You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

October 21, 2024

Thai Court Decision Moves Design Assessment Closer to International Standards

Subscribe to Updates
Managing Intellectual Property

Thailand’s Central Intellectual Property and International Trade (IP&IT) Court has delivered a favorable ruling for Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd., a major player in the tire manufacturing industry, regarding the registration of its motorcycle tire design patent. In this case, Tilleke & Gibbins represented Sumitomo in successfully advocating for recognition of the unique design elements in the company’s motorcycle tire products.

Case Overview

The case revolved around Sumitomo’s two design patent applications for motorcycle tire designs, which were initially rejected by the Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) on the grounds that they were similar to prior art. Based on an examination of the design elements, primarily focusing on the tire tread patterns, the DIP’s Patent Board had concluded that Sumitomo’s designs were not sufficiently unique to warrant patent protection, as the tread patterns of the new designs were deemed too similar to one found in prior art for tire products.

In response, Tilleke & Gibbins filed a complaint with the IP&IT Court on behalf of Sumitomo, seeking a revocation of the Patent Board’s decision and requesting that the court compel the DIP, as the defendant, to proceed with the registration of Sumitomo’s design patents. The complaint emphasized that the designs were novel and distinct, warranting patent protection under Thai law.

Legal Strategy

The firm’s legal argument focused on the interpretation of Thai patent law, particularly regarding the protection of a product’s external appearance, and emphasized that the determination of a design’s novelty must consider the product’s overall appearance rather than isolating individual features. This approach is consistent with international guidelines on design patents, which require the evaluation of novelty and distinctiveness based on how an informed user would perceive the design as a whole.

While Sumitomo’s tire tread patterns may share some superficial similarities to existing designs, the overall impression of the designs was unique. The grooves in the tread of Sumitomo’s design were arranged diagonally—with sharp, narrow ends—and extended fully to the tire edge, features absent in existing designs. These unique elements contributed to a distinctive appearance that set Sumitomo’s designs apart.

During the trial, Tilleke & Gibbins provided detailed technical testimony regarding the design features, aiming to show how the design’s unique diagonal grooves and sharp, pointed ends made it look noticeably different from the more rounded and thicker lines in the existing designs. This testimony was essential in convincing the IP&IT Court that the designs were novel and deserved patent protection under Thai law.

Court Ruling

The IP&IT Court issued a favorable ruling revoking the DIP’s rejection of Sumitomo’s design patent applications. In its judgment, the IP&IT Court considered the definition of “product design” under the Patent Act B.E. 2522 (1979), which refers to the shape, pattern, or color of the product having special characteristics that make it suitable as a model for industrial products. Therefore, product design patents protect the external appearance of products, including their shape, pattern, and color. When assessing whether a product design is similar to an existing design, only the product’s external appearance should be compared. This principle further supported the court’s ruling that Sumitomo’s designs were distinct and deserving of patent protection.

The IP&IT Court further agreed with the argument that the DIP had failed to assess the overall appearance of the tire designs properly. The IP&IT Court emphasized that a design patent protects a product’s external appearance and identified some critical differences between Sumitomo’s designs and the prior art. For instance:

  • The groove patterns in Sumitomo’s designs were narrower and sharper, with the grooves extending fully to the tire edges, while the grooves in the existing designs were thicker and more rounded and did not reach the tire edges.
  • The side pattern of Sumitomo’s tires, which featured alternating short and long diagonal grooves, was a feature absent in the existing designs.

The court’s consideration and thoughtfulness aligned with the diagram the firm presented to the court during the trial.

Based on these considerations, the IP&IT Court ruled that Sumitomo’s tire designs were indeed novel and not mere imitations of the prior art. As a result, the IP&IT Court ordered the DIP to proceed with the registration of Sumitomo’s design patents.

Key Takeaways

The IP&IT Court judgment emphasized the need to assess the overall appearance of a design when determining its eligibility for patent protection, aligning Thai law with international standards. The judgment clarifies that even functional products, like tire tread patterns, can have distinctive design features worthy of patent protection.

The favorable decision in Sumitomo’s motorcycle tire case is a significant win and demonstrates the importance of a legal strategy that considers both the technical and visual aspects of product design.

This article first appeared in Managing Intellectual Property.

Related Professionals

Industries

Automotive

Practices

Dispute Resolution and Litigation

Intellectual Property

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 27, 2022
The Energy Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) has launched a pilot project to study the energy consumption and the economic, social, and environmental impact of electric motorcycle taxis, as well as the behavior of drivers and passengers. The project, which was launched on December 27, 2021, as part of EGAT’s Carbon Neutrality Policy, will continue for a year, after which EGAT will consider the data and decide whether electric motorcycle taxis should be introduced nationwide. EGAT is also currently encouraging the use of electric bikes within their own organization, and they initially expect this to help reduce annual carbon dioxide emissions by 37 tons and prevent the release of about 838,000 milligrams of dust per year. EGAT expects additional significant reductions from electric motorcycle taxi pilot projects in multiple locations. A study conducted in Kenya in 2015 by that country’s energy regulator found that sub-150cc motorcycles emit approximately 46.5 grams of carbon dioxide per kilometer, and these emissions increase proportionally in accordance with engine size. According to Thailand’s Office of Industrial Economics, citing data collected by the Federation of Thai Industries Automotive Industry Group, a total of 1,516,096 motorcycles were sold in Thailand in 2020—a surprisingly robust figure in light of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Assuming that public motorcycles travel an average of 15,000 kilometers per year, each motorcycle is therefore producing approximately 0.7 tons of carbon dioxide per year. If Thailand is able to change 50% of its yearly sales of standard motorcycle to electric motorcycles, annual carbon dioxide emissions could decrease by approximately 530,000 tons. Furthermore, since 28.8% of carbon dioxide emissions in Thailand are generated from the transport sector, the transition to electric mobility vehicles looks to be one of the most promising solutions for lowering carbon dioxide emissions in the country. Considering developments
Read More
January 12, 2022
Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) recently published BOI Notification No. Sor. 8/2564, which extends the scope of investment promotion covering electronic vehicle (EV) industry manufacturers to include the production of “automotive platforms” for electric vehicles, and creates a new category of BOI promoted activities covering the manufacture of electric bicycles (E-bikes). Automotive Platforms The following investment promotion categories have been extended: 4.24 – Manufacture of Battery Electric Vehicles 4.26 – Manufacture of Electric Battery Tricycles 4.27 – Manufacture of Electric Battery Busses and Trucks These categories now include the manufacture of “automotive platforms”—which must include an energy storage system, charging module, and front and rear axle module—benefiting from similar tax incentives and subject to additional conditions, as detailed below. New BOI Promotional Category for E-Bike Production The BOI has also introduced a new category, No. 4.28, covering the manufacture of E-bikes. Projects under this category will be eligible for a three-year CIT exemption with an additional one-year exemption if certain criteria are met. Applications for this category must cover the manufacture of E-bikes, the manufacture or sourcing of electric batteries, and a management plan for used batteries. In addition to the general conditions for EV projects (industrial standards, manufacturing timelines, etc.), the BOI has also imposed the following conditions specific to E-bike projects: E-bike frames must be produced from light-weight materials such as aluminum alloy, chromium–molybdenum alloy steel (chrome moly), titanium alloy, and carbon fiber; and E-bike batteries must adopt environmentally-friendly technology. Interestingly the BOI allows E-bike production lines to jointly use manufacturing lines for ordinary bicycles. However, the sale of ordinary bicycles is regarded as non-BOI-promoted income and will not be entitled to BOI tax incentives. These new provisions, intended to stimulate both local and foreign investments in the electric automotive industry, seem to complete the BOI promotion
Read More
January 14, 2019
When Vietnam began to open its market in the late 1980s, there were few cars on its roads. Over time, as the country’s economy entered a period of rapid growth, the number of cars grew accordingly. While that number has steadily risen, car ownership in Vietnam is still low by world standards, with only about 23 cars per 1,000 people. However, that rate is only expected to increase in the coming years as per capita income continues to rise.
Read More