You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 21, 2012

Legal Requirements for Lucky Draws

Subscribe to Updates
Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

Online lucky draw campaigns are becoming one of the more popular marketing tactics to promote brands and products, as consumers are attracted to the promise of free goods and services, and internet users can quickly pass along links to friends via social networking. Lucky draws or other sweepstakes-type contests have the added bonus of being easy and cheap for companies to arrange.

However, even though draw campaigns have become a common marketing approach, many people are unaware that if a prize draw is to be held in Thailand or if the participants are located in Thailand, it would require a license, without which the party awarding the prize or gift could face criminal penalties.

Pursuant to Section 8 of the Gambling Act of 1935, a license for a lucky draw is required for those who wish to arrange for complimentary gifts or prizes to be awarded, including a draw in any manner relating to business campaigns or occupations. The arrangement of a draw without a license can result in imprisonment of up to one year and/or a fine of THB 2,000.

In addition to the license requirement, draw prizes must be given on a random basis and the draw must be held for business purposes. Even receiving an indirect benefit from holding a draw could be considered for commercial purposes, and the license is still required.

The selection process for the winner must take place physically and publicly in Thailand and in the presence of witnesses; selection by a computer or other automated means is strictly forbidden. Prizes must not be illegal, be against good morals, or be harmful to the public or national security.

With these conditions as listed above, the question arises as to the practical arrangement of the draw, given that the process cannot be automated. For example, even if participants take part via Facebook or another social networking website, the organizer has to print out participants’ information from the data system, put the information in a container, shuffle, and select the winner by hand.

Moreover, details of the prizes (such as the type of prize and value) must be provided to the public. Cash or cheques cannot be awarded as a substitute for the prize specified in the license; and if the prize is valued at more than THB 1,000, it is subject to 5% withholding tax, which will be deducted from the prize’s value.

If the draw is held in Bangkok, the license application must be submitted to the Provincial Administration Department, whereas if the activities are held outside Bangkok, the application must be submitted to the chief district officer of that locality.

The processing time for a license application is at least 15 working days and the permit fee depends on the length of the event, as the below table shows.

The Cost of Lucky Draws – Permit fees vary by length of events
License Validity 1 day 7 days 1 month 6 months 1 year
Fee (THB) 300 600 1,500 6,000 9,000

Once the winner has been chosen, a report specifying the details of the winner must be submitted to the department or the chief district officer of that locality, as the case may be.

In addition, advertisements for lucky draws must conform to the requirements under the Consumer Protection Act of 1979 and the ministerial regulations issued under the Act. The promotion organizers, for instance, are required to give clear information regarding the conditions of the offer, terms and conditions of the draw, entry period and ending dates of the offer, details of the prize and its value, date and time of the draw, advertising media to announce the name of the winner, etc.

Failure to include all of the above information in the advertisement will result in it being deemed as an unfair advertisement, which could be considered as violating the Consumer Protection Act, in which case the Advertising Board will take actions against the offending advertisers.

Any advertiser that does not comply with the laws and regulations mentioned above shall be liable to jail of up to six months and/or a fine of up to THB 50,000.

Even though businesses have the freedom to carry out lucky draws, organizers should be aware that holding a draw campaign or other similar activities from which the organizer receives direct or indirect benefits, whereby the prizes will be given on a random basis without prior permission of the local authority, is illegal.

Realistically, some people break these rules as they (wrongly) believe lucky draws are unlegislated and the risk of arrest for offenders is minimal. However, if you are organizing or thinking about organizing a draw campaign, you should consider the above rules and regulations, as violators could be subject to criminal liabilities

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 24, 2026
Myanmar’s Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA) has published the guidelines it uses to assess and approve company names for registration in the country. The guidelines, which were published on May 18, 2026, explain how DICA determines whether a proposed name is identical or too similar to an existing name, and they identify words and expressions that may be prohibited or restricted. Businesses planning to incorporate in Myanmar should expect DICA to scrutinize proposed names more closely than it has in the past. Prohibitions on Company Names The Myanmar Companies Law prohibits company names that are identical or similar to existing company names, and DICA’s internal assessment guidelines explain how this rule applies in practice. Under the guidelines, DICA may reject a proposed company name if the proposed name: Is identical or nearly identical to an existing company name; Differs from an existing company name only in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, or transliteration; Only adds words such as “Group,” “Holding,” “International,” “Myanmar,” or “Family” to an existing company name; Merely rearranges the words in an existing company name; Is pronounced similarly to an existing name; Uses the same brand name as an existing company, even if the company carries out different business activities; or Uses an existing brand name together with an abbreviation of that brand name or a shortened form of the name or business description. DICA may also consider whether a proposed name could give the impression that two companies are related, even if they operate in different business sectors. In addition, DICA may review a company name even after registration. If it later determines that the name does not comply with the Myanmar Companies Law or is otherwise unsuitable, DICA may direct the company to change its name under section 26 of the Myanmar Companies Law.
Read More
August 20, 2026
Vietnam’s Law on Bankruptcy and Rehabilitation No. 142/2025/QH15, passed by the National Assembly on December 11, 2025, does something many regional counterparts do not yet attempt: it instructs parties and arbitral tribunals on exactly what happens to an arbitration once a debtor becomes insolvent. Together with the Law on Commercial Arbitration No. 54/2010/QH12, the new law improves upon what used to be an uncertain area of practice, now providing an explicit, mandatory sequence of procedures. Suspension and Termination of Arbitration Proceedings Under article 40(2) of the law, once a Vietnamese court accepts a bankruptcy petition, any arbitration that concerns the debtor’s financial obligations must be temporarily suspended as soon as the tribunal receives the court’s notification. If the court subsequently issues a decision commencing bankruptcy proceedings, article 59(2) takes a further step: the suspended arbitration is terminated outright, and the underlying case file is transferred to the court handling the insolvency for resolution. The two provisions work as a sequence: first suspension, then termination and transfer, rather than as independent triggers. Meanwhile, article 60(4) reinforces this effect by vesting the bankruptcy court with exclusive jurisdiction over all claims against the debtor from the date the petition is accepted. Notably, this mechanism operates automatically, without the need for the insolvency court to issue a separate anti-arbitration order. The tribunal simply suspends or terminates the proceeding by operation of law once notified; however, Vietnamese law currently provides no procedure by which a party can apply to the insolvency court for permission to continue the arbitration despite the statutory effect. Practitioners with a Vietnamese counterparty in arbitration should treat notification of a bankruptcy filing as something to flag to the tribunal immediately since continuing to arbitrate a claim that has become subject to article 40(2) or 59(2) risks producing an award vulnerable
Read More
August 20, 2026
Thai law contains no provision that speaks directly to what happens to an arbitration when one of the parties becomes insolvent. The interaction between arbitration and insolvency is derived instead from the general operation of two separately drafted laws: the Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940) and the Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002). Because Thai courts have had few opportunities to interpret how these two statutes apply together, the practical answer to many questions, such as who represents an insolvent party in arbitration, whether an award will be enforced, and what happens to a foreign proceeding, depends on inference from general principles of insolvency, arbitration, and procedural law rather than on settled rules. Liquidation and Restructuring The Bankruptcy Act governs both liquidation, which winds up a debtor’s affairs, and restructuring (rehabilitation), which aims to preserve a business. The consequences for arbitration differ accordingly. In liquidation, the debtor’s assets vest in the official receiver, who alone can conduct or continue any arbitration affecting the estate; the debtor loses the authority to act on its own behalf. In restructuring, the plan preparer or administrator takes over that role, but there is more room for the debtor to remain involved, since the objective of rehabilitation is to keep the business operational. Restructuring carries an automatic stay that takes effect once the Bankruptcy Court accepts the restructuring petition. This stay can halt an arbitration regardless of where it is seated. In contrast, liquidation does not work through a stay; instead, the debtor’s loss of authority over its own assets and disputes is what constrains the arbitration. Neither proceeding provides a party a formal route to apply for permission to continue arbitrating—the Bankruptcy Act contains no such mechanism—though in restructuring cases the Bankruptcy Court may allow proceedings to continue where doing so will not prejudice
Read More
August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.
Read More