You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 19, 2014

Lex Mundi Global Practice Guide: Restrictions and Incentives on Ownership of Farmland

Lex Mundi and Tilleke & Gibbins

Agricultural expansion through farmland has been a key driver of growth in several parts of the world to cope with the increasing needs for food. In many jurisdictions, the ownership and possession of farmland by foreigners has been subject to restrictions and incentives. This Global Practice Guide: Restrictions and Incentives on Ownership of Farmland, prepared members of the Lex Mundi Agribusiness practice group, provides insights for agribusiness companies and investors regarding potential opportunities and restrictions in this burgeoning area. The overview for Thailand is provided below, while the full guide can be found on the Lex Mundi website.

1. How is farmland typically defined? Please include details of any usage and size requirements if applicable.

Under the Agriculture Land Reform Act B.E. 2518 (1975), “farmland” can be typically defined as land used predominantly for agriculture. Additionally, “agriculture” covers paddy cultivation, plantations, orchards, animal rearing, fisheries, and aquatic animal breeding.

The Agriculture Land Reform Office (ALRO) is a government authority that obtains land by taking it from the public domain or purchasing and expropriating it from landowners. ALRO reforms the land into agricultural areas to provide for people who are deemed appropriate.

Section 30 of the Agriculture Land Reform Act regulates all land or immovable property which has been obtained by ALRO. ALRO has the power to allocate this land to agricultural workers (i.e. farmers) or agricultural institutions according to the rules, methods, and conditions prescribed by the responsible committee. The following qualifications shall be met:

  1. Not to exceed 50 rai* for an agricultural worker and persons in the same family engaging in other fields of agricultural work, except as in (2);
  2. Not to exceed 100 rai for an agricultural worker and persons in the same family engaging in animal husbandry classified as large animals according to the notification of the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives; 
  3. The land area must be used as the committee deems appropriate for an agricultural institution considering their category and procedures. 

Other than ALRO’s allocation of land to agricultural workers and the agricultural institutions as mentioned above, any person or legal entity who wishes to lease, hire-purchase, buy, or use agricultural land or immovable property to engage in business supporting or relating to agriculture must obtain approval from ALRO according to the regulations and conditions approved by the committee. However, the size of the land shall not exceed 50 rai.

2. Is government approval required in order to take an interest in farmland (by means of acquisition, lease or otherwise)?

As mentioned above, the right to use farmland under the Agriculture Land Reform Act shall be approved by ALRO.

3. If government approval is required, are there procedural requirements, licences and/or permits to be obtained or waiting periods which may affect the transfer of the interest in farmland?

A person who wishes to take interest in agricultural land from ALRO must submit the application to either the Central ALRO or the Provincial ALRO in which the land is located.

It generally takes about 1.5-2 years to obtain approval and/or the Sor Por Gor 4-01 certificate.

4. Is local presence required in order to take an interest in farmland?

The applicant must be Thai (either a juristic person or an individual) to take interest in farmland but does not require a local presence in Thailand.

5. Which governmental authorities are involved in the determination of the regulations of ownership of farmland?

Regulations on ownership of farmland are determined by ALRO of the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives.

6. Does the government offer any incentives or encourage the acquisition of farmland? For example, the government may offer tax exemptions on the purchase of farmland.

The registration fee of the rights over land related to agricultural land reform under the Agriculture Land Reform Act is eligible for exemptions.

7. What kind of encumbrances typically affect farmland?

A person or legal entity who is granted rights under the Agriculture Land Reform Act shall not have the right to subdivide or transfer rights to such land to others except by way of inheritance or transference to an agricultural institution or ALRO.

8. What is the process for finding out about the existence of encumbrances affecting farmland?

The existence of encumbrances can be checked at the Department of Land and the Provincial ALRO where the land is located.

9. What kind of permits and/or licenses are you required to hold if you have an interest in farmland?

“Sor Por Gor 4-01” is a certificate to enter and use certain reformed land, which will be issued to the agricultural worker or agricultural institution who received the land allocated by ALRO, while other persons approved by ALRO to lease, hire-purchase, or buy land will receive title deed and an agreement entered into between ALRO and the applicant.

10. Is any reform expected to the laws affecting the ownership of farmland?

No reform is currently expected.

* 1 rai = 400 square wah (1600 sq. meters) = 0.4 acres = 0.16 hectares
1 ngan = 100 square wah
1 square wah = 4 sq. meters

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 1, 2025
In September 2025, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused a company listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), including its current and former directors, of concealing material information in connection with its filing registration and draft prospectus. This recent enforcement action demonstrates the serious consequences of making false statements or appearing to conceal material information in IPO filings and ongoing disclosures. In addition to being subject to criminal penalties, such actions can impact the eligibility of directors and executives to serve and may cause lasting reputational damage. Key Legal Risks The Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (as amended) imposes strict liability for making false statements or concealing material information in IPO registration statements and draft prospectuses. In such cases, investors can claim for damages, and there are also criminal penalties, including imprisonment for up to five years and substantial fines, may apply to the company, its directors, and responsible officers. However, misstatements or omissions in IPO filings do not, by themselves, disqualify directors or executives from holding office, whether arising from an SEC accusation or even a final court judgment. In contrast, for ongoing disclosures after listing, such as financial statements, annual reports, and meeting notices, false or misleading statements or concealment of material information can result in not only criminal liability but also immediate disqualification of directors and executives. If the SEC accuses a listed company or its directors or executives of such misstatements or omissions, those directors or executives are immediately disqualified from their positions, even before a final court judgment. Director and Executive Qualifications Directors and executives must meet the SEC’s specified standards of trustworthiness, as set out in the relevant rules. The SEC clearly defines characteristics that are considered to demonstrate a lack of trustworthiness. For ongoing disclosures, being involved in
September 30, 2025
Vietnam’s higher education system is at a pivotal stage of reform, with the government taking decisive steps to strengthen its policy and regulatory framework. In response to obstacles encountered during the implementation of the Law on Higher Education, issued in 2012 and amended in 2018, the third draft of the amended Law on Higher Education (Draft Law) is scheduled for submission to the National Assembly in October 2025. The Draft Law reflects the state’s commitment to aligning the education sector with international standards while addressing persistent structural challenges. The Draft Law emphasizes clarifying institutional mandates, enhancing accountability, and modernizing governance models to enable higher education institutions to operate with greater autonomy and efficiency. Against this backdrop, we outline below several notable provisions of the third draft and their potential implications for higher education institutions (HEIs) in Vietnam. Applicable Entities In addition to HEIs as defined and covered under existing legislation, the Draft Law extends its scope of applicable entities. The current Law on Higher Education does not regulate training institutions under state agencies, the armed forces, or political and social organizations, nor does it provide specific provisions for institutions offering only postgraduate education. To address this, the Draft Law introduces the term “institutions with higher education activities,” expanding its scope to include: (a) academies and research institutes established by the prime minister, mandated to provide doctoral-level training; (b) educational institutions affiliated with state agencies, political organizations, socio-political organizations, and the people’s armed forces, authorized to offer higher education programs in their specialized fields; and (c) institutions established pursuant to international treaties or by decision of the prime minister, with authorization to deliver certain levels of higher education. The inclusion of “institutions with higher education activities” represents a significant development both legally and institutionally. In an increasingly diversified higher education
September 29, 2025
In September 2019, the government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 75/2019/ND-CP on Administrative Sanctions in the Field of Competition (Decree 75) to address the urgent need for clear sanctioning mechanisms following the implementation of the new Law on Competition in July 2019. However, after five years of enforcement, various gaps and inconsistencies have been exposed that hinder its application. These shortcomings have reduced the deterrent effect of the sanctioning regime, and created legal uncertainty for market participants. A recent case involving Duc Giang – Lao Cai Chemicals’ acquisition of another chemical company—one of the first cases of economic concentration violation to be sanctioned by the National Competition Commission (NCC) since the Law on Competition took effect—highlights the practical difficulties under Vietnam’s competition law enforcement regime. In this case, although the transaction exceeded the statutory notification thresholds of economic concentration set out in the law, the parties failed to submit the required notification. This violation resulted in the NCC imposing aggregate fines of VND 1,423,982,880 (approximately USD 54,770) on the companies in September 2024. On appeal, Duc Giang – Lao Cai Chemicals argued that the chairman of the NCC was legally entitled to issue a warning as the key punishment instead of a monetary penalty. However, the chairman rejected the appeal, citing Article 14 of Decree 75, under which the specific penalty and level for “failure to notify economic concentration” is a fine, not a warning. While the chairman of the NCC is generally empowered to impose penalties, a warning cannot be applied if the specific regulation for a particular violation does not provide for it as a sanction. This example shows the inadequacy and inconsistency of the regulations on penalties for violations of competition law, and underscores the need for an amendment of Decree 75 to resolve such conflicts
September 26, 2025
As Vietnam accelerates its digital transformation, data centers have emerged as critical infrastructure supporting the shift toward a digital government, digital economy, and digital society. For businesses targeting Vietnam’s rapidly growing data center market, a clear understanding of the evolving regulatory landscape, compliance obligations, and government incentives is key to successful market entry and operation. This article provides a strategic overview of investment opportunities and key compliance requirements in Vietnam’s dynamic data center sector. Investment Incentives to Boost Data Center Growth Since July 1, 2024, organizations and individuals across all economic sectors have been encouraged to invest in and contribute to the development of data centers. By law, there are no restrictions on shareholding ratios, capital contributions, or foreign investor participation in data center and cloud computing services under business cooperation contracts. Currently, investment in AI data centers is classified as a specially incentivized industry, qualifying for preferential treatments and incentives in terms of investment, taxation, land use, and other related areas. Large-scale data centers, together with AI and cloud computing, are currently considered as strategic technologies and products for which Vietnam offers significant fiscal, tax, and land incentives to promote investment. Additionally, these large-scale projects may receive direct financial support from local development budgets for facility construction, technical infrastructure, and equipment procurement, subject to state budget provisions and applicable laws. AI data center construction projects also enjoy preferential treatment under customs regulations. Regulatory Approvals for Providing Data Center Services The 2023 Telecom Law and its guiding documents marked a significant milestone by classifying data center services as value-added telecom services. Under the law, a data center service is defined as a telecom service that enables users to process, store, and retrieve information via a telecom network through the leasing of part or all of a data center. A