You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 1, 2026

Thailand Opens Certain Services and Other Activities to Foreign Business

Subscribe to Updates

Thailand has taken another step toward liberalizing its foreign business framework, exempting additional service activities and derivatives brokerage or agency businesses from the licensing requirements of the Foreign Business Act (FBA).

Since the FBA came into effect, Thailand has taken a measured approach to opening its economy to foreign investment. While the FBA regulates foreign participation in businesses that may affect domestic interests, the framework has also evolved to allow foreign participation in certain business activities where sector-specific laws and regulatory frameworks already provide sufficient oversight, making additional FBA restrictions unnecessary. This is particularly true where Thai businesses are sufficiently capable of competing in certain service sectors, or where liberalization is intended to facilitate the provision of services among companies within the same corporate group.

Against this backdrop, two new ministerial regulations have been issued pursuant to the FBA.

Service Businesses Under the FBA

Under the FBA, certain categories of business are restricted for foreign operators. List 3 of the FBA sets out businesses that foreigners may operate only if they obtain a foreign business license (FBL) or a foreign business certificate (FBC), or unless a specific exemption applies.

List 3 (21) covers “other service businesses,” which is a catch-all provision that captures a wide range of service businesses not specifically enumerated elsewhere in the FBA. In practice, this means that most service activities carried on by foreigners in Thailand require an FBL or FBC unless otherwise exempted.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the FBA provides a mechanism to address this breadth by empowering the Minister of Commerce to issue ministerial regulations excluding specific types of service businesses from List Three (21). Once a service business is so excluded, foreigners may operate it without obtaining an FBL or FBC.

Prior to the new regulations, four ministerial regulations had been issued to exempt specific services from list 3 (21) of the FBA. The exempted services have generally fallen within three principal categories:

  • Services already governed by sector-specific laws, where market entry and business conduct are already regulated and supervised by the relevant sector regulator, making an additional FBA permission requirement duplicative.
  • Intragroup services provided between affiliated entities within the same corporate group, which are considered less likely to have a material impact on competition in the broader Thai market.
  • Services where the Thai market has reached sufficient readiness, with Thai businesses having developed adequate capabilities and competitive strength to operate alongside foreign participants.

Efforts to further remove additional service businesses from the restricted list had been under discussion for several years. Following an extended period of consideration and consultation, the Ministerial Regulation Prescribing Service Businesses Not Requiring Permission for Foreign Business Operations (No. 5), B.E. 2569 (2026) was published in the Government Gazette on August 28, 2026.

The regulation marks a significant step in Thailand’s opening of its service sectors to foreign investment, while maintaining the broader policy objective of ensuring that Thai businesses remain sufficiently prepared and protected as market access is expanded.

Exempted Service Businesses

The service businesses exempted by the ministerial regulation include:

  • Securities business under the Securities and Exchange Act. The exemption has been expanded to cover loans provided for securities purchases and securities repurchase agreement transactions regulated under the Securities and Exchange Act.
  • Services relating to derivatives where the underlying assets fall outside the scope of the Derivatives Act. The regulation introduces three additional services related to derivatives business, covering derivatives dealers, advisors, and fund managers in transactions involving underlying assets, or whose settlement is linked to foreign exchange rates or interest rates, subject to applicable requirements. Where Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) determines that these businesses need not be regulated, they fall outside the SEC’s regulatory scope and may be carried on without further regulatory requirements. On this basis, the Ministry of Commerce considers a separate FBA license unnecessary for foreign investors.
  • Telecommunications services. The exemption applies only to telecom operators that do not have their own telecommunications network (type 1 license holders) and are of a nature appropriate for liberalized service provision under the applicable telecommunications regulatory framework.
  • Treasury center business. This business is subject to regulation under the laws governing exchange control and is already supervised by the Bank of Thailand.
  • Intragroup shared management services (administration, human resources, IT). The exemption expands the scope of previously permitted advisory services to include administrative, human resources, and information technology management services provided among qualified group companies that satisfy the applicable ownership and management control criteria.
  • Intragroup domestic debt-guarantee services. This exemption applies exclusively to qualified affiliated group companies within the same corporate group, subject to the same ownership and management criteria as those applicable to intragroup shared management services, but with a higher applicable threshold.
  • Premises leasing for financial and vending equipment. This applies to services involving the leasing of space for ATMs, financial service kiosks, and vending machines for the benefit of employees.
  • Petroleum-drilling services under the law on petroleum. The exemption applies to petroleum drilling services provided by contractors directly engaged under contracts with concessionaires, production-sharing contractors, or service contractors under the law governing petroleum operations.

Brokerage or Agency Businesses

Issued on the same day (August 28, 2026), the Ministerial Regulation Prescribing Brokerage or Agency Businesses That Do Not Require Permission to Operate a Business of a Foreign Person B.E. 2569 (2026) exempts the following businesses from brokerage and agency restrictions under the FBA:

  • Derivatives agents under the law governing derivatives, where the agent conducts transactions in derivatives whose underlying goods or variables are not subject to the law governing derivatives.
  • Derivatives agents under the law governing derivatives, where the agent conducts transactions in derivatives that require cash settlement calculated by reference to an exchange rate or interest rate, and the derivatives transactions are conducted outside a derivatives exchange.

Guidance for Foreign Investors

These regulations signal the government’s continued commitment to modernizing the FBA’s foreign investment framework, aligning it more closely with Thailand’s economic development objectives and its international competitiveness agenda.

Businesses falling within any of the newly exempted categories should review their current FBA licensing arrangements, as an FBA license or foreign business certificate may no longer be required—reducing compliance costs and simplifying operations.

However, the liberalization discussed above involves exemption only from licensing requirements under the FBA. This exemption does not eliminate or replace any licenses, approvals, or registrations required under applicable sector-specific legislation.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

November 7, 2025
Thailand and the United States signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) titled “Cooperation to Diversify Global Critical Minerals Supply Chains and Promote Investments” on October 26, 2025, signaling a new strategic alignment aimed at developing Thailand’s mineral sector, particularly in rare earth elements (REEs). The MOU has implications for investments in technology, manufacturing, and other related sectors. This update outlines the key provisions of the MOU and the potential opportunities and legal navigating points for businesses. Objectives The primary driver of this agreement is the US initiative to diversify global supply chains for critical minerals and reduce reliance on current market leaders, particularly China. For Thailand, it represents a major opportunity to attract high-tech investment and develop its downstream processing industries. The cooperation is set to focus on five main areas: Technical knowledge: Exchange of technical expertise and international best practices to strengthen Thailand’s mining and processing sector. Joint cooperation: Establishing workshops, seminars, and scientific collaboration to boost innovation. Regulatory practice: Promoting good governance and streamlining regulatory and licensing procedures. Information sharing: Sharing data on potential projects and global market prices. Full-value chain: The MOU covers the entire mineral lifecycle, from exploration and extraction to processing, refining, and recycling. “First Opportunity to Invest” Clause The most debated provision within the MOU states that “participants expect to have the first opportunity to invest . . . in critical minerals assets that may be sold in Thailand.” Business implications: This clause is widely interpreted as granting US companies a first look or preferential access to investment opportunities in Thailand’s critical minerals sector. This could be a significant advantage for US-based or affiliated companies in mining, technology, and energy seeking to secure a foothold in a developing REE supply chain. Thai government position: Thai officials, including the prime minister, have publicly clarified
Read More
October 31, 2025
On September 29, 2025, Thailand’s Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC Office) published its Regulations on the Review and Certification of Binding Corporate Rules B.E. 2568 (2025) (the Regulations). The Regulations provide clarity on the PDPC Office’s approach to reviewing and certifying binding corporate rules (BCRs) under Section 29 of the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA), and aim to facilitate international data transfers within a group of undertakings or enterprises (a “corporate group”). In conjunction with this development, the PDPC Office also approved BCRs for two companies operating in Thailand on September 30, 2025. This milestone represents the first concrete progress since the PDPC’s Notification on Criteria for the Protection of Personal Data Sent or Transferred to a Foreign Country pursuant to Section 29 of the PDPA B.E. 2566 (2023) came into effect in March 2024. Some key features of the Regulations are set out below. Categorization of BCRs BCRs are classified into two types: (1) BCRs for Controllers (BCR-C) and (2) BCRs for Processors (BCR-P). The category must be clearly specified when submitting the BCRs to the PDPC Office. Documentation Requirement The applicant must prepare and submit the application (a standard template may be provided by the PDPC Office in the future) along with supporting documents for review and certification in the Thai language. If the supporting documents are in a foreign language, a certified Thai translation should be provided. The translation must be notarized by a notary public or qualified person. Supporting documents may include, among others, a binding instrument such as an intra-group agreement, or a list of entities subject to the BCRs. Expedited Process Requirement Organizations with existing BCR approvals under the EU or UK GDPR, or from countries announced by the PDPC under Section 28, may apply through an
Read More
October 30, 2025
Recent events at a Thai listed company, where a proposal to remove the director was not successful, amid claims that a competitor was attempting to gain control of the company, illustrate how disputes over corporate control can unfold differently at the board level and shareholder level. At the board level, removing directors of a listed company mid-term to gain corporate control is not an easy task under Thai law, as it requires a higher threshold than appointing a new director, which typically only requires a simple majority vote in a listed company. At the shareholder level, Thailand’s tender offer and competition regimes add complexity where different shareholder groups act in concert to remove opposing board representatives or otherwise influence control. In this article, we will explore why the attempted removal of a director may fail, and how the tender offer regime may apply. Key Issues at a Glance Shareholder groups may seek to convene meetings to propose changes to board composition or company authority. Such proposals can be delayed or complicated by regulatory requirements and the need for additional disclosures. Regulatory authorities and minority shareholders may raise concerns when major shareholders coordinate to influence board control, especially if such actions could trigger tender offer or merger control obligations. Companies often respond by seeking further information on shareholder relationships and potential conflicts before proceeding. Why the Director Removal Failed Under Section 76 of the Public Limited Companies Act B.E. 2535 (as amended), the early removal of a director requires two conditions to be satisfied at the same meeting of shareholders: Headcount test: At least 75% of shareholders attending and entitled to vote must vote in favor. If multiple shareholders appoint the same person as proxy, each proxy is counted as a separate head for the purpose of the headcount test,
Read More
October 24, 2025
On October 22, 2025, the Thai government posted a directive not to grant gambling licenses for gambling involving poker nationwide to crack down on illegal gambling activities. The directive was issued by Thailand’s Ministry of Interior to align with government policies to prevent the legalization of all types of gambling businesses, including poker as a sporting activity. This will result in the revocation of poker activities as sport and institute a strict ban on such activities nationwide. Businesses should note the new government’s strict approach toward gambling activities as the legal situation regarding gambling in the country continues to draw close attention.
Read More