You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 23, 2017

New Labor Protection Act to Introduce Changes to Employer Regulations

Informed Counsel

A number of amendments have been introduced to Thailand’s Labor Protection Act (LPA) and are pending royal assent and publication in the Government Gazette. Notable changes include provisions aimed at protecting the benefits of specific groups or categories of employees, reducing requirements on registration of work rules by businesses, and protecting employees by helping them receive statutory severance at retirement. The details of each key change are outlined below.

The Ministry of Labor’s Wage Committee will be empowered with the authority not only to set minimum wages based on types of businesses, specific categories of work, and locations, but also to set minimum wages for specific groups (e.g., student employees, etc.), in order to encourage businesses to hire and to protect specific employees or categories of employees. 

Businesses with 10 or more employees will no longer be required to submit their work rules or amendments to work rules to the Director General of the Department of Labor Protection and Welfare or designee, in order to ease administrative burden. Businesses will still be required to:

  • Announce the implementation of the work rules within 15 days from the date on which the employer has 10 or more employees, or amended work rules;
  • Keep work rules or amendments to the work rules on the premises or at their office at all times; and
  • Openly post work rules or the amendments at the employees’ workplace (the employer may also post the work rules or amendments in electronic format for ease of access and review by employees).

Provisions on retirement have been introduced, with retirement deemed to be termination of employment. Thus, retiring employees will be entitled to receive statutory severance under any of the following conditions:

  • The employer’s work rules set a retirement age of 60 years and the employee reaches 60 years of age; or
  • The employer’s work rules or agreements do not set a retirement age and the employee reaches 60 years of age, would like to retire, and has informed the employer of their intent to retire.

The employer’s work rules or agreements set a retirement age above 60 years of age and the employee reaches 60 years of age, would like to retire, and has informed the employer of their intent to retire.

The new amendments also increase penalties for certain labor offenses, including those related to child labor protection, in an effort to deter exploitation of employees.

Once in force, it is expected that the new LPA will effectively address the following important challenges in the current LPA:

  • The Wage Committee may only set minimum wages based on types of businesses, specific categories of work, and locations, but is not authorized to set a minimum wage for specific groups of employees, thus excluding certain groups from receiving fair minimum wages.
  • Work rules and amendments to work results must be submitted by employers to the Department of Labor Protection and Welfare, creating an administrative burden both for employers submitting documents and for government officers receiving them.
  • There are no provisions on retirement, and retirement terms in the workplace therefore depend on work rules and agreements between employers and employees. In practice, some employers had tried to avoid paying severance by asking employees to voluntarily resign when the employees reached retirement age under the work rules or agreement. Compounding the problem is the fact that some companies have not set a retirement age for employees in their work rules. In other cases, employers applied a retirement age greater than 60 years of age, and when some older employees had physical problems and could not work, they had to resign, or even passed away before reaching retirement age. Under these circumstances, the employees did not receive statutory severance.

The amendments in the new LPA appear to be highly beneficial to both employers and employees. Nonetheless, employers in Thailand may wish to review their existing policies for compliance as the new provisions are likely to take effect in the very near future.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 31, 2026
On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Vocational Education No. 124/2025/QH15, which took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Vocational Education No. 74/2014/QH13 of 2014. The new law broadens the categories of institutions eligible to deliver vocational training, introduces vocational upper secondary schools, and shifts governance structures for private institutions from ownership-representative boards of management to stakeholder-based school councils. These reforms aim to diversify training providers, align programs with labor market needs, and create a more flexible, open vocational education ecosystem, offering expanded opportunities for foreign and domestic investors, universities, and enterprises. Some highlights of the new Law on Vocational Education are presented below. Expansion of Vocational Training Levels and Programs In addition to elementary, intermediate, and college—the three levels of vocational training program set out under the 2014 Law on Vocational Education—the new law expands the structure by introducing two new levels: Vocational high school training programs are placed between elementary and intermediate levels, and are aimed at combining upper secondary education with vocational training, expanding options for learners after graduating from the lower secondary level. Other vocational training programs are not specified in detail under the new law, but aim to equip learners with the capability to perform and handle one or several simple tasks of an occupation. Expansion of Vocational Education Providers The new law reclassifies and extends vocational education providers by classifying them into two distinct categories: Vocational education institutions, which include colleges, intermediate schools, and vocational high schools. Establishments participating in vocational education activities, which include vocational education centers, vocational-continuing education centers, continuing education centers, other centers with vocational education functions, enterprises, cooperatives, and higher education institutions. Vocational education providers may provide one vocational training level only, or several/all levels, depending on the type of provider. The
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins in Vietnam have contributed the Vietnam chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Vietnam chapter was authored by partner Kien Trung Trinh, counsel Sarah Galeski, and associates Dung Thi Phuong Le and Nguyen Thi Huong Nguyen. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Vietnam chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Thailand chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Bangkok have contributed the Thailand chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Thailand chapter was authored by Pimvimol (June) Vipamaneerut, Chusert Supasitthumrong, Dusita Khanijou, and Chomanut Arif. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Thailand chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 16, 2026
Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Yangon has contributed the Myanmar chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Myanmar chapter was prepared by Kyaw Min Tun, an associate in the firm’s Myanmar office. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Myanmar chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.