You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 5, 2019

Moving Employees from a Rep. Office to a Foreign-Invested Enterprise in Vietnam

Informed Counsel

In recent years in Vietnam, new policies and changes in the law have led to many situations where foreign companies are no longer allowed to operate as representative offices (ROs), or find that it is no longer optimal to do so. As a result, many companies are converting or considering the conversion of their ROs into full subsidiaries or “foreign-invested enterprises” (FIEs). This has been an especially hot topic in the pharmaceutical sector after changes brought on in 2017 by new legislation.   

Establishing an FIE can open up new business opportunities and is recommended for companies with serious long-term commitments to Vietnam, but the shift from RO to FIE can pose its share of challenges, particularly in the area of labor and employment. A clear understanding of the conversion process will help ensure a smooth transition.

Representative Offices: A Good Place to Start   

ROs are very common as a first step when foreign companies enter the Vietnam market. The RO is a quick and relatively simple way to get started, and allows the company to explore the market and establish relationships with Vietnamese businesses (distributors, agents, etc.) without a massive outlay of investment capital.

The problem with the RO is that it is only allowed to conduct a limited scope of business activities under the law. Specifically, ROs are not permitted to “directly engage in profit-making activity in Vietnam.” Though such activity is not clearly defined in the law, it is understood to mean that the RO cannot provide goods or services to distributors or consumers, or collect money from them. The RO is meant to be merely a liaison office for its foreign parent company.   

Though ROs have been known to find creative ways of “doing business without doing business,” most companies with serious interest in the Vietnam market will eventually choose to establish FIEs in the form of limited liability companies or joint-stock companies. FIEs are allowed to conduct a much greater scope of business activities than ROs, including profit-making activities, though the licensing process is correspondingly longer and more complicated.

For some companies, the establishment of an FIE is more a necessity than a choice. For example, in the pharmaceutical sector, with the effectiveness of Decree 54/2017/ND-CP dated May 8, 2017, guiding the Law on Pharmacy (as amended) and its implementation documents, it became clear that ROs of foreign pharmaceutical companies could no longer directly employ medical representatives who conduct drug introduction activities to healthcare professionals without valid medical representative cards formally issued by the provincial department of health under the name of the RO. In turn, the provincial departments of health will no longer issue those cards to ROs, or renew the RO’s existing cards, which has effectively rendered the practice impossible. As a result, these companies have been “urged” to set up their own FIEs, not only to conduct actual pharmaceutical business in Vietnam in the long run, but also to receive the medical representatives and other staff from their ROs.

Moving Employees to the FIE   

In theory, once an FIE is successfully established, the RO’s employees can be moved to the FIE, and the foreign investor can officially close the RO, though the procedure is not always so simple. In the pharmaceutical sector, for example, the RO may need to be maintained in parallel with the FIE for a certain period of time to ensure the smooth operations of the FIE as well as the drug export-import activity.   

To move employees from the RO to the FIE, labor contracts between the RO and the employees must be terminated. To ensure a smooth migration, that should be structured as a mutual termination agreement, pursuant to which no involvement from the local labor authority or the trade union is required. A termination notice must be prepared, along with minutes of termination and liquidation of the labor contract.   

To let employees go who do not agree to the mutual termination, the RO will need to prepare a “labor usage plan” to describe the situation and clearly demonstrate that the termination of the labor relationship is necessary to comply with the law. The labor usage plan must be submitted to/discussed with the appropriate-level trade union for its consideration and approval. This procedure can be rather time-consuming as Vietnamese labor law is very protective of employees and the trade unions, especially the district trade union federations, will review the labor usage plan very carefully to ensure there are no contents viewed as unfair to the impacted employees. Thus, it is always better to attempt to reach agreement on mutual termination, even if it requires additional expense.   

The termination package provided to the RO’s departing employees will typically include:

  • salary accrued up until the termination date;
  • a prorated portion of any 13th month salary (commonly provided in labor contracts in Vietnam);
  • unused annual leave; and
  • statutory severance allowance, where applicable.

An additional payment may be negotiated by the parties to be offered as “goodwill,” and is typically determined by the seniority of the employee—for example, the employee may receive one-half month’s or one month’s salary for each year of employment.   

The RO must then ensure that all insurance and tax obligations are fulfilled. The former employees must be deregistered with the social insurance body, and all social insurance premiums and income personal income tax for the employees must be paid up to the contract termination date.   

On the FIE side, the newly established entity will sign new employment contracts with the migrated employees. In practice, the terms of these contracts should be at least as favorable as the terms in the previous contracts with the RO.   

The FIE can then register the migrated employees with the social insurance body and begin paying premiums for them, and also declare the employees with the tax authority, in order to assume their personal income tax obligations.

Planning Ahead   

Navigating Vietnamese labor law can be a challenge for foreign companies, as the country tends to be more protective of employees than many other jurisdictions, and requires strict adherence to formal protocol. Companies who make the decision to convert their ROs in Vietnam to FIEs would be wise to set out a step-by-step employee migration plan in advance, with the assistance of experienced advisors, to ease the transition and ensure business continuity.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 26, 2026
Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed an updated Cambodia chapter to Foreign Investment Review 2026, a global guide to the legal and regulatory environment for foreign investment in 25 jurisdictions around the world. Published and distributed by Lexology Panoramic, the guide is focused on law and policy regarding foreign investment oversight, regulatory frameworks, procedural requirements, and other notable concerns for foreign investors. The updated Cambodia chapter was prepared by Jay Cohen, partner and director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Phnom Penh office, and Nitikar Nith, associate. The chapter focuses most closely on the law and policy section, which explains the government’s policies and practices regarding foreign direct investment, the main investment laws and their scope, and the relevant authorities responsible for regulating mergers, acquisitions, and other business transactions. The chapter also brings up key recent developments, such as the prospect of Cambodia establishing a competition regulator. A PDF of the Cambodia chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also provided the Laos, Myanmar, and Vietnam chapters to Foreign Investment Review 2026. Readers can also gain 30 days of complementary access to the full Foreign Investment Review 2026 guide and the rest of Lexology Panoramic’s varied offerings through this link.
January 26, 2026
Myanmar’s Private Security Services Law, enacted on February 18, 2025, together with its implementing Directive on Applications for a Private Security Services License or Permit issued on June 18, 2025, establishes the country’s first comprehensive regulatory framework for both commercial private security service providers and companies that employ in-house security personnel. The framework applies to both Myanmar and foreign entities. For foreign investors and multinational operators, the new regime introduces strict licensing requirements, local content rules, and various approvals that must be carefully considered as part of business planning and compliance processes. Regulatory Authority and Structure The governing authority under the Private Security Services Law is the Private Security Services Central Supervisory Committee, formed with the minister of the Ministry of Home Affairs (MOHA) as chairperson, the chief of the Myanmar Police Force as vice-chairperson, and members from other high-ranking officials from relevant ministries, such as Transport and Communications, Defense, Planning and Finance, Investment and Foreign Economic Relations, Legal Affairs, Immigration and Population, Labor, and Commerce. This Central Committee is the highest regulatory authority and has the power to adopt policies, approve or reject applications for licenses and permits, and decide appeals against administrative actions taken by Supervisory Committees, which operate under the Central Committee at the state and regional level. They are responsible for processing applications, verifying compliance with statutory requirements, submitting applications to the Central Committee with remarks, and issuing licenses and permits once approved. Supervisory Committees also monitor compliance by license or permit holders and impose administrative penalties for noncompliance, while the Central Committee exercises final decision-making authority. License Requirements for Security Service Providers To apply for a private security services license, companies must be registered under the Myanmar Companies Law. Foreign companies may also operate a private security services business in Myanmar, subject to compliance
January 21, 2026
Spurred by global geopolitics and Canada’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, which aims to forge deeper ties with ASEAN, Canadian companies have been showing growing interest in Thailand and Southeast Asia in recent years. To understand the opportunities offered by the region, we sat down with Andrew Stoutley, a Toronto native and the chief operating officer of Tilleke & Gibbins, a leading Southeast Asian regional law firm with over 130 years of history in Thailand. Q: Why are Canadian companies looking at Thailand and Southeast Asia right now? A: Two reasons stand out. First, diversification has moved up the agenda. Many Canadian companies want options outside North America due to tariff volatility and policy uncertainty in the United States, as well as questions around the next Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement mandatory joint review. At the same time, the shift of global production from China to Southeast Asia is accelerating, driven by rising costs, geopolitics, and the need to avoid overreliance on a single market. As a result, Canadian companies are looking for a second production base or a regional hub, and Thailand and its neighbors are natural choices given their manufacturing depth, location, and established supply chains. Second, Canada’s own efforts in the region are gaining traction. The Indo-Pacific Strategy has led to more on-the-ground support, including larger trade missions, upgraded diplomatic posts, and new financing options. Export Development Canada (EDC) now has a presence in Bangkok, giving Canadian companies a direct line to financing and insurance in Thailand. There’s also steady progress on trade frameworks like the recently signed Canada–Indonesia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (which will come into effect pending domestic procedures), ongoing negotiations of a Canada–ASEAN FTA, and the exciting announcement about the launch of negotiations of a Canada–Thailand FTA. Together, these developments have the potential to make it much easier
January 20, 2026
Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) has imposed new restrictions on foreign-majority shareholding and land ownership for companies in certain promoted activities. The changes took effect on September 1, 2025, but were not published in the Government Gazette until December 30, 2025, under Notification of the Board of Investment No. Sor. 7/2568 on the Amendment to List of Activities Eligible for Investment Promotion under Notification of the Board of Investment No. 9/2565, dated July 22, 2025. Foreign Land Ownership Restrictions Generally, foreign land ownership is one of the privileges granted to BOI-promoted companies, allowing them to own land to engage in the promoted activities. However, with these new restrictions, the BOI will no longer grant land-ownership privileges to foreign-majority-owned companies that conduct business activities in the following categories: Rolling, drawing, casting, or forging of nonferrous metals (category 5.4.9) Manufacturing of ferrous metal products or ferrous metal parts (category 5.4.11.2) Manufacturing of nonferrous metal products and/or nonferrous metal parts for industrial use (category 5.4.11.4) Manufacturing of other metal products, including other metal parts for industrial use (category 5.4.11.5) Manufacture of chemical products for industry (category 6.2) Manufacture of plastic products for industrial goods and parts (category 6.4.1) These restrictions do not apply to existing BOI-promoted companies that have at least three projects granted promotion under the same juristic person during the past 15 years (2011–2025) with total investment of at least THB 5 billion, excluding the cost of land and working capital. Foreign Shareholding Restrictions For companies to be eligible for BOI promotion in three other categories of business activities, at least 51% of the company’s registered capital must be held by Thai individual shareholders, unless the BOI-promoted activity is located within a special border economic zone as designated by the BOI. These three categories are: Manufacture of bags made of