You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 2, 2021

Decree on Consumer Protection in the Financial Sector in Laos

Informed Counsel

Background

On May 8, 2020, the Lao Ministry of Justice published the Decree on Consumer Protection regarding Financial Services No. 225/GOV, dated April 6, 2020, in its online Official Gazette. The decree was drafted by the Bank of the Lao PDR (BOL), which is the central bank in Laos. In addition to supplementing the country’s guidelines on commercial banks’ obligations to their customers, the new decree bolsters the country’s consumer protection regulatory regime under its primary relevant piece of legislation, the Law on Consumer Protection No. 02/NA, dated June 30, 2010.

Scope of Application

The decree was drafted to elaborate on Article 57 of the Law on Commercial Banks No. 56/NA, dated December 7, 2018, which requires commercial banks to devise clear procedures for receiving and resolving consumer complaints. Besides its application to commercial banks as defined by the law, the decree also applies to a wide range of service providers, including microfinance institutions (deposit-taking or otherwise), deposit and savings cooperatives, leasing companies, pawnshops, and providers proposing other types of financial services under the supervision of the BOL (referred to collectively as “service providers”). Likewise, the decree addresses a spectrum of financial services, including:

  • Monetary deposits and issuance of deposit certificates;
  • Provision of credit;
  • Card services;
  • Hire-purchase and leasing;
  • Mortgages;
  • Payment services;
  • Buying and selling currencies; and,
  • Other services authorized by the BOL, which covers all types of banking services in Laos.

Fee Restrictions and Disclosure Requirements for Financial Services

The decree requires service providers to set a written policy determining the appropriateness of the selected product, official fee, service fee, representation fee, interests rate, and other fees, in accordance with the relevant law and regulations (if any), and to document the justification for the price of each product.

Service providers are also required to advise consumers on financial services through supporting documents and materials. Though the decree provides specific requirements for different types of financial services, it notes that all service providers must provide consumers with information on the following:

  • Fees or service fees, representation fees (if any), interest and other fees—to be summarized in the relevant section of the material;
  • Impact of a change of interest rate, exchange rate, or other factors that affect the price, remuneration, or other conditions relating to the financial service;
  • The expected return of the product;
  • Duration of the contract and payment plan;
  • Conditions for termination of contracts with consumers if the consumers cannot fulfill their obligations;
  • Risks to the financial service;
  • Other similar products (if any); and,
  • How the consumer’s confidential information will be kept private.

The supporting documents and materials, which must be written primarily in the Lao language, are to use terms that are easily understood and should be in an easily readable font size and color (especially the section on the consumer’s rights and obligations under the contract). Moreover, financial service advertisements should not mislead consumers. For instance, service providers cannot claim that they guarantee a return on investment for financial services that are deemed risky.

Consumer Data Maintenance and Other Requirements for Service Providers

The decree is also attentive to the manipulation of personal information, financial information, and card passwords. Service providers must not disclose the information of consumers, and if any information is leaked, the service provider must inform the relevant consumer and document the leak. If the leak affects a large number of consumers, the service provider must also report the situation to the BOL.

The decree also requires service providers to:

  • Provide the financial services without discrimination concerning nationality, ethnicity, gender, or religion;
  • Explain the financial services;
  • When applicable, propose options that may be most appropriate for the selected consumer, so that the consumer can make an informed decision (e.g., by discussing the pros and cons of selected financial services);
  • Not retain information that may harm the consumer for the benefit of the service provider;
  • Provide services based on the disclosed or advertised information of the selected product, and not charge undisclosed fees;
  • Provide consumers with all necessary documents, such as the unsigned draft contract, the original copy of the contract after being signed, and any accompanying documentation, and specify when the consumer has the right to terminate the contract; and,
  • Set a reasonable time for the consumer to review a contract before signing or to cancel the contract (in which case the service provider may charge the consumer for the actual expenses incurred).

The decree also requires service providers to assist non-literate or visually impaired consumers, either by explaining or reading the relevant contract and other relevant documents before their signing, or by having the consumers’ respective representatives sign the contract on their behalf.

Contracts for Financial Services

All contracts related to financial services must include the following information:

  • Names and addresses of the contracting parties;
  • Terms and conditions of using the financial service;
  • Rights and obligations of the consumer;
  • Fees, service charges, and penalties (if any);
  • Information on the confidentiality of the consumer’s information;
  • Dispute resolution requirements;
  • Rights, conditions, and methods for terminating the contract; and
  • Consequences of terminating the contract.

The required content may also differ according to the type of financial service. For example, card services contracts must include information on withdrawal fees, using the card in Laos and internationally, and the credit granted and minimum monthly repayments, while contracts to provide credit must include interest rates and consequences of default.

Dispute Resolution and Penalties

In setting up a new unit or hiring an employee, service providers are required to set up communication channels to receive comments from and propose solutions to consumers’ feedback. The decree permits the service providers to administer these channels in writing, verbally, or electronically.

Upon establishing these communication channels, service providers must indicate the contact details of the unit or employee, and the relevant consumer protection department of the BOL, in every contract of services proposed. Service providers must also explain contact details and processes to the public by clearly displaying this information in their offices, branches, units, or websites.

The decree requires service providers to pay special attention to consumer complaints by recording them and, upon receiving the complete information of the source of the complaints, resolving them promptly. If the service provider cannot propose a solution to the relevant consumer immediately and requires further information on the corresponding issue, they must provide updates to the consumer every 15 days.

If the service provider’s solution is not satisfactory, the service provider and customer may then refer the dispute to the BOL (including cases involving multiple consumers). If the parties still cannot reach an agreement, the decree stipulates that they may then consult the Economic Dispute Resolution Center (a domestic arbitration center), the Lao People’s Courts, or both.

The decree provides only a broad outline of the penalties that may be triggered if its provisions are violated. It indicates that the particular sanctions will depend on the violation and may include disciplinary measures and civil compensation, but a sliding scale of the proposed fines is not given. As a result, the sanctions under the current decree may be difficult to implement, though future regulations may elaborate further.

Conclusion

By addressing financial services and their providers in Laos, this decree is an innovative regulation that is notable for its dedication to filling out the country’s consumer protection regulatory regime, as well as its transparent counsel and recommendations for service providers and their consumers. In particular, its obligations imposed on service providers, and its elaboration of the expected content of contracts for financial services, are significant steps. By clarifying the requirements of the contracts, the decree conveys its recognition of the surge of financial leasing services, which have become common for the purchase of various goods, such as cars, throughout the country in recent years, but which many had considered somewhat unregulated to date.

Overall, although the relevant sanctions have yet to be to clarified, this decree is another positive signal that the Lao authorities are expanding consumer protection in Laos after their publication earlier this year of other consumer protection-related decisions (including on the establishment of consumer protection associations, and consumer protection considerations for telecommunications and internet service providers). Moreover, the decree fulfills, in large part, its objective to elaborate on parts of the Law on Consumer Protection and the Law on Commercial Banks. Consequently, although the decree is not exhaustive, it has clearly made a positive contribution to Laos’ efforts to enhance the relationship between consumers, service providers, and financial services, both domestically and internationally.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 28, 2025
In recent years, Vietnam has positioned itself among the leading countries in the world in terms of digital asset ownership and trading volume. This rapid adoption reflects the country’s growing digital economy and the increasing engagement of individuals and businesses in blockchain-based financial activities. Central to this growth are Resolution No. 57-NQ/TW of the Politburo dated December 22, 2024, on breakthroughs in science, technology, innovation, and national digital transformation with a vision to 2045 (“Resolution 57”) and Resolution No. 03/NQ-CP of the Government dated January 9, 2025, promulgating the Action Plan to Implement Resolution 57 (“Resolution 03”), which outline a flexible and innovative policy framework that embraces pilot programs for emerging technologies to lay the groundwork for Vietnam’s legislative framework concerning cryptocurrency and blockchain technologies. Regulatory clarity in terms of digital assets and blockchain technologies is now more critical than ever for businesses and investors. In light of this, Vietnam is currently in the process of introducing three key legal instruments, with drafts of the Law on Digital Technology Industry (“Draft DTI Law”), Resolution of the National Assembly on the Establishment of Regional and International Financial Centers in Vietnam (“Draft Financial Center Resolution”), and Resolution of the Government on the Pilot Implementation of Crypto Asset Markets in Vietnam (“Draft Crypto Pilot Resolution”) nearing promulgation. Current Regulatory Direction and Schedule Vietnam’s regulatory framework for crypto assets and blockchain has been in a developmental stage since 2017, focusing on directions, plans, and schedules rather than established regulations. In February 2024, under Decision No. 194/QD-TTg of the Prime Minister, the Ministry of Finance (MOF) was assigned to draft a legal framework to either prohibit or regulate virtual assets and service providers by May 2025, signaling a clearer regulatory direction. In March 2025, Directive No. 05/CT-TTg of the Prime Minister directed the MOF
March 28, 2025
On October 25, 2024, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Circular No. 49/2024/TT-NHNN (“Circular 49”) amending and supplementing certain provisions of Circular No. 11/2022/TT-NHNN dated September 30, 2022, on bank guarantees (“Circular 11”). However, shortly thereafter, the SBV replaced both Circular 11 and Circular 49 with Circular No. 61/2024/TT-NHNN (“Circular 61”) dated December 31, 2024, which incorporates most of the updates from Circular 49 while introducing further amendments to bank guarantee regulations to align with the 2024 Law on Credit Institutions and 2023 Law on Real Estate Business. Circular 61 has an effective date of April 1, 2025. Below, we highlight some new regulations on bank guarantees under Circular 61, including those that were adopted from Circular 49. Updated Definitions Circular 61 broadens the definition of “customer” in bank guarantee relationships, introducing the possibility of a fourth party. Traditionally, a customer would request a credit institution to guarantee its obligations. Under the revised framework, a customer may also request the credit institution to issue a guarantee for another party, such as a parent company requesting a guarantee for its subsidiary. This change establishes a broader scope of parties involved in a bank guarantee relationship, which now includes the customer, the guarantor, the guaranteed party, and the beneficiary. Circular 61 also updates the definitions of “bank guarantee”, “cross-guarantee”, and “guaranteed party” to align with the term “bank guarantee” as defined in the 2024 Law on Credit Institutions. This includes requirements on mandatory debt acknowledgement. Bank Guarantees for Sale of Off-Plan Housing Circular 61, in alignment with Circular 49, the Law on Credit Institutions, and the Law on Real Estate Business, allows foreign bank branches and commercial banks (the “Guarantor”) to guarantee off-plan housing with a detailed procedure. The guarantee agreement between the Guarantor and the real estate project investor
March 21, 2025
Vietnam’s Law on Securities of 2019 was one of several laws amended (“Amended Securities Law”) under the wide-ranging Law No. 56/2024/QH15 passed by the National Assembly on November 29, 2024. The amendments came into force on January 1, 2025, with certain provisions related to professional securities investors and the eligibility criteria for public companies becoming effective on January 1, 2026. Below are some of the key points of the Amended Securities Law. Changes to Professional Securities Investors Professional securities investors (PSIs) are investors who have adequate financial capacity or securities qualifications and can participate in private placements and private funds, among other investment activities. Under the Amended Securities Law, foreign investors, including individuals and organizations, are now automatically classified as PSIs, without having to meet any requirements regarding financial capacity. This loosening of requirements is expected to attract more foreign investment. However, from January 1, 2026, individual PSIs will only be able to purchase, trade, and transfer privately placed corporate bonds that: (i) have been given credit ratings and are secured by collateral, or (ii) have been given credit ratings and covered by payment guarantees from credit institutions. Meanwhile, institutional PSIs will not be bound by these restrictions relating to privately placed corporate bonds. Protecting Shareholders in Private Securities Issuance The Amended Securities Law introduces additional conditions for private issuance of shares, convertible bonds, and warrant-linked bonds by public companies, and revises the required contents in the issuance plans from “criteria and number of investors” to “number of shares, offering price, or principles for determining the offering price.” This change promotes shareholder supervision and protects minority shareholders from overly powerful boards of directors. Expanded Powers of SSC The Amended Securities Law grants the State Securities Commission (SSC) new powers to suspend and cancel private placements of securities and adds
March 19, 2025
On January 1, 2025, the Department of Business Development (DBD) in Thailand’s Ministry of Commerce implemented new stringent corporate registration screening measures in collaboration with several other government agencies to prevent entities from opening corporate mule accounts to commit criminal activities in Thailand. The DBD’s Order of the Office of Central Company and Partnership Registration No. 3/2024 stipulates a new method for registering the establishment of partnerships and limited companies for people who have been involved in underlying crimes or who are owners of bank accounts that are being used for underlying crime, as per the notification of the Anti-Online Scam Operation Center (AOC) to the Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) and the collated AMLO list of such persons. The order establishes the following key requirements: Managing partners and directors of partnerships and limited companies, respectively, whose names have been listed by the AMLO as a person who is involved in an underlying offense, or as the owner of a bank account being used for the underlying offense, must appear before the registrar in person. The concerned persons cited on the AMLO list must provide valid documentation of their identity to the DBD registrar (e.g., national identification card, government official identification card, government or state enterprise employee identification card, alien identification card, passport, document used in lieu of a travel document, or other similar documents with photo identification). This collaboration between the DBD and various relevant government agencies aims to eradicate the problem of fraudsters using mule accounts set up under legally established entities to deceive the public. It also seeks to enhance checks and screening of corporate mule accounts that are used to carry out criminal activities such as money laundering or cybercrime. These actions are part of the Thai government’s broader policy to suppress economic crimes. For more