You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 18, 2024

Thailand Reaffirms Alcoholic Beverage Packaging and Labeling Requirements

A new notification on required labeling and packaging for alcoholic beverages was published in Thailand’s Government Gazette on November 8, 2024, taking full effect the following day.

The notification (Notification of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Committee Re: Criteria, Methods, and Conditions for Packaging of Alcoholic Beverages and Warning Statements of Alcoholic Beverages Both Produced Domestically and Imported into Thailand 2024) essentially reaffirms a mandatory requirement for packaging and warning statements for alcoholic beverages, which echoes existing regulations from 2009 and 2017.

Under the authority of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act B.E. 2551 (2008) (ABCA), the notification reinforces the Alcoholic Beverage Control Committee’s objective of promoting consumer awareness through standardized warning labels.

The notification addresses the following key aspects:

  • Packaging definitions. The notification defines packing-related terms for the first time under the ABCA. These terms include (1) packaging, (2) containers (also known as primary packaging), and (3) outer packaging (secondary packaging).
  • Packaging requirements. Containers for alcoholic beverages produced or imported for sale in Thailand must be at least 0.175 liters each.
  • Warning statements. Although alcoholic beverages are classified as food under the Food Act B.E. 2522 (1979), the notification exempts alcoholic beverages from general food labeling requirements prescribed in the Food Act. Instead, it mandates that the following warning statements be prominently displayed:
    • Sale of liquor to persons under 20 years old is prohibited;
    • Drinking reduces driving ability; and
    • Not suitable for persons under 20 years old.
  • Format. The notification specifies that these warning statements must be written in Thai, in bold characters, with a minimum type size of five millimeters. The warning must be enclosed in a box that contrasts with the label background and surrounding content.
  • Exemptions. Certain products, such as alcoholic beverages imported as samples or otherwise not intended for commercial sale, are exempt from the warning statement requirements.

The notification consolidates and reinforces Thailand’s alcohol packaging standards, maintaining an emphasis on consumer protection and awareness by ensuring that important information is clearly and consistently displayed on all alcoholic beverage packaging. It formally grants the Alcoholic Beverage Control Committee the authority to oversee and enforce warning statements in alcoholic beverage labeling.

With no major changes to existing regulations, the notification came into effect swiftly, without granting any grace periods.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 5, 2020
Southeast Asian food exporters to China should be aware of new regulations announced in late November 2019 by China’s General Administration of Customs (GAC) for all food products. The first is still in draft form and seeks to expand the scope of the GAC’s role in policing all food products, while the second update—already implemented–makes the application process for an import license for animal and plant food products much more rigorous.
December 6, 2018
The ease with which counterfeiters are able to hide their identity online, simply by hiding behind a username, can often complicate the protection of IP rights. However, if an infringer’s anonymity can be pierced, it can yield huge seizures of counterfeit products, make great strides in protecting valuable intellectual assets, and close major distribution channels.    
August 29, 2018
Although the Thai Trademark Act provides protection for passing off, filing a lawsuit to defend an IP owner’s unregistered rights can still pose certain challenges. This is especially true where two registered trademarks are different, but the product packaging designs of both marks are confusingly similar. In these circumstances, the court occasionally decides upon a mere comparison of the two marks and may determine that the similarities of their packaging designs are not likely to cause confusion among public consumers due to their dissimilarity.   
February 27, 2018
In what is thought to be the first order certifying a class under Thailand’s recently enacted class action legislation, the Act to Amend the Civil Procedure Code (Number 26) B.E. 2558 (the “Act”), the Civil Court in Bangkok has issued an order in case Black No.SorWor.4/2560 against Wax Garbage Recycle Center Co., Ltd. and others, granting the lead plaintiffs’ request for the case to proceed as a class action.