You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 19, 2014

Lex Mundi Global Practice Guide: Restrictions and Incentives on Ownership of Farmland

Subscribe to Updates
Lex Mundi and Tilleke & Gibbins

Agricultural expansion through farmland has been a key driver of growth in several parts of the world to cope with the increasing needs for food. In many jurisdictions, the ownership and possession of farmland by foreigners has been subject to restrictions and incentives. This Global Practice Guide: Restrictions and Incentives on Ownership of Farmland, prepared members of the Lex Mundi Agribusiness practice group, provides insights for agribusiness companies and investors regarding potential opportunities and restrictions in this burgeoning area. The overview for Thailand is provided below, while the full guide can be found on the Lex Mundi website.

1. How is farmland typically defined? Please include details of any usage and size requirements if applicable.

Under the Agriculture Land Reform Act B.E. 2518 (1975), “farmland” can be typically defined as land used predominantly for agriculture. Additionally, “agriculture” covers paddy cultivation, plantations, orchards, animal rearing, fisheries, and aquatic animal breeding.

The Agriculture Land Reform Office (ALRO) is a government authority that obtains land by taking it from the public domain or purchasing and expropriating it from landowners. ALRO reforms the land into agricultural areas to provide for people who are deemed appropriate.

Section 30 of the Agriculture Land Reform Act regulates all land or immovable property which has been obtained by ALRO. ALRO has the power to allocate this land to agricultural workers (i.e. farmers) or agricultural institutions according to the rules, methods, and conditions prescribed by the responsible committee. The following qualifications shall be met:

  1. Not to exceed 50 rai* for an agricultural worker and persons in the same family engaging in other fields of agricultural work, except as in (2);
  2. Not to exceed 100 rai for an agricultural worker and persons in the same family engaging in animal husbandry classified as large animals according to the notification of the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives; 
  3. The land area must be used as the committee deems appropriate for an agricultural institution considering their category and procedures. 

Other than ALRO’s allocation of land to agricultural workers and the agricultural institutions as mentioned above, any person or legal entity who wishes to lease, hire-purchase, buy, or use agricultural land or immovable property to engage in business supporting or relating to agriculture must obtain approval from ALRO according to the regulations and conditions approved by the committee. However, the size of the land shall not exceed 50 rai.

2. Is government approval required in order to take an interest in farmland (by means of acquisition, lease or otherwise)?

As mentioned above, the right to use farmland under the Agriculture Land Reform Act shall be approved by ALRO.

3. If government approval is required, are there procedural requirements, licences and/or permits to be obtained or waiting periods which may affect the transfer of the interest in farmland?

A person who wishes to take interest in agricultural land from ALRO must submit the application to either the Central ALRO or the Provincial ALRO in which the land is located.

It generally takes about 1.5-2 years to obtain approval and/or the Sor Por Gor 4-01 certificate.

4. Is local presence required in order to take an interest in farmland?

The applicant must be Thai (either a juristic person or an individual) to take interest in farmland but does not require a local presence in Thailand.

5. Which governmental authorities are involved in the determination of the regulations of ownership of farmland?

Regulations on ownership of farmland are determined by ALRO of the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives.

6. Does the government offer any incentives or encourage the acquisition of farmland? For example, the government may offer tax exemptions on the purchase of farmland.

The registration fee of the rights over land related to agricultural land reform under the Agriculture Land Reform Act is eligible for exemptions.

7. What kind of encumbrances typically affect farmland?

A person or legal entity who is granted rights under the Agriculture Land Reform Act shall not have the right to subdivide or transfer rights to such land to others except by way of inheritance or transference to an agricultural institution or ALRO.

8. What is the process for finding out about the existence of encumbrances affecting farmland?

The existence of encumbrances can be checked at the Department of Land and the Provincial ALRO where the land is located.

9. What kind of permits and/or licenses are you required to hold if you have an interest in farmland?

“Sor Por Gor 4-01” is a certificate to enter and use certain reformed land, which will be issued to the agricultural worker or agricultural institution who received the land allocated by ALRO, while other persons approved by ALRO to lease, hire-purchase, or buy land will receive title deed and an agreement entered into between ALRO and the applicant.

10. Is any reform expected to the laws affecting the ownership of farmland?

No reform is currently expected.

* 1 rai = 400 square wah (1600 sq. meters) = 0.4 acres = 0.16 hectares
1 ngan = 100 square wah
1 square wah = 4 sq. meters

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Real Estate

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

November 7, 2025
Thailand and the United States signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) titled “Cooperation to Diversify Global Critical Minerals Supply Chains and Promote Investments” on October 26, 2025, signaling a new strategic alignment aimed at developing Thailand’s mineral sector, particularly in rare earth elements (REEs). The MOU has implications for investments in technology, manufacturing, and other related sectors. This update outlines the key provisions of the MOU and the potential opportunities and legal navigating points for businesses. Objectives The primary driver of this agreement is the US initiative to diversify global supply chains for critical minerals and reduce reliance on current market leaders, particularly China. For Thailand, it represents a major opportunity to attract high-tech investment and develop its downstream processing industries. The cooperation is set to focus on five main areas: Technical knowledge: Exchange of technical expertise and international best practices to strengthen Thailand’s mining and processing sector. Joint cooperation: Establishing workshops, seminars, and scientific collaboration to boost innovation. Regulatory practice: Promoting good governance and streamlining regulatory and licensing procedures. Information sharing: Sharing data on potential projects and global market prices. Full-value chain: The MOU covers the entire mineral lifecycle, from exploration and extraction to processing, refining, and recycling. “First Opportunity to Invest” Clause The most debated provision within the MOU states that “participants expect to have the first opportunity to invest . . . in critical minerals assets that may be sold in Thailand.” Business implications: This clause is widely interpreted as granting US companies a first look or preferential access to investment opportunities in Thailand’s critical minerals sector. This could be a significant advantage for US-based or affiliated companies in mining, technology, and energy seeking to secure a foothold in a developing REE supply chain. Thai government position: Thai officials, including the prime minister, have publicly clarified
Read More
October 31, 2025
On September 29, 2025, Thailand’s Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC Office) published its Regulations on the Review and Certification of Binding Corporate Rules B.E. 2568 (2025) (the Regulations). The Regulations provide clarity on the PDPC Office’s approach to reviewing and certifying binding corporate rules (BCRs) under Section 29 of the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA), and aim to facilitate international data transfers within a group of undertakings or enterprises (a “corporate group”). In conjunction with this development, the PDPC Office also approved BCRs for two companies operating in Thailand on September 30, 2025. This milestone represents the first concrete progress since the PDPC’s Notification on Criteria for the Protection of Personal Data Sent or Transferred to a Foreign Country pursuant to Section 29 of the PDPA B.E. 2566 (2023) came into effect in March 2024. Some key features of the Regulations are set out below. Categorization of BCRs BCRs are classified into two types: (1) BCRs for Controllers (BCR-C) and (2) BCRs for Processors (BCR-P). The category must be clearly specified when submitting the BCRs to the PDPC Office. Documentation Requirement The applicant must prepare and submit the application (a standard template may be provided by the PDPC Office in the future) along with supporting documents for review and certification in the Thai language. If the supporting documents are in a foreign language, a certified Thai translation should be provided. The translation must be notarized by a notary public or qualified person. Supporting documents may include, among others, a binding instrument such as an intra-group agreement, or a list of entities subject to the BCRs. Expedited Process Requirement Organizations with existing BCR approvals under the EU or UK GDPR, or from countries announced by the PDPC under Section 28, may apply through an
Read More
October 30, 2025
Recent events at a Thai listed company, where a proposal to remove the director was not successful, amid claims that a competitor was attempting to gain control of the company, illustrate how disputes over corporate control can unfold differently at the board level and shareholder level. At the board level, removing directors of a listed company mid-term to gain corporate control is not an easy task under Thai law, as it requires a higher threshold than appointing a new director, which typically only requires a simple majority vote in a listed company. At the shareholder level, Thailand’s tender offer and competition regimes add complexity where different shareholder groups act in concert to remove opposing board representatives or otherwise influence control. In this article, we will explore why the attempted removal of a director may fail, and how the tender offer regime may apply. Key Issues at a Glance Shareholder groups may seek to convene meetings to propose changes to board composition or company authority. Such proposals can be delayed or complicated by regulatory requirements and the need for additional disclosures. Regulatory authorities and minority shareholders may raise concerns when major shareholders coordinate to influence board control, especially if such actions could trigger tender offer or merger control obligations. Companies often respond by seeking further information on shareholder relationships and potential conflicts before proceeding. Why the Director Removal Failed Under Section 76 of the Public Limited Companies Act B.E. 2535 (as amended), the early removal of a director requires two conditions to be satisfied at the same meeting of shareholders: Headcount test: At least 75% of shareholders attending and entitled to vote must vote in favor. If multiple shareholders appoint the same person as proxy, each proxy is counted as a separate head for the purpose of the headcount test,
Read More
October 24, 2025
On October 22, 2025, the Thai government posted a directive not to grant gambling licenses for gambling involving poker nationwide to crack down on illegal gambling activities. The directive was issued by Thailand’s Ministry of Interior to align with government policies to prevent the legalization of all types of gambling businesses, including poker as a sporting activity. This will result in the revocation of poker activities as sport and institute a strict ban on such activities nationwide. Businesses should note the new government’s strict approach toward gambling activities as the legal situation regarding gambling in the country continues to draw close attention.
Read More