You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 23, 2017

The New Customs Act: Important Changes for Importers and Exporters

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

The Thai Customs Act was enacted in 1926, and has undergone several changes during the past nine decades of its existence. Despite the amendments, however, some provisions in the Act continued to pose problems for importers, exporters, and business operators.

In an effort to address these problems, the government has enacted a new Customs Act B.E. 2560 (2017). The Act was published in the Royal Gazette  on May 17, 2017, and will become effective 180 days from the publication date. This article describes some of the Act’s key points that will impact business operators, importers, and exporters.

Time Limits for Duty Evaluation

Customs officers are entitled to evaluate duty under the Act and the Customs tariff law within three years from the date of submission of an import or export entry clearance form. In situations where the customs officer cannot make an evaluation within the allotted time period, the Director-General of the Customs Department is entitled to extend the deadline by a maximum of two years. If the director has evidence to believe that the duty payer intended to avoid paying the duty, the customs officer has an additional five years to evaluate the duty.

The main reason for limiting the time frame for evaluation is that companies have experienced problems when customs officers evaluated duties too far back in time. In such cases, companies often did not possess required documents, as they had been either lost or destroyed. It is hoped that this problem will be resolved with the introduction of the new time limits.

Reduced Penalties

Under the Act, some offenses—such as importing or exporting goods with the intent to avoid paying duty—can result in a maximum imprisonment of 10 years, and a fine from one-half to four times the amount of the duty evaded, or both. The court is entitled to seize the goods even if there is no person to be punished under its judgment. These penalties under the new Act are generally lower than those under the old law.

Change of Presumed Liability

The old Act contained strict liability for directors and officers, unless they were able to prove that they were not involved in the offense, admitted to the offense, or acted reasonably to prevent the offense. The new Act changes this principle.

Under the new law, if the offender is a juristic person, and if the offense occurred due to the order or act of any director, manager, or person responsible for business operations, that person will face the same criminal penalties as the juristic person. Moreover, if the director, manager, or responsible person neglected their duty, which caused the juristic person to carry out an offense, the director or manager will also face the same criminal penalties as the juristic person.

Appeal Timelines

The Act states that the Board of Appeal, which is an internal appellate review panel within the Customs Department, has 180 days to perform its review, counting from the date on which the customs officer receives the appeal and a complete set of supporting documents. If the Board of Appeal does not finish reviewing the appeal within the specified deadline, the importer or exporter who submitted the appeal can submit a court claim.

In addition, if necessary, the Finance Minister is entitled to appoint an additional Board of Appeal or several Boards of Appeal.

Reduced Incentives and Rewards

A common complaint among business operators has been that the incentive and reward payments that customs officers were entitled to were too high under the old Act. This issue, companies argued, was an obstacle to doing business and served as a disincentive for imports and exports. The new Act seeks to address this concern by reducing incentive and reward amounts.

In addition, the Director-General of the Customs Department, with the Finance Minister’s approval, is entitled to deduct money from the sales price of seized goods, or deduct money from a fine if there are no seized goods or if the goods cannot be sold, and pay the deducted money as an incentive and a reward.

For some offenses, the deduction rate is 40 percent—20 percent as an incentive payment and 20 percent as a reward amount. More importantly, the new Act introduces a cap of THB 5 million on the incentive payment and a cap of THB 5 million on the reward payment.

Business operators should also be aware of changes to other important provisions in the new Act, including imposition of a clear deadline for return of duty guarantees. Lawmakers are hopeful that the new Customs Act will promote and facilitate import and export activities, and generally reduce obstacles when doing business in Thailand.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 23, 2026
Arbitration under Thai law rests on consent. Section 11 of the Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002) requires an arbitration agreement to be in writing and signed by the parties. This may also be satisfied by communications, an unchallenged allegation in pleadings, or incorporation by reference to a document containing an arbitration clause. A non-signatory cannot, as a general rule, be compelled to arbitrate merely because it participated in the transaction, received a benefit, or belongs to the corporate group of a signatory. Thai law nevertheless permits arbitration agreements and awards to affect third parties indirectly in limited circumstances. Under section 24, an arbitration clause is separable from the main contract; the invalidity of the contract does not invalidate the clause. In Supreme Court Judgment No. 3918/2563, an apparent sales contract concealed a construction contract and was void under the Civil and Commercial Code. However, the concealed construction contract and written arbitration clause remained effective. The tribunal had jurisdiction, and its award was enforceable under the Arbitration Act. Under the Arbitration Act, when a claim or liability is validly transferred, the transferee is bound by the related arbitration agreement. This includes assignment, transfer of obligations, legal succession, and subrogation. Depending on the facts and contract and agency law, consent may arise through execution by an authorized agent, ratification, assumption of obligations, or conduct accepting the contract and its arbitration clause. Thai law respects separate corporate personality. The group-of-companies doctrine has no statutory basis under the Arbitration Act, while alter egos or sham allegations require compelling evidence and an identifiable legal basis. Supreme Court Judgment No. 9161/2568 illustrates the procedural treatment of non-signatories. A consultancy contract required LCIA arbitration seated in Dubai. When the employer sued a consultant and his spouse in Thailand concerning a housing loan, the court disposed of
September 15, 2026
The Myanmar Investment Commission (MIC) has issued a notification that gives investors with projects in Myanmar clearer guidance for securing approval and for changing, expanding, or exiting an approved project. Issued on August 19, 2026, MIC Notification No. 5/2026 replaces MIC Notification No. 26/2021 and sets procedures for state or regional investment committees to review, approve, and supervise investment projects, including project amendments, investment increases, land-use rights applications, compliance inspections, and suspension or termination of approved businesses. Endorsement Application Timeline and Deemed Acceptance In Myanmar, prospective investors seeking approval under the Myanmar Investment Law generally do so through an MIC permit or an MIC endorsement, depending on the nature of the investment. While certain large-scale investment projects require an MIC permit, projects that are not required to obtain an MIC permit may instead apply for an MIC endorsement. Investors seeking MIC endorsement for their planned projects typically submit their applications to the relevant state or regional investment committee. These committees are established under the Myanmar Investment Law and are authorized to approve investments of less than USD 5 million, subject to the project’s nature and location. MIC Notification No. 5/2026 specifies that upon receiving an endorsement application, the relevant investment committee office will check it for completeness and determine whether it can be considered at the state or regional level or must be referred to the MIC; if it must be forwarded to the MIC, this will be done within 10 working days. If an application is within its purview, the committee may reject the endorsement application within 15 working days of receipt; otherwise, the application is deemed accepted. If approved, the endorsement certificate will be issued within 10 working days of the approval decision, subject to applicable procedures. Endorsement Certificate Amendment The notification clarifies which amendments a state
September 9, 2026
Certain securities, derivatives, and treasury activities in Thailand were opened to foreign investors when Thailand’s Ministry of Commerce published two new ministerial regulations in the Government Gazette on August 28, 2026. The regulations significantly broaden the service activities that foreign-owned businesses may conduct without a license or certificate under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542, as amended (FBA). Securities and Derivatives Business Exemptions Prior to the issuance of these ministerial regulations, the exemptions covered (1) securities brokerage and derivatives brokerage with their only underlying assets being agricultural commodities, financial instruments, and securities; and (2) dealers, advisers, and fund managers conducting derivatives business under Thailand’s derivatives laws. The ministerial regulations provide broader exemptions. In addition to derivatives under the laws on derivatives as before, the following two major categories are provided: Derivatives whose underlying assets or variables fall outside the scope of Thailand’s laws on derivatives. This addresses a gap in the previous framework, which did not comprehensively exempt derivatives tied to nonregulated underlying assets or variables, such as certain commodities. Foreign brokers, advisors, and fund managers can now facilitate a broader range of hedging and risk management instruments without triggering FBA licensing requirements. Derivatives traded outside a derivatives exchange, or over the counter (OTC), whose payments are calculated by reference to foreign exchange rates or interest rates. This removes an FBA licensing barrier for foreign providers of widely used OTC hedging products, broadening the solutions available to importers and exporters managing currency exposure and to borrowers seeking greater certainty over financing costs. The ministerial regulations also exempt brokers and agents handling transactions involving either of these two derivatives categories. For securities businesses, the ministerial regulations add exemptions for margin loans used to purchase securities and for securities repurchase transactions. These additions clarify whether such activities qualify as exempt brokerage
September 4, 2026
Foreign business restrictions on telecommunications, treasury center businesses, and intragroup support services were eased when Thailand published the Ministerial Regulation Prescribing Service Businesses Not Requiring Permission for Foreign Business Operations (No. 5) B.E. 2569 (2026) in the Government Gazette on August 28, 2026. The ministerial regulation expands the categories of service businesses that foreign investors may operate without a foreign business license (FBL) under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA). Of particular relevance to the telecommunications, fintech, and technology sectors, the ministerial regulation exempts: Type 1 telecommunications licensees, which do not have their own networks; Treasury center businesses operated in accordance with Thailand’s exchange control regulations; and Certain intragroup administrative, human resources, and information technology management services. Telecommunications Services Foreign-owned businesses providing telecommunications services under a type 1 telecommunications license may now operate without obtaining an FBL. This may streamline market entry for qualifying telecommunications and digital infrastructure businesses. The exemption applies only to the FBA licensing requirement. Operators must continue to comply with applicable requirements under the Telecommunications Business Act and the regulations of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission, and the change does not affect foreign ownership restrictions applicable to type 2 or type 3 telecommunications businesses. Treasury Center Businesses The ministerial regulation also exempts qualifying treasury center businesses from the FBL requirement. This may facilitate centralized treasury functions in Thailand, including liquidity management, foreign exchange management, and intragroup funding arrangements. Treasury center operations remain subject to applicable requirements of the Bank of Thailand and other competent authorities. Intragroup Administrative, HR, and IT Services Certain administrative, human resources, and information technology management services provided between affiliated entities are also exempt, provided the relevant entities satisfy prescribed ownership or management criteria. The exemption is available where the service provider and recipient are related through specified ownership