You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

July 15, 2013

Thailand to Crack Down on Illegal Online Pharmacies

E-Commerce Law & Policy

International headlines recently focused on a dramatic case of regulatory enforcement against an online pharmacy. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported that a 33-year-old Thai woman was running a company with the website www.eDrugnet.com, along with at least 30 other affiliated websites. These sites sold drugs without prescriptions, despite the fact that prescriptions were required in the purchasers’ country. These e-pharmacy websites were hosted in Thailand and shipped drugs to the United States. After receiving e-mails with drug orders from foreign customers, the company would send drugs overseas in boxes labeled as samples and gifts, via express mail.

After a lengthy investigation by the U.S. FDA, FBI, and Department of Homeland Security, which involved meeting the woman in Bangkok and ultimately causing her to fly to the United States to meet undercover agents, the woman confessed to the scheme. She pleaded guilty in a U.S. district court, and her websites have since been taken offline. On January 31, 2013, she was sentenced for wire fraud, money laundering, and introducing misbranded drugs into the United States. She has already agreed to pay the U.S. government US$2.1 million, reflecting the proceeds from her company’s drug sales, and the U.S. District Judge also added a US$5,000 fine to her sentence.

Online Pharmacies and Counterfeit Medicines

Given the millions of dollars involved in this case, it was bound to capture attention. This case highlights the efforts that government authorities are pursuing in order to reign in the rapid growth of online pharmacies. The authorities recognize that the sale of drugs online may offer certain advantages, but these are accompanied by potential dangers for consumer health and safety.

Online pharmacies can be beneficial in helping consumers find the specific drug products they need, and they often offer special discounts. Online pharmacies are also easy to access—a simple web search reveals a seemingly endless list of drugs that can be purchased on the web. Furthermore, if a customer feels embarrassed about purchasing a certain product (for example, erectile-dysfunction medication) from an actual pharmacy, using a virtual pharmacy can save the customer from an uncomfortable experience.

This is where the problems begin to arise. Online pharmacies often trade in counterfeit medicines that contain incorrect or inactive ingredients, thus creating potentially fatal risks for patients. The trade in counterfeit drugs has grown into a global industry worth billions of dollars, and these illegal activities have flourished on the internet.

Many online pharmacies focus their trade on specific product ranges that can be sold in a high volume online, with erectile-dysfunction (ED) drugs at the top of the list. A recent analysis and review of unregistered ED drugs seized by police and health authorities in Eastern Thailand found that most samples (88%) contained an amount of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) below the labeled claim, while some samples contained the wrong API altogether (e.g. chloramphenicol, an antibiotic). Apart from ED drugs, counterfeit abortifacient drugs, anti-obesity drugs, antimalarial drugs, and psycholeptic drugs have a high tendency to be sold illegally via e-commerce channels.

In Thailand, almost all of these counterfeit drugs are manufactured abroad and then smuggled into the country. These products are usually labeled “Made in Thailand” or show a Thai address. In general, the name and address are fake, and the manufacturers cannot be found in the records of the Thai FDA’s pharmaceutical manufacturing database.

Combating the Problem through Regulation

Despite the boom in online sales of drugs, Thailand does not yet have separate legislation governing the online sale of pharmaceutical products through e-pharmacies hosted in the Kingdom. Currently, the online sales of these products are governed by the Drug Act B.E. 2510 (1967), which broadly covers physical sales of medicinal and pharmaceutical products.

According to Section 14 of the Drug Act, the Thai FDA, as the licensing authority, will approve a “license to sell drugs” for business operators if they comply with certain requirements. One of the requirements is that business operators resident in Thailand must have the appropriate premises to sell or store drugs, with the appropriate equipment for use in the sale or storage of drugs, and control over the maintenance of drug quality and quantity, as prescribed in the Ministerial Regulations. In addition, Section 21 of the Drug Act states that a business operator that has been permitted to sell modern drugs must have a pharmacist on duty during business hours.

These two sections of the Drug Act forbid the distribution of drugs “virtually,” since neither the requirement of appropriate premises nor that of an on-duty pharmacist would be satisfied by an online operation.

Restrictions on Drug Advertising

Despite the fact that it is illegal under Thai law to market drug products online, many online pharmacies are using social-media marketing as a promotional channel to attract customers and sell them illicit medicines and psychotropic substances. Many pharmacies are creating fan pages via social media as part of “direct-to-consumer advertising” strategies. This can put many people at a greater risk of buying and using dangerous products.

With regard to online advertising, while there are no specific rules on the use of the internet or social media for drug advertisements, the Thai FDA enforces and regulates the promotion of drugs via Sections 88 to 90 of the Drug Act. Under Section 88 bis, businesses that advertise drugs via radio, television, movies, or through printed matter must receive permission from the Thai FDA for the text, sound, and/or picture(s) used in their advertisement(s).

Nevertheless, according to the Thai FDA, most online advertisements (more than 85%) are being presented without permission. Currently, the FDA has made it a priority to deal with this problem. Thus, business operators must ensure that their social-media marketing strategies meet Thai FDA requirements, as well as the requirements of the Drug Act. Any violation of the Drug Act’s marketing provisions is subject to a fine of up to THB 100,000 (US$3,340).

Increasing International and Local Enforcement

Coupled with the increase in regulatory enforcement, government authorities are taking other aggressive actions against online pharmacies and counterfeit medicines both internationally and locally. According to a report of the World Health Organization (WHO), over half of the medicines from illegal internet pharmacies are counterfeit. In order to fight against this phenomenon, the WHO set up the International Medical Products Anti-Counterfeiting Taskforce (IMPACT) in 2006. IMPACT has led international actions, offering guidance on how to strengthen legislative and regulatory frameworks. Through IMPACT, the WHO has worked with regulatory agencies such as Interpol to uncover counterfeit operations.

In 2010, Operation Pangea III, coordinated by Interpol and IMPACT, collated data from 45 participating countries and uncovered a vast network of counterfeit drug sales on the internet. The operation revealed 694 websites engaged in illegal activities, 290 of which have now been shut down. One of the first coordinated operations, Storm II, successfully targeted 8 countries across Southeast Asia, including Thailand. The operation led to the seizure of 20 million fake medicines, including antibiotics, antimalarial and birth control tablets, tetanus serums, aspirin, and ED drugs.

Building on this international cooperation, the Thai FDA has established the Center for Combating Counterfeit Drugs. This center engages consumers in the broader enforcement effort by encouraging tipsters to provide information about counterfeit medicines to government authorities (via [email protected]).

Looking Ahead

Thailand’s current drug laws were established more than 40 years ago and are therefore ill suited to deal with e-commerce. A draft bill to replace the current Drug Act is now being discussed, but like its predecessor, the current draft remains silent on the issue of online pharmacies or the online trade of drugs. The new draft law does mention the imposition of civil liability, which could apply to e-commerce Drug Act violators. Through additional civil liability, legislators have sought to increase compensation for victims of drugs sold in violation of the Drug Act.

Will civil liability be enough to quell the perpetration of online trading or e-commerce in medicines? Given how difficult it is to identify the operators of online pharmacies, there are doubts about whether the enactment of the new draft law will do much to alleviate the damage resulting from online drug purchases.

As an alternative, Thai law may prioritize preventing these adverse results by imposing regulations directly on online pharmacies and distributors of pharmaceutical products, as such regulations could be much more effective than merely compensating victims after the fact.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 24, 2026
For businesses in Thailand’s regulated industries, the problem of “too many licenses” is one of the most familiar hurdles to getting a product to market. Take a simple example: importing the materials necessary to sell teriyaki chicken skewers. To legally do this, a business may need approvals from several different agencies—separate permits for the chicken (Department of Livestock Development), the dipping sauce (Thai FDA), the wooden skewers (Department of Forestry), and other ingredients, each under a different authority. This kind of overlap is often cited to argue for a “regulatory guillotine”—a systematic review to cut outdated or duplicative rules that slow investment and business activity. The Facilitation of Licensing and Public Service Consideration Act B.E. 2569 (2026) (Licensing Facilitation Act 2026) is Thailand’s most significant response yet to that concern. This article looks at the Facilitation Act 2026 through a life sciences and regulatory affairs lens—what it may mean for the manufacturers, importers, and distributors of food, drugs, medical devices, cosmetics, and similar products who routinely deal with several regulators to bring a single product to market. The Super License: One Approval Standing in for Many The reform with the clearest potential for regulated-product businesses is the law’s “super license” mechanism, referred to as a “main license” in the statute. Once a business obtains the main license for a regulated activity, it is automatically deemed to hold all related sublicenses issued by other agencies for that same activity, provided the activity has been designated as eligible in the Government Gazette. The Licensing Facilitation Act 2026 also creates a central application center, allowing applicants to submit a single application and pay all relevant fees at one point of contact, with the center routing the application to each agency through a shared information system. The potential benefits of this for businesses
July 13, 2026
Indonesia’s Halal Product Assurance Agency (BPJPH) has issued new regulations establishing clearer procedures for imposing administrative sanctions on businesses that violate halal product assurance requirements. BPJPH Regulation No. 2 of 2026 on the Imposition of Administrative Sanctions for Violations of Halal Product Assurance Implementation, issued on June 5, 2026, strengthens Indonesia’s halal compliance framework, as mandated under Law No. 33 of 2014 on Halal Product Assurance and Government Regulation No. 42 of 2024 on the Implementation of Halal Product Assurance. BPJPH Regulation No. 2/2026 also supports the upcoming mandatory halal compliance deadline of October 17, 2026, which will apply to a broad range of products and services, including imported food and beverages, slaughtering products and services, natural and quasi-drugs, health supplements, cosmetics, chemical and genetically engineered products, clothing and accessories, household goods, prayer equipment, stationery, and class A medical devices. Scope BPJPH is authorized to impose administrative sanctions for violations of halal product assurance requirements committed by businesses, halal inspection agencies (LPH), halal auditors, halal product process companion institutions (lembaga pendamping PPH), and halal product process companions (pendamping PPH). The head of BPJPH has authority to determine, cancel, or amend the imposition of administrative sanctions, including upon receipt of objections. This authority covers revocation of Halal Certificates (including foreign halal certificate registration numbers), withdrawal of goods from circulation, freezing of LPH operations, freezing of halal product process companion institutions, revocation of PPH companion institution registration numbers, revocation of halal auditor registration numbers, and revocation of LPH accreditation status. Administrative Sanctions Businesses may be subject to any of the following administrative sanctions: Written warning; Administrative fine; Revocation of the halal certificate, including revocation of foreign halal certificate registration numbers; and Withdrawal of goods from circulation. The regulation sets out the types of violations that may trigger these sanctions, with each
July 1, 2026
Obtaining marketing authorization is a fundamental requirement for bringing pharmaceutical products to the Thai market. Companies must navigate the Thai Food and Drug Administration’s registration procedures while also complying with post-approval pharmacovigilance obligations, licensing requirements for manufacturing and importation, data protection rules, and other regulatory requirements. This guide provides an overview of Thailand’s regulatory framework for pharmaceutical marketing authorization, including available registration pathways, review timelines, application fees, postmarketing surveillance obligations, licensing requirements, exemptions, data exclusivity, freedom of information, and parallel import considerations. It is intended as a practical reference for pharmaceutical companies, regulatory affairs professionals, and others involved in bringing medicinal products to the Thai market. Download the guide below for a concise overview of the current requirements and procedures governing pharmaceutical marketing authorization in Thailand.
June 24, 2026
Patent enablement requirements are provided under Article 102 of Vietnam’s Law on Intellectual Property (IP Law). In particular, a patent specification must “fully and clearly disclose the nature of the invention to such an extent that, based on the specification, a person having ordinary skill in the relevant art can implement the invention.” In pharmaceutical and biotechnology patents, this requirement is more complicated and subject to more rigorous assessment. The Patent Examination Guidelines (Guidelines) of the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (IP Office) were amended in March 2026 to introduce Annexes III and IV for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, in which Annex III provides detailed guidelines on the assessment of specification requirements. These amendments were made under a project for strengthening capacity in industrial property examination between the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and the IP Office. Annex III provides detailed instructions on how examiners assess enablement in a pharmaceutical or biotechnology application, and offers examples of acceptable and unacceptable descriptions with regard to the enablement aspect. Enablement Requirements in Pharma and Biotech Patents Article 12.7 of Circular 10/2026/TT-BKHCN (Circular 10) adds to the requirements of Article 102 of the IP Law that the description must demonstrate the novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability of the technical solution. For pharmaceutical composition subject matters, Article 12.9 of Circular 10 sets out that the description must present the results of clinical trials and/or the pharmacological effects of the claimed pharmaceutical composition, and must include at least the following information: Substance/mixture used. Testing method (system) employed. Information on the test results. Correlation between the pharmacological effects obtained from the tests and the application of the pharmaceutical product in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. The Guidelines note that pharmacological study results should be presented in a quantified manner, and pharmacological