You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 26, 2021

New Labor Rules for Foreigners Working in Vietnam

Vietnam has been an attractive destination for foreign workers in recent years. According to the Ministry of Labor, Invalids, and Social Affairs, a state authority managing labor-related matters, 91,200 foreigners worked in Vietnam at the end of July 2019. By March 18, 2020, the number increased to 94,000. Although these numbers are still low if compared with some other ASEAN countries, they show the growing trend of foreigners moving to Vietnam for work and living. Further, as a result of the trade conflict between the U.S. and China and Vietnam’s success during the COVID-19 pandemic, many foreign investors have shifted or intend to move their investments into Vietnam. This rise in investment will bring about a further increase in the number of foreign workers.

In line with the new 2019 Labor Code, which replaced the 2012 Labor Code on January 1, 2021, the government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 152/2020/ND-CP dated December 30, 2020, providing guidance concerning foreigners working in Vietnam (Decree 152). Decree 152 will replace the current applicable regulations on the same matter under Decree No. 11/2016/ND-CP, as amended by Decree No. 140/2018/ND-CP (together, Decree 11), on February 15, 2021.

Foreign investors and expatriates should be aware of the notable new points of Decree 152 below.

Additional Work Permit Exemptions

Generally, a foreigner working in Vietnam is required to obtain a work permit prior to the commencement of work, except in exempted cases. Decree 152 retains substantially the same exemptions stipulated under Decree 11, but adds the following two new categories of foreign employees who are exempt from work permit requirements:

  1. An expatriate who marries a Vietnamese citizen and resides in Vietnam; and
  2. An expatriate who enters Vietnam for the purpose of teaching or research which is permitted by the Ministry of Education and Training.

It is worth noting, however, that even if an expatriate falls under one of the statutory cases of work permit exemption, it does not mean he/she can freely work without satisfying any local procedures. In fact, the expatriate and his/her employer are still legally required to notify the local labor authority of the exemption.

Reduction in Cases Requiring Labor Usage Plan Approval

Before hiring an expatriate to work in Vietnam, an employer is generally required to formulate and submit to the local labor authority, for its approval, a “labor usage plan” explaining the demand for the use of foreign labor. However, under Decree 152, this requirement is exempted for the following cases:

  1. An expatriate who is an owner or member (i.e., shareholder) of a limited liability company whose capital contribution (paid-up share) to the charter capital of the company is VND 3 billion (approximately USD 130,000) or more;
  2. An expatriate who is a member or the chairman of the board of management and also a shareholder of a joint-stock company whose capital contribution to the company’s charter capital is VND 3 billion or more;
  3. An expatriate who is a manager of a representative office, project, or NGO office;
  4. An expatriate who enters Vietnam for a period of less than three months to do marketing for a service;
  5. An expatriate who enters for a period of less than three months to resolve a complicated technical or technological issue which (i) affects or threatens to affect business operations and (ii) cannot be resolved by Vietnamese experts or any other foreign experts currently in Vietnam;
  6. An expatriate who enters Vietnam to hold the position of a manager, executive, expert, or technician for a period of work of less than 30 days per entry and no more than three entries a year;
  7. An expatriate who enters Vietnam to implement an international agreement to which a central or provincial authority is a signatory;
  8. An expatriate who is a student at a foreign school or training institution which has a probation agreement with an agency, organization, or enterprise in Vietnam, or is a probationer or apprentice on a Vietnamese seagoing ship;
  9. An expatriate who is a relative of a member of a foreign representative body authorized to work in Vietnam under an international treaty to which Vietnam is a signatory;
  10. An expatriate who obtains an official passport to work for a regulatory agency, political organization, or socio-political organization; and
  11. An expatriate who takes charge of establishing a commercial presence (i.e., a foreign-invested business entity, representative office, branch of foreign trader in Vietnam, or executive office of a foreign investor in a business cooperation contract).

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Vientiane have contributed the Laos chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Laos chapter was prepared by associates Naiyane Xaechao and Sayphin Singsouvong. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Laos chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Phnom Penh have contributed the Cambodia chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Cambodia chapter was authored by Jay Cohen, partner and director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Phnom Penh office, and Chanvisal Lok, associate. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Cambodia chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 14, 2026
Employers operating in Thailand can enforce post-employment noncompete covenants, but success depends on precise drafting and strong evidentiary support. Thai courts will uphold restraints that protect legitimate employer interests and are fair and reasonable in duration, geographic reach, and substantive scope. Overbroad covenants, however, draw judicial skepticism and may fail unless they are drafted in severable, defensible components tied to the employee’s actual role. This article synthesizes recent trends in Thai case practice, explains how Thai courts assess reasonableness in employment restraints, and provides a practical litigation-focused framework for drafting enforceable covenants, preparing evidence, and pursuing relief through the Labor Court. The Legal Framework and Its Practical Implications Thai courts evaluate noncompete covenants under general principles of contract enforceability and public policy, with particular focus on whether a restraint is necessary to protect a legitimate employer interest and proportionate to that objective. In employment matters, this analysis is shaped by the employee-protective tenor of Thai labor law and by the Labor Court’s equitable discretion in determining appropriate remedies. The practical takeaway is that standardized or broadly drafted covenants rarely survive scrutiny. Courts look for a demonstrable nexus between the employee’s actual exposure to confidential information, trade secrets, or customer relationships and the scope of the restraint. Where that nexus is weak or the restraint operates as a blanket prohibition, courts are inclined to decline enforcement or limit relief to a narrowly tailored prohibition. The employer interests most commonly recognized as legitimate in Thai practice include the protection of trade secrets, confidential business information, and goodwill tied to identifiable customer segments or territories. Courts are more likely to enforce restraints where employers can clearly document what information is at risk, why particular customer relationships matter, and how the employee was involved with those assets. Judges also look closely at the
December 19, 2025
On December 12, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Labor published a ministerial regulation prescribing the minimum and maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions. The regulation, which takes effect on January 1, 2026, sets a flat minimum base wage of THB 1,650 per month and a phased increase of the maximum base wage over the following six years, as outlined in the table below. Impact on Social Security Benefits Not only will monthly contributions increase as a result of the adjustment to the maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions, but the maximum benefits available to insured persons will also be enhanced, as shown in the next table. Employer Obligations From January 1, 2026, employers must correctly withhold wages and remit social security contributions for both the employer’s and employees’ portions in compliance with the revised thresholds. Failure to comply may expose employers to penalties under the Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990). Employers should ensure that payroll systems are updated as necessary to reflect these changes to the wage ceiling used for social security contribution calculations.