You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 27, 2020

Options for Employers in Laos during the COVID-19 Outbreak

The adverse impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have led employers to look for ways to mitigate the losses being wrought by the turmoil. While working remotely from home is a viable option for some, economic slowdown or to the nature of some industries make it unfeasible for others.

This article considers the legality of some measures to mitigate employment costs in Laos.

Can an employer suspend an employment contract?

No. Lao labor law currently only allows employment contracts to be suspended for national military service, or in the case of that employee being detained, held, or restricted in a certain area by a government authority. Hardship facing the company—even of the scale faced under the current pandemic—is, for now, not a valid reason for suspending an employment contract in Laos. If the contract itself has a specific provision for suspension under circumstances such as this, suspension might be possible, but the opinion of the local authorities should be sought first.

Can an employer unilaterally reduce an employee’s salary?

There is no such provision under Lao labor law. However, the law provides that, in the event of a temporary suspension of the business (not merely a slowdown of any degree) ordered by relevant local authorities or resulting from a decision of the employer, the employer must continue to pay employee salaries at a rate of at least 50% of their regular salary. The law does not limit the duration of the suspension, and does not address whether any reason (such as force majeure) must be demonstrated by the employer. Based on our experience, and discussions with the authorities, the current situation may fall under the scope of the temporary suspension provision, offering some potential relief to affected companies.

Can an employer terminate a contract?

An employer may terminate an employment contract for “business reasons,” as defined under Lao labor law, which includes instances where economic conditions make reducing employee numbers necessary. To do so, a number of requirements must be met:

  • The employer must consult the trade union, the employees’ representative, or the majority of the employees to explain the reasons for the termination in advance. 
  • Minutes of the above meeting must be taken and signed by all attendees, and reported to the Labor Administration Agency.
  • Advance notice (30 or 45 days, depending on the nature of the work) must be given to all employees.
  • Severance payment, as laid out by the law, must be paid.

Employers may also agree on termination of the employment contract by mutual consent with the employees.

We note that many companies are considering use of the term force majeure to justify termination of relationships under the outbreak across multiple jurisdictions. Please note that Lao labor law does not define force majeure, and it is therefore not yet a statutory reason for terminating an employment contract in Laos. However, further developments on this may soon be provided by the local authorities.

Can employees refuse to work, citing concerns of an unsafe environment?

Yes. Under Lao law, employers generally have a duty to provide a safe workplace for employees, and the Decree on Occupational Safety and Health further allows employees to refuse to work if they judge that the conditions are not sufficiently safe. However, this provision is relatively new (implemented in February 2019), so there is a lack of guiding precedent.

Breaches of regulations relating to labor safety, labor hygiene, and workplace safety are also punishable under the new Penal Code published in October 2018. Workplace health and safety obligations are thus an important consideration for employers at this time. At the very least, employers should comply with the notice recently issued by the Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare (No. 0709, dated March 11, 2020), which requires employers to provide equipment (such as soap, hand sanitizer gel, masks, etc.) at their own expense to protect employees from COVID-19. The notice also asks employers to stay up to date on their employees’ health, monitoring whether any of them exhibit symptoms associated with COVID-19 and taking appropriate measures if they do so.

The situation is evolving day by day. Employers should always be sure they are acting on the most up-to-date information, as exceptional measures may be taken by the authorities to cope with this exceptional situation. In this shifting environment, it is always possible that some of the above observations of the law may be affected by forthcoming special measures, so employers should closely monitor the developments to ensure they are acting on the most up-to-date information.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

May 10, 2021
Attorneys from Tilleke & Gibbins’ offices in Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam have contributed chapters on labor law in these jurisdictions to the Global Employment Law Guide, published by Lex Mundi. The guide provides answers to key employment-related legal questions in 57 jurisdictions around the world, with all entries provided by member firms in the global Lex Mundi legal network. Each chapter contains in-depth information on the jurisdiction’s legal framework governing employment relationships, including coverage of the following topics: Employment categories and contract types Employee rights and protections Employment termination Leave and social benefits Restrictive covenants COVID-19 vaccination mandates and post-pandemic workplace reopening Readers can browse the contributions, generate country-specific reports, and compare attorney-client privilege in multiple jurisdictions. For more information, please visit the Lex Mundi website.
March 2, 2021
Maintaining positive employee relations is a top concern for virtually all companies. Many companies in Thailand—especially those located in the country’s industrial estates—have labor unions, while others rely on other non-union pathways for attending to the concerns of employees. In all of these cases, the union or collective group of employees also chooses members of the “employee committee” that is charged with fostering good relations and open communications with the employer through regular meetings dedicated to discussion of workplace matters. Companies with a workforce of 50 or more employees need to understand the roles of the employee committee and the specific rights accorded to the committee members, which are different from the rights of the other employees. Besides the obvious benefits that this understanding has for relations with their employees, it is also important if an employer takes disciplinary action against employee committee members, as violation of a committee member’s rights could result in the employer facing criminal penalties. The legal basis for these employee committees is the Labor Relations Act B.E. 2518 (LRA), which stipulates that in any workplace with at least 50 employees, the employees or their labor union of the business establishment is entitled to establish an employee committee. Members are elected (or, in the case of a labor union, appointed) to three-year terms on the committee, with the total number of committee members depending on the size of the workforce, as shown in the table. Membership Requirements Among partially unionized workforces, labor unions are generally given precedence when it comes to control of the committee. If a labor union whose members account for more than 20% of the total employees in a workplace, the union gets to appoint the majority of the employee committee members (e.g., four out of a seven-person committee, five of a
February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension