You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 28, 2016

Direct Sale and Direct Marketing Act: Draft Amendments Could Pose Challenges to Operators

Informed Counsel

In recent years, the Thai government has attempted to strike a balance between attracting investment and protecting consumer interests. On the one hand, it has tried to liberalize foreign investment, eradicate bureaucratic red tape, and introduce investment promotion and investor-friendly policies through tax and non-tax incentives. On the other hand, it has enacted a number of laws and regulations to enhance consumer protection.

Despite this balancing act, certain laws and regulations still impose stringent requirements on business operators. This includes the Direct Sale and Direct Marketing Act B.E. 2545 (2002) (Act), which requires business operators to register with the Office of the Consumer Protection Board (OCPB) prior to commencing a direct sale or direct marketing business in Thailand. Business operators, and particularly foreign business operators, have faced frequent impediments during registration, caused by stringent processes, policy reviews, and documentation requirements, which are imposed by officials who are tasked with enforcing and applying the Act.

The officials typically request applicants to revise certain documents, such as their product catalogs, marketing plans, and benefit and compensation schemes, on the basis that they do not meet the officials’ guidelines. These guidelines, however, are not publicly available. Therefore, not only are business operators faced with strict requirements, but the requirements are also obscure, resulting in a registration process that is time consuming and unpredictable.

A number of draft amendments to the Act have been proposed which will introduce significant changes to its substantive and procedural provisions. This article discusses the amendments, and the impact on business operators and consumers.

Key Amendments and Requirements for Applications

The amendments introduce a definition for a “company,” which was not previously defined. This is intended to limit qualified applicants to juristic persons that have registered capital (i.e., only limited companies under the Civil and Commercial Code and public limited companies under the law relating to Public Limited Companies).

Companies that qualify for registration are subsequently required to fulfill statutory requirements, including the need to have paid-up capital amounting to not less than THB 10 million, and not revoking the direct sale or direct marketing registration within a period of five years prior to the application submission date.

Directors or persons who have the power to manage the company must not be: (1) declared bankrupt; (2) adjudged incompetent or quasi-incompetent; (3) imprisoned by a final judgement, excluding imprisonment for negligence or misdemeanors; (4) a director or an authorized person in another company which has already been granted direct sale or direct marketing registration; and (5) a director or an authorized person in any company whose registration has been revoked.

A direct sale and direct marketing committee is prohibited from holding more than 10 percent of the shares in a company conducting a direct sale or direct marketing business within a period of one year prior to and during their time in office, in order to avoid conflicts of interest.

To apply for registration, applicants are required to provide a guarantee to the registrar in accordance with the amount prescribed by Ministerial Regulation, but this amount must not be less than THB 500,000. The guarantee may be in the form of cash, a bank guarantee, government bonds, bonds issued by state enterprises, or other properties which are stipulated in a notification of the direct sale and direct marketing committee. This guarantee may be used to pay damages incurred by consumers as a result of breaches of buy-sell agreements committed by the operators.

The amendments also impose reporting duties on both direct sale and direct marketing operators. If operators relocate their office, they are required to notify the registrar within 15 days from the relocation date. In addition, operators must submit reports on their business operations to the registrar, in accordance with the forms, guidelines, and periods prescribed in a notification issued by the direct sale and direct marketing committee. Any transfer or cessation of operations must be approved by the registrar, in conjunction with publishing a notification in a local newspaper and informing consumers by registered mail or through another medium of communication.

Increased Protection for Consumers

The amendments impose a number of additional responsibilities and liabilities, including the requirement that direct sale operators must be jointly liable to consumers who purchase goods or services from independent distributors, even though ownership of such goods or services is transferred from the operators to the independent distributors.

The responsibility to prepare buy-sell documents for goods or services also falls on operators, and such documents must be provided to consumers, together with the purchased goods or services. For direct sales, the independent distributors must hand over the documents to consumers in place of the direct sale operators. In the event that operators or independent distributors breach these statutory duties, the buy-sell agreements will not be binding on consumers.

Penalties for Registration Violations

The registrar has the authority to impose corrective measures on violators for non-serious violations before revoking a registration, while serious violations will lead to a registration being revoked. The amendments also impose criminal penalties on those who fail to comply with the registrar’s orders, or who violate provisions on consumer advertisements and communication.

The amendments provide a transition period for operators that have already registered for direct sale and direct marketing. These operators must comply with the requirements within the prescribed time frame permitted for such matters, as stipulated under the amendments—otherwise, their registrations will be automatically revoked.

While the amendments aim to protect consumers from unaccountable business operators, the additional requirements could adversely impact existing business operators that are unable to meet even more stringent requirements. If the registrations of these operators are revoked, the government may consider the consumers who were negatively affected by the revocation, and remedial measures may be enacted to counteract any ensuing issues. The draft amendments have now been submitted to the National Assembly for further consideration, and business operators in this sector will be closely monitoring the progress of their enactment.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 20, 2026
Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) now requires data center projects to demonstrate measurable benefits for local workforce development, R&D, SME capability, and domestic supply chains to qualify for corporate income tax (CIT) exemptions. BOI Notification No. Por. 3/2569, issued on February 6, 2026, updates the requirements for projects seeking promotion under BOI category 8.2.1 (data centers). All data center projects must now submit and implement plans covering development of Thai human resources and domestic supply chain support before benefiting from any CIT exemption. Human Resources Development Plan The BOI seeks to promote local talent development beyond basic training. Plans must include the following elements: Training for data center design, construction, and operations targeting vocational students, engineering and ICT undergraduates and postgraduates, and energy and building personnel in Thailand. Joint curricula with Thai universities and technical institutes. Collaborative R&D with Thai nationals or institutions in areas including AI, resource allocation, high-performance computing, and data center hardware and systems. Thai SME upskilling in electrical and energy systems and IT services. Domestic Supply Chain Support Plan Plans must demonstrate knowledge transfer in design, construction, cooling, security, and power and water management. Projects must also include usage or installation of domestically manufactured equipment or engage specialist domestic entities. Criteria for BOI Evaluation The BOI will assess data center operators’ eligibility for CIT incentives based on two criteria: Scale requirement: Training and joint-curriculum initiatives must reach a total participants equal to at least 10 times the project headcount and run for the duration of the CIT incentive. If this threshold is not met, the applicant must also implement continuous R&D or SME skills-development plans throughout the incentive period. Substantiality test: Supply-chain plans must be substantive, meet industry standards, and show measurable development of the domestic digital and data center supply base. To ensure compliance,
February 25, 2026
Tilleke & Gibbins has updated the Vietnam chapter in the newly released Licensing 2026 guide, published by Lexology Panoramic. The comparative guide provides companies and other interested readers with information on licensing law and practice in various countries around the world. Licensing 2026 provides detailed information on the following topics: Restrictions, laws and licensing arrangements Intellectual property issues: Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, contesting the validity of licensor’s IP rights, invalidity and expiry of IP rights, security interests, proceedings against third parties, sublicensing, jointly owned IP, first to file, scope of patent protection, trade secrets, copyright Software licensing: Perpetual licensing, legal requirements, user restrictions Royalties and payments, currency conversion, and taxes: Relevant legislation, restrictions, taxation of foreign licensors Competition law issues: Restrictions on trade, legal restrictions, and IP-related court rulings Indemnification, disclaimers, and damages: Prevalence and enforceability of indemnity provisions and contractual waivers of damages Termination: Right to terminate, impact of termination Bankruptcy: Impact of licensee or licensor bankruptcy Dispute resolution: Governing law, arbitration, enforceability, injunctive relief, contractual waivers The Vietnam chapter is available below as a PDF. Readers can gain 30 days of complementary access to the full Licensing 2026 guide and the rest of Lexology Panoramic’s varied offerings through this link.
February 19, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has overhauled its approach to related-party transactions (RPTs) by issuing new rules that simplify approval processes while expanding oversight. Capital Market Supervisory Board Notification No. TorJor. 46/2568 will replace the longstanding Notification No. TorJor. 21/2551, which has governed RPT compliance for over a decade. The new regulation takes effect on July 1, 2026. Any RPT matters approved by a company’s board of directors or approved for shareholders’ approval before that date remain subject to Notification No. TorJor. 21/2551. The new RPT rules will introduce significant changes that market participants should carefully consider. Consolidated Definitions Under the previous framework, key definitions relevant to RPT compliance were dispersed across multiple sources, including SEC notifications, Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) regulations, and provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act (before amendments). The new regulation consolidates these definitions into a single notification. Concepts such as “related party” and “connected person,” as well as relevant transaction categories, are now more systematically organized and written in greater detail. The SET has yet to issue corresponding regulations, which should include more detailed related disclosure requirements. Unified Threshold and Mandatory Board Approval The most significant change under the new regulation is the elimination of the multitiered approval framework based on transaction type. Instead of various categories, transactions are now classified as either (1) financial assistance provided to related persons, or (2) other RPTs in order to determine the level of corporate approvals and disclosures for each transaction size in these categories, but the concept remains the same. Under the previous regulation, RPTs were divided into small, medium, and large transactions, with differing approval requirements. The new regulation effectively merges the small and medium categories. As a result, all RPTs must now be approved by the board of directors as a baseline
February 19, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a new regulation on material transactions (MTs) to govern asset acquisitions and disposals by listed companies and their subsidiaries. The new notification on MT criteria (No. TorJor. 45/2568) from the Capital Market Supervisory Board replaces the long-standing notification (No. TorJor. 20/2551) that has governed such matters. The SEC has also introduced parallel amendments to the country’s related-party transaction rules. The new regulation will take effect on July 1, 2026. Any MT matters approved by a company’s board of directors for shareholders’ approval before that date remain subject to Notification No. TorJor. 20/2551. Following that date, the new MT rules will introduce several significant changes that market participants should carefully consider. Expanded Scope of Material Transactions One of the key changes under the new regulation is the expansion of the definition of MTs, which now expressly covers financial assistance and certain lease and business lease arrangements that are not in the ordinary course of business of the listed company or its subsidiaries. For financial assistance, this includes lending, granting credit, providing guarantees, or entering into any arrangement that increases the company’s financial obligations, particularly where the recipient is facing liquidity issues or unable to repay debts. Other forms of financial support also fall within scope. However, whether the provision of collateral for others qualifies as an MT remains somewhat unclear, since no disposal of assets occurs for the provider of collateral. This issue remains to be carefully considered. For lease-related transactions, the MT rules now specifically include the lease or hire-purchase of all or part of a business or assets operated by or belonging to a listed company or its subsidiaries. New Exemptions The new regulation introduces clearer exemptions for transactions between a listed company and its subsidiaries or among subsidiaries, which