You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 28, 2017

New Decree Could Drastically Affect Auto Business in Vietnam

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

On October 17, 2017, the government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 116/2017/ND-CP setting out the conditions for the manufacture, assembly, importation, and offering of warranty and maintenance services of automobiles (Decree 116). In light of the new decree, which took immediate effect, companies operating in the automotive industry in Vietnam may find it necessary to comply with strict new regulations in order to carry out their business in the country.

Automobile Importation

Decree 116 is particularly strict on auto importers. The decree states that only companies – not individuals – will be considered for the issuance of a business license for automobile importation. These companies also must have facilities for automobile warranty and maintenance either under their ownership, under a lease contract, or belonging to their authorized dealerships.

Notably, Decree 116 also puts forward a stringent requirement for auto importers to obtain documents certifying or documenting that they are authorized to act on behalf of the foreign automobile manufacturers and assemblers to recall imported cars in Vietnam. This extreme clause may spell an end to small-scale auto importers in Vietnam, as the probability that international car manufacturers will agree to allow an unofficial dealer to conduct any recall of their products is minimal. This is especially true in the cases of international car manufacturers which already have official dealerships in Vietnam such as Audi, BMW, and Toyota.

Although this new regulation will likely lead to a decrease in the number of companies eligible for entry into the automobile importation market, such reduction could benefit consumers in the sense that companies with weak potential and lack of experience will be excluded from the market. Also, even strong, experienced importers will have to seek partnerships with famous and well-established foreign automobile manufacturers instead of less reputable and trustworthy partners.

Another important issue of Decree 116 is the tightening of regulations on imports of used cars. Any used cars imported into Vietnam must be registered for circulation in countries with equivalent or higher emissions standards than those currently in force in Vietnam. In addition, when conducting inspection procedures for used vehicles with quality management agencies, the importers must be able to provide valid circulation registration certificates up to the date of export granted by a competent foreign agency, or papers of equivalent legal validity. Used cars are required to have a warranty period of at least two years or 50,000 km for small cars, and at least one year or 20,000 km for other types of cars.

These regulations make doing business in automobile importation more difficult, especially for old/used cars. Many used-car dealers are complaining that the new policy will make their business unprofitable and force them to close down. On the bright side, this move will undoubtedly reduce the importation of secondhand cars of uncertain provenance, which should have a corresponding positive impact on the environment and give the domestic automobile industry more opportunity to develop.

Auto Manufacturing and Assembly

Decree 116 also tightens regulations related to domestic auto manufacturers and assemblers. Pursuant to Article 7 of the decree, companies carrying out automobile manufacturing and assembly business in Vietnam are required to meet a wide range of requirements on facilities such as workshops, production lines, warranty facilities, fire safety, environmental safety, etc. Particularly, with regard to personnel, the technicians in charge of the manufacturing and assembly lines must have a university degree or higher and must have at least five years of experience in automobile assembly and manufacturing. Obviously, though burdensome for the manufacturers and assemblers, these strict regulations will benefit consumers by limiting the number of inexperienced companies that may participate in the market.                  

Auto manufacturers and assemblers (as well as importers) are also obliged to collect and dispose of all scrap cars. Though it is not clear how this regulation will be enforced, it should help increase the environmental responsibility of companies in the automotive industry and at the same time benefit the living environment of the people.

Warranty and Maintenance Requirements

According to Decree 116, companies seeking a license  to provide warranty and maintenance services for automobiles must meet conditions on workshops, premises, work areas, tools and equipment, human resources and quality management systems, occupational safety and health, fire prevention and firefighting, as well as records on environmental protection. In addition, these companies must also commit to providing technical support and supply of parts and accessories for the warranty and maintenance of automobiles of either domestic or foreign auto manufacturers and assemblers.

The Vietnam Automobile Registry under the Ministry  of Transport of Vietnam (the Inspection Agency) is the agency competent to grant certificates of automobile warranty and maintenance.

Conclusion

The strict regulations introduced under Decree 116 are likely to close the door for small-scale auto importers in Vietnam. Also, under the regulations from the new decree, the importation of autos in general will be much more costly and time-consuming. As such, Vietnamese consumers should not expect to own cheap imported cars anytime soon. In light of Decree 116, however, Vietnam’s automobile market will soon be clear of weak and inexperienced players and be more organized with official dealerships.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 9, 2026
On April 28, 2026, the Central Bank of Myanmar (CBM) issued Notification No. 18/2026 introducing the new Foreign Remittance Business Regulations. The new regulations apply to companies intending to operate foreign remittance businesses in Myanmar that are not licensed banks, non-bank financial institutions, or other financial institutions. The regulations supersede and replace the previous regulatory framework governing foreign remittance businesses under CBM Notification No. 21/2019. While the overall structure remains familiar, the new regulations introduce more detailed requirements for licensing, operations, reporting, and compliance, with a stronger focus on transparency and regulatory oversight. Broader Licensing Requirements Under the new regulations, applicants must submit detailed business plans describing the use of information technology and mobile platforms, along with clear plans for handling remittances from workers abroad and resolving customer complaints. Financial Thresholds and Reporting Requirements The baseline financial thresholds remain unchanged. Licensees must maintain a security deposit of MMK 100 million in an escrow account, along with a separate revolving fund dedicated solely to remittance operations. The new regulations introduce more structured reporting obligations. Licensees are now required to submit daily remittance transaction data by the next business day before noon, in addition to monthly and periodic reporting requirements. Foreign bank account statements must also be submitted regularly, and licensees must provide updates on business operations every six months. Strengthened AML and CFT Framework The new regulations place a greater emphasis on anti-money laundering (AML) and counter financing of terrorism (CFT), with tighter controls over management changes. Any changes in shareholding, share transfers, or the appointment of key management personnel such as the managing director require prior approval from the CBM. Licensing Fees and Validity The new regulations increase licensing costs, while maintaining the same validity period of three years. The new regulations provide more detailed grounds for suspension and
Read More
June 4, 2026
On May 19, 2026, the Cabinet of the Royal Thai Government approved, in principle, revisions to Thailand’s visa exemption scheme and visa on arrival (VOA) program, as proposed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Tourism and Sports. The revisions represent a tightening of Thailand’s immigration framework and will affect a broad range of short-term visitors. Background On July 15, 2024, Thailand expanded its visa exemption scheme by increasing the permitted period of visa-exempt stay from 30 days to 60 days in order to promote tourism, support the country’s post-pandemic economic recovery, and facilitate international travel. Under this revised scheme, passport holders from 93 countries and territories (an increase from the previous 57 countries and territories) have been permitted to enter Thailand without a visa and remain in the country for up to 60 days per entry for purposes including tourism, business engagements, urgent work, and ad hoc assignments. In addition, eligible visitors may apply at the Thai Immigration Bureau for a further 30-day extension of stay. Key Changes The proposed revisions would revoke the current 60-day exemption and reinstate the previous stay period, thereby reducing the maximum permitted stay for eligible travelers to 30 days per entry. In addition, the number of countries and territories eligible under the 30-day visa-exemption scheme is expected to be reduced to 54. The scope of the VOA scheme would likewise be significantly narrowed, with the number of eligible countries reduced from 31 countries to just four (Azerbaijan, Belarus, Serbia, and India). Further, Thailand is expected to introduce a new 15-day visa exemption category for nationals of Seychelles, the Maldives, and Mauritius. The revised framework would also limit each country or territory to a single visa exemption privilege in order to simplify Thailand’s immigration framework and reduce overlapping immigration privileges.
Read More
May 25, 2026
After several years of policy discussion and continued efforts led by the Ministry of Commerce (MOC) to relax the list of reserved businesses under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA), the reform process has now reached a significant milestone. On May 12, 2026, the Thai cabinet approved in principle two draft subordinate legislative instruments aimed at delisting certain reserved business activities under the FBA and reducing licensing requirements for foreign business operators. These developments signal a renewed and concrete effort by the government to modernize Thailand’s business regulatory framework in order to attract foreign investment and boost Thailand’s competitiveness in the global market. Nine Businesses Set for FBA Delisting Below is a list of the nine businesses that are being targeted for delisting from the FBA’s restrictions. A draft ministerial regulation would delist the first eight reserved businesses, while a royal decree has been drafted to delist the ninth business: Telecommunications services (Type 1 license only, covering operators without their own telecommunications infrastructure), under the supervision of the Office of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission. Treasury center services subject to the Foreign Exchange Control Act B.E. 2485 and under the supervision of the Bank of Thailand. Securities-collateralized lending, pursuant to the laws governing securities and exchange and derivatives regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Agency, dealer, advisory, or fund management services relating to derivatives where the underlying assets fall outside the scope of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) Intra-group shared services, including administrative, human resources, and IT functions Intra-group domestic debt guarantee services Leasing of partial space for installation of financial service machines and automatic vending machines for employee use Petroleum drilling services Trading of agricultural product derivatives through a futures exchange, with physical delivery or receipt of agricultural products at a futures exchange–designated
Read More
April 29, 2026
Vietnam’s education sector is entering a new regulatory era. On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly adopted a series of new and amended laws in the field of education, including the 2025 Law on Vocational Education, the 2025 Law on Higher Education, and the amended Law on Education No. 123/2025/QH15 (Amended Law on Education). These laws together took effect on January 1, 2026, marking a significant reform of Vietnam’s legal framework governing the education sector. The legislative package introduces a new lawmaking approach under which foundational and principle-based provisions are codified in the Amended Law on Education, while the Law on Higher Education and the Law on Vocational Education serve as specialized statutes providing supplementary, sector-specific regulatory detail tailored to their respective subsectors. The Amended Law on Education fundamentally restructures how educational institutions are established, governed, and licensed, with direct implications for private investors, foreign-invested entities, and education service providers operating in Vietnam. Below are several highlights of the key changes under the amended law, especially in the private sector, that stakeholders should understand: Change in the National Education System In addition to primary education, lower secondary (junior high school) education is now compulsory in Vietnam. Accordingly, diplomas are no longer awarded upon completion of lower secondary school but only for upper education levels. The national education system is also expanded through the introduction of vocational high school as a new level of vocational education. Such reform creates additional learning pathways that not only enable learners to pursue both further education and participate in the labor market, but also better align education and training with socioeconomic development needs. New Hurdle for Joint Investors: Mandatory Corporate Entity Requirement Where two or more investors jointly establish an education institution, the investors are no longer permitted to directly establish such an institution.
Read More