You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 25, 2023

New Competition Regulations for Thailand’s Energy Sector

Subscribe to Updates

Thailand’s Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) has issued four new regulations under the Energy Business Act B.E. 2550 (2007) setting forth competition regimes to control both anticompetitive conduct and market structure in the energy business sector. The regulations were published in the Government Gazette on December 19, 2022, and took effect the following day.

The key provisions of these ERC competition regulations largely mirror those articulated in the Trade Competition Act B.E. 2560 (2017) and its subordinate legislation. The most significant features of these competition regulations are summarized below.

Market Definition Regulation

The ERC’s market definition regulation (officially the ERC Regulation re: Market Definition and Relevant Market of Related Energy Services B.E. 2565) outlines the general framework for defining relevant markets in the energy sector. The factors to be taken into consideration include types of energy licenses, geographical areas, competition conditions, and interchangeability of energy services. In the annex to this regulation, the ERC has classified the relevant energy service markets as follows:

  • Power business activities include power generation, power transmission system services, power distribution system services, power distribution services, and power system control services.
  • Natural gas business activities include natural gas transmission through pipelines via natural gas transmission systems, natural gas procurement and wholesale via natural gas distribution systems, natural gas retail via natural gas distribution systems, and storage and regasification of liquefied natural gas.

The ERC will review its market definitions and relevant energy service markets from time to time, taking into account changes in technology and competition conditions as well as feedback from public hearings.

Market Dominance Regulation

Under the ERC’s market dominance regulation (officially the ERC Regulation re: Criteria on Business Operator having a Market Dominance B.E. 2565), the ERC is empowered to proactively determine and declare which license-holding energy business operators have a dominant position or significantly dominant position under its criteria, subject to public hearing and objections from the business operators concerned. The ERC can also request market data from business operators for these purposes. In addition, the ERC assumes authority to impose measures on business operators to prevent potential harm to competition or eliminate competition concerns.

Anticompetitive Conduct Regulation

The ERC’s anticompetitive conduct regulation (officially the ERC Regulation re: Rules and Measures on Monopoly, Reduction and Restriction on Competition in Energy Businesses B.E. 2565) aims to prevent license-holding energy business operators from unilaterally or jointly undertaking actions that may cause monopolization of—or reduction or restriction of competition in—energy service markets. However, the anticompetitive conduct regulation does not clarify or list examples of anticompetitive conduct; rather, the ERC will investigate and decide on a case-by-case basis regarding the conduct’s potential harm to competition and its effects in each relevant energy service market.

All energy business operators must notify the ERC immediately in the following cases:

  • They are aware of any conduct that may lead to monopolization or to reduction or restriction of competition;
  • They are harmed by anticompetitive conduct by other license holders; or
  • A license holder gains or may gain a dominant position in an energy service market.

An investigation and inquiry can be initiated with either a complaint from a license holder or by the ERC itself. The ERC has authority to impose specific remedies to suppress anticompetitive conduct, including cease-and-desist orders, administrative fines, orders to separate certain businesses’ accounting systems, obligation to disclose information to or notify the ERC, ERC determination of service prices or fees, and obligation to provide services to other license holders.

Merger and Cross-Shareholding Regulation

The ERC’s merger and cross-shareholding regulation (officially the ERC Regulation re: Rules and Procedures on Merger and Cross-Shareholding in Energy Businesses, B.E. 2565) repeals the previous merger control regulation for energy businesses and sets forth a new set of regimes to control mergers and acquisitions between two or more license holders in the energy industry. Under this regulation, “mergers” include mergers, amalgamation and acquisitions of assets, and direct and indirect acquisitions of shares as defined by the regulation. Cross-shareholding between license holders is also subject to control by the ERC.

  • Preapproval requirement: License holders that wish to proceed with a merger or cross-shareholding transaction must seek approval from the ERC at least 60 days in advance. Supporting documents that the concerned parties must submit include objectives and plan, market analysis, and an impact assessment report. In approving the merger, the ERC will reflect on potential harm to competition, the effect on the license holders’ contractual parties, and impact on stability of energy and public interests, as well as whether it is a merger with a failing company.
  • Pretransaction reporting requirement: Energy license holders only need to submit a premerger report (instead of a preapproval application) to the ERC if the license holder can prove that after the merger is completed, the total assets, revenue, or value of assets acquired from other license holders will not exceed the threshold prescribed by the regulation.

These requirements also apply to a merger by a license holder’s controlling entity, parent entity, subsidiary, or affiliate.

Implications

The announcement of these four new competition regulations by the ERC signals its intention to combat anticompetitive behaviors and market concentration. This also presages more stringent enforcement by the ERC to relieve competition concerns and ensure free and fair competition in the energy industry. License holders and business operators active in the relevant energy business markets should be prepared for stricter controls and more stringent duties to seek approval from, notify, or report to the ERC as a result of the triggering events prescribed in these ERC regulations.

For more information on internal competition compliance, or any aspect of the regulatory regime for energy businesses in Thailand, please contact Kobkit Thienpreecha at [email protected], Supasit Boonsanong at [email protected], Nutavit Sirikan at [email protected], or Kobchai Nitungkorn at [email protected].

Related Professionals

Industries

Energy

Practices

Antitrust and Competition

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 8, 2021
On March 24, 2021, the Prime Minister of Vietnam issued Decision No. 12/2021/QD-TTg issuing regulations on oil spill response. One of the more notable changes is the introduction of templates for oil spill response plans.
Read More
February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension
Read More
February 22, 2021
Following the recent imposition of sanctions on Myanmar individuals and companies by the US, the UK and Canada have now imposed new sanctions. As with the US sanctions, these new measures impact UK and Canadian citizens and companies, and non-UK and non-Canadian companies and citizens with interests in those jurisdictions. The EU has indicated that it is planning to issue similar sanctions in the near future. New UK Sanctions In addition to the 16 individuals already sanctioned by the UK government, on February 18, 2021, the UK government announced that three individuals have been sanctioned for serious human rights violations and are now subject to asset freezes and travel bans. The full list of Myanmar individuals and companies sanctioned by the UK is available on the website of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. Breaches of UK financial sanctions are criminal offences punishable in the UK by up to 7 years imprisonment and heavy fines. New Canadian Sanctions Also on February 18, timed to coincide with the UK sanctions, new Canadian sanctions were imposed on nine individuals. As with the UK, Canada already had a number of individuals in the Myanmar military on its sanctions list, and the new additions bring the total number of individuals sanctioned by Canada to 54. All assets of these individuals in Canada are now frozen, and they are banned from travelling to Canada. Canadian businesses or entities may not do business with any of the 54 individuals. Full details of the impact of the sanctions are available on the Government of Canada’s website, as is a database of the Myanmar individuals and companies subject to them. Breach of Canadian sanctions carries with it up to 5 years’ imprisonment in Canada and/or a large fine. Other Countries The EU is reportedly drawing up sanctions
Read More
February 18, 2021
As you will no doubt know, on February 1, 2021, the Myanmar military declared a state of emergency in Myanmar for a period of one year. State Counsellor Daw Aung Sang Su Kyi was detained, as were the president and various significant political and civil leaders. Min Aung Hlaing, commander-in-chief of the Tatmadaw (Myanmar armed forces) has installed himself as chairman of the State Administration Council, the current administration. New sanctions The reaction of the Biden administration has been swift. On February 10, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14014, which provides bases to impose sanctions on individuals and companies deemed by the US to, among other things: operate in the defense sector of Myanmar; be responsible for policies that undermine democratic processes in Myanmar; have taken actions to undermine democratic processes or institutions, or prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of free speech, in Myanmar; or be a spouse or child of the foregoing. On the next day, February 11, the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), imposed sanctions under the new executive order on ten individuals—including General Min Aung Hlaing—and three companies, including Cancri Gems & Jewelry Co, Myanmar Imperial Jade Co, and Myanmar Ruby Enterprise.  All such individuals and companies have now been designated on the US list of specially designated nationals (SDNs). Effect of sanctions As a result of such sanctions, the property of these individuals or companies that is located in the US or is under the possession or control of US companies and citizens is frozen, and US companies and citizens are generally prohibited from dealing deal with any such property.  Reportedly, roughly USD 1 billion of funds belonging to the individuals and companies blocked on February 11 are located in the US and thus now frozen. The SDN list As many
Read More