You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 17, 2021

Laos Sets Out Rules for Securing Investment Promotion Incentives

Subscribe to Updates

Laos has issued important new guidelines on obtaining investment promotion incentives in the country. The Instructions on the Promotion of Investment Incentives concerning the State Land Rental and Concession Fee, which was published in the Lao Official Gazette on May 28, 2021, supplement the Law on Investment Promotion of 2016 by clarifying procedural requirements for general investment, obtaining an incentive certificate, activity-specific requirements, and zone categories for various districts.

The Law on Investment Promotion plays a key role in clarifying Laos’ approval process for investments and business activities. The law provides a list of promoted sectors that can receive certain incentives (e.g., profit tax holidays and exemption from state land rental or concession fees) if they fulfill the law’s general requirements. The incentives can last for 4 to 15 years, depending on the type of promoted activity and the zone in which it is located (i.e., zone 1 for remote areas, zone 2 for developed areas, and zone 3 for special economic zones). Additionally, the Law on Investment Promotion introduced the “incentive certificate,” which is issued upon request when an investment activity is approved for receiving promotion incentives.

However, the Law on Investment Promotion was considered to be very general, and these instructions represent the Lao authorities’ attempt to clarify the law by specifying the types of investment activities eligible for incentives, the procedure for requesting and obtaining an incentive certificate, and other requirements for businesses and investments to thrive in Laos.

Incentive Certificate

According to the investment promotion instructions, legal entities must submit an application for an incentive certificate to the appropriate section of the Ministry of Planning and Investment (MPI), which will coordinate internally and with other governmental agencies, including the Ministry of Finance. If the activity is deemed eligible and all requirements are met, the authorities will issue the certificate within 30 working days in accordance with the following procedure:

  1. A legal entity submits a request for an incentive certificate via the one-stop service at the central or provincial level.
  2. Within 10 working days, the appropriate section of the MPI coordinates with relevant governmental agencies at the central and provincial levels to conduct an on-site inspection of the entity’s investment activity.
  3. The one-stop service will submit its opinion on the matter to the Investment Promotion and Management Committee, which will issue its decision within 15 working days.
  4. If approved, the incentive certificate will be issued within five working days. If the request is rejected, the one-stop service will inform the applicant within two working days.

According to the instructions, large investment projects that have signed a concession agreement with the Lao government, and are subject to a National Assembly resolution on incentives beyond those provided in the Law on Investment Promotion, do not have to request an incentive certificate.

A legal entity that receive an incentive certificate must implement the incentive-eligible activities from its certificate, comply with its sector’s laws and regulations, pay its taxes and other official fees, and report its activity every six months to the MPI, Ministry of Finance, and any other relevant governmental agencies.

The instructions provide that an initial warning will be issued to a legal entity that does not observe the country’s law and regulations. If it does not correct the wrongs in accordance with the warning within 45 working days, its tax incentives may be withdrawn.

Investment Requirements

The instructions group investment requirements into two categories—general and specific.

All legal entities seeking investment promotion incentives must fulfill the general investment requirements (termed “horizontal requirements” in the instructions). According to the instructions, an entity must invest LAK 1.2 billion (approx. USD 127,000) in one of the promoted sectors, or employ at least 30 Lao technical staff or at least 50 Lao workers with employment contracts of at least one year. In addition, entities must pay up their registered capital, comply with all applicable laws and regulations (including environmental requirements), and fulfill their tax obligations.

Additional specific requirements apply to 108 activities within the promoted sectors in the Law on Investment Promotion, a list of which are detailed in the instructions. The law’s promoted sectors are broad, each encompassing a range of business activities as follows:

  • High and modern technology applications, scientific research, research and development, use of innovative and environmental-friendly technology, efficient use of natural resources and energy;
  • Clean and toxic-free agriculture, seed production, animal breeding, industrial plantations, forestry development, protection of environment and bio-diversity, activities promoting rural development and poverty reduction;
  • Environmentally friendly agricultural processing, national traditional and unique handicraft processing;
  • Environmentally friendly and sustainable natural, cultural, and historical tourism development;
  • Education, sports, human resource development and labor skill development, vocational training institutions or centers, production of educational and sports equipment;
  • Construction of modern hospitals, pharmaceutical and medical equipment factories, traditional medicine production and treatment;
  • Investment, service provision and development of public infrastructure for urban traffic congestion reduction and residence facilities, infrastructure development for agricultural and industrial production, transportation of goods, transit services and international linkages;
  • Policy banks and microfinance focusing on poverty reduction for people and communities with limited access to banks; and
  • Modern commercial centers promoting domestic products and world-renowned brands, fairs for domestic products (industrial, handicraft, and agricultural).

The annex that contains the 108 activities mentioned above also contains the specific requirements for the activities that are subject to them. These are myriad and are often concerned with meeting domestic or international standards—for example:

  • Factories that process sugar must comply with the ISO 9001 and ISO 14000 standards and be certified as a GMP or HACCP within four years of its date of starting the operation.
  • Factories that assemble two-wheeled vehicles (e.g., motorcycles) must assemble vehicles in an automated or semi-automated process using technologically advanced machines, which must not be more than five years old from their year of manufacture. The activity must meet ISO 9001 standards issued within four years, and factories must be of the semi knocked down (SKD) type.

Zones

As mentioned above, the Law on Investment Promotion offers different promotional incentives based on the location—or “zone”—of the activity, with zone 1 being remote areas with limited infrastructure, zone 2 for areas with better socioeconomic infrastructure to support investment, and zone 3 for special economic zones. The Law on Investment Promotion did not provide further guidance on which specific areas of the country were located in zone 1 or zone 2, and the recently issued instructions clarify this point by listing the districts that fall into each zone.

Conclusion

The instructions strengthen the Law on Investment Promotion by adding clarity and legal certainty to areas of the law that had formerly been left up to the discretion of local authorities. Now, however, the conditions and requirements are confirmed by the recent instructions and are made available to every investor in Laos. This movement toward regulatory consistency is another encouraging step taken by the Lao government to improve the country’s business climate and foster a more welcoming environment for foreign direct investment.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 24, 2026
Myanmar’s Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA) has published the guidelines it uses to assess and approve company names for registration in the country. The guidelines, which were published on May 18, 2026, explain how DICA determines whether a proposed name is identical or too similar to an existing name, and they identify words and expressions that may be prohibited or restricted. Businesses planning to incorporate in Myanmar should expect DICA to scrutinize proposed names more closely than it has in the past. Prohibitions on Company Names The Myanmar Companies Law prohibits company names that are identical or similar to existing company names, and DICA’s internal assessment guidelines explain how this rule applies in practice. Under the guidelines, DICA may reject a proposed company name if the proposed name: Is identical or nearly identical to an existing company name; Differs from an existing company name only in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, or transliteration; Only adds words such as “Group,” “Holding,” “International,” “Myanmar,” or “Family” to an existing company name; Merely rearranges the words in an existing company name; Is pronounced similarly to an existing name; Uses the same brand name as an existing company, even if the company carries out different business activities; or Uses an existing brand name together with an abbreviation of that brand name or a shortened form of the name or business description. DICA may also consider whether a proposed name could give the impression that two companies are related, even if they operate in different business sectors. In addition, DICA may review a company name even after registration. If it later determines that the name does not comply with the Myanmar Companies Law or is otherwise unsuitable, DICA may direct the company to change its name under section 26 of the Myanmar Companies Law.
Read More
August 20, 2026
Vietnam’s Law on Bankruptcy and Rehabilitation No. 142/2025/QH15, passed by the National Assembly on December 11, 2025, does something many regional counterparts do not yet attempt: it instructs parties and arbitral tribunals on exactly what happens to an arbitration once a debtor becomes insolvent. Together with the Law on Commercial Arbitration No. 54/2010/QH12, the new law improves upon what used to be an uncertain area of practice, now providing an explicit, mandatory sequence of procedures. Suspension and Termination of Arbitration Proceedings Under article 40(2) of the law, once a Vietnamese court accepts a bankruptcy petition, any arbitration that concerns the debtor’s financial obligations must be temporarily suspended as soon as the tribunal receives the court’s notification. If the court subsequently issues a decision commencing bankruptcy proceedings, article 59(2) takes a further step: the suspended arbitration is terminated outright, and the underlying case file is transferred to the court handling the insolvency for resolution. The two provisions work as a sequence: first suspension, then termination and transfer, rather than as independent triggers. Meanwhile, article 60(4) reinforces this effect by vesting the bankruptcy court with exclusive jurisdiction over all claims against the debtor from the date the petition is accepted. Notably, this mechanism operates automatically, without the need for the insolvency court to issue a separate anti-arbitration order. The tribunal simply suspends or terminates the proceeding by operation of law once notified; however, Vietnamese law currently provides no procedure by which a party can apply to the insolvency court for permission to continue the arbitration despite the statutory effect. Practitioners with a Vietnamese counterparty in arbitration should treat notification of a bankruptcy filing as something to flag to the tribunal immediately since continuing to arbitrate a claim that has become subject to article 40(2) or 59(2) risks producing an award vulnerable
Read More
August 20, 2026
Thai law contains no provision that speaks directly to what happens to an arbitration when one of the parties becomes insolvent. The interaction between arbitration and insolvency is derived instead from the general operation of two separately drafted laws: the Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940) and the Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002). Because Thai courts have had few opportunities to interpret how these two statutes apply together, the practical answer to many questions, such as who represents an insolvent party in arbitration, whether an award will be enforced, and what happens to a foreign proceeding, depends on inference from general principles of insolvency, arbitration, and procedural law rather than on settled rules. Liquidation and Restructuring The Bankruptcy Act governs both liquidation, which winds up a debtor’s affairs, and restructuring (rehabilitation), which aims to preserve a business. The consequences for arbitration differ accordingly. In liquidation, the debtor’s assets vest in the official receiver, who alone can conduct or continue any arbitration affecting the estate; the debtor loses the authority to act on its own behalf. In restructuring, the plan preparer or administrator takes over that role, but there is more room for the debtor to remain involved, since the objective of rehabilitation is to keep the business operational. Restructuring carries an automatic stay that takes effect once the Bankruptcy Court accepts the restructuring petition. This stay can halt an arbitration regardless of where it is seated. In contrast, liquidation does not work through a stay; instead, the debtor’s loss of authority over its own assets and disputes is what constrains the arbitration. Neither proceeding provides a party a formal route to apply for permission to continue arbitrating—the Bankruptcy Act contains no such mechanism—though in restructuring cases the Bankruptcy Court may allow proceedings to continue where doing so will not prejudice
Read More
August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.
Read More