You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 4, 2020

Laos Provides Tax Relief and Other Measures to Reduce the Economic Impact of COVID-19

Subscribe to Updates

On April 2, the prime minister of Laos issued the Decision on the Policies and Measures to Reduce the Impact from the COVID-19 Pandemic. A number of the measures announced will affect locally established business operators.

Relief Measures

The latest decision reiterates previously issued measures from the Ministry of Finance and the Bank of Laos (see here and here). The most salient new measures provided in the decision are primarily concerned with tax relief as follows:

  • Salary tax exemption for both private and public sector employees, applicable for monthly salaries below LAK 5 million (approx. USD 550), in effect from April to June.
  • Deferment of payments for affected businesses, including normal contributions to the National Social Security Fund (NSSF), in effect for the months of April to June. The new deadline for contributions to the NSSF has not yet been specified.
  • Profit tax exemption for micro-enterprises from April to June.
  • Exemption from customs duties, tax, and related official fees, on medical devices and other products for prevention, control, and preparation in regard to COVID-19 (e.g., masks, sanitizers, medical equipment, and other necessary items—a more detailed list will be provided later).
  • Postponement of tax obligations for eligible business operators in the tourism industry for the months of April to June 2020. A detailed list of the businesses that will benefit from this provision will be provided by the Ministry of Information, Culture, and Tourism.

Other measures in the decision include postponement of the payment of annual road tax to June 30; confirmation of the Bank of Laos’ proposal to decrease the interest rate and ratio of the compulsory reserve for private commercial banks; and an announcement that the government is studying the possibility of reducing and deferring electricity and water bill payments for both individuals and businesses.

Public Sector Expenditures

The prime minister stated that large-scale investment projects should be encouraged to maintain their ongoing operations, private investment should be facilitated, and ministries and local authorities should decrease their usual administrative expenses by at least 10% of their budget for 2020. Expenses that will be reduced include those relating to (1) meetings and seminars, (2) welcoming of foreign guests, (3) scientific studies, (4) construction expenses, (5) national celebrations, (6) fixed assets, and (7) other expenses. The resulting cost savings will be redirected to the government’s COVID-19 prevention efforts.

New public investment infrastructure projects that have already been approved by the National Assembly in 2020 will be delayed to 2021. Projects deemed to be overvalued or to have a limited impact will be reassessed and suspended or renegotiated.

Lao Airlines is singled out as a state enterprise that may need to adapt its business plan, and it should be ready to resume its activities as soon as the COVID-19 pandemic has passed.

Comments

As is the case in many other jurisdictions, the government of Laos has taken a series of extraordinary measures over the past week to address the far-reaching impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, and these further clarifications by the prime minister are welcome. Further details will be required in regard to the deadlines and eligibility for some of the relief measures, and we expect that these issues will be treated on a case-by-case basis by the line ministries until further explanations are provided through official channels.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Employment

Tax

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 2, 2021
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a significant increase in the popularity of electronic meetings among businesses across the world, as physical meetings became unfeasible due to government lockdowns and regulations limiting gatherings to limit the risk of further spreading the disease. In Thailand, this turn of events has resulted in the promulgation of a new electronic meeting law to modernize rules that facilitate the convening of corporate entities’ statutory meetings as required under Thai law. Electronic meetings in Thailand have been permitted to some degree since June 27, 2014, when the Announcement of the National Council for Peace and Order No. 74/2557 on Teleconferences through Electronic Means B.E. 2557 (2014) first allowed the practice, subject to various restrictions. However, many companies considered two strict requirements under this announcement to be impractical: at least one-third of the quorum for the electronic meeting had to physically attend the meeting at the designated meeting venue, which implies that no more than two-thirds of the quorum could choose to attend the meeting via electronic means; and all participants of the electronic meeting (whether attending electronically or in person) had to be physically present in Thailand at the time of the meeting, which effectively prohibited overseas participation. New Rules for Electronic Meetings The new electronic meeting law, the Royal Decree on Teleconferences through Electronic Means B.E. 2563 (2020), came into effect on April 19, 2020, replacing the 2014 order and relaxing its most onerous limitations in order to facilitate meetings of directors and shareholders via electronic means during the COVID-19 pandemic. The key relaxations codified by the royal decree include allowing all attendees to attend meetings via electronic means, such as by phone or videoconferencing, from anywhere in the world. Furthermore, there is no longer a physical attendance requirement, and notices (and enclosures)
Read More
March 2, 2021
When Vietnam’s new Law on Enterprises of 2020 (2020 LOE) came into effect on January 1, 2021, the implementing regulations for corporate matters guiding the now-repealed Law on Enterprises of 2014 ceased their effectiveness, per principles under the laws on promulgation of legislative documents. As a result, governmental bodies and enterprises have been awaiting the issuance of new implementing regulations that will apply to the 2020 LOE. The first major guidance arrived on January 4, 2021, when the government issued Decree No. 01/2021/ND-CP on enterprise registration (Decree 01), which replaces Decree No. 78/2015/ND-CP dated September 14, 2015 (Decree 78) on the same matter. This article discusses some notable points of Decree 01 in comparison to Decree 78. Operating Status of Enterprises Decree 01 sets out seven possible legal statuses under which an established enterprise may be classified in its profile on the National Business Registration Portal (NBRP), which is available for public access: Active; Business temporarily suspended; No longer in business at the registered address; Enterprise registration certificate revoked due to decision issued by tax authority; In dissolution process, divided, merged, or acquired; In bankruptcy process; and Dissolved, bankrupt, or ceased to exist. By default, the status of a company is active. The status will be updated to one of the other options in the NBRP when the respective licensing procedures are completed at the provincial Department of Planning and Investment (e.g., for temporary suspension of business or initiation of dissolution process), or according to the decision of the relevant authorities (e.g., for bankruptcy). The previous Decree 78 did not provide detail on the available status options. The common statuses observed on the NBRP before the enactment of Decree 01 were “active,” “business temporarily suspended,” “locked” (akin to the current “in dissolution process”), and “dissolved.” This change will make
Read More
March 2, 2021
Maintaining positive employee relations is a top concern for virtually all companies. Many companies in Thailand—especially those located in the country’s industrial estates—have labor unions, while others rely on other non-union pathways for attending to the concerns of employees. In all of these cases, the union or collective group of employees also chooses members of the “employee committee” that is charged with fostering good relations and open communications with the employer through regular meetings dedicated to discussion of workplace matters. Companies with a workforce of 50 or more employees need to understand the roles of the employee committee and the specific rights accorded to the committee members, which are different from the rights of the other employees. Besides the obvious benefits that this understanding has for relations with their employees, it is also important if an employer takes disciplinary action against employee committee members, as violation of a committee member’s rights could result in the employer facing criminal penalties. The legal basis for these employee committees is the Labor Relations Act B.E. 2518 (LRA), which stipulates that in any workplace with at least 50 employees, the employees or their labor union of the business establishment is entitled to establish an employee committee. Members are elected (or, in the case of a labor union, appointed) to three-year terms on the committee, with the total number of committee members depending on the size of the workforce, as shown in the table. Membership Requirements Among partially unionized workforces, labor unions are generally given precedence when it comes to control of the committee. If a labor union whose members account for more than 20% of the total employees in a workplace, the union gets to appoint the majority of the employee committee members (e.g., four out of a seven-person committee, five of a
Read More
March 2, 2021
Like many countries, Thailand requires stamp duty to be paid on the execution of certain legal instruments. A liable person who fails to pay stamp duty on a required instrument can be subject to a maximum surcharge of six times the applicable stamp duty, and an instrument on which stamp duty has not been paid will not be admissible as evidence in civil cases (that is, it will have limited legal weight and enforceability). Before July 2019, there were three methods for paying stamp duty: Affixing adhesive stamps on the instrument (and canceling it by the liable person in order to make sure that the adhesive stamp duty cannot be reused); Having a stamp impressed on the paper instrument; or Filing a prescribed form and paying the duty by cash or cashiers cheque at an area revenue office. In addition to paying the correct amount of stamp duty, the law also requires that stamp duty on certain instruments be paid using a specific prescribed method from the list above. Failure to use the prescribed method would be considered as that the stamp duty not having been paid. For example, a hire-of-work instrument is subject to stamp duty, but if the remuneration stated within the agreement is at least THB 1,000,000 (approximately USD 33,500), the stamp duty must be paid by filing a prescribed form and paying by cash or cashier’s cheque at an area revenue office. Affixing adhesive stamp duty is not allowed in that circumstance. E-Stamp Duty In June 2019, the Revenue Department introduced a fourth method of paying stamp duty, allowing online payments in specific circumstances (e-Stamp Duty). After the launch of the e-Stamp Duty system, the Revenue Department issued a notification (Notification of the Director-General of Revenue concerning Stamp Duty (No. 58)) requiring stamp duty on
Read More