You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 29, 2014

Food and Beverage Franchising in Vietnam

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

On February 8, 2014, a few days after the Lunar New Year, Vietnam’s first-ever McDonald’s opened in Ho Chi Minh City’s District 1. Situated on a major transportation axis, but away from tourist areas and the downtown core, the new restaurant boasted 24-hour service and a drive-thru—for both cars and motorbikes—which was also purported to be the first in Vietnam.

Curious customers queued round the clock in snaking lines more commonly seen at amusement parks than chain restaurants, as a flood of teens, families, and professionals awaited their first taste of the famous Big Mac. In just the first 24 hours of business, 22,500 customers were served, according to the Daily Mail. By the end of the first month, a staggering 400,000 people had dined at this single location. Though those numbers may be inflated, they reflect an apparent truth: the Vietnamese market has a great demand for famous worldwide brands.

As of March 2014, there were approximately 120 foreign franchisors registered in Vietnam. The businesses predominantly come from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Singapore, but there is a good mix of nationalities. The dominant business sectors are retail, education, and food service, with food and beverage franchises accounting for 30% of the registered franchises. KFC and Lotteria came to Vietnam over a decade ago and currently have over 140 restaurants and over 170 outlets, respectively, in the country. Pizza Hut arrived in 2007 and now has over 40 restaurants. Meanwhile, newcomers such as Subway, Starbucks, Popeye’s, and Burger King are steadily opening restaurants in Vietnam, and McDonald’s surely has an eye on rapid expansion.

Franchising has become a popular way for foreign food brands to enter the Vietnamese market because it is considered to be the fastest and least risky alternative, one which sidesteps certain regulatory restrictions still imposed on foreign-invested businesses in the food service industry. For example, despite Vietnam’s accession to the WTO in 2007, foreign-invested businesses are not allowed to establish their own restaurants, subject to narrow exceptions (e.g., where a restaurant is established in parallel with the construction of a hotel), though this restriction is to be removed in 2015.

In addition, foreign food and beverage service providers entering Vietnam through a franchising arrangement with a Vietnamese partner do not need to have a legal presence in Vietnam or set up a business entity in Vietnam, and thus can avoid significant capital outlays. However, franchising carries its own set of challenges and hurdles.

Franchising Regulations and Procedures

Despite the market entries of a number of globally recognized food and beverage brands, potential franchisors should understand that franchising is still in an early stage in Vietnam, and the same could be said for Vietnam’s franchising laws. Franchising was first recognized as a form of commercial activity in the Commercial Law of 2005, with the legal groundwork for franchising activities laid out a year later in Decree 35 and Circular 09. There is now a registration system with the government and a comprehensive set of regulations; however, there is still a lack of depth in the regulations, which can leave ambiguities in many areas for those wishing to operate a franchise system in Vietnam.

Franchising law in Vietnam requires that all foreign franchisors register their proposed franchising activities with the Vietnamese authorities before carrying out the activities. The authority responsible for managing franchising is the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT). The MOIT sets out requirements for the application file that foreign franchisors need to submit to register their activities in Vietnam. As part of the application, a foreign franchisor will need to submit a “Franchise Description Document” (FDD), which may contain a considerable amount of commercially sensitive data about the franchisor. Apart from the extensive FDD, the application file must include relevant business certificates, intellectual property certificates, and, in the case of a secondary franchisor, a letter of approval to sub-franchise from the franchisor. The amount of information that the franchisor must prepare may be substantial and the costs incurred to translate and notarize such documents can also be considerable.

Keys to Successful Franchising

As a prerequisite to franchising, foreign franchisors should ensure that their intellectual property rights (trademarks, patents, etc.) are registered in Vietnam. The registration of trademarks should be in the foreign franchisor’s own name as the registrant. Otherwise, if the local franchisee is the registrant, complications may arise if a dispute occurs between the two parties.

Franchisors often want disputes arising under franchise agreements to be resolved by foreign courts or arbitration centers. However, the recognition and enforcement in Vietnam of foreign judgments or awards can be extremely difficult or even impossible to secure. Foreign courts’ judgments are generally unenforceable in Vietnam unless there is a treaty between Vietnam and the relevant country on the recognition of judicial decisions. Thus, franchisors must give close consideration as to the dispute resolution provisions under their franchise agreements.

Finally, franchisors should also be aware that fees and payments arising from the franchise agreement, such as initial franchise fees, royalties, technical assistance fees, training fees, and marketing fees, are subject to Vietnam’s foreign contractor tax regime, which includes value-added tax and corporate income tax. Corporate income tax rates may vary depending on whether there are applicable double tax avoidance treaties. (Vietnam is a party to double tax avoidance treaties with more than 60 other countries, but notably not with the U.S.)

Outlook

The government has made great efforts to set up regulations allowing franchises to be established in Vietnam. This has resulted in a number of global brands entering the market, highlighted by the recent entry of McDonald’s. However, additional guidance will be required as Vietnam’s laws on franchising continue to develop.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 24, 2026
Myanmar’s Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA) has published the guidelines it uses to assess and approve company names for registration in the country. The guidelines, which were published on May 18, 2026, explain how DICA determines whether a proposed name is identical or too similar to an existing name, and they identify words and expressions that may be prohibited or restricted. Businesses planning to incorporate in Myanmar should expect DICA to scrutinize proposed names more closely than it has in the past. Prohibitions on Company Names The Myanmar Companies Law prohibits company names that are identical or similar to existing company names, and DICA’s internal assessment guidelines explain how this rule applies in practice. Under the guidelines, DICA may reject a proposed company name if the proposed name: Is identical or nearly identical to an existing company name; Differs from an existing company name only in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, or transliteration; Only adds words such as “Group,” “Holding,” “International,” “Myanmar,” or “Family” to an existing company name; Merely rearranges the words in an existing company name; Is pronounced similarly to an existing name; Uses the same brand name as an existing company, even if the company carries out different business activities; or Uses an existing brand name together with an abbreviation of that brand name or a shortened form of the name or business description. DICA may also consider whether a proposed name could give the impression that two companies are related, even if they operate in different business sectors. In addition, DICA may review a company name even after registration. If it later determines that the name does not comply with the Myanmar Companies Law or is otherwise unsuitable, DICA may direct the company to change its name under section 26 of the Myanmar Companies Law.
Read More
August 20, 2026
Vietnam’s Law on Bankruptcy and Rehabilitation No. 142/2025/QH15, passed by the National Assembly on December 11, 2025, does something many regional counterparts do not yet attempt: it instructs parties and arbitral tribunals on exactly what happens to an arbitration once a debtor becomes insolvent. Together with the Law on Commercial Arbitration No. 54/2010/QH12, the new law improves upon what used to be an uncertain area of practice, now providing an explicit, mandatory sequence of procedures. Suspension and Termination of Arbitration Proceedings Under article 40(2) of the law, once a Vietnamese court accepts a bankruptcy petition, any arbitration that concerns the debtor’s financial obligations must be temporarily suspended as soon as the tribunal receives the court’s notification. If the court subsequently issues a decision commencing bankruptcy proceedings, article 59(2) takes a further step: the suspended arbitration is terminated outright, and the underlying case file is transferred to the court handling the insolvency for resolution. The two provisions work as a sequence: first suspension, then termination and transfer, rather than as independent triggers. Meanwhile, article 60(4) reinforces this effect by vesting the bankruptcy court with exclusive jurisdiction over all claims against the debtor from the date the petition is accepted. Notably, this mechanism operates automatically, without the need for the insolvency court to issue a separate anti-arbitration order. The tribunal simply suspends or terminates the proceeding by operation of law once notified; however, Vietnamese law currently provides no procedure by which a party can apply to the insolvency court for permission to continue the arbitration despite the statutory effect. Practitioners with a Vietnamese counterparty in arbitration should treat notification of a bankruptcy filing as something to flag to the tribunal immediately since continuing to arbitrate a claim that has become subject to article 40(2) or 59(2) risks producing an award vulnerable
Read More
August 20, 2026
Thai law contains no provision that speaks directly to what happens to an arbitration when one of the parties becomes insolvent. The interaction between arbitration and insolvency is derived instead from the general operation of two separately drafted laws: the Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940) and the Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002). Because Thai courts have had few opportunities to interpret how these two statutes apply together, the practical answer to many questions, such as who represents an insolvent party in arbitration, whether an award will be enforced, and what happens to a foreign proceeding, depends on inference from general principles of insolvency, arbitration, and procedural law rather than on settled rules. Liquidation and Restructuring The Bankruptcy Act governs both liquidation, which winds up a debtor’s affairs, and restructuring (rehabilitation), which aims to preserve a business. The consequences for arbitration differ accordingly. In liquidation, the debtor’s assets vest in the official receiver, who alone can conduct or continue any arbitration affecting the estate; the debtor loses the authority to act on its own behalf. In restructuring, the plan preparer or administrator takes over that role, but there is more room for the debtor to remain involved, since the objective of rehabilitation is to keep the business operational. Restructuring carries an automatic stay that takes effect once the Bankruptcy Court accepts the restructuring petition. This stay can halt an arbitration regardless of where it is seated. In contrast, liquidation does not work through a stay; instead, the debtor’s loss of authority over its own assets and disputes is what constrains the arbitration. Neither proceeding provides a party a formal route to apply for permission to continue arbitrating—the Bankruptcy Act contains no such mechanism—though in restructuring cases the Bankruptcy Court may allow proceedings to continue where doing so will not prejudice
Read More
August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.
Read More