You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 8, 2025

New Draft Regulatory Framework for Food Product Declaration and Registration in Vietnam

Subscribe to Updates

In response to persistent challenges in food safety management and recent high-profile incidents involving counterfeit supplemented foods, infant formula, and health supplements, the Ministry of Health of Vietnam is initiating comprehensive regulatory reforms. These reforms include proposed amendments to the Law on Food Safety and its implementing Decree No. 15/2018/ND-CP (Decree 15), introducing significant changes to the registration procedures for food products, especially supplemented food products and health supplements.

While awaiting public consultation and approval of the amended Law on Food Safety, the Ministry of Health is developing an interim mechanism, which includes a draft decree to replace Decree 15 and a draft resolution to address urgent issues until the amended law becomes effective, expected in July 2026.

To align with the new Law on Quality of Products and Goods, the draft resolution stipulates that the declaration and registration of food products will follow the following procedures:

  • Declaration of applied standards for food products, which is currently known as the “self-declaration” procedure, applies to processed packaged foods, food additives, food processing aids, containers or utensils that come into direct contact with food, packaging materials in direct contact with food, and micronutrients.
  • Granting of circulation numbers, which is the current “registration of product declaration” procedure, applies to specific categories of food including health supplements, medical nutrition foods, special dietary foods, nutritional products for children up to 36 months, and, especially, supplemented foods, which are currently subject to self-declaration but will be shifted to this registration procedure.

In addition, the following new procedure is introduced in the draft decree:

  • Registration of declaration of conformity, which applies to the same product category as in “declaration of applied standards” above, but is for products that are already subject to technical regulations covering both safety indicators and quality indicators.

Changes to the Food Product Declaration and Registration Procedures

Details of the procedures for declaration of applied standards and granting of circulation numbers are stipulated in the draft resolution, while details of the procedure for registration of declaration of conformity are stipulated in the draft decree. These procedures will see some key changes compared to the current regulations, as highlighted below:

  • Letter of authorization: A letter of authorization (LOA) from the manufacturer or product owner to the entity conducting the declaration of applied standard or registration is a new requirement applicable to both procedures. Information that must be included in the LOA is detailed in the draft resolution.
  • Quality criteria: It is newly required to test quality criteria in a Certificate of Analysis (COA), in addition to safety criteria, for both procedures. The COA will need to follow the format set out in the draft resolution.
  • Declaration of conformity with internal standards: In addition to the declaration of compliance with food safety requirements, both product declaration and registration procedures have a new requirement that the declaring or registering entity must confirm that the product complies with its internal standards. This conformity is substantiated by submitting the in-house specification along with a dossier detailing the development of the specification.
  • Timeline for declaration of applied standards: The draft resolution introduces a defined principal evaluation timeline of 21 days from the date of submission—an element not specified under current regulations. It also clarifies that entities may begin manufacturing and trading declared products once the declaration, including the entity name and product name, is published on the authority’s official website.
  • Required documents: The required documents applicable to products subject to the registration of product declaration procedure are much more stringent than in current practice. The registration dossier will cover two parts: (i) administrative and (ii) technical. More technical documents will be required for the technical part, such as a manufacturer’s certificate (GMP, HACCP, etc.), report on product research and development process, documentation on quality and safety standards, documentation of manufacturing process, long-term stability report, and other technical explanation (if necessary).
  • Timeline for registration of product declaration: The estimated principal approval timeline is specifically set as 90 days from the date of submission. Compared to the current regulation, the timeline for submitting a supplemental dossier will be reduced from 90 working days to 60 working days from the date of receiving an official notice of deficiency. Notably, instead of an unlimited number of revisions, the draft resolution only permits a one-time revision.
  • Exclusion of certain products from the registration of product declaration procedure: Certain food additives—including blended food additives with new functions, those not on the Ministry of Health’s permitted list, or those used for incorrect purposes—are no longer subject to the registration of product declaration procedure under the draft resolution. Neither the draft resolution nor the draft decree specify how these products should be registered, suggesting that future regulations on food additive management may address this gap.

Suspension of Product Declaration Registration

The draft resolution introduces a new provision allowing competent authorities to temporarily suspend the receipt and processing of product declaration dossiers from entities who have violated food safety regulations. Processing will resume once the violations are fully remedied and a compliance report is submitted.

Transitional Provision

Under the draft decree, for food products that are registered or self-declared before the effective date of the decree, product owners must complete the procedures for re-registering or re-declaring product standards in accordance with the draft resolution (after it is enacted), within the following timeframes:

  • 18 months from the effective date of the decree for products that already have a Certificate of Receipt for Product Declaration.
  • 6 months from the effective date of the decree for products that are self-declared.

After these deadlines, any previous product declaration documents or certificates will no longer be valid for production or importation. However, products with a certificate that were produced within 18 months of the decree’s effective date and products that were self-declared and produced within 6 months of the decree’s effective date may continue to be circulated until their expiration date, and the product owner remains fully responsible for those products.

The draft decree does not specify a transitional period for the supplemented food products that will be shifted from the self-declaration procedure to the registration of product declaration procedure.

The draft resolution and draft decree will be discussed and approved under the fast-track procedure. However, no expected effective date has been provided. It remains possible that further revisions to the draft decree may be introduced.

Impact for Businesses and Next Steps

Businesses will be required to prepare additional documentation for declaration and registration processes to comply with the new regulations once they are enacted. Stricter documentation will be required for products subject to registration of declaration procedure, especially for supplemented foods, which are shifted from self-declaration procedure to registration of product declaration procedure.

Businesses should review their product portfolios to determine applicable registration pathways, develop plans to update the declaration and registration dossiers, and monitor for further amendment, official issuance, and implementation guidance.

Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 4, 2022
Cosmetics have become an essential feature of the modern lifestyle led by many consumers in Cambodia. Every day, a wide range of new cosmetic brands, variants, and formats enter the Cambodian market, catering to a growing consumer base. The market generally relies on the import of foreign cosmetic brands, making Cambodia an attractive market for overseas cosmetics companies, but local brands are on the rise as well. Alongside the significant growth of the cosmetics market in Cambodia, and the Royal Government’s continuing push to increase consumer protection in Cambodia, in 2022, the Ministry of Commerce (MOC) issued Prakas No. 0064 on the Requirements for Cosmetic Distribution (the Prakas). The Prakas applies to both locally manufactured and imported cosmetics, and both individual and businesses that trade in cosmetics. The Prakas aims to regulate cosmetics and cosmetic business activities, to ensure that cosmetics distributed in Cambodia are of good quality and safe for use.  The key points contained in the Prakas are summarized below. Legal Obligations for Trading Cosmetics Any person trading in cosmetics, including wholesale or retail, and those that offer cosmetics as gifts or for testing, must ensure that the products are safe and meet the legal labelling requirements. Anyone trading cosmetics must respect the Law on Consumer Protection, with the Prakas highlighting key aspects of that law and referring to the applicable penalties under that law. Online sellers of cosmetics must obtain an additional approval letter (for individuals) or a license (for legal entities) to operate an online business, issued by the MOC. In addition, they require a certificate for providing online services from the Ministry of Post and Telecommunications. Interestingly, the Prakas does not refer to the cosmetic business licensing required under regulations issued by the Ministry of Health. As the Prakas does not outright contradict these
Read More
July 20, 2022
What does “digital health” include within each jurisdiction? Thailand: For the most part, the idea of “digital health” or “telemedicine” has generally fallen within the area of medical device regulation in Thailand. The normal sort of digital health components you would think of—like software and device accessories for diagnosis, monitoring, prevention, or treatment of illnesses—would fall into medical device classification, so long as they do not achieve their intended function by immunological, metabolic, or pharmacological means. The “digital health” devices you commonly think of, like mobile medical apps, wearable technologies and software, fall mainly within this definition. After the last update to the Medical Device Act in 2008, Thailand next looked at digital health in 2019, with the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA)—which is largely aligned with GDPR principles—and the Cybersecurity Act. These deal with important issues arising from “digital health” and “telemedicine” like personal data protection, consent to use and consent to transfer data, and privacy. Vietnam: Similarly, in Vietnam, while there’s not a clear definition of “digital health” in the law, it is understood to include various types of medical devices, software, and online services used for healthcare purposes—including diagnosis and treatment as well as medical records and telemedicine. There’s no law on digital health, per se, but many of these areas are covered by separate circulars issued by the Ministry of Health. There’s a circular (referred to as “Circular 49”) from late 2017 on telemedicine, for example, that actually uses the term “telemedicine” to identify the industry and sets out licensing and technical requirements. Indicators such as this show that Vietnam is definitely embracing the concept. Indonesia: In Indonesia, there is also no precise definition of “digital health.” Digital health is regulated under several laws and regulations, such as provisions concerning medical devices under the health
Read More
July 6, 2022
Patent is an essential piece of the amended Law on Intellectual Property (“Amended IP Law”), which was passed by the National Assembly of Vietnam on June 16, 2022, and will take effect on January 1, 2023 (except for the regulation on protection of experimental data for agrochemical products, which will take delayed effect on January 14, 2024). Among the amended and supplemented contents of the Amended IP Law, there are notable patent-related amendments to Article 60 on assessing the novelty of inventions and Article 96 on grounds for invalidating patent protection titles. We discuss these changes below. Secret Prior Art Under Article 60.1 A significant amendment to Clause 1, Article 60 of the Amended IP Law on the novelty of inventions is to broaden the scope under which an invention can be considered to have lost its novelty. For the first time in Vietnam, “secret prior art” –a patent application with an earlier filing date or priority date but published on or after the filing date or priority date of an examined patent application – is introduced as a prior art document. In the diagram above, at the time of filing of the A2 application, secret prior art A1 has been filed but not yet published, making it inaccessible to the public. At this point, only the A1 applicant and the IP Office are aware of the A1 application. Under the current provisions of the 2005 IP Law, as amended in 2009 and 2019, the A1 patent application is not eligible to be a prior art document when assessing the novelty of A2. However, based on the “first-to-file principle” and the principle of priority, the IP Office has still had other approaches to bar the patentability of an A2 patent application if there is such an A1 application. By
Read More
June 13, 2022
Thailand’s cannabis cultivation licensing scheme for the country’s transition toward legalization of the plant has now come to an end. The Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) announced in the Government Gazette that from June 9, 2022, “only cannabis extract with tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) of more than 0.2% by weight will be considered a narcotic.” This means that now anyone can grow, sell, or purchase cannabis seeds, plants, and inflorescence freely in Thailand, and licenses for the cultivation, possession, and distribution of cannabis are no longer required. Neither the number of cannabis plants nor the place of cultivation is restricted. It is thus the beginning of a new chapter for cannabis cultivation in Thailand, with many opining that now is a good time to enter this exciting and growing industry. The journey to this point began in 2019, when Thailand amended its laws on cannabis to allow for treatment for medical purposes, with one of the prerequisite conditions being that the cannabis must be grown in Thailand. The law was further amended to promote commercialization of the cannabis industry, allowing for cannabis to be added to food and beverages, cosmetics, and herbal products. In addition, three traditional cannabis-based formulas were listed in the universal healthcare coverage scheme, which means that almost all Thais have access to traditional cannabis recipes without cost. The successful launch of medical cannabis and its applications, and its viability as an economic industry, have become a national agenda and priority policy of the MOPH. In order to achieve the above outcomes, several legal frameworks and guidelines throughout the product’s lifecycle have been developed. For example, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has so far granted licenses to cultivate cannabis (also known as a license to manufacture a narcotic) on more than 1,977 acres (around 800 hectares).
Read More