You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 28, 2025

New Developments in Vietnam’s Casino Policies for Local Gamblers

Subscribe to Updates

On November 26, 2025, the government of Vietnam issued Resolution No. 8/2025/NQ-CP to extend and expand the pilot program allowing Vietnamese citizens who meet certain conditions to gamble at three integrated casino resorts in Vietnam:

  • Corona Resorts & Casino Phu Quoc (An Giang Province) – Effective immediately, and continuing an ongoing pilot program that started in 2019.
  • The Grand Casino Ho Tram (Ho Chi Minh City) – New pilot program for five years starting November 26, 2025.
  • Van Don Integrated Casino & Tourism Complex (Quang Ninh Province) – New pilot program for five years from the date the casino receives its license.

The pilot program was originally established under Decree No. 03/2017/ND-CP on casino business, which also sets out the specific eligibility conditions for Vietnamese citizens. After the pilot period, these projects must stop allowing Vietnamese players until the government issues further decisions.

This expansion of the pilot program comes after Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance (MOF) released a draft decree earlier this year proposing significant changes to the regulatory framework governing casino operations. These revisions, which focus on increasing fiscal contributions from local players and strengthening compliance obligations for casino operators nationwide, are detailed below.

Proposed Increase in Casino Entry Fees for Vietnamese Players

The draft decree increases the entry fees applicable to Vietnamese citizens permitted to play at casinos. Under the current regulations, Vietnamese players are required to pay an entry fee of VND 1 million (approx. USD 38) for 24 consecutive hours or VND 25 million (approx. USD 950) per month. The draft decree proposes increasing these fees to VND 2.5 million (approx. USD 95) for 24 consecutive hours and VND 50 million (approx. USD 1,900) per month, effectively doubling the existing amounts and marking the first major fee revision since the pilot program allowing Vietnamese players was introduced in 2017.

According to the government’s explanatory report, one of the purposes of this increase is to serve as a simplified mechanism for assessing players’ financial capacity, replacing the previously burdensome income-verification process and aligning with international practices. All revenue generated from these entry fees must be remitted to the provincial budget and will be allocated primarily to education, vocational training, healthcare, and other public welfare programs, with at least 60% designated for these priority sectors.

Strengthened Management and Compliance Requirements for Casino Operators

The draft decree also tightens the operational and compliance framework for casinos. Casino operators will be required to maintain customer identification records, entry logs, and transaction information for a minimum of five years to support any potential inspection or enforcement actions.

Casinos must also operate a continuous 24/7 surveillance system covering all critical areas and retain security footage for at least 180 days, with longer periods required if requested by authorities. Notably, operators must also implement backup storage measures to ensure uninterrupted retention of surveillance footage for the required period, even in cases of equipment failure.

Outlook

The draft decree, if adopted, will establish a more stringent regulatory environment for casino operators while providing clearer guidance for future investments in integrated resort developments, continuing Vietnam’s cautious and controlled liberalization of casino access for locals. Existing operators and prospective investors should begin reviewing their compliance systems, internal controls, and development plans to prepare for the forthcoming regulatory changes.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Real Estate

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 6, 2026
Thailand is developing new legislation on responsible business conduct that would impose statutory obligations on large enterprises to manage human rights and environmental risks throughout their operations and supply chains. The Draft Act on the Promotion of Responsible Business Conduct, commonly referred to as the Human Rights and Environmental Due Diligence (HRDD) Bill, has been developed through extensive consultation involving a wide range of stakeholders, with the Ministry of Justice playing a leading role. If enacted, the HRDD bill would reshape how certain large businesses operate and manage their supply chains, reflecting a recognition of international standards and global concerns regarding human rights and environmental protection. By introducing legally binding due diligence obligations, the draft aims to ensure that businesses operating in Thailand are held accountable for adverse impacts throughout their operations and supply chains, in line with emerging global legal frameworks. Who Will Have to Comply? The HRDD bill primarily targets large enterprises based on their annual revenue thresholds: Manufacturing businesses with annual revenue exceeding THB 500 million Wholesale, retail, or service businesses with annual revenue exceeding THB 300 million The draft would also cover state-owned enterprises and foreign businesses operating in Thailand if their operations meet the applicable revenue thresholds. What Does Human Rights and Environmental Due Diligence Involve? Under the HRDD bill, due diligence is not a one-time checklist but an ongoing process with several key requirements: Adopt and publicly disclose a sustainability policy. Businesses must commit publicly to respecting human rights and protecting the environment, and must integrate this policy into corporate governance and risk management systems. Identify and assess risks. Companies must identify and assess risks of human rights violations and environmental harm across their operations and value chains. Prevent or reduce risks. Businesses must implement effective and proportionate measures to prevent or mitigate
Read More
December 30, 2025
On December 17, 2025, Laos’ Ministry of Industry and Commerce (MOIC) issued a notice introducing a new digital system that allows e-commerce businesses to obtain required certificates and licenses through an online, application-based platform. Notice No. 3988, which will take effect on February 1, 2026, introduces the E-Trust platform, a downloadable application that allows e-commerce businesses to remotely obtain acknowledgement certificates and business operating licenses. New Digital Registration Options Under the previous framework established by the Decree on E-commerce (2021), businesses were required to complete registration exclusively through paper-based submissions. The new system now offers businesses two registration options: Traditional paper-based process at the Division of E-commerce Management within the MOIC; or Electronic registration and renewal through the E-Trust platform. This change is expected to streamline procedures, reduce administrative burdens, and enhance accessibility for businesses operating outside Vientiane. The E-Trust platform facilitates compliance for both individuals and legal entities required to submit applications and renewals for required certificates and licenses. The development is particularly beneficial for businesses located in remote provinces, as it eliminates the need for physical travel and significantly accelerates processing times. Compliance Requirements and Penalties Businesses must obtain or renew the required certificates and licenses to avoid sanctions under the Decision on Fines and Other Measures for Violation of the Decree and Regulations on E-commerce (No. 2828/MOIC, dated November 11, 2025). Penalties for noncompliance may include monetary fines and other enforcement measures.
Read More
December 25, 2025
On December 11, 2025, Vietnam’s National Assembly issued Resolution No. 254/2025/QH15 (Resolution No. 254) to address practical difficulties encountered in implementing the Law on Land 2024. The resolution provides specific mechanisms and policies to resolve issues related to land allocation, land leasing, and conversion of land-use purposes, while also addressing land valuation principles, timing of information collection, and land valuation methods. The resolution takes effect on January 1, 2026. Key provisions affecting investors are discussed below. Land Use Terms for Transferred Investment Projects The National Assembly has addressed situations where the remaining term of a transferred investment project is insufficient for the transferee’s business or financial plans. Resolution No. 254, along with the Law on Investment 2025, introduces aligned regulatory solutions. Under the Law on Investment 2025 (4th version submitted to the National Assembly for promulgation), if an investment project implemented prior to March 1, 2026, has been transferred and the transferor holds a Land Use Rights Certificate, has fulfilled all land-related financial obligations, and is not subject to termination, the competent authority may determine a new operating term if the remaining operating term does not meet the transferee investor’s financial or business plan. This adjustment occurs when approving or adjusting the investment policy or issuing or amending the investment registration certificate. The revised operating term is calculated from the date of the approval or issuance and must not exceed the statutory maximum of 70 years for projects in economic zones and 50 years for projects outside economic zones. Resolution No. 254 also permits adjustment of the land use term for transferred investment projects involving land, provided that the transferee investor pays additional land rent in accordance with applicable law, thereby ensuring consistency with the Law on Investment 2025. Land Rent Payment Options Resolution No. 254 generally expands the
Read More
December 19, 2025
Prior to the dissolution of the House of Representatives, Thailand’s cabinet approved a draft amendment to the Administrative Procedure Act, following review by the Council of State. If enacted, this reform will fundamentally change how state agencies process business applications and appeals by imposing enforceable timelines and legal consequences for inaction. The draft directly targets a longstanding commercial frustration: applications and appeals that vanish into administrative silence, stalling investment and foreclosing judicial review across sectors ranging from real estate and manufacturing to healthcare and finance. The “Silence Means Yes” Rule for Applications At the core of the reform is a new automatic “approval by implication” for applications subject to statutory processing deadlines. If an official fails to notify an applicant of a decision within the legally prescribed period, the application will be deemed approved as a matter of law. This presumption shifts the costs of delay from businesses to the bureaucracy and gives applicants a definitive legal position once time expires. The mechanism applies to routine licensing and registration matters governed by explicit consideration periods in existing statutes or ministerial regulations. Officials may extend the decision period by up to thirty days, but only if they notify the applicant before the original deadline and substantiate that the delay arises from genuinely exceptional circumstances beyond their control. Certain sensitive applications are expressly excluded from automatic approval, including those that may significantly affect national security or defense, public safety and health, the environment or natural resources, or national cultural heritage. Once the deadline passes without a decision, businesses can proceed with deployment of capital and operations—construction, hiring, procurement, and market entry—without waiting for formal permission that may never arrive. For time-sensitive projects, this materially reduces regulatory timing risk. The “Deemed Rejection” Rule for Appeals The draft introduces a parallel “deemed rejection”
Read More