You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 13, 2013

Real Estate Investment Trusts in Thailand

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

The evolution of real property financing in Thailand—from primarily bank loans to rigid property funds to the proposed real estate investment trusts (REITs)—reflects the liberalisation of the Thai market, the need for alternative funding options, and the need for the country to maintain its regional competitiveness.

The Capital Market Supervisory Board under the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued regulations last year governing the issuance and offering of REITs in Thailand. The regulations took effect on Jan 1 this year.

Development of REITs: In the past, Thailand’s commercial real estate market was funded primarily by bank loans, secondary offerings and initial public offerings, and to a limited extent, private equity. Previous attempts to broaden financing options through the Property Fund for Public Offering (PFPO) channel proved to be ineffectual and unpopular due to its many restrictions.

One glaring absence from the list of financing options is the REIT—long prized in the United States for its flexibility and deduction of shareholder dividends from taxable corporate income. The lack of the REIT financing option in Thailand became all the more apparent when demand for commercial and residential real estate projects increased (due to very low interest rates) during the recovery of the property sector from 2003 onward.

Recognising the limitations of PFPOs, the SEC approved the new regulatory framework for establishing REITs in 2010 and has since followed up by issuing the regulations now in effect.

REIT regulations: The new REIT regulations are expected to provide a modernised vehicle for financing real estate investments, while also providing the flexibility that has made the funds popular at the international level. Additionally, REITs will likely replace existing PFPOs altogether. Establishing a new PFPO or increasing registered capital in an existing one has not been possible during the one-year period following the issuance of REIT regulations.

Converting an existing property fund to a REIT, however, will be possible. The grace period for the existing property funds to raise funds and borrow for investment expansion is effective until the end of 2013, but as the launch of the REITs seems to have run behind schedule, the deadline is likely to be extended.

The REIT regulations contemplate a trust fund structure (not a juristic structure as in existing property funds), whereby the trustee will have the legal right over the fund in terms of ownership and/or properties. Trust certificates will be listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Thus, when forming and operating a REIT, one will need to take into account existing SEC rules regarding, for example, investment in properties, corporate governance, and management restrictions. REIT managers (which can be companies) will manage the REITs, for which they will be required to hold licences issued by the SEC.

Other features of the REIT regulations will ease the limitations seen in the old property fund rules, including the following:

  • A REIT can leverage up to 35% of its net asset value (NAV) of assets and up to 60% of its NAV for credit rating of investment grade, whereas the current property fund regulations allow only for leveraging 10% of the NAV.
  • The holding restriction for affiliated companies will be increased to 50% of the total trust certificates sold, up from one-third under the PFPO regulations.
  • REITs will be permitted to invest in a broad spectrum of real property types, and barred only from investing in immoral or illegal businesses, while a PFPO is permitted to invest only in certain types of real estate projects.The SEC and the Revenue Department are now finalising the tax structure for REITs.

High hopes for Thailand’s REITs: The hope is that the new REIT option will attract foreign investment to fuel Thailand’s property fund market while maintaining the country’s credit ratings. The creation of the REIT will provide another means for financing real estate, thereby reducing the need to rely primarily on Thai banks as a source of long-term capital. Finally, large institutional investors seeking real estate exposure will be able to purchase a diversified product in line with their risk appetite.

With the right blend of tax incentives, strong oversight, and a flexible investment framework, Thailand may begin to see growth rates in REITs nearing the levels seen in other parts of Asia such as Japan, South Korea, and Singapore.

REITs are expected to drive continued growth in the Thai real estate market and, at the very least, the REIT system is a significant upgrade from the PFPO system, representing an important step in the evolution of Thailand’s capital market and financing system.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 20, 2026
Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) has imposed new restrictions on foreign-majority shareholding and land ownership for companies in certain promoted activities. The changes took effect on September 1, 2025, but were not published in the Government Gazette until December 30, 2025, under Notification of the Board of Investment No. Sor. 7/2568 on the Amendment to List of Activities Eligible for Investment Promotion under Notification of the Board of Investment No. 9/2565, dated July 22, 2025. Foreign Land Ownership Restrictions Generally, foreign land ownership is one of the privileges granted to BOI-promoted companies, allowing them to own land to engage in the promoted activities. However, with these new restrictions, the BOI will no longer grant land-ownership privileges to foreign-majority-owned companies that conduct business activities in the following categories: Rolling, drawing, casting, or forging of nonferrous metals (category 5.4.9) Manufacturing of ferrous metal products or ferrous metal parts (category 5.4.11.2) Manufacturing of nonferrous metal products and/or nonferrous metal parts for industrial use (category 5.4.11.4) Manufacturing of other metal products, including other metal parts for industrial use (category 5.4.11.5) Manufacture of chemical products for industry (category 6.2) Manufacture of plastic products for industrial goods and parts (category 6.4.1) These restrictions do not apply to existing BOI-promoted companies that have at least three projects granted promotion under the same juristic person during the past 15 years (2011–2025) with total investment of at least THB 5 billion, excluding the cost of land and working capital. Foreign Shareholding Restrictions For companies to be eligible for BOI promotion in three other categories of business activities, at least 51% of the company’s registered capital must be held by Thai individual shareholders, unless the BOI-promoted activity is located within a special border economic zone as designated by the BOI. These three categories are: Manufacture of bags made of
January 8, 2026
Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) has tightened criteria for BOI-promoted companies to own land for residential use and introduced new procedures for land ownership applications under a new notification. Officially titled Notification of the Office of the Board of Investment No. Por. 9/2568 Re: Amended Criteria and Conditions for Permitting Foreign Juristic Persons Receiving Investment Promotion to Own Land for Office and Residence for Operational-Level Workers to Operate Business Granted Investment Promotion, dated July 18, 2025, the new notification was published in the Government Gazette on January 6, 2026, and is applicable to all applications submitted since the date of the notification (July 18, 2025). The new notification introduces an online application process for BOI-promoted companies seeking to own land for office use or residential purposes via the e-Land system, the BOI’s electronic system for land rights and benefits. Applications are reviewed virtually, and any requested amendments or additional documents must be submitted within seven business days. Failure to amend the application or submit any additional requested documents within this period will result in automatic rejection and removal of the application from the system. The new notification builds on the requirements specified in the previous notification on land ownership allowances for foreign companies, issued in 2024, by introducing additional qualification requirements for residences for operational-level workers (i.e., unskilled laborers). In this regard, such a residence must not be: Part of a land development project (housing estate), A condominium unit, or Classified as a house or commercial building.
December 25, 2025
On December 11, 2025, Vietnam’s National Assembly issued Resolution No. 254/2025/QH15 (Resolution No. 254) to address practical difficulties encountered in implementing the Law on Land 2024. The resolution provides specific mechanisms and policies to resolve issues related to land allocation, land leasing, and conversion of land-use purposes, while also addressing land valuation principles, timing of information collection, and land valuation methods. The resolution takes effect on January 1, 2026. Key provisions affecting investors are discussed below. Land Use Terms for Transferred Investment Projects The National Assembly has addressed situations where the remaining term of a transferred investment project is insufficient for the transferee’s business or financial plans. Resolution No. 254, along with the Law on Investment 2025, introduces aligned regulatory solutions. Under the Law on Investment 2025 (4th version submitted to the National Assembly for promulgation), if an investment project implemented prior to March 1, 2026, has been transferred and the transferor holds a Land Use Rights Certificate, has fulfilled all land-related financial obligations, and is not subject to termination, the competent authority may determine a new operating term if the remaining operating term does not meet the transferee investor’s financial or business plan. This adjustment occurs when approving or adjusting the investment policy or issuing or amending the investment registration certificate. The revised operating term is calculated from the date of the approval or issuance and must not exceed the statutory maximum of 70 years for projects in economic zones and 50 years for projects outside economic zones. Resolution No. 254 also permits adjustment of the land use term for transferred investment projects involving land, provided that the transferee investor pays additional land rent in accordance with applicable law, thereby ensuring consistency with the Law on Investment 2025. Land Rent Payment Options Resolution No. 254 generally expands the
December 16, 2025
Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed the Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to Infrastructure and Construction in Southeast Asia, a comparative guide developed by Drew Network Asia (DNA). The publication brings together insights from leading ASEAN law firms to address common legal and practical issues faced by participants in the construction and engineering sector across the region. Covering nine major Southeast Asian jurisdictions, the guide provides concise answers to frequently encountered questions relating to infrastructure and construction projects. Topics addressed include the regulatory environment, procurement practices, project structuring, risk allocation, contracting terms, dispute resolution mechanisms, and the enforcement of arbitral awards. Each jurisdictional chapter follows a consistent question-and-answer format, enabling readers to compare legal approaches and market practices across countries. This structure highlights both areas of convergence and key differences between jurisdictions, supporting more informed decision-making in cross-border projects and investments. While the guide offers a practical regional overview, it also underscores that legal frameworks and market practices vary significantly between jurisdictions and may be shaped by local principles and industry norms. Readers seeking jurisdiction-specific advice are encouraged to contact the practitioners listed at the end of each chapter. The full guide is available for download through the button below or directly from the DNA website.