You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

October 6, 2022

New Regulations on Drug Registration in Vietnam

Subscribe to Updates

On September 5, 2022, Vietnam’s Ministry of Health (MOH) issued Circular No. 08/2022/TT-BYT on the registration of drugs and drug materials (Circular 08). Circular 08 will come into effect on October 20, 2022, and replace Circular No. 32/2018/TT-BYT and its amendments, which are the current regulations on drug registration.

Below are some noteworthy contents of Circular 08:

  • The requirements on providing a Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product (CPP) are less stringent under the new regulations. For example, a CPP is now only required to include content as stipulated in the WHO’s CPP template. No additional contents—such as specification of finished products, APIs, herbal ingredients, and names and addresses of the API/herbal ingredient’s manufactures as under the current regulations—are required. Another new point is that, for the registration dossiers of new chemical drugs, vaccines, and imported biologicals (except probiotics), applicants are required to submit only one CPP issued by the manufacturing country if the CPP issuing authority is the EMA or any SRA (Stringent Regulatory Authority); no additional CPP/legal document is required as currently.
  • There will be a new option for providing legal documents of the manufacturer of APIs, excipients, capsule shells, semi-finished herbal medicine products, and herbal ingredients to prove compliance with GMP requirements. In particular, in addition to a GMP certificate, manufacturing license stating the manufacturer meets GMP, CPP for API with content satisfying GMP, Certification of Suitability (CEP), or self-evaluation form, it is acceptable if the company submits a Good Agricultural and Collection Practices/GACP certificate (for herbal ingredients) or other legal documents granted by the authorities containing at least the following contents: name and address of the manufacturer, certification that the manufacturer meets GMP requirements, and name of the drug substance/excipient/capsule/semi-finished medicinal material/medicinal ingredient.
  • For vaccines, serums containing antibodies, and derivatives of human blood and plasma, Circular 08 introduces a more lenient policy for receiving registration dossiers. Instead of requiring a complete dossier at the time of submission, the dossier can be submitted without a certificate of analysis, quality specification, or testing method certified by the Vietnam National Institute for Control of Vaccines and Biologicals (NICVB). These papers, which can often take a long time to acquire, can be submitted later in the evaluation process, allowing applicants to secure an earlier filing date.
  • In addition to the procedure for declaring brand-name drugs, the procedures and conditions for classification of a drug as a reference biological are now specified for the first time.
  • A check from the Drug Administration of Vietnam (DAV) on the authenticity of information in legal documents in drug registration dossiers is not always required. Before granting marketing authorization (MA), the check is required in some special cases such as when the CPP shows signs of being erased or modified, or when the legal documents are related to a registrant or manufacturer having drugs registered in Vietnam for the first time. After MA has been granted, the check is required only if the DAV receives information in the form of official documents or email or through mass media reflecting that the status of approval or circulation in the host country requires verification or clarification, or that the foreign manufacturer or applicant has failed to meet operating conditions.
Related Professionals

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 9, 2026
On August 5, 2026, the Consumer Case Division of Thailand’s Civil Court rendered a judgment in a case involving a beauty clinic that advertised acne scar treatments using claims that the clinic was operated by a specialist physician and that the treatment, allegedly involving stem cell technology, could permanently remove acne scars. The plaintiff brought a claim against both the physician-owner and the clinic company, alleging that the advertisements were false and induced her to purchase the treatment. The court found that the clinic was liable for the false representations and that the physician-owner, as both the authorized director of the company and the medical practitioner who provided treatment, was jointly responsible. Although the plaintiff could not fully prove all damages claimed, the court awarded compensation of THB 20,000, together with interest. While the judgment arose from a consumer protection dispute, it serves as a valuable reminder that medical facility advertisements in Thailand are regulated and may expose clinics and healthcare providers not only to regulatory enforcement but also to civil liability from patients who rely on misleading promotional claims. Regulatory Framework Governing Medical Facility Advertisements Medical facility advertising in Thailand is governed by the Medical Facility Act B.E. 2541 (1998), as amended by the Medical Facility Act (No. 4) B.E. 2559 (2016). The principal secondary legislation is the Department of Health Service Support (DoHSS) Notification Re: Rules, Procedures, Conditions, and Fees for an Advertisement or Publication Concerning a Medical Facility, which came into force on November 25, 2019. Under this notification, “advertising” includes any act, by any means, that causes members of the public to see, hear, or otherwise become aware of a message, sound, or image for the commercial benefit of a medical facility. This broad definition covers not only traditional media but also clinic websites, social
Read More
September 9, 2026
On June 30, 2026, Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 on Food Packaging, which expands the list of approved food-contact substances and recognizes a broader range of permissible functions for those substances. The new regulation, which revokes BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, reflects developments in packaging technology and materials science. Although the new regulation provides more advantages to business actors by adding more food contact substances to the approved list for use in food packaging, there are more stringent rules and restrictions for testing. One of the most significant changes is a comprehensive migration-testing framework that sets out requirements for packaging materials, testing conditions, food simulants, and specific migration limits. Overall and Specific Migration Under BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, migration requirements were primarily set out within the lists of approved food-contact substances and packaging materials. BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 instead expressly requires packaging materials that come into direct contact with food to meet both overall and specific migration limits. These are defined as follows: Overall migration: The total quantity of all substances that migrate from the packaging, regardless of whether the substances are hazardous or nonhazardous to health. Specific migration: The quantity of a particular identified substance known to be hazardous to health that migrates from the packaging. Stricter Limits on Heavy Metals The overall migration limit for plastic packaging remains unchanged under both regulations at 60 mg/kg or 10 mg/dm². However, the new regulation introduces significant changes to the regulation of heavy metals. Under the 2019 regulation, four heavy metals—lead, cadmium, chromium VI, and mercury—were subject to a single combined limit of 1 mg/kg. The 2026 regulation, however, requires each heavy metal to meet its own individual specific migration limit, adds arsenic as
Read More
September 4, 2026
Blind boxes and collectibles have become increasingly popular, driven by the excitement of not knowing which character or design will be revealed until the package is opened. While most visible in the art toy market, the same concept is also used in the food industry. Confectionery, snacks, and other food products are sometimes sold with toys, character figures, cards, or other collectibles. A package might, for example, contain one of ten possible characters, with consumers knowing that an item is included but not which one they will receive. Some collections may also feature rare or “secret” items. For food businesses, however, adding a randomized toy or collectible involves more than a marketing decision. The food, the nonfood item, and the randomized mechanism may each raise different regulatory considerations in Thailand. Thai FDA Requirements for Nonfood Objects Packaged with Food The main food regulatory consideration is Ministry of Public Health Notification No. 310 B.E. 2551 (2008), which regulates food packaged together with things or objects that are not food. Under Notification No. 310, certain nonfood objects may be packaged together with food where they fall within specified exceptions, including objects that serve the following purposes: Maintaining the quality or standard of the food, such as a desiccant or oxygen absorber; Serving as a seasoning or as part of food preparation, such as chili powder sachets or seasoning sachets contained in instant noodle packages; or Functioning as an eating or food-preparation utensil, such as a spoon or fork included with instant noodles. Other nonfood objects that do not fall within these categories generally should not be placed inside the food container together with the food. Where a toy, collectible, or other nonfood object is intended to be sold together with a food product, businesses should therefore carefully consider the nature of
Read More
August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.
Read More