You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 26, 2016

New e-Payment Service Regulations for SFIs: A Boon for Customer Confidence?

Informed Counsel

In today’s digital economy, financial technology (FinTech) is a major economic driving force. FinTech has transformed the private sector, resulting in a drastic shift in the way customers use financial services. Financial institutions, in particular, have taken significant strides to implement innovative platforms to facilitate financial transactions and payment methods for goods and services. As electronic services become more sophisticated and prevalent, however, greater regulatory scrutiny needs to be paid to the industry in order to protect end-users and prevent damage to the country’s economy.

Background

Commercial banks are veterans in the e-Payment service market. They are governed by the Royal Decree Regulating Electronic Payment Services B.E. 2551 (2008); relevant Notifications of the Electronic Transaction Commission (ETC); and applicable Notifications of the Bank of Thailand (BOT), which also closely monitors their business activities.

Specialized Financial Institutions (SFIs), which were established by the government to provide financial services to various sectors that are not sufficiently served by commercial banks, are also engaged in the e-Payment service market. Thailand’s regulatory authorities determined that the laws and regulations surrounding SFIs and their engagement in e-Payment service businesses were insufficient, and further regulations were needed.

The Royal Decree on e-Payment Services

On March 30, 2016, the government promulgated the Royal Decree Governing the Control and Supervision of Electronic Payment Service Businesses of Specialized Financial Institutions B.E. 2559 (2016). It took effect on July 28.

As with commercial banks, the Royal Decree of 2016 designates the BOT to control and supervise the e-Payment service businesses of the following SFIs: Government Savings Bank, Bank for Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives, Government Housing Bank, Islamic Bank of Thailand, Export-Import Bank of Thailand, Small and Medium Enterprise Development Bank of Thailand, Thai Credit Guarantee Corporation, and Secondary Mortgage Corporation.

The Royal Decree aims to standardize supervisory provisions and measures enforced on both private and state service providers. This should help ensure financial and commercial stability, prevent damage caused to the public, and build trust and credibility in the e-Payment system among the public.

In terms of substantive provisions, the Royal Decree categorizes e-Payment service business into three lists, which resemble the categories for commercial banks in the Royal Decree Regulating Electronic Payment Services B.E. 2551 (2008), as follows:

  • List A: e-Money services used for purchasing specific goods or services as specified in advance from an entrepreneur, excluding e-Money services used only for customers’ convenience without the procurement of any profit from issuing the card, as prescribed by the BOT with the approval of the ETC. These services require notification before business operations commence.
  • List B: Credit card network services, electronic draft capture services, transaction switching services for payments in one system, and e-Money services used for purchasing specific goods or services as specified in advance at a place which uses the same system for distributing and providing these goods or services. These services require registration before business operations commence.
  • List C: Clearing services, settlement services, e-Payment services through any devices or networks, transaction switching services for payment through several systems, payment service provider services, and e-Money services used for purchasing specific goods or services as specified in advance in which the place where the services were used was not limited and the system for distributing or providing the services is not the same. These services require a license before business operations commence. The license lasts for ten years.

The Royal Decree also empowers the ETC to set methods and service conditions on: (1) custody and disclosure of customers’ personal information; (2) examining and maintaining system security for consistent reliability; (3) express prescribing of any service fees; (4) receiving and the process to ratify customers’ complaints or disputes; and (5) accounting and reporting, among others.

In addition, depending on the type of business, the BOT may prescribe additional rules on: (1) issuing evidence for payment; (2) keeping money which will be sent; (3) prescribing the finality of transferred money which may be unconditionally and promptly utilized by the beneficiary; and (4) arranging an independent auditor for security.

Any service providers in List A and List B that fail to comply with these rules will be subject to an administrative fine and/or an order of the ETC to take appropriate corrective action. Any service providers in List C that fail to comply with these rules can be subject to corrective measures, suspension, or license revocation.

Implementation

Even though the Royal Decree came into force on July 28, its transitional provisions allow SFIs which have operated an e-Payment service business prior to this date to continue their operation until November 24, 2016. The SFIs that want to continue their business need to notify, register, or apply for a license in accordance with this Royal Decree from August 26 to September 25, 2016.

If the Royal Decree is effectively enforced, and both the BOT and the ETC undertake their supervisory authority properly, information technology systems and electronic platforms will be much safer for customers who interact with these SFIs. Improved security and protection will lead to greater credibility with customers, and this will entice considerably more people to use e-Payment services.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 4, 2025
On July 3, 2025, the Trade Competition Commission of Thailand (TCCT) officially announced an invitation for stakeholders to participate in a public survey to gather feedback on the flexibility and appropriateness of credit terms across different business sectors for goods and services. The TCCT initially introduced guidelines on unfair trade practices related to credit terms applicable to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in 2021, with amendments following in 2022. The guidelines have had a wide impact, as businesses have had to adapt their payment procedures and practices, particularly those for dealing with SMEs, to comply with the guidelines. The TCCT is now seeking comprehensive feedback from businesses and other stakeholders to evaluate the effectiveness and practicality of these guidelines. The collected responses may potentially lead to future amendments aimed at enhancing fairness and efficiency in business transactions. To summarize the core principles, the guidelines aim to improve the liquidity and cash flow of SMEs, stipulating payment terms of: Within 30 days for agricultural products or primary agricultural processing involving non-complex production. Within 45 days for trade, manufacturing, and service sectors. The guidelines also identify practices deemed unfair, including: Unjustified delays in payment beyond agreed credit terms. Changes to credit terms or contractual conditions without at least 60 days’ advance notice. Other unfair conduct or credit term conditions that impose excessive burdens on an SME. Interested stakeholders are encouraged to submit their feedback through the TCCT’s online survey form available via their official public media channels. The survey is open for responses until July 20, 2025.
July 2, 2025
On June 27, 2025, Vietnam’s National Assembly adopted a Resolution on International Financial Centers in Vietnam (“IFC Resolution”), which is set to take effect September 1, 2025, putting forward major policy breakthroughs on multiple fronts. The IFC Resolution has the goal of turning Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang into leading international financial centers with autonomy and tools to compete, thereby raising Vietnam’s position in the global financial network, in association with economic growth drivers. Below are some of the key points of the IFC Resolution, which has notable changes from previous drafts (see our articles on Vietnam’s Draft Resolution on Financial Centers: Implications for Fintech and Banking and Vietnam’s Emerging Regulatory Landscape for Blockchain and Cryptocurrency), including: The removal of the Central Supervisory Agency. The addition of a definition of international financial centers, which are specific geographic areas in Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang with members entitled to special policies. The addition of a list of entities eligible for membership, and entitlement to the special policies. Major Policy Breakthroughs The IFC Resolution introduces specific policies in the following areas: Liberalization of foreign exchange control for members, including policies such as open foreign exchange use between members and exemption from foreign exchange control procedures for 100% foreign-owned members. Specialized licensing for members to establish and operate single-member limited liability banks and foreign bank branches with the ability to apply accounting standards, debt classification, risk provisions, and prudential ratios according to the owner’s policies. Creation of a capital market for innovative startups, including a crowdfunding mechanism or private placement mechanism through a licensed platform, and development of a green finance market with green certification. Creation of a regulatory sandbox for fintech technologies, products, services, and business models not yet prescribed by law, offering exemption from compliance with
June 30, 2025
On April 29, 2025, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Circular No. 03/2025/TT-NHNN (Circular 03), which provides detailed guidance on the opening and use of Vietnamese dong (VND) accounts by non-resident foreign investors engaging in indirect investment activities in Vietnam. Circular 03, which took effect on June 16, 2025, amends Circular No. 06/2019/TT-NHNN of the SBV on the management of foreign exchange for foreign direct investment activities in Vietnam (Circular 06) and replaces Circular No. 05/2014/TT-NHNN of the SBV guiding the opening and use of indirect investment capital accounts for implementation of foreign indirect investment activities in Vietnam (Circular 05). Below are some of the key points of Circular 03. Change of Account Name Circular 03 renames “indirect investment capital account” to “indirect investment account” (IIA). This change aligns with the terminology used in other legislation, ensuring consistency across Vietnam’s legal framework governing foreign exchange and investment activities. Additionally, by removing the word “capital,” the new term better encompasses the full range of transactions that may be conducted through these accounts, such as share transfer and other forms of indirect investment-related activities. This helps prevent misinterpretation and facilitates compliance for foreign investors operating in Vietnam. Account Types Circular 03 clearly delineates account types and investor residency status as follows: For non-resident foreign investors: The opening and use of investment accounts in VND is for carrying out transactions related to indirect investment activities. For resident foreign investors: Credit and debit transactions are made through payment accounts in VND in accordance with relevant laws. Additional Permitted Uses of IIAs In addition to the cash inflows and outflows authorized under Circular 05, Circular 03 introduces more cash transactions that can be conducted via IIAs. These include: Receiving interest and other legal income when conducting stock purchase transactions that do not require
June 27, 2025
Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed the Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to Taking and Enforcing Collateral Security and Guarantees in Southeast Asia, a comparative guide developed by Drew Network Asia (DNA). The publication examines the legal frameworks governing collateral security and guarantees across seven Southeast Asian jurisdictions and is intended to assist financial institutions, corporate borrowers, and cross-border investors in evaluating secured lending options in the region. The guide provides a practical overview of key issues relevant to taking and enforcing security interests—covering, among other topics, the types of assets that may be secured, the formalities and registration requirements for creating security, and the rights and procedures available in enforcement scenarios. Each chapter follows a consistent question-and-answer format to allow readers to compare approaches across jurisdictions easily. While the guide offers a high-level survey of the region’s collateral and guarantee regimes, it also notes that country-specific developments and transaction-specific considerations may affect the applicable requirements. Readers seeking detailed advice are encouraged to consult the lawyers listed at the end of each jurisdictional chapter. The full guide is available for download using the button below or directly from the DNA website.