You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 21, 2025

Vietnam’s Amended Securities Law: What You Need to Know

Subscribe to Updates

Vietnam’s Law on Securities of 2019 was one of several laws amended (“Amended Securities Law”) under the wide-ranging Law No. 56/2024/QH15 passed by the National Assembly on November 29, 2024. The amendments came into force on January 1, 2025, with certain provisions related to professional securities investors and the eligibility criteria for public companies becoming effective on January 1, 2026.

Below are some of the key points of the Amended Securities Law.

Changes to Professional Securities Investors

Professional securities investors (PSIs) are investors who have adequate financial capacity or securities qualifications and can participate in private placements and private funds, among other investment activities. Under the Amended Securities Law, foreign investors, including individuals and organizations, are now automatically classified as PSIs, without having to meet any requirements regarding financial capacity. This loosening of requirements is expected to attract more foreign investment.

However, from January 1, 2026, individual PSIs will only be able to purchase, trade, and transfer privately placed corporate bonds that: (i) have been given credit ratings and are secured by collateral, or (ii) have been given credit ratings and covered by payment guarantees from credit institutions. Meanwhile, institutional PSIs will not be bound by these restrictions relating to privately placed corporate bonds.

Protecting Shareholders in Private Securities Issuance

The Amended Securities Law introduces additional conditions for private issuance of shares, convertible bonds, and warrant-linked bonds by public companies, and revises the required contents in the issuance plans from “criteria and number of investors” to “number of shares, offering price, or principles for determining the offering price.” This change promotes shareholder supervision and protects minority shareholders from overly powerful boards of directors.

Expanded Powers of SSC

The Amended Securities Law grants the State Securities Commission (SSC) new powers to suspend and cancel private placements of securities and adds new circumstances for the SSC to cancel public offerings.

The SSC may suspend a registered private placement of securities for up to 60 days: (i) if the offering documents contain misleading information or omit material information that could impact investment decisions and cause damage to investors, or (ii) if the distribution of the securities does not comply with statutory requirements. The issuer must announce the suspension within 7 business days from the suspension and recall the issued securities upon the investor’s request as well as provide a refund to the investor within 15 days from the investor’s request. If deficiencies leading to the suspension are corrected, the SSC will issue a written notice of withdrawal of the suspension. As a result, such private placement will be allowed to proceed.

The SSC may cancel a registered private placement of securities if (i) the issuer fails to address deficiencies leading to the suspension within the suspension period; (ii) the offering documents or the distribution of the private placement of shares are found to have violated the law while the issued shares are not yet listed or registered for trading on the stock exchange; or (iii) the offering documents or the distribution of the securities upon completion of private placement are found to have breached the law. Cancellation of the private placement does not apply to offered shares, shares converted from convertible bonds, or shares purchased from warrants that have been listed or registered for trading on the stock exchange after the private placement.

Under the Amended Securities Law, the SSC may now cancel a public offering if the offering documents or the distribution of the public offering are found to have violated the law after the public offering, but before completion of procedures to be listed or registered for trading on the stock exchange.

Liability Framework for Public Companies, Shareholders, and Advisors

Previously, issuers, underwriters, auditors, and “certifying organizations” were liable for the legality, accuracy, and sufficiency of securities-related documents and reporting during public offerings or when registering securities for listing or trading. The Amended Securities Law extends this liability to private offerings of securities, public disclosures by public companies or their shareholders, and reporting of secondary trading of securities by investors. Further, advisors involved in these activities may be exposed to greater liability for their failure to adhere to professional standards.

This change pushes public companies, their shareholders, and advisors to be more accountable and enhance the transparency in the securities market. They must ensure that all documents and information related to public disclosures and securities trading do not have misleading information and comprehensively include all material facts that could influence decisions by investors, authorities, and other stakeholders.

Defining “Securities Market Manipulation”

The Amended Securities Law updates the acts of “securities market manipulation” as outlined in the 2015 Penal Code to align the definitions of securities market manipulation under securities law and criminal law, closing any gaps between the two. This change aims to imposes administrative liability for market manipulation that does not reach threshold for criminal liability.

Other Changes

The Amended Securities Law adds additional grounds for the cancellation of public company status, which include a public company (i) failing to publish its audited financial statements or annual shareholder meeting resolutions, for two consecutive years; (ii) failing to register its shares with the Vietnam Securities Depository and Clearing Corporation; or (iii) failing to register its shares for listing.

Privately issued corporate bonds offered before January 1, 2026, will adhere to the 2019 Securities and the 2020 Law on Enterprises until the principal and interest are fully paid. Privately issued corporate bonds disclosed to the stock exchange before January 1, 2026, but not yet distributed will follow the same laws until distribution is complete, after which they will comply with the Amended Securities Law.

A public company repurchasing shares from employees in accordance with an employee stock ownership program does not need to reduce charter capital, but only needs to report the total number of repurchased employee shares at the nearest annual general meeting of shareholders. Accordingly, the Amended Securities Law is implicitly reviving treasury shares as previously outlined in the expired 2006 Securities Law, allowing public companies to hold treasury shares after the effective date of the 2019 Securities Law for this limited case of repurchased employee shares. This amendment is paired with an exception to the 6-month blackout period for issuing new shares after a share repurchase for repurchase of shares from leaving employees according to the employee stock ownership program.

Outlook

The Amended Securities Law aims to significantly strengthen governance, increase robustness, and provide better protection for investors in Vietnam’s securities market. This initiative should help address evolving challenges, upgrade the local market, and ensure alignment with international practice.

Related Professionals

Practices

Banking and Finance

Capital Markets

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 3, 2026
On July 23, 2026, the Bank of Thailand (BOT) released for public comment its draft Notification on Digital Channel Security, which would significantly expand the scope and stringency of Thailand’s existing mobile banking security framework. If finalized in its current form, the draft notification would extend mandatory security requirements to credit card providers and credit providers, cover internet banking in addition to mobile applications, phase out SMS one-time passwords (OTPs) for transaction authentication, and introduce biometric verification requirements for high-value transactions. The public comment period is open through August 24, 2026. Background The BOT’s existing Mobile Banking Security Notification, issued in 2024, sets minimum security standards for financial institutions, specialized financial institutions (SFIs), and e-money providers, significantly reducing “money-draining app” fraud. However, fraudsters have since shifted to nonbank providers and internet banking channels, prompting the BOT to propose broader security requirements. Expanded Scope of Regulated Entities and Channels The existing Mobile Banking Security Notification covers only financial institutions, SFIs, and e-money providers offering mobile banking services. The draft expands coverage in two key areas: entities and channels. On the entity side, it adds credit card providers and credit providers that offer fund transfers to third parties at other financial service providers or that provide cash withdrawal services to individual retail customers. On the channel side, it broadens coverage to include internet banking in addition to mobile banking. Strengthened Customer Authentication The draft introduces enhanced authentication requirements in three areas: Service enrollment and device changes. Providers must implement rigorous identity verification, notify customers of enrollment results through out-of-band communication channels, and adopt risk-mitigation measures such as cooling-off periods and temporary transaction limits. Transaction-level authentication. Providers must use two-factor authentication for fund transfers, cardless ATM withdrawals, and transaction limit increases. Secure authentication factors. Key requirements include the following: “What-you-know” factors must
Read More
July 27, 2026
A new decree on penalties for violations related to the crypto asset market creates compliance risks for offshore crypto asset exchanges in Vietnam that do not hold, and practically cannot obtain, a Vietnamese license, and for Vietnamese users who continue to transact on those platforms. Decree No. 284/2026/ND-CP (Decree 284), issued by the government of Vietnam on July 16, 2026, formally establishes an administrative penalty framework for violations related to crypto assets and the crypto asset market. The decree takes effect on September 1, 2026, and will remain in force for the duration of the five-year pilot program under Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP, which is scheduled to end in September 2030. Direct Penalties on Vietnamese Users The most immediate commercial risk to offshore platforms is that their Vietnamese users now face direct personal liability for using their exchanges. Vietnamese users who trade crypto assets outside of a Ministry of Finance-licensed service provider face fines of up to VND 50 million (approximately USD 1,900). Vietnamese users trading in crypto assets that are offered or issued to foreign users face higher penalties of up to VND 100 million (approximately USD 3,800). It is expected that Vietnamese users will be more willing to migrate away from offshore platforms now that there is a risk of real enforcement against them. Penalties on Unlicensed Service Providers Violations of providing crypto asset services or advertising crypto-related services without a license face fines of up to VND 200 million (approximately USD 7,700). Operating a crypto asset trading market without proper authorization falls within the same highest penalty bands. Organizations that violate issuance, provision, or disclosure rules may face fines of up to VND 200 million. Although the maximum administrative fine per violation is capped at VND 200 million for organizations and VND 100 million for individuals, these
Read More
July 17, 2026
On July 11, 2026, media reports conveyed key messages from Bank of Thailand (BOT) Governor Vitai Ratanakorn’s announcement of a sweeping regulatory crackdown on grey capital activities. The measures target high-value cash transactions, gold trading, and stablecoin flows, with new requirements set to take effect in the fourth quarter of 2026. The initiative aims to prevent financial institutions from facilitating shadow economy activity, money laundering—particularly through stablecoins—and capital flight, through enhanced compliance obligations on commercial banks across multiple transaction channels. Expanded Cash Controls Close the Deposit–Withdrawal Circuit New fourth-quarter guidelines will require individuals depositing THB 5 million or more in cash to formally verify the source of their funds. This builds on restrictions introduced in April 2026, which required anyone withdrawing 5 million baht or more in cash to provide their bank with verified commercial justification for why electronic transfers or checks could not be used. That initial measure caused high-value physical cash withdrawals to drop by 35 percent nationwide. The upcoming deposit-side requirement closes the circuit on large cash movements. The BOT is also assessing tracking mechanisms for high-value banknote swaps, specifically targeting individuals seeking to exchange large volumes of THB 1,000 notes into smaller THB 100 or THB 500 denominations without clear business justification. Governor Vitai emphasized that these measures require continuous deployment of multiple parallel strategies rather than short-term fixes. Tightened Bullion Reporting Frameworks Restrict Money Laundering Channels The BOT has also tightened reporting frameworks for gold trading to close money laundering loopholes and shield the Thai baht from speculative bullion volatility. Regulators identified a recurring pattern in which buyers purchased large quantities of gold through digital applications in the morning and then made same-day physical withdrawals from retail gold shops in the afternoon. Gold shops are reminded of their duties to flag and report cash
Read More
July 8, 2026
The Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) has issued new oversight and disclosure rules, effective July 1, 2026, overhauling the previous requirements. The reforms apply to listed companies, REITs, and property and infrastructure funds, and aim to enhance transparency, align with international standards, and ensure timely investor information. The key changes and practical implications are highlighted below. Major Shareholder Reporting When a shareholding change reaching or crossing 5% or any subsequent multiple of 5% is reported under section 246 of the Securities and Exchange Act or a tender offer is completed (except for voluntary delisting), listed companies must disclose an updated shareholder list for the month in which the triggering event occurred. The list must be compiled within five business days after month-end and disclosed within 14 days thereafter. Noncompliance will trigger a “notice pending” (NP) sign. This replaces the previous requirement to disclose shareholder lists only at annual general meetings or on record dates. Companies should coordinate with their share registrars to meet the new event-driven timelines. New Financial and Internal Control Disclosures The new rules require disclosure of material impairment, expected credit losses, and unreturned business deposits when these reach specified thresholds. Companies must also disclose events or indicators that may materially affect their internal control systems. Boards and audit committees should expect to escalate accounting and internal-control issues earlier, as these matters may now trigger standalone SET disclosure obligations—not just financial statement treatment. Backdoor Listing With the Securities and Exchange Commission’s regulation on material transactions (MTs) taking effect on July 1, 2026, and now serving as the primary, standalone framework governing acquisitions and disposals, the SET needed to issue a standalone rule on backdoor listing matters. These matters had been covered by a previous regulation on MTs issued by the SET. The key differences between the SET’s
Read More