You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 22, 2019

New Contract Controls Introduced for Residential Property Leasing Businesses in Thailand

The Contract Committee of the Consumer Protection Board has announced a number of new controls and lessee protections regarding residential property rental contracts executed from January 29, 2020, onward. These were detailed in the Notification of the Contract Committee Re: The Stipulation of Residential Property Leasing as a Contract-Controlled Business B.E. 2562 (2019), which was published in the Government Gazette on October 31, 2019.

This new notification replaces a similarly named notification issued by the Contract Committee in 2018, which designated residential property leasing as a contract-controlled business and governed any residential lease agreement executed from May 1, 2018, onward.

Any residential lease agreement entered into under the 2018 notification and currently in effect will continue to be in force until the expiration of the agreement, whereas any residential lease agreement executed from January 29, 2020, onward must comply with the Contract Committee’s new notification.

Like the 2018 notification, the new notification defines a “residential property leasing business” as a business that leases (or subleases) five units of property or more to individual lessees, for residential purposes, in exchange for a fee collected by the business operator, regardless of whether the units are in the same building. This includes all types of residential property that is leased for residential purposes, except for dormitories and hotels, which are regulated under a separate regime.

The new notification includes two lists: required terms and prohibited terms. Any business operator who fails to meet the notification requirements may be subject to imprisonment for up to one year, a fine of up to THB 100,000, or both.

Required Terms and Conditions

The following terms must be included in the residential lease. If any residential lease agreement does not contain them, it will be interpreted as including them as implied terms:

  • Residential lease agreements must include a version in Thai, wherein the size of the letters must not be less than 2 millimeters, and have no more than 11 letters within 1 inch and must contain the following details:
    • Name and address of the business operator and its authorized person;
    • Name and address of the lessee;
    • Name and location of the property;
    • Details of the property’s physical condition, including any items and equipment in the property;
    • Term of the lease, specifying its commencement date and expiration date;
    • Rental fee rates and due dates for payment;
    • Public utility fee rates (e.g., electricity, water supply, telephone) and the due dates for payments and their calculation method;
    • Service fee rates (i.e., services that are the business operator’s expenses, relating to the facilities and securities provided for the lease of property, which are not costs relating to the residential lease business), which must be reasonable and at the actual cost paid for the services, and which provide the due dates for payment along with their calculation method; and
    • Security deposit and advance rental fee rates.
  • Invoices for the fees in items 6–8 above must be sent to the lessee at least three days before their due dates, and the lessee will have the right to check the information relating to the payments that are shown in the invoices.
  • Details of the physical condition of the property and equipment (if any), which have been inspected and acknowledged by the lessee, must be attached to the lease agreement, and a duplicate must be delivered to the lessee.
  • The security deposit must be immediately returned to the lessee at the end of the agreement, unless the business operator has to investigate any damage in order to ascertain whether or not it is the responsibility of the lessee. If the lessee is found not to have caused any damage, the security deposit must be returned within seven days from the end of the agreement, and the business operator will re-take possession of the property. The business operator is responsible for any expenses incurred in returning the security deposit to the lessee.
  • If the agreement has a prescription period, the lessee has the right to terminate the agreement before expiration, provided the lessee has leased the property for no less than half of the period specified in the agreement. The lessee must provide at least 30 days’ advance written notice to the business operator, and must not be in default in respect to paying the rental fee or other expenses.
  • The business operator’s right to terminate the agreement must be written in red or black letters, or in bold or italics, and underlined, or emphasized in other ways that make such terms more pronounced than the other content of the agreement.
  • For termination of the agreement according to number 6 above, the business operator must provide at least 30 days’ advance written notice to the lessee. However, only 7 days’ advance notice is required if the cause of termination results from actions of the lessee that directly affect the normal livelihood of the other lessees. No advance notice is required if the lessee does not comply with the law and the regulations relating to public order and good morals.

Prohibited Terms and Conditions

If any of the prohibited terms listed below are included in a residential lease agreement, that agreement will be interpreted as not including them. These include the following:

  • Any waiver or limitation of the business operator’s liability from its breach of the agreement or wrongful acts, in respect to the material part, with no sufficient reason provided;
  • Any requirement placing the total amount of the advance rental fee and the security deposit above the equivalent of three months’ rent;
  • Any term that allows the business operator to change the rental fees, public utilities fees, service fees, or any other expenses before the end of the agreement;
  • Any term that allows the business operator to confiscate the security deposit or the advance rental fee without any fault on the part of the lessee;
  • Any term that allows the business operator, or its representative, to inspect the building or property without prior notice, unless it is an emergency circumstance that may create damage or have an impact on the business operator or the other lessees if the business operator does not conduct such emergency inspection;
  • Any stipulation of electricity and water supply fees that exceed the rates specified by the relevant authorities;
  • Any term that allows the business operator to prevent or obstruct the lessee’s access to the property to seize or remove the lessee’s belongings, without exercising the right to terminate the agreement legally;
  • Any term that allows the business operator to request any fee or expense for renewing the lease;
  • Any term that allows the business operator to terminate the agreement without any material breach of the lease agreement by the lessee;
  • Any term that makes the lessee liable for damages incurred due to ordinary wear and tear from the usage of the property’s contents and equipment;
  • Any term that makes the lessee liable for damage to the property, contents, and equipment that was not the lessee’s fault, and which occurred during force majeure situations; and
  • Any term that makes the lessee liable for defects to the property, contents, and equipment which were incurred due to ordinary wear and tear through usage.

Legal Basis

Through this notification, the Contract Committee of the Consumer Protection Board is exercising its power—granted by section 35 bis of the Consumer Protection Act B.E. 2522 (1979)—to ensure that written contracts between certain businesses and their consumers contain the necessary terms and conditions, thus preventing consumers from being unreasonably disadvantaged by unfair contract terms.

For more information on this or any notification of the Contract Committee or the Consumer Protection Board, or on any aspect of property leasing businesses in Thailand, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected].

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

December 16, 2025
Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed the Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to Infrastructure and Construction in Southeast Asia, a comparative guide developed by Drew Network Asia (DNA). The publication brings together insights from leading ASEAN law firms to address common legal and practical issues faced by participants in the construction and engineering sector across the region. Covering nine major Southeast Asian jurisdictions, the guide provides concise answers to frequently encountered questions relating to infrastructure and construction projects. Topics addressed include the regulatory environment, procurement practices, project structuring, risk allocation, contracting terms, dispute resolution mechanisms, and the enforcement of arbitral awards. Each jurisdictional chapter follows a consistent question-and-answer format, enabling readers to compare legal approaches and market practices across countries. This structure highlights both areas of convergence and key differences between jurisdictions, supporting more informed decision-making in cross-border projects and investments. While the guide offers a practical regional overview, it also underscores that legal frameworks and market practices vary significantly between jurisdictions and may be shaped by local principles and industry norms. Readers seeking jurisdiction-specific advice are encouraged to contact the practitioners listed at the end of each chapter. The full guide is available for download through the button below or directly from the DNA website.
December 15, 2025
On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam officially passed the amended Law on Construction, marking the culmination of a multiyear reform process aimed at modernizing Vietnam’s construction legal framework, streamlining administrative procedures, and aligning with digital transformation and sustainability goals. The amended law, which replaces the current Law on Construction No. 50/2014/QH13, will take effect on July 1, 2026. The Ministry of Construction (MOC) is also preparing several guiding decrees covering project classification, digital submissions and database management, and technical standards for design documentation. Key Changes in the Amended Law While the executed version of the amended Law on Construction has yet to be released to the public, reports have confirmed that it includes the following key changes introduced under the latest draft submitted by the MOC in September: Project classification: The amended Law on Construction classifies construction projects by investment form (public, PPP, business investment, and others), which aligns with the Law on Public Investment, the Law on Investment, and the Law on PPP Investment. This reduces regulatory overlap and clarifies responsibilities. Project preparation and appraisal: The requirement for prefeasibility reports for business investment projects is abolished, as this requirement is now governed by the Law on Investment and the Law on Public Investment. This change shortens the preparation timeline and reduces duplication of procedures. In addition, the authority’s appraisal is streamlined to a single feasibility stage. Also eliminated is the appraisal process conducted following basic design approval, shifting more responsibility to investors and consultants, with targeted post-audit mechanisms for high-risk projects. Construction permits: One of the most significant new changes of the amended Law on Construction is the expansion of exemptions from construction permit requirements to the following eight distinct groups of construction works: State-secret works, emergency or urgent constructions, works under special public investment
November 28, 2025
On November 26, 2025, the government of Vietnam issued Resolution No. 8/2025/NQ-CP to extend and expand the pilot program allowing Vietnamese citizens who meet certain conditions to gamble at three integrated casino resorts in Vietnam: Corona Resorts & Casino Phu Quoc (An Giang Province) – Effective immediately, and continuing an ongoing pilot program that started in 2019. The Grand Casino Ho Tram (Ho Chi Minh City) – New pilot program for five years starting November 26, 2025. Van Don Integrated Casino & Tourism Complex (Quang Ninh Province) – New pilot program for five years from the date the casino receives its license. The pilot program was originally established under Decree No. 03/2017/ND-CP on casino business, which also sets out the specific eligibility conditions for Vietnamese citizens. After the pilot period, these projects must stop allowing Vietnamese players until the government issues further decisions. This expansion of the pilot program comes after Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance (MOF) released a draft decree earlier this year proposing significant changes to the regulatory framework governing casino operations. These revisions, which focus on increasing fiscal contributions from local players and strengthening compliance obligations for casino operators nationwide, are detailed below. Proposed Increase in Casino Entry Fees for Vietnamese Players The draft decree increases the entry fees applicable to Vietnamese citizens permitted to play at casinos. Under the current regulations, Vietnamese players are required to pay an entry fee of VND 1 million (approx. USD 38) for 24 consecutive hours or VND 25 million (approx. USD 950) per month. The draft decree proposes increasing these fees to VND 2.5 million (approx. USD 95) for 24 consecutive hours and VND 50 million (approx. USD 1,900) per month, effectively doubling the existing amounts and marking the first major fee revision since the pilot program allowing Vietnamese players
November 21, 2025
On November 17, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Interior introduced significant regulatory changes to make rooftop solar adoption easier and more cost-effective for property owners. Ministerial Regulation No. 72 B.E. 2568 (2025), issued under the Building Control Act B.E. 2522 (1979), was published in the Government Gazette on November 19, 2025, with immediate effect. Background Under the Building Control Act (BCA), any alteration made to a building requires either notification of the relevant authority or application for a building alteration permit—unless the alteration falls under a separate list of exceptions specified in the ministerial regulations issued under the BCA. In 2015, installation of solar rooftops on any residential building under 160 square meters was added to this list of exceptions, subject to inspection and notification requirements. The newly enacted regulation now eliminates many of these requirements and introduces a broader and more permissive framework to promote solar adoption nationwide. Key Changes Specifically, the regulation introduces three major changes: Expanded exemption from the definition of “building alteration”: The installation of solar panels on any building roof—regardless of the type of building or the total area of the installation—is no longer considered a building alteration under the BCA, provided that the total weight of the installation does not exceed 20 kg/m2. Removal of structural integrity certification requirement: The new regulation eliminates the obligation to obtain a structural stability certificate from a licensed civil engineer. Removal of notification requirement: Property owners or possessors are no longer required to notify the local authority before installation of a solar rooftop. Impact This significant streamlining of requirements for solar rooftop installation is expected to accelerate the adoption of renewable energy in the country, particularly for residential and commercial properties—similar to the way Thailand’s December 2024 removal of licensing requirements for factory solar rooftop installations encouraged such