You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 19, 2024

Thai SEC Proposes Changes to Takeover Rules

Subscribe to Updates

Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has announced a public hearing on proposed amendments to takeover regulations under Thailand’s Security and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (and the regulations issued thereunder) that have the potential to reshape the country’s market for takeovers. The proposed changes, which have not yet been compiled in a formal draft regulation, may affect acquisition planning but could also help reduce unnecessary regulatory and administrative burdens. The SEC is accepting comments on the proposed changes through its website until November 30, 2024.

The key proposed changes are detailed below.

  • Alignment of tender offers and reporting under Section 246: Previously, Section 246 (reporting of acquisition/disposition upon reaching or crossing any multiple of 5% shareholding) focused only on group shareholding changes, while Section 247 (tender offer obligation) looked at both groups and individuals to trigger tender offering obligations. The proposed amendment aligns these requirements by considering only group-level triggers for both sections.

    Another change addresses situations where an entity acquires another entity (persons under Section 258) that already holds shares in a listed company. Currently, actions of shareholders in a listed company resulting in a person under Section 258 and such shareholders as a group holding shares in a listed company in aggregate and triggering the tender offer threshold only result in reporting under Section 246 while having no tender offer obligation.

    Under the proposed amendment, such actions will trigger a tender offer obligation—not immediately upon the acquisition of persons under Section 258 and reaching or crossing the relevant threshold, but once there is any increase (even a single share) in the shareholding in the listed company, unless the circumstances fall into an exemption (e.g., disposal of the additional shares within seven business days) or a waiver is obtained. Currently, obligations are triggered at the next threshold, but this amendment will implement a “one share rule” instead.

  • Expanded exemptions to tender offer obligations: The proposed amendments ease tender offer rules, especially when there will be no significant change of control. Some of the key proposed new exemptions include securities acquisitions conducted in the following situations:
    • To comply with other laws;
    • Through an amalgamation or a preferential public offering (PPO) to maintain shareholder proportions (similar to a rights offering (RO)), without seeking additional control; or
    • As part of a rehabilitation plan approved by the court or in compliance with a Bank of Thailand regulation related to a plan to resolve financial institution issues.
  • Pricing transparency: The proposed changes designate the pricing method for making a tender offer through the chain principle, by requiring the use of the highest acquisition cost 90 days prior to the submission of the tender offer form to the SEC. If there was no acquisition in that period, pricing calculations should be based on the VWAP (volume-weighted average price) over a period starting 20 business days before the acquisition date. Further clarification may be needed regarding which level of the chain should be used for pricing calculation.
  • Tender offer conditions: The proposed change aims to have the tender offeror ensure that its Section 258 persons comply with certain mandatory conditions (e.g., not obtaining shares at a price higher than the tender offer price in the six months following the end of the tender offer period, and taking no actions differing from those specified in the tender offer in the year following the tender offer period). This includes obligations to comply with applicable exemptions, such as those allowing for a partial tender offer.
  • Whitewash exemptions: The proposed amendment expands the whitewash exemption to cover any new investors from a private placement of remaining shares after an RO or PPO, instead of only granting whitewash exemptions to existing shareholders as under the current rule. However, the private placement threshold allowable under the whitewash exemption has not yet been specified and will require further clarification from the SEC.

The consultation period for the SEC’s proposed amendments to Thailand’s takeover rules is open until November 30, 2024. As there is not yet a formal draft regulation, the opinions gathered on the proposed principles described above will receive consideration as the draft is being prepared. Another hearing can be expected once a draft regulation is available.

For further guidance on takeover regulations, or any aspect of capital markets in Thailand, please contact our experts Patcharaporn Pootranon at [email protected], Veerakorn Samranweth at [email protected], or Narita Sakunchotikarote at [email protected].

Related Professionals

Practices

Capital Markets

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 10, 2023
On January 16, 2023, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) prescribed a set of security measures that digital asset business operators must implement if they provide custody of digital assets for their customers. The new security measures are prescribed in two notifications from the SEC and its office on digital asset wallet management systems and cryptographic key management systems, with the aim of safeguarding digital assets in custody against loss, fraud, and cybertheft. The notifications took immediate effect. The new security measures and the management systems are summarized below. Policy and guidelines for managing systems related to digital asset custody Digital asset business operators must have a written risk management policy for all systems relating to digital asset custody, approved by their board of directors and made accessible to all employees. The policy must be reviewed or revised at least once annually, or promptly if any potential risks are identified. Specific procedures must be implemented, such as establishment of a compliance team and internal controls. Management of systems for digital asset wallets and cryptographic keys Digital asset business operators must have policies and procedures for managing all systems relating to digital asset custody. This includes properly designing, developing, and managing digital asset wallets in a safe and secure manner. The same requirement on policies and procedures applies to cryptographic key management as well. Management of incidents that may affect systems related to digital asset custody Digital asset business operators must have measures in place to manage incidents that may impact systems related to digital asset custody. The measures include designating a person responsible for incident management, testing and reviewing the incident management policy annually, reporting any incidents affecting digital asset custody to the designated responsible person and the SEC immediately, and conducting a digital forensic investigation with an independent
Read More
February 6, 2023
Thailand’s Department of Business Development (DBD) has clarified that even after the amended Civil and Commercial Code (CCC) comes into effect on February 7, 2023, companies with articles of association pursuant to the previous CCC will still have to follow the previous requirements for publication of shareholders’ meeting notices. The amended CCC removes the requirement for companies to publish a notice in a local newspaper when calling a general meeting of shareholders. Instead, companies can call a general meeting of shareholders either by sending a notice by post with acknowledgement of receipt to every shareholder whose name appears in the register of shareholders or by delivering the notice in person. However, the amended CCC still requires companies that have issued share certificates to bearers to publish a notice at least once in a local newspaper or via electronic means, as prescribed by the relevant ministerial regulations. Notwithstanding these updated requirements, the DBD has issued a clarification explaining that the amended CCC coming into effect on February 7 will not usher in a blanket change to the way most companies are required to notify shareholders about a general shareholders’ meeting. If a company’s articles of association were made pursuant to a prior version of the CCC, that company will still need to publish a notice calling for a general meeting of shareholders in a local newspaper—even after the new amendment becomes effective. If companies would like to change their practice so that they no longer have to publish this notice, they will need to amend their articles of association after the effective date of the amended CCC. For more information on the new requirements of the amended CCC, or on any aspect of corporate laws and corporate governance in Thailand, please contact Prisna Sungwanna at [email protected], or Kobchai Nitungkorn at
Read More
December 30, 2022
Thailand’s cabinet has approved draft legislation to impose a financial transactions tax (FTT) on securities trading in the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET). The cabinet’s decision, which came on November 29, 2022, sets Thailand on a path to repeal a tax exemption that has been in place for over 30 years. If the legislation is ultimately passed, the FTT will be applied to transactions starting in April 2023. The sale of securities on the SET has been exempt from specific business tax (SBT) since December 1991 in an effort to promote trading on the secondary market and boost the domestic economy. The draft legislation approved by the cabinet in November 2022 aims to repeal the SBT exemption on securities trading on the SET and impose an FTT, which is a kind of SBT imposed on a specific commercial transaction. It is an indirect and transactional tax (similar to a sales tax) and is imposed on gross receipts, not on value added at each stage of manufacturing, trading, or service like VAT. Generally, securities sellers are the ones liable for FTT. However, the draft law stipulates that securities brokers are to withhold FTT from the gross share sales income and remit it to the Revenue Department on behalf of the securities seller within the 15th (or 23rd, depending on circumstances) day of the next month through the Revenue Department’s e-filing platform. Under this arrangement, securities sellers and investors do not have any duty to remit SBT, and sellers have no reporting obligations regarding sale transactions. Under the current draft, the imposition of FTT will be implemented in two phases, with an initial reduced rate as detailed in the table below. The securities subject to FTT include shares (both ordinary and preference), warrants, derivative warrants, exchange traded funds, depositary receipts, mutual
Read More
August 5, 2022
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission and the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) have opened a public hearing period on proposed changes to requirements for IPO securities issuers and other regulations relating to companies listed on the SET and the Market for Alternative Investment (MAI). The proposed changes aim to prevent the use of publicly offered securities to avoid or violate strict regulations on investment management. During the public hearing period, interested parties may submit comments on the proposed rules until August 18, 2022, with the finished regulations expected to be issued soon after. Key Proposed Changes to Rules for Securities Issuers Under the proposed rule adjustments, securities issuers (i.e., operating companies, holding companies, or foreign companies that request a public offering) must not be investment companies, except for companies or subsidiaries undertaking financial institution business (e.g., commercial banks, finance companies, credit foncier companies, securities companies, and life/non-life insurance companies). “Investment company” refers to a company that has more than 40 percent of its total assets as passive investments in securities, derivatives (excluding for hedging purposes) or digital assets. When considering whether a company that has a subsidiary is classified as an investment company, it will be determined based on the consolidated financial statement. Excluded from such classification are investments for low-risk liquidity management (i.e., bank deposits, government bonds, debt instruments backed by the Ministry of Finance, money market mutual funds, or fixed-income funds); affiliate companies that do not operate as investment companies; subsidiary companies under the same group company; and investments in business networks, synergies, or value chains. Key Proposed Changes to Rules for Listed Companies A company with the characteristics of an investment company mentioned above is not allowed to list its securities on the SET or the MAI. Companies listed on SET and MAI with more than
Read More