You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 1, 2020

Thailand Readies Draft Notification to Allow Hemp-Based Ingredients for Food Innovation

Informed Counsel

The cannabis industry in Thailand took its first concrete step in February of 2019, when medical cannabis was unexpectedly legalized. In August 2019, a Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) notification delisted some components and derivatives of cannabis plants from the category of narcotics and reclassified them as products within the purview of individual laws (e.g., on medicine, herbal products, cosmetics, food, etc.). Then, in October 2019, the Narcotics Control Committee clarified the legal definition of hemp in order to streamline the development of the hemp industry, which is not limited to medical applications. After months of inactivity in 2020, caused by the refocusing of attention on efforts to combat the COVID-19 outbreak, the Thai FDA recently circulated draft MOPH notifications that aim to govern hemp-based food ingredients under the Food Act.

Under these draft notifications, only non-viable hemp seeds, hemp seed oil, and protein derived from hemp seeds will be allowed as ingredients in food products. This means the development of food and food supplements comprising those ingredients is likely to be allowed soon. The key features of these drafts are provided below.

Products and Ingredients

In the present drafts, hemp seeds, hemp seed oil, proteins from hemp seeds (as defined in law), and food supplements containing these ingredients are classified as “specially controlled foods,” a product category associated with the highest risk under the Food Act B.E. 2522 (1979).

In addition to existing notifications on food contaminants, the drafts prescribe the maximum levels of impurities, such as cadmium and lead, that can be found in the hemp seeds. Moreover, the total THC must not exceed 5 ppm (that is, 5 milligrams per kilogram) in dry hemp seeds, and the CBD content must not exceed 30 ppm in dry hemp seeds. More standards are also proposed for hemp seed oil, proteins from hemp seeds, and various other hemp-based food products.

In the presentation of the products, statements claiming any type or amount of THC or CBD, or any health claims about these substances, are prohibited. On the other hand, a statement or claim about the hemp seed, hemp seed oil, or proteins from hemp seeds may be allowed, subject to rules prescribed in a separate notification pertaining to health claims in food products.

Notable label requirements include “May contain THC and CBD. Anyone with allergies or sensitivities to said substances should consume with caution,” and “No therapeutic properties.”

Cross-References to Other Regulations

Because these hemp-based food ingredients are derived from plants that can have narcotic qualities, some parts of the supply chain would still be governed by the Narcotics Act and its implementing regulations; particularly the upcoming Hemp Regulation, which is now at a relatively advanced stage in the review process for draft regulations. All relevant notifications and regulations should thus be read jointly to give a complete picture of the regulatory framework.

The present draft notifications on hemp-based food ingredients make a number of references to the future Hemp Regulation. For instance, it states that licensed food manufacturers who process viable (i.e. still narcotic) hemp seeds into non-viable hemp seeds (non-narcotic food ingredients) must also hold a separate hemp possession license under the Hemp Regulation. Similarly, to import viable hemp seeds into Thailand, an importer must hold a separate hemp importation license under the Hemp Regulation. However, the current draft Hemp Regulation places a five-year transitional restriction on the importation of hemp. It appears from a joint reading of the legislation that importation of viable hemp seeds, even for food production, is only likely to be allowed after the Hemp Regulation has been effective for five years.

Expected Developments

The draft notification on hemp-based food ingredients are currently in the public scoping period, which will end on September 21, 2020. Until then, comments may be submitted via the official website of the FDA’s Food Division (relevant contents in Thai only). The drafts are subject to further amendments following the scoping period.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 22, 2026
A new decree in Vietnam brings significant implementation clarity to the country’s existing extended producer responsibility (EPR) legal framework. An EPR mechanism was first codified in Vietnam in the 2020 Law on Environmental Protection amid ongoing challenges surrounding the collection and treatment of product and packaging waste. The mechanism was progressively detailed through Decree No. 08/2022/ND‑CP and its successive amendments, but the regulatory framework remained insufficiently developed, notably in terms of support mechanisms for waste collection, recycling, and treatment. The newly launched regulations in Decree No. 110/2026/ND-CP (Decree 110), issued on April 1, 2026, and taking effect on May 25, 2026, stipulate fully and clearly the responsibility of manufacturers and importers to recycle products and packaging and to treat waste. Some key provisions of Decree 110 for manufacturers, importers, and related stakeholders are presented below. Subjects of EPR The Law on Environmental Protection assigns responsibility to manufacturers and importers for product and packaging recycling (under Article 54) or waste collection and treatment (under Article 55), depending on the type of products and packaging they produce or import. Decree 110 elaborates on these EPR provisions by specifying the responsible entities and listing out the types of products and packaging subject to recycling and waste treatment responsibilities. Decree 110 clarifies the responsible entities in special cases, such as when products under the same brand are made by multiple manufacturers, when there is a contract manufacturing or entrusted import relationship, and when the manufacturer or importer is part of a corporate group. Notably, exemptions may be applied in some scenarios, such as for manufacturers and importers of products and packaging exclusively for export, temporary import and re-export, or research and testing purposes, as well as for entities with annual revenue from related products not exceeding VND 30 billion. Recycling Responsibilities Decree 110
March 30, 2026
In response to an emerging crisis on food safety, the government of Vietnam promulgated Decree No. 46/2026/ND-CP (Decree 46) on January 26, 2026, and Resolution No. 66.13/2026/NQ-CP (Resolution 66.13) on January 27, 2026, setting out a number of substantive changes to the procedure and strict requirements for the declaration, registration, and importation of food products. Both instruments took effect upon issuance. However, shortly after they entered into force, food businesses encountered significant implementation challenges, particularly with respect to state inspection procedures at the customs clearance stage for imported products. In response, the government issued Resolution No. 09/2026/NQ-CP (Resolution 09) on February 4, 2026, temporarily suspending Decree 46 and Resolution 66.13 until a new effective date of April 16, 2026. Continued Suspension of Implementation of Decree 46 and Resolution 66.13 After considering feedback gathered by the Ministry of Health from food businesses and other stakeholders during the suspension period, the Vietnam Government Office issued a notice on March 20, 2026, agreeing to extend the suspension until the issuance of an amended Law on Food Safety and its guiding decree. Following this notice, on March 22, 2026, the Ministry of Health prepared a draft resolution to implement the notice and replace Resolution 09. Under the draft resolution, the effectiveness of Decree 46 and Resolution No. 66.13 would continue to be suspended until the amended Law on Food Safety takes effect, except for the provisions under Resolution 66.13 allowing flexibility in documents evidencing product efficacy, which would take effect on April 16, 2026, and remain effective until the Law on Food Safety is replaced (but not later than February 28, 2027). Accordingly, for products subject to the registration declaration procedure, such as health supplements, efficacy may be substantiated by either (i) scientific evidence supporting the declared function and effects of the product
February 26, 2026
Laos’ Food and Drug Department (FDD) has been using a new online registration system for drugs since the beginning of the year. The system, which was implemented following the November 2025 issuance of Notice No. 5960/FDD, became the official pathway for submissions on January 1, 2026. Since that date, paper-based registrations have no longer been accepted. This marks a significant advancement in the digitalization of regulatory processes in Laos. As the online system is now the exclusive platform for registration, renewal, and amendments, companies that have not yet aligned their processes to the new system should act promptly to ensure a smooth transition. To assist with this, the FDD will conduct periodic training sessions on the use of the online registration system, which will be delivered either in person or remotely, depending on operator demand. To start using the system, drug and medical device manufacturers, as well as import-export companies, that have not yet registered must submit a formal request identifying the authorized personnel who will access the platform, after which they will be issued user accounts and access codes. Each request must be accompanied by the company’s enterprise registration certificate (incorporation certificate), a copy of the identity card or passport of each designated user, and a scanned copy of their signature. There is no restriction on the number of users per company, allowing flexibility to meet operational needs. Companies that already hold accounts and access codes from the trial phase may continue using them and may apply for additional accounts if needed. Additional Requirements The new system also introduces a standardized format for drug registration numbers. For example, an import drug registration number such as 06 I 4040/15 will be changed to 06-IM-04040-15, and a domestic drug registration number such as 06 L 4040/15 will be changed to
January 21, 2026
Spurred by global geopolitics and Canada’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, which aims to forge deeper ties with ASEAN, Canadian companies have been showing growing interest in Thailand and Southeast Asia in recent years. To understand the opportunities offered by the region, we sat down with Andrew Stoutley, a Toronto native and the chief operating officer of Tilleke & Gibbins, a leading Southeast Asian regional law firm with over 130 years of history in Thailand. Q: Why are Canadian companies looking at Thailand and Southeast Asia right now? A: Two reasons stand out. First, diversification has moved up the agenda. Many Canadian companies want options outside North America due to tariff volatility and policy uncertainty in the United States, as well as questions around the next Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement mandatory joint review. At the same time, the shift of global production from China to Southeast Asia is accelerating, driven by rising costs, geopolitics, and the need to avoid overreliance on a single market. As a result, Canadian companies are looking for a second production base or a regional hub, and Thailand and its neighbors are natural choices given their manufacturing depth, location, and established supply chains. Second, Canada’s own efforts in the region are gaining traction. The Indo-Pacific Strategy has led to more on-the-ground support, including larger trade missions, upgraded diplomatic posts, and new financing options. Export Development Canada (EDC) now has a presence in Bangkok, giving Canadian companies a direct line to financing and insurance in Thailand. There’s also steady progress on trade frameworks like the recently signed Canada–Indonesia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (which will come into effect pending domestic procedures), ongoing negotiations of a Canada–ASEAN FTA, and the exciting announcement about the launch of negotiations of a Canada–Thailand FTA. Together, these developments have the potential to make it much easier