You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 28, 2017

Thailand Food and Drug Administration Unveils New Official Fees

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

Higher life expectancy, a growing middle-income population, and the government’s policy of promoting access to medicine are key drivers boosting demand for healthcare-related businesses in Thailand. In 2015, healthcare expenditures accounted for 4.6 percent of Thailand’s GDP, and there is an increasing trend in government budgetary spending in healthcare. Due to these factors, the healthcare market is experiencing strong growth, bringing opportunities in cosmetics, health supplements, medical devices, and pharmaceuticals.

Nonetheless, a major obstacle for these industries is the slow-moving registration process of the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This registration process is a mandatory prerequisite for introducing new healthcare products to the Thai market.

There are currently thousands of drug registration dossiers under evaluation by the FDA that have been stalled under successive governments. A similar backlog has been found in the process to obtain licenses for moderate- to high-risk medical devices, novel foods, food supplements, and innovative herbal products.

The backlog of pending product approvals hinders industries from competing effectively in the market, and it impacts companies eager to launch their new products in a timely manner. More importantly, from a consumer standpoint, the slow approval process prevents Thais from being able to buy products at lower competitive prices and restricts access to the latest innovative drugs.

Delays in the approval process stem from the fact that the FDA lacks sufficient qualified officers to examine technical dossiers to assess the quality, efficacy, and safety of products. The FDA has difficulty in hiring qualified experts, and there are not enough specialists to handle the ever-increasing number of application dossiers.

Reforming the FDA Approval Process

In order to solve this backlog issue, the prime minister has exercised his power as head of the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) by using section 44 of the 2014 interim constitution to issue NCPO Order No. 77/2559 Re: Increasing the Efficiency of the Health Products Approval Process, which was published in the Government Gazette on December 28, 2016. The order directs that the FDA approval process for healthcare products must be reformed. The main implications of the order include the following:

  • The FDA’s product approval timeline must not exceed the time specified in its public manuals, which are handbooks that inform the public about the application procedures, relevant legislation, timelines, and list of documents needed for product registration at the FDA.
  • The FDA will consider the official fee schedule in its approval process. Official fees earned by the FDA will be used as honorariums for reviewers/experts to assess technical dossiers, as well as to improve the approval procedure, as per regulations of the Ministry of Finance. Unlike in the past, official fees earned by the FDA will not be refunded to the Ministry of Finance as government revenue.
  • The FDA will outsource some work, such as onsite inspections and evaluations of technical documents, to external experts of local or overseas agencies, who have been approved by and registered with the FDA.

New FDA Official Fees

The FDA engaged in over 10 meetings with major pharmaceutical companies to discuss the overhaul of its approval process and official fee schedule. Subsequently, the Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) issued MoPH Notification Re: Actual Official Fees in the Approval Process to Be Paid by the Applicant on August 4, 2017. The notification prescribes the highest rates of official fees and actual fees to be paid by applicants, with the highest rates to remain effective for 10 years, and revisions by the FDA allowed in five years.

In the past, the FDA approval process charged only one fee for obtaining a license. The new official fee schedule introduced by the MoPH notification itemizes fees to be incurred for each step of the application process, from filing the application, to dossier evaluation, to obtaining a license.

As of August 4, 2017, an applicant now pays THB 2,500 for filing an application, THB 182,500 for dossier evaluation, and THB 2,000 for obtaining the Marketing Authorization (MA) Drug Product License for a new chemical drug. The MoPH notification also prescribes fees covering the lifecycle of a drug product, including fees for an importation/manufacturing license, a sales license, an advertisement approval license, variations of these licenses, etc. More interestingly, the FDA now charges an hourly consultation fee of THB 500–2,000, depending on the consultation matter.

Healthcare business operators should closely monitor the registration and approval process reforms of the Thai FDA. Although the FDA’s official fees have increased substantially, product owners hoping to bring their new products to the Thai market are likely to benefit greatly from the invigorated registration process that promises drug product approval in a more timely and systematic manner.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 19, 2026
For the first time, Thailand’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published a consolidated list identifying all substances that have successfully passed its novel food safety evaluation process. The list is a step forward in regulatory transparency, but it also highlights a feature of the Thai regime that food companies often overlook: each approval is tied exclusively to the company that applied for it. A substance’s appearance on the list does not give other companies the green light to use it. This article examines the structure of Thailand’s novel food approval framework, the implications of applicant exclusivity, and the strategic choices it requires of food companies looking to bring novel ingredients to the Thai market. Thai FDA Food Safety Evaluation Framework Notification No. 376 of the Ministry of Public Health requires novel food substances to undergo a food safety assessment, with an exemption only for novel foods manufactured exclusively for export. The framework also encompasses “foods that do not qualify as novel foods” but which present characteristics warranting a safety evaluation, such as differing quality standards, increased serving sizes, or applications in specific food categories, where such changes affect consumption levels, nutritional value, or consumer safety. The recently published list of foods that passed the safety evaluation by the Thai FDA is structured by substance category and identifies the approved company (domestic manufacturer or importer), country of origin, substance name and trade name, approved purpose of use, and date of the Thai FDA’s approval notification certificate. A notable feature of Thailand’s novel food regime is that the approval result is tied exclusively to the company that submitted the application. Publication of the consolidated list does not constitute a general authorization to use the approved substances. The Thai FDA’s approval certificate specifies the approved conditions of use and the requirements
Read More
June 17, 2026
Thailand’s new labeling requirements for medical devices, which include for the first time a unique device identification (UDI) requirement for software as a medical device (SaMD), take effect on June 20, 2026. The Notification of the Ministry of Public Health regarding Criteria, Methods, and Conditions on Labeling and Instructions for Use for Medical Devices 2025, which replaces a similar notification from 2020, was published in the Government Gazette on December 22, 2025. To ensure clarity, modernity, and patient safety, the regulation requires domestic manufacturers and importers to provide labels and instructions for use (IFU) that are clearly legible, complete, and free of false or misleading claims. It also permits IFU to be provided in electronic format, such as via QR codes, websites, or other digital channels—directly relevant to SaMD, where physical labels are impractical and electronic presentation is the natural medium. The notification distinguishes two categories for labeling language. Home-use medical devices (for lay users outside healthcare facilities) must have labels and IFU in Thai. Professional-use medical devices may display labels and documentation in either Thai or English. This distinction is significant for SaMD developers: software intended for clinical professionals may use English-language interfaces and IFU, while consumer-facing health applications must provide Thai-language content. Labeling and UDI Requirements Labels and IFU must include, at a minimum: Product name and intended purpose Quantity or volume Name and address of domestic manufacturer or importer Thai FDA approval number Lot, version, or serial number Manufacturing date and expiry date For SaMD, the version number requirement is particularly relevant. The regulation also mandates display of a UDI code for SaMD in risk category 2 (moderate-risk), category 3 (moderate- to high-risk), and category 4 (high-risk), according to Thailand’s medical device risk classification system (which complies with the ASEAN Medical Device Directive and the EU
Read More
June 5, 2026
On May 25, 2026, Vietnam’s Ministry of Health issued Circular No. 16/2026/TT-BYT governing free-of-charge medicine support programs for medical establishments (Circular 16). Circular 16 will take effect on July 10, 2026, replacing Circular No. 31/2018/TT-BYT, which currently regulates the same subject matter. Circular 16 introduces several significant changes compared to the existing legal framework. Removal of Prior Approval Requirement Under the current regulations, free-of-charge medicine support programs are divided into two categories: (1) entirely free-of-charge provision of medicines for all types of drugs and (2) partially free-of-charge provision applicable only to brand-name drugs under patent protection or drugs whose generic products with identical active ingredients and dosage forms are available in Vietnam. Under the current regulations, partially free-of-charge programs are subject to mandatory registration with the competent authority, while entirely free-of-charge programs could be implemented without prior approval. A key reform under Circular 16 is that it stipulates only entirely free-of-charge medicine support programs applicable to all types of medicines, thereby eliminating the partially free-of-charge category. In addition, free-of-charge medicine support programs may be carried out solely based on a written agreement between the pharmaceutical company and the medical establishment, without any requirement for prior approval from competent authorities prior to implementation. Written Agreement Requirements Circular 16 requires the pharmaceutical company and medical establishment to enter into a written agreement in accordance with a prescribed template. This agreement must include the following compulsory information: Information on the supported medicines Form of support (entirely free-of-charge provision to patients) Quantity of medicines provided Target patient groups and applicable indications Duration of the program Rights and obligations of each party Transitional provisions on the protection of patients’ rights upon completion of the program The agreement may contain other contents as agreed by the parties, provided that these do not contradict applicable laws.
Read More
June 4, 2026
Indonesia’s Minister of Health has issued Decree No. HK.01.07/MENKES/301/2026 on the Affixation of Nutritional Labels and Health Information to Ready-to-Eat Processed Food Products. The decree came into force on April 14, 2026, and was issued to implement the Health Law and Minister of Health Regulation No. 3 of 2026 on Disease Control. The decree requires the inclusion of Nutri-Level labeling on the front-of-pack nutrition labeling (FOPNL) to indicate the product’s nutritional level based on the content of sugar, salt, and fat (“gula, garam dan lemak (GGL)”). Changes from 2024 Draft Regulation The Nutri-Level labeling was previously proposed in 2024 by the Indonesian FDA (BPOM) through a draft regulation concerning nutrition information. While the categories of Nutri-Level labeling remain the same in the issued decree, the content requirements of sugar, salt and fat in the decree are different from the earlier proposal introduced in the 2024 draft BPOM regulation. In addition, the decree has further specified that the content of fat in the Nutri-Level labeling is the content of saturated fat, not total fat as previously proposed in the 2024 draft. The decree requires Nutri-Level labeling to be implemented in beverage products, which is the same as previously proposed in the 2024 draft BPOM regulation. Other food products may gradually become subject to mandatory Nutri-Level labeling under future implementing regulations. Nutri-Level Labeling Food levels as shown by the Nutri-Level labeling are classified into four color-coded categories from A to D: Level A (lowest amount) in dark green Level B in light green Level C in yellow Level D (highest amount) in red The Nutri-Level labeling is represented by the following image. The requirements for each level for sugar, salt, and fat content, based on amounts per 100 milliliters of product in beverage form, are as follows. Nutri-Level information must be
Read More