You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 28, 2021

Myanmar Issues New Guidelines for Non-Banking Financial Institutions

Subscribe to Updates

On January 26, 2021, the Central Bank of Myanmar (CBM) published Notification 1/2021 in relation to non-banking financial institutions (NBFIs). This notification, which took immediate effect and has far-reaching implications for NBFI operations in Myanmar, applies to NBFIs wishing to conduct finance company business, leasing business, or factoring business, which are defined in the Financial Institutions Law (2016) (FIL) as follows:

  • Finance company business is “business engaging primarily in financing the purchase of goods or services with funding other than deposits from the public.” Interest would be charged on such finance.
  • Leasing business is “the business of letting or sub-letting movable property on hire, regardless whether the letting is with or without an option to purchase the property.” An obvious example would be vehicle leasing.
  • Factoring business is “the business of financing accounts receivables.” This is when a business sells its accounts receivable at a discount.

The key provisions of the notification are summarized below.

NBFI Registration

To conduct any of the above businesses, an individual or company must apply for a registration certificate from the CBM by submitting the documents specified in the notification. The registration certificate may come with terms and conditions prescribed by the CBM on a case-by-case basis. It seems likely that these terms and conditions could include minimum capital requirements, but this remains to be seen.

Trading as an NBFI without a CBM certificate is punishable by two to five years imprisonment and a fine of MMK 500 million (approx. USD 375,000).

NBFI Certificate Revocation

The CBM has extensive powers to revoke the NBFI certificate in certain circumstances, including failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the registration certificate; conducting non-NBFI business; conducting business in a manner detrimental to the interests of consumers; failure to comply with anti-money laundering or counter terrorism laws and regulations; and so on.

Prohibition on Deposit Acceptance

The notification makes clear that, unlike a commercial bank, an NBFI may not accept a deposit, which is defined by the FIL as “a sum of money paid on terms under which it will be repaid or it is repayable, either wholly or in part, with any consideration in money or money’s worth and such repayment being either, on demand or at a time or in circumstances agreed by the person or an entity making the payment and the person receiving it.”

Foreign Ownership

Interestingly, the notification refers to changes in ownership from local to foreign control, or ceasing the status of a foreign company, which implies that 100% foreign-owned NBFIs will be permitted. From our discussions with the CBM it appears that foreign investment may be allowed on a case-by-case basis, but this has yet to be confirmed. If so, this would be an interesting new opportunity for foreign investors in the financial sector. Currently there are no foreign-owned NBFIs in Myanmar.

Further Provisions

Among other things, the notification continues to deal with interest rates that may be charged by an NBFI, fit and proper requirements for senior management, financial reporting to the CBM, and inspection by the CBM.

For more details on the CBM’s notification for NBFIs, or on any aspect of banking law in Myanmar, please contact Dr. Ross Taylor at [email protected] or +66 2056 5880.

Related Professionals

Practices

Banking and Finance

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 14, 2025
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has published the Draft Guidelines for Digital Fraud Management, which aim to help financial service providers tackle digital fraud and ensure safety and trust in the Thai financial system. These draft guidelines, which are available for public comment until March 18, 2025, provide a comprehensive framework for financial service providers, covering prevention, detection, management, and resolution of digital fraud, as well as support for customers affected by fraud. The BOT tentatively plans to implement these draft guidelines on April 1, 2025, along with circular letters on the minimum required measures for tackling “mule accounts” (deposit or e-money accounts used as tools to receive and transfer funds obtained through the commission of any offense) and measures to strengthen Thailand’s customer due diligence and enhanced due diligence procedures. Under the draft guidelines, “financial service providers” include financial institutions and special financial institutions under the Financial Institution Business Act and payment providers under the Payment Systems Act. Commercial banks, special financial institutions, and operators of transferable e-money services must adhere to every requirement in the draft guidelines. Other financial service providers (e.g., payment providers other than operators of transferable e-money services) can implement the draft guidelines as deemed appropriate to their services, products, and service channels. Digital Fraud Management Requirements The draft guidelines establish the following key requirements: Policy and oversight. Directors and senior executives of financial service providers must set and adopt appropriate “end-to-end” fraud management policies and KPIs to manage digital fraud, covering prevention, monitoring, detection, management, resolution, and support for affected customers. Fraud management processes. Financial service providers must establish a clear framework for managing digital fraud throughout the customer lifecycle, from customer onboarding to service termination, according to industry standards at a minimum and covering at least the following processes: Know your customer
Read More
February 24, 2025
On January 31, 2025, the Bank of Thailand (BOT) announced a new Notification re: Responsible Lending, replacing a similar notification from 2023. This new notification provides updated measures to assist debtors in different circumstances and clear implementation guidelines for lenders, with the aim of resolving household debt issues. Scope The service providers covered by the notification include banks and nonbanks (e.g., credit card companies, asset management companies, licensed personal loan providers, and nano finance operators) that conduct lending business. New Requirements The notification’s core focus remains loan management throughout the lifecycle of a loan—from credit product development to legal proceedings and debt transfers to other creditors—but with further clarification and detail compared to the 2023 notification. The key revisions in the new notification are summarized below. Advertising standards: The notification tightens requirements in some areas and relaxes them in others. Stricter requirements: It is now clearly stipulated that the BOT oversees taglines that may encourage excessive borrowing. More examples of noncompliant statements are also added (e.g., “Elevate your lifestyle now, pay later”; “Get approved, even with credit challenges”). In addition, advertising material that contains multiple credit products should provide clear minimum and maximum interest rates, especially when there are significant differences in the interest rates of each product. Relaxed requirements: The required information for some marketing activities is now reduced. For example, in marketing events with staff promoting loan products and offering free giveaways, service providers have the discretion to provide effective interest rate information in the manner they deem appropriate, and the advertisement material can display only the mandatory warning statements without providing interest rate details. Encouraging customer financial discipline: The notification requires service providers to implement more elaborate and extensive tools to influence customer behavior (termed “nudging” by the BOT) at every stage of the lending cycle. This
Read More
February 19, 2025
On January 3, 2025, the Bank of the Lao PDR (BOL) issued Decision No. 11/BOL on the Use of Foreign Currency in Lao PDR, taking effect on the same date. This decision sets out the rules for using foreign currency in Laos and ensures the Lao kip (LAK) remains the primary currency while allowing flexibility for international transactions. Key points in the decision are outlined below. Permissible Activities for Foreign Currency The decision provides that authorized entities can use foreign currency as a secondary currency to LAK in the setting of cost and pricing structures, announcing and advertising prices, and making or receiving payments for goods and services that are imported or have manufacturing inputs imported from other countries. Otherwise, LAK is the only permitted currency. The decision also stipulates that foreign exchange must be conducted only via authorized commercial banks or foreign exchange markets. The exchange rate for setting costs, pricing structures, announcing and advertising prices, and making and receiving payments for goods and services in foreign currency must match the exchange rate announced by commercial banks from time to time. Businesses Allowed to Use Foreign Currency The decision allows certain businesses and organizations to use foreign currency. These entities are divided into two groups: those that need approval before using foreign currency, and those that can use it immediately. Enterprises that can use foreign currency with BOL approval include: Businesses that export goods or services and entities that lease or obtain concessions from the government, generating revenue in foreign currency through commercial banks. Enterprises that provide international freight and passenger transportation services. Enterprises that provide services related to cross-border logistics and warehousing. Enterprises located at international borders and airports, such as duty-free shops and restaurants. Enterprises that have obligations to make payments in foreign currency to other
Read More
February 17, 2025
Thailand’s draft Emergency Decree on Technology Crimes Suppression, which we covered in a client alert in January 2025 primarily addressed to telecom operators and financial institutions, is expected to have significant implications for a wide range of business operators.  The draft emergency decree has already been approved by the cabinet but may undergo further developments as it continues in the legislative process. In this article, we will highlight the material impacts of the draft emergency decree on overseas and local fintech operators. Expanded Definition of “Technology Crimes” The definition of “technology crimes” now includes the following acts of forgery or alteration: Forging or altering the identity of individuals and biometric characteristics by utilizing computer or communication systems or other electronic means to commit offenses. Forging or altering symbols, trademarks, or seals of groups (e.g., foundations, community enterprises) or juristic persons, including acts by juristic persons using individuals or juristic persons as nominal directors or shareholders, regardless of whether such individuals or legal juristic persons reside in Thailand. Forging or altering digital or online platforms, regardless of the platform’s location or legal status. Individuals who conspire, utilize, assist, or support the commission of these offenses will face the same penalties as the principal offender. Business Operator Definition The scope of “business operators” is now expanded to cover various fintech and digital asset operators beyond those under the Payment Systems Act (PSA). The draft emergency decree now includes the following operators, whether they are legally authorized or not: Business operators under the PSA and business operators who operate “as if” they are payment system operators Business operators under the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses or business operators who operate “as if” they are digital asset business operators. Foreign exchange business operators. Disclosure and Exchange of Information Business operators must disclose
Read More