace businesses in September 2025.
  • Modern trade and credit terms: This sector was the focus of the TCCT’s 2019 Guidelines on Unfair Trade Practices between Wholesale and Retail Operators and Manufacturers or Suppliers (widely known as the “Modern Trade Guidelines”) , as well as its 2021 Guidelines on Unfair Trade Practices regarding the Credit Terms under which Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Sell Products or Services to a Purchaser (also known as the “Credit Term Guidelines”), which were amended the following year.
  • Ride-hailing and on-demand delivery (including food delivery and quick commerce): The TCCT published the Guidelines on Unfair Trade Practices between Digital Platform Operators for Food Delivery and Restaurants (or the “Food Delivery Guidelines”)in December 2020, but no specific guidelines currently exist for ride-hailing and mart/quick commerce.

The TCCT’s decision to revise existing guidelines follows field research across multiple provinces and in-depth market structure analysis. The findings of that research suggest that current guidelines may not fully capture fast-changing trading practices, platform ecosystems, and sector-specific market dynamics. The consultation is therefore an opportunity for operators to explain how their markets work in practice, identify where regulatory assumptions may not reflect commercial realities, and help the TCCT design rules that are targeted, workable, and proportionate.

TCCT’s Market Report on Ride-Hailing and On-Demand Delivery

Alongside the call for public consultation, the TCCT has released a detailed market report for the ride-hailing and on-demand delivery sectors, conducted by its Market Structure and Business Systems Division.

In the ride-hailing sector, a single platform held approximately 70 percent market share in 2024, but by 2026 the market had evolved into a behavioral duopoly between two leading platforms holding around 45–50 percent and 45 percent, respectively, with smaller players holding minimal shares. The rapid ascent of the challenger platform resulted from aggressive pricing strategies, including waiving commission fees for drivers during its market-entry phase. A newer entrant that launched in early 2024 introduced a zero-commission model charging drivers a flat THB 20 platform fee per trip.

The food delivery market has experienced more dramatic concentration. The market, valued at approximately THB 100 billion over 2022–2025, underwent a major structural shift in May 2025 when a pioneering operator with more than 19 percent market share announced its permanent withdrawal from Thailand due to sustained losses. At the same time, a domestic financial group completed the sale of its loss-making food delivery platform to a consortium of local investors. These exits left two leading food delivery platforms controlling a combined 80–90 percent of transaction volume in 2026, with a third operator holding approximately 10 percent as a supporting player within a broader regional e-commerce group.

The report identifies systemic entry barriers that reinforce market concentration. These include:

  • Indirect network effects that create a “chicken-and-egg problem” whereby new platforms cannot attract drivers or delivery riders without passengers or customers, and vice versa, forcing entrants to subsidize both sides simultaneously at enormous cost.
  • Multihoming barriers that impose hidden costs on drivers wishing to work across multiple platforms—including uniforms, insulated delivery bags, high-performance smartphones, fast internet packages, and advance deposits—compounded by loyalty programs designed to incentivize single-platform commitment.
  • Data and ecosystem advantages that enable incumbents to leverage their market power and achieve economies of scope, including superior algorithmic pricing, demand forecasting, and integrated financial services such as digital wallets and buy-now-pay-later schemes that create switching costs and lock in users.

The report also documents several categories of potentially anticompetitive conduct. Pricing behaviors include:

  • Surge pricing through opaque algorithms that may discriminate unfairly against consumers in urgent need.
  • Predatory pricing or pricing below cost to eliminate smaller competitors, followed by raising prices and commission rates once market dominance is achieved (recoupment).
  • Unfair commission fees imposed on small merchants with high platform dependency, coupled with unilateral changes to rider compensation without advance notice.

Nonprice conduct includes:

  • Price parity clauses that prohibit restaurants from offering lower prices on their own websites or competing platforms.
  • Self-preferencing through algorithm manipulation to promote in-house food preparation or captive logistics services.
  • Exclusivity arrangements that coerce merchants or riders to avoid competitors in exchange for preferential commission rates or marketing tools.

Next Steps for Business Operators

The public consultation marks a significant shift toward more responsive competition law enforcement in Thailand’s digital platform economy. The TCCT is expected to play a more active role through heightened ex-ante oversight and sector-specific guidance, and it has signaled its intention to align enforcement more closely with international competition policy trends—including the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), foreign competition authority enforcement experience, and Thailand’s broader policy direction toward OECD accession. The outcome of this consultation, in conjunction with the TCCT’s market studies, will likely shape how Thailand’s competition rules are interpreted and applied across these sectors.

Participation in the consultation is thus important not only to comment on existing and future guidelines but also to influence the market study assumptions that may underpin future law reform and enforcement priorities. This is a valuable opportunity to help the TCCT understand the nature of participants’ businesses, the commercial justification for existing practices, and the differences between Thai market conditions and foreign market dynamics and regulatory models.

Business operators should act promptly to:

  1. Identify which aspects of the consultation and market study may affect their business model, commercial terms, data practices, pricing policies, commission structures, merchant or supplier arrangements, and platform governance.
  2. Prepare factual evidence and practical examples showing how the relevant markets operate in Thailand.
  3. Submit clear, well-supported comments before the consultation closes on August 31, 2026.

To encourage this process, Tilleke & Gibbins is helping operators assess the consultation’s impact and develop practical advocacy positions. We can also lead industry-wide discussions and engagements with the TCCT and other regulators so that the consultation reflects insightful market practices and a balanced regulatory approach.

Related Professionals

Practices

Antitrust and Competition

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 20, 2026
The past year has been an important one for the Trade Competition Commission of Thailand (TCCT). With a right combination of commissioners bringing expertise in competition law, investigations, administrative procedures, court processes, and sector-focused industries, the regulator has pushed forward with stronger enforcement efforts and closer cooperation with both domestic and international stakeholders. In 2025 the TCCT participated in major international initiatives—including peer reviews conducted by the OECD and ASEAN. These efforts reflect Thailand’s ongoing ambition to elevate its competition law framework to meet international expectations and build trust among global communities. There was also significant momentum around potential amendments to the Trade Competition Act (TCA). Political parties, the TCCT, the private sector, and civil society all agreed that the 2017 law could benefit from clearer rules and more effective enforcement tools. Although a draft amendment passed an initial reading and moved to a subcommittee for revision, the process stalled following the dissolution of Parliament. At the same time, the TCCT invested heavily in strengthening its own internal capabilities. It expanded collaborations with organizations such as the OECD, ASEAN authorities, the EU, and counterparts in Japan and Australia. The TCCT also published sector-specific market studies, including on digital platforms and e‑marketplaces and on cold‑rolled steel. The regulator also shared draft guidelines aimed at regulating online platforms—although these have not yet been finalized. What’s Next for the TCCT? Looking ahead, the TCCT is set to keep building on the momentum it has created and be a more active, transparent, and practical regulator. It is likely to become even more visible in the public sphere as it steps up efforts to raise awareness about competition law, especially among businesses that may not traditionally follow or be familiar with such regulatory developments. Digital markets, including e‑commerce and online marketplaces, will remain a
Read More
February 16, 2026
On February 4, 2026, the Trade Competition Commission of Thailand (TCCT) released a draft notification outlining updated criteria and procedures for requesting advance decisions under section 59 of the Trade Competition Act (TCA). This draft is now open for public comment through the TCCT website until March 5, 2026. Section 59 of the TCA lets businesses proactively ask the TCCT to review whether a planned activity, such as a business strategy, marketing program, or other proposed conduct, could potentially violate the TCA. The major limitation is that this mechanism cannot be used for merger‑control matters. The new draft aims to make the process more accessible and user‑friendly. Key updates include allowing for electronic submission of requests and establishing a shorter notification timeframe, requiring the TCCT to explain any delay to the 60‑day review period within 7 days instead of the previous 15 days. For many businesses, this preliminary consultation tool is an effective way to reduce regulatory and competition‑law risks. Businesses that have taken advantage of this process have found that obtaining an advance decision can provide meaningful legal certainty, as the decision is binding once issued.
Read More
January 21, 2026
Spurred by global geopolitics and Canada’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, which aims to forge deeper ties with ASEAN, Canadian companies have been showing growing interest in Thailand and Southeast Asia in recent years. To understand the opportunities offered by the region, we sat down with Andrew Stoutley, a Toronto native and the chief operating officer of Tilleke & Gibbins, a leading Southeast Asian regional law firm with over 130 years of history in Thailand. Q: Why are Canadian companies looking at Thailand and Southeast Asia right now? A: Two reasons stand out. First, diversification has moved up the agenda. Many Canadian companies want options outside North America due to tariff volatility and policy uncertainty in the United States, as well as questions around the next Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement mandatory joint review. At the same time, the shift of global production from China to Southeast Asia is accelerating, driven by rising costs, geopolitics, and the need to avoid overreliance on a single market. As a result, Canadian companies are looking for a second production base or a regional hub, and Thailand and its neighbors are natural choices given their manufacturing depth, location, and established supply chains. Second, Canada’s own efforts in the region are gaining traction. The Indo-Pacific Strategy has led to more on-the-ground support, including larger trade missions, upgraded diplomatic posts, and new financing options. Export Development Canada (EDC) now has a presence in Bangkok, giving Canadian companies a direct line to financing and insurance in Thailand. There’s also steady progress on trade frameworks like the recently signed Canada–Indonesia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (which will come into effect pending domestic procedures), ongoing negotiations of a Canada–ASEAN FTA, and the exciting announcement about the launch of negotiations of a Canada–Thailand FTA. Together, these developments have the potential to make it much easier
Read More
December 4, 2025
Thailand has expanded the circumstances under which state agencies may bypass competitive bidding procedures to address urgent security challenges. On November 28, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Finance published the Ministerial Regulation Determining Cases of Procurement by Specific Method (No. 6) B.E. 2568 in the Royal Gazette, introducing a new pathway for procuring supplies and services needed to address cyber and military threats that may affect the stability of government agencies or the nation. For technology vendors, cybersecurity firms, and defense contractors, this regulatory change creates immediate opportunities to engage directly with government buyers facing urgent security challenges. New Fast-Track Category for Security Threats The regulation amends Thailand’s Public Procurement and Supplies Management Act B.E. 2560 (2017) to add a new category of procurement that qualifies for the “specific method”—a noncompetitive, direct selection process. Previously, agencies could use this expedited method only in limited circumstances, such as emergencies, cases with proprietary technology requirements, or national security operations. The new provision explicitly covers procurement of supplies related to preventing or resolving cyber or military threats that could impact the stability of a state agency or the country. This addition recognizes the urgent nature of modern security challenges, where competitive bidding timelines may leave agencies vulnerable during critical threat windows. State agencies dealing with active cyberattacks, preparing defensive measures against anticipated threats, or responding to military security concerns can now move directly to negotiate with qualified vendors rather than conducting lengthy public tender processes. Vendor Considerations Vendors offering cybersecurity solutions now have a regulatory avenue to work directly with government clients when stability concerns are present. These solutions include threat detection systems, anti-ransomware tools, incident response services, firewalls, and security consulting. Similarly, defense contractors providing military equipment or specialized security supplies can pursue direct engagement channels where traditional procurement methods would create
Read More