You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 24, 2018

New Regulations on Foreign Investment in Goods Trading

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

Goods trading and activities directly related to goods trading are considered a “conditional” business for foreign investment in Vietnam, meaning the market is open to foreign investors provided they meet certain conditions. This area was governed for more than 10 years by Decree No. 23/2007/ND-CP (Decree 23), which was in line with the old 2005 Investment Law and gradually became out-of-date, especially when the new 2014 Investment Law took effect on July 1, 2015. Given this fact, on January 15, 2018, Decree No. 09/2018/ND-CP (Decree 9) was issued and took immediate effect, replacing Decree 23 as the primary legal basis for foreign investment in goods trading in Vietnam. Decree 9 provides many significant changes in line with the 2014 Investment Law for foreign investors and their wholly set-up foreign invested enterprises (FIEs). Some of the key changes are summarized below.

Single authority for licensing. Under Decree 9, the local Department of Industry and Trade (DOIT) has become the sole licensing authority for licensing matters in goods trading. The DOIT is also responsible for liaising with and seeking consultations from the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT) in any application dossiers required in- principle approvals from the MOIT. Though this is an internal working process between the DOIT and the MOIT, the relevant foreign investor or FIEs will be kept updated.

Some sub-license requirements removed. Under Decree 23, to engage in import, export and wholesale of goods, FIEs were required to have such activities with specific HS codes of the traded goods recorded in the Investment Registration Certificate, or separately in a sub-license called a Trading License (a.k.a. Business License). Furthermore, Decree 23 regulated that the in-principle approval from the MOIT was a must in case of granting wholesale rights to FIEs. Decree 9 relaxes these requirements. Accordingly, specific HS codes of traded goods are no longer recorded in the Investment Certificate and provided that the FIEs have rights to conduct import, export and wholesale of goods recorded in their Investment Registration Certificates as the enterprises’ business lines, they are entitled to legally do such activities without a Trading License, for any kinds of goods that are not in the list of products/goods prohibited from being imported and distributed in Vietnam. Decree 9 reserves the Trading License requirement for the import and wholesale of oil and lubricants only.

Retail sub-license easier to secure. Under Decree 9, there is a significant change in the procedure for an FIE to obtain a Trading License for retailing. The local DOIT no longer needs to seek consultation from the MOIT as an in-principle approval to grant the license, which will help shorten the timeline for obtaining the license. However, in-principle approval from the MOIT is still needed for retailing rice, sugar, video records, books, newspapers and magazines.

Retail outlet and the “economic needs test” requirement.  Similar to Decree 23, Decree 9 allows FIEs with a Trading License for retailing to set up a first retail outlet; however, to set up subsequent retail outlets, a vaguely defined “economic needs test” (ENT) may be required to prove the viability of the additional outlet. Under Decree 9, FIEs can be exempt from an ENT if the subsequent outlet satisfies the following conditions: (1) it has an area of less than 500 sqm; (2) it is located in a shopping mall; and (3) such retail outlet is not classified as a convenience store or mini supermarket. Decree 9 also provides much clearer criteria for the ENT. These improvements should allow FIEs to more easily set up their own retail outlets for distributing their products to end-users, and make the retail market in Vietnam more welcoming to foreign investment.

Clarification of “related activities.” Decree 23 and the 2005 Commercial Law were unclear as to which business activities were considered “activities directly related to goods trading,” which caused difficulties for both foreign investors/FIEs and licensing authorities in applying the conditions/procedures in practice. To solve this gap, Decree 9 clearly lists out the activities directly related to goods trading, including: (1) commercial assessment services; (2) logistics services; (3) goods leasing services (exclusive of finance leasing); (4) enhancement services (exclusive of advertising); (5) commercial intermediary services; (6) e-commerce services; and (7) goods tender organizing services. A Trading License is required for FIEs to conduct  these activities, except for certain logistics services included in Vietnam’s WTO Commitments in Services. The procedure for obtaining a Trading License in these cases requires an in-principle approval from the MOIT. 

Post-M&A requirements in goods trading. One of the important changes under the 2014 Investment Law is to provide a legal regime for mergers and acquisitions. Before Decree 9, there remained many gaps and inconsistencies in mergers and acquisitions in the goods trading field. In fact, when foreign investors acquired shares in a local trading enterprise to make it an FIE, Decree 23 did not have specific provisions as to what the FIEs had to do to continue trading legally. Decree 9 fills these gaps, providing a clear legal framework for trading FIEs formed via share acquisitions or capital purchases by foreign investors. In particular, Decree 9 introduces a specific procedure for such trading FIEs that have retail outlet(s) to maintain and continue running such retail outlets.

Outlook. The changes in Decree 9 show that Vietnam is still trying to shield local retailers from foreign investors with greater financial capacity and retail experience. However, by minimizing the administrative procedures and broadening opportunities for foreign investors/FIEs to engage in goods trading, Decree 9 also demonstrates the government’s intent to attract foreign investment. With an increase of competition in the Vietnam retail market, Vietnamese consumers may also benefit when more imported products can be sold at an affordable price. However, Decree 9 is still very new, and there are bound to be conflicts among the authorities in terms of understanding and application. It is hoped that the MOIT will issue additional guidance on Decree 9 soon.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 22, 2026
A new decree in Vietnam brings significant implementation clarity to the country’s existing extended producer responsibility (EPR) legal framework. An EPR mechanism was first codified in Vietnam in the 2020 Law on Environmental Protection amid ongoing challenges surrounding the collection and treatment of product and packaging waste. The mechanism was progressively detailed through Decree No. 08/2022/ND‑CP and its successive amendments, but the regulatory framework remained insufficiently developed, notably in terms of support mechanisms for waste collection, recycling, and treatment. The newly launched regulations in Decree No. 110/2026/ND-CP (Decree 110), issued on April 1, 2026, and taking effect on May 25, 2026, stipulate fully and clearly the responsibility of manufacturers and importers to recycle products and packaging and to treat waste. Some key provisions of Decree 110 for manufacturers, importers, and related stakeholders are presented below. Subjects of EPR The Law on Environmental Protection assigns responsibility to manufacturers and importers for product and packaging recycling (under Article 54) or waste collection and treatment (under Article 55), depending on the type of products and packaging they produce or import. Decree 110 elaborates on these EPR provisions by specifying the responsible entities and listing out the types of products and packaging subject to recycling and waste treatment responsibilities. Decree 110 clarifies the responsible entities in special cases, such as when products under the same brand are made by multiple manufacturers, when there is a contract manufacturing or entrusted import relationship, and when the manufacturer or importer is part of a corporate group. Notably, exemptions may be applied in some scenarios, such as for manufacturers and importers of products and packaging exclusively for export, temporary import and re-export, or research and testing purposes, as well as for entities with annual revenue from related products not exceeding VND 30 billion. Recycling Responsibilities Decree 110
Read More
April 15, 2026
On March 31, 2026, Vietnam’s government issued Decree 102/2026/ND-CP (Decree 102), which amends Decree 75/2019/ND-CP on administrative sanctions for competition law violations (Decree 75). Effective from May 20, 2026, the new decree introduces a number of significant changes aimed at strengthening enforcement, revising penalty structures, and broadening the range of remedial measures, primarily for violations related to economic concentration. Revised Penalties for Economic Concentration Violations Decree 102 significantly revises the penalties for violations related to economic concentration. Failure to notify an economic concentration; implementing an economic concentration before clearance Under the new framework, Articles 14 and 15 of Decree 75 have been amended to impose a range of monetary fines, rather than relying solely on percentage‑based penalties as under the previous regime, for violations involving the failure to notify an economic concentration or the implementation of an economic concentration prior to clearance. The fines range from VND 500 million to VND 1 billion for each enterprise participating in a concentration with combined assets, revenues, or purchase value below VND 3,000 billion in the preceding fiscal year, capped at 5% of the violating enterprise’s total turnover in the relevant market. For concentrations meeting or exceeding the VND 3,000 billion threshold across those same metrics, the fines increase to VND 1 billion to VND 2 billion per enterprise, also subject to the 5% cap. These differentiated thresholds allow penalties to better reflect the size of the transaction and its potential competitive impact. Non-compliance with conditional approvals Enterprises that do not implement or only partially implement the conditions specified in a conditional economic concentration approval decision face fines ranging from 1% to 3% of total turnover in the relevant market during the fiscal year preceding the violation. Decree 102 also adds a new remedial measure requiring enterprises to fully implement all conditions
Read More
March 31, 2026
Against the backdrop of Vietnam’s rapid economic and technological transformation and its ambition to build a knowledge-driven economy, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Higher Education No. 125/2025/QH15 on December 10, 2025, The new law took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Higher Education No. 08/2012/QH13 of 2012 and its subsequent amendments after more than a decade of implementation. The new law reflects a significant policy shift toward enhancing the institutional autonomy of higher education institutions (“HEIs”)—universities and other university-level institutions. By granting broader autonomy, Vietnam aims to enable HEIs to operate more proactively, better respond to market needs, and improve the quality and efficiency of education and research activities. Comprehensive Institutional Autonomy in HEIs The new law marks a significant shift by granting HEIs comprehensive autonomy as a statutory right, within the bounds of the licensed scope of educational operation and the legal framework, rather than a conditional right as provided under the former law. Under the new law, HEIs are empowered to exercise autonomy over their academic expertise, training, scientific research, international cooperation, organizational structure, personnel, finance, and other higher education activities. The expansion of institutional autonomy is also accompanied by a correspondingly strengthened framework of institutional accountability. However, Vietnam maintains a certain degree of control and imposes restrictions on institutional autonomy in sensitive and strategically important areas. These controls and restrictions include limitations on training autonomy in the majors of teacher training, national defense, and security; and restrictions on financial and personnel management autonomy for HEIs under the administration of the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Public Security. New Model for Curriculum Development The new law removes the concept of “opening a training major” and focuses regulation on how training programs are developed and delivered. Under the previous regime,
Read More
March 31, 2026
Thailand’s Department of Business Development (DBD) has issued a regulation imposing additional requirements for amending a company’s directors and signatory power to designate a foreign national as an authorized signatory of the company. This measure, effective April 1, 2026, has been introduced in response to the widespread use of Thai nationals as nominees to conduct business on behalf of foreigners, a practice considered to have an adverse impact on the country’s economic stability and security. The new measures are particularly concerned with changes to the authorized signatory structure of companies that originally had only Thai directors authorized to sign for and bind the company. Under the new rules, any amendment that results in a foreign national becoming an authorized signatory—whether solely or jointly—for such a company will be subject to additional verification. Directors signing an application to register such an amendment to the company’s authorized signatory structure are now also required to provide a statement confirming that all shareholders of the company have made genuine contributions and no Thai national has assisted with, supported, or participated in business activities in a nominee capacity. Implications Companies intending to appoint foreign directors as authorized signatories should be aware of the increased regulatory requirements and assessments. Additional documentation and confirmations may be required as part of the registration process.
Read More