You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 19, 2020

PTIT Focus: Extension of the Schedule of Operation Date to Distribute Power to the Commercial Network Due to Force Majeure

Subscribe to Updates
Petroleum Institute of Thailand: PTIT Focus

On 28 November 2018, the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) passed a resolution to extend the Schedule of Operation Date (SCOD) due to force majeure. Subsequently, the ERC issued the Notification Regarding Methods of Considering the Extension of SCOD to Distribute Power to a Commercial Network Due to Force Majeure. However, the notification did not stipulate specific types or sizes of power plants under energy purchase agreements.

Under the notification, a force majeure  event that can be a justification for the extension of SCOD must be a force majeure  event as defined under the Civil and Commercial Code, and as set out under the regulations regarding power purchases and power purchase agreements. Accordingly, a force majeure  event is one in which the occurrence, or consequences, could not be prevented even though the victim (or near-victim) took appropriate care as might be expected from him or her in that situation and in such condition.

Force majeure  also refers to government actions. These could include changes in energy policies or in the law that result in the project owner, the project sponsor, or the Electricity Sales Department being unable to comply with any provision of the regulations regarding power purchase agreements, as well as seizure of the project, assets or any rights, shares, or benefits from the contracted energy producer by a government entity. Also covered are blockades or other acts of war; uprisings, rebellions, disturbances, and strikes; as well as accidents such as earthquakes, storms, fires, floods, and unusually bad weather conditions. Also considered force majeure  would be accidental disruptions to the power distribution system caused by accident. All of these scenarios could severely impact the project or the performance of the energy producer’s duties under the power purchase agreement.

Furthermore, when determining force majeure, both the nature of the facts and the circumstances must both be considered, and the following factors must be met: (1) The party claiming force majeure  must not have been the cause (or have contributed to) the facts or circumstances resulting in that party’s inability to comply with regulations regarding energy purchase agreements. (2) The party claiming force majeure  must have taken appropriate care as might be expected from them in that situation and in those conditions, despite the facts or circumstances of the events that occurred being unforeseeable or unpreventable, or beyond the party’s control. (3) The party claiming force majeure  must have made attempts to satisfy the energy purchase agreement. (4) The party claiming force majeure  must have made efforts to mitigate the possible impacts as appropriate for a person in that situation and in those conditions.

When determining the extension of a SCOD for distributing power to a commercial network due to force majeure, the factors must include the project’s preparedness under four areas: the preparedness of the property, the preparedness of the technology, the preparedness of the source of investment funds, and the preparedness of obtaining approvals under the relevant laws and regulations. The determination of the extension of the SCOD must also be such that the extension is only as is necessary and suitable, and must take into account the significance and impact of the force majeure  event. Officials must also periodically report to the Energy Policy Executive Committee and the National Energy Policy Council.

In conclusion, force majeure  is a general legal basis wherein a contracting party is unable to perform their duties under the agreement due to a force majeure  event, whereby that party is not held to be at fault for the inability to perform their duties. Nevertheless, the extent to which force majeure  can be used in determining the extension of the SCOD must be considered in accordance with the factors stipulated in the notification referenced above, including the combined nature of the facts and circumstances, as well as the preparedness of the project with regard to the four areas described above. This notification serves as a guideline to be used at the discretion of the government authorities in extending the SCOD in a manner that displays good governance, and following it will result in the highest fairness for commercial operators and other persons affected by the extension of the SCOD.

 

This article first appeared in the August 2019 edition of PTIT Focus, the Petroleum Institute of Thailand’s monthly newsletter. The article was published in both English and Thai. 

Related Professionals

Industries

Energy

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

May 25, 2026
After several years of policy discussion and continued efforts led by the Ministry of Commerce (MOC) to relax the list of reserved businesses under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA), the reform process has now reached a significant milestone. On May 12, 2026, the Thai cabinet approved in principle two draft subordinate legislative instruments aimed at delisting certain reserved business activities under the FBA and reducing licensing requirements for foreign business operators. These developments signal a renewed and concrete effort by the government to modernize Thailand’s business regulatory framework in order to attract foreign investment and boost Thailand’s competitiveness in the global market. Nine Businesses Set for FBA Delisting Below is a list of the nine businesses that are being targeted for delisting from the FBA’s restrictions. A draft ministerial regulation would delist the first eight reserved businesses, while a royal decree has been drafted to delist the ninth business: Telecommunications services (Type 1 license only, covering operators without their own telecommunications infrastructure), under the supervision of the Office of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission. Treasury center services subject to the Foreign Exchange Control Act B.E. 2485 and under the supervision of the Bank of Thailand. Securities-collateralized lending, pursuant to the laws governing securities and exchange and derivatives regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Agency, dealer, advisory, or fund management services relating to derivatives where the underlying assets fall outside the scope of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) Intra-group shared services, including administrative, human resources, and IT functions Intra-group domestic debt guarantee services Leasing of partial space for installation of financial service machines and automatic vending machines for employee use Petroleum drilling services Trading of agricultural product derivatives through a futures exchange, with physical delivery or receipt of agricultural products at a futures exchange–designated
Read More
February 10, 2026
Data center and cloud investments are forming a major focus of private-sector investment in Thailand, with tech giants like Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and TikTok, as well as numerous telecom and data center companies, committing significant outlays to data center and cloud development. The country’s Board of Investment (BOI) approved projects worth THB 1.87 trillion in 2025, and THB 746 billion of this was from planned data center investments—by far the largest amount from any single industry. Thailand’s swift rise as a regional data center hub is fueled by surging demand for cloud, AI, and digital services, as well as large-scale investments from global tech firms. The country’s strategic location, competitive power costs, robust fiber infrastructure, expanding IT talent, and supportive government policies—including BOI incentives and streamlined approvals—have made it an attractive destination for scalable and sustainable digital infrastructure investments. The BOI’s proactive approach in updating promoted categories and providing both tax and non-tax incentives further ensures Thailand’s continued growth in this sector. 2025 BOI Changes for Data Centers In the middle of 2025, the BOI responded to the remarkable trend by updating investment‑promotion categories across various sectors (e.g., machinery and electrical equipment, public utilities, digital and innovative industries) to accommodate growing investment in data‑center projects. Before the change, which was detailed in a notification that has applied to investment promotion applications submitted from July 1, 2025, onward, data‑center projects under BOI promotion were granted a single A1 incentive (an eight‑year corporate income‑tax exemption) and subject to one uniform set of conditions. The July 2025 notification restructured promotion for data centers into two categories based on power‑usage efficiency: high‑efficiency data centers and other data centers. Under these rules, qualified high‑efficiency data centers are eligible for an eight‑year corporate income tax (CIT) exemption, while for other data centers this exemption is
Read More
November 21, 2025
On November 17, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Interior introduced significant regulatory changes to make rooftop solar adoption easier and more cost-effective for property owners. Ministerial Regulation No. 72 B.E. 2568 (2025), issued under the Building Control Act B.E. 2522 (1979), was published in the Government Gazette on November 19, 2025, with immediate effect. Background Under the Building Control Act (BCA), any alteration made to a building requires either notification of the relevant authority or application for a building alteration permit—unless the alteration falls under a separate list of exceptions specified in the ministerial regulations issued under the BCA. In 2015, installation of solar rooftops on any residential building under 160 square meters was added to this list of exceptions, subject to inspection and notification requirements. The newly enacted regulation now eliminates many of these requirements and introduces a broader and more permissive framework to promote solar adoption nationwide. Key Changes Specifically, the regulation introduces three major changes: Expanded exemption from the definition of “building alteration”: The installation of solar panels on any building roof—regardless of the type of building or the total area of the installation—is no longer considered a building alteration under the BCA, provided that the total weight of the installation does not exceed 20 kg/m2. Removal of structural integrity certification requirement: The new regulation eliminates the obligation to obtain a structural stability certificate from a licensed civil engineer. Removal of notification requirement: Property owners or possessors are no longer required to notify the local authority before installation of a solar rooftop. Impact This significant streamlining of requirements for solar rooftop installation is expected to accelerate the adoption of renewable energy in the country, particularly for residential and commercial properties—similar to the way Thailand’s December 2024 removal of licensing requirements for factory solar rooftop installations encouraged such
Read More
September 25, 2025
Tilleke & Gibbins’ labor and employment team in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City has contributed the Vietnam chapter to Labor and Employment Disputes 2026. Drawing on the expertise of three of the firm’s employment specialists, the chapter provides practical guidance for navigating employment disputes in Vietnam and covers: Pre-action considerations: key requirements, third-party funding, contingency fee arrangements Issuing a claim: forum, territorial jurisdiction, standing, commencing claims, fees, service, defendants and legal personality, types of claims, time limits, counterclaims Case management: procedure, rules, amendments to claims, adding parties, consolidating proceedings, class and collective actions, evidence, witnesses, tactical considerations Interim relief: availability, requirements Trial: hearings conduct and time frames, confidentiality and public access, media reporting, elements of successful claims and burden of proof Alternative dispute resolution: available types, requirements and expectations, enforcement Collective employment and labor rights: enforcement and standing Remedies and enforcement: available remedies, assessing compensation, enforcement mechanisms Appeals: procedure, time frames, other means of challenge Updates and trends: recent cases and developments, technology developments, other issues The Vietnam chapter is available for download below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia and Thailand chapters to Labor and Employment Disputes 2026. Readers can also gain 30 days of complementary access to the full Labor and Employment Disputes 2026 guide and the rest of Lexology Panoramic’s varied offerings through this link.
Read More