You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 30, 2019

Decree 169: New Regulations on Medical Devices in Vietnam

Subscribe to Updates

On December 31, 2018, the Vietnamese government promulgated Decree No. 169/2018/ND-CP (Decree 169), amending Decree No. 36/2017/ND-CP (Decree 36) on medical device management. Decree 169 took immediate effect upon its issuance. The new regulations will have a great impact on the circulation of medical devices, especially foreign products, in Vietnam. Some of the major changes are set out below.

Classification of Medical Devices

Medical devices in Vietnam are classified and managed based on their potential risks, as determined by qualified entities. Under the previous regulation (Decree 36), risk classification results from qualified foreign entities could be recognized in Vietnam without conducting a separate local classification. This was beneficial to foreign manufacturers who sell their products in many countries, as it required no further time and expense for the local classification procedure in Vietnam and ensured a single classification result across multiple markets.

However, from January 1, 2019, foreign classification results are no longer accepted in Vietnam. Instead, the results must come from qualified local entities. It is worth noting that some local entities, despite being considered qualified by the Ministry of Health (MOH), still do not have appropriate capacity to conduct medical device classifications and, in practice, have issued classification results that were not accurate.

The classification rules under Decree 169 are generally stricter than under Decree36. For example, the final classification results will use the highest risk classification, regardless of whether the product has many use purposes or is combined with other medical devices with different risk classifications.

If an incorrect local classification result is submitted to the authority for product registration purposes, the authority will refuse to grant a product registration number if the number is not yet issued or revoke a registration number that has been granted, and may recall any circulating products.

Transitional Regulations

Decree 169 sets out the transition mechanisms as below.

  • Foreign classification results submitted to the authorities prior to December 31, 2018, will continue to be used for the registration procedure.
  • Local classification results issued before December 31, 2018, will be published on the MOH’s online system (http://dmec.moh.gov.vn) before April 1, 2019. MA license/import license holders are then required to review the relevant classification results in light of the classification rules under Decree 169 and report any incorrect classification to the MOH prior to July 1, 2019.

Registration of Medical Devices

Class A Medical Devices

A major change for Class A (lowest risk) medical devices is that the certificate of free sale (CFS) – not previously required – must now be included in any registration dossier submitted after December 31, 2018. This change may cause some difficulties for foreign manufacturers in terms of cost and time, and in some cases it may be impossible to obtain the CFS because some products that are considered Class A medical devices in Vietnam are not considered medical devices in other countries.

Previously, the granted registration of a Class A medical device could not be amended. If any change arose, a new registration procedure was required. However, Decree 169 stipulates a more flexible mechanism, in which the following changes can be made to the registration during the circulation of Class A medical devices.

  • Address of product owner or license holder.
  • Name of license holder.
  • Either name or address of product manufacturer.
  • Product packaging for in vitro medical devices.
  • Warranty establishments.
  • Labels and instructions for use, but the indication of the product cannot be changed.

Class B, C and D Medical Devices

A positive development for medical device companies is that Decree 169 allows a newly added form of registration, namely, “quick registration.” This will reduce the statutory time required to obtain a registration number from 60 days to 30 days, but is only applicable to the following situations:

  • The product has been circulated in at least two of the following countries: Japan, Canada, Australia, United States, or EU member country.
  • The product was circulated in Vietnam prior to December 31, 2018, and satisfies both of the following conditions: (i) The product was circulated for at least three years within the period of five years before the submission date, and (ii) there have been no warnings about the quality or safety of the product.

Additionally, from July 1, 2020, it will be required to include the ASEAN Common Submission Dossier Template (CSDT) in the submitted registration dossier for Class B, C and D medical devices. At that time, it will no longer be necessary to submit the technical document, instructions for use, and labels. It is expected that the MOH will issue further guidance on CSDT soon.

Decree 169 helps to simplify the customs clearance procedure by emphasizing that medical devices will be allowed to be imported into Vietnam without a written confirmation from the MOH that defines the imported product as a medical device when conducting customs clearance.

Transitional Regulations

In the transition time, it is worth noting the following regulations:

  • Class A medical devices are only allowed to be imported if they are registered.
  • A marketing authorization (MA) license for Class B, C, and D medical devices will only be required from January 1, 2020, onwards, instead of January 1, 2018, as set forth under Decree 36.
  • It is required to have a valid import license to import Class B, C, and D medical devices which are specifically listed out in Circular 30/2015/TT-BYT on Import of Medical Devices (Circular 30). Import licenses issued in 2018 (expiring on December 31, 2018) or 2019 will be valid until December 31, 2019.
  • Class B, C and D medical devices that are not specifically listed out in Circular 30 can continue to be freely imported into Vietnam without any import license, provided that their certificates of classification results are published on the MOH website http://dmec.moh.gov.vn.
  • For IVD biologicals (e.g., microbiology reagents, histology reagents, etc.), Decree 169 sets out specific regulations under which such IVD biologicals can still be treated as drugs under the Pharma Law.
  • For chemicals, insecticides and germicides for household and medical use, with only one indication of disinfecting medical devices, which have been granted MA licenses which expire after July 1, 2016 and before January 1, 2019, their MA licenses will be used until December 31, 2019.
Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 9, 2026
On August 5, 2026, the Consumer Case Division of Thailand’s Civil Court rendered a judgment in a case involving a beauty clinic that advertised acne scar treatments using claims that the clinic was operated by a specialist physician and that the treatment, allegedly involving stem cell technology, could permanently remove acne scars. The plaintiff brought a claim against both the physician-owner and the clinic company, alleging that the advertisements were false and induced her to purchase the treatment. The court found that the clinic was liable for the false representations and that the physician-owner, as both the authorized director of the company and the medical practitioner who provided treatment, was jointly responsible. Although the plaintiff could not fully prove all damages claimed, the court awarded compensation of THB 20,000, together with interest. While the judgment arose from a consumer protection dispute, it serves as a valuable reminder that medical facility advertisements in Thailand are regulated and may expose clinics and healthcare providers not only to regulatory enforcement but also to civil liability from patients who rely on misleading promotional claims. Regulatory Framework Governing Medical Facility Advertisements Medical facility advertising in Thailand is governed by the Medical Facility Act B.E. 2541 (1998), as amended by the Medical Facility Act (No. 4) B.E. 2559 (2016). The principal secondary legislation is the Department of Health Service Support (DoHSS) Notification Re: Rules, Procedures, Conditions, and Fees for an Advertisement or Publication Concerning a Medical Facility, which came into force on November 25, 2019. Under this notification, “advertising” includes any act, by any means, that causes members of the public to see, hear, or otherwise become aware of a message, sound, or image for the commercial benefit of a medical facility. This broad definition covers not only traditional media but also clinic websites, social
Read More
September 9, 2026
On June 30, 2026, Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 on Food Packaging, which expands the list of approved food-contact substances and recognizes a broader range of permissible functions for those substances. The new regulation, which revokes BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, reflects developments in packaging technology and materials science. Although the new regulation provides more advantages to business actors by adding more food contact substances to the approved list for use in food packaging, there are more stringent rules and restrictions for testing. One of the most significant changes is a comprehensive migration-testing framework that sets out requirements for packaging materials, testing conditions, food simulants, and specific migration limits. Overall and Specific Migration Under BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, migration requirements were primarily set out within the lists of approved food-contact substances and packaging materials. BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 instead expressly requires packaging materials that come into direct contact with food to meet both overall and specific migration limits. These are defined as follows: Overall migration: The total quantity of all substances that migrate from the packaging, regardless of whether the substances are hazardous or nonhazardous to health. Specific migration: The quantity of a particular identified substance known to be hazardous to health that migrates from the packaging. Stricter Limits on Heavy Metals The overall migration limit for plastic packaging remains unchanged under both regulations at 60 mg/kg or 10 mg/dm². However, the new regulation introduces significant changes to the regulation of heavy metals. Under the 2019 regulation, four heavy metals—lead, cadmium, chromium VI, and mercury—were subject to a single combined limit of 1 mg/kg. The 2026 regulation, however, requires each heavy metal to meet its own individual specific migration limit, adds arsenic as
Read More
September 7, 2026
Indonesia’s Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi) has reinstated a key provision limiting pharmaceutical patent protection, signaling a renewed commitment to balancing patent rights with public access to medicines. In its ruling to Case No. 255/PUU-XXIII/2025, the court partially granted a petition for judicial review of Law No. 65 of 2024, which had amended the country’s Patent Law, and ordered the restoration of a provision that had excluded certain pharmaceutical inventions from patentability. The decision took effect immediately upon its pronouncement at the court’s plenary session on August 28, 2026. Background The petition challenged the removal of article 4(f) from Law No. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents (Patent Law), as amended by Law No. 65 of 2024. Article 4(f) had excluded from patentability certain inventions relating to new uses of known substances. The petitioners argued that removing this provision would open the door to patent protection for second medical use inventions and facilitate patent evergreening—practices that can extend exclusivity periods, delay generic market entry, and reduce public access to affordable medicines. The petitioners included several patient advocacy and public-interest organizations: the Indonesian Dialysis Patients Community Association, the Indonesian Association of Drug Abuse Victims (PKNI), the Indonesian Pulmonary Hypertension Foundation (YHPI), the Rekat Peduli Indonesia Foundation, and the Indonesian Positive Women’s Association (IPPI), along with the Indonesia for Global Justice Association and four individual petitioners. The petitioners also challenged the constitutionality of the phrase “interested party” in article 70(1) of the Patent Law, arguing that it should be construed expressly to clarify who has standing to appeal a decision to grant a patent before the Board of Patent Appeal, and to allow a broader range of parties—such as patent holders, licensees, consumer organizations, prosecutors, aggrieved third parties, and others who may suffer direct or indirect harm from the grant of a patent—to
Read More
September 4, 2026
Blind boxes and collectibles have become increasingly popular, driven by the excitement of not knowing which character or design will be revealed until the package is opened. While most visible in the art toy market, the same concept is also used in the food industry. Confectionery, snacks, and other food products are sometimes sold with toys, character figures, cards, or other collectibles. A package might, for example, contain one of ten possible characters, with consumers knowing that an item is included but not which one they will receive. Some collections may also feature rare or “secret” items. For food businesses, however, adding a randomized toy or collectible involves more than a marketing decision. The food, the nonfood item, and the randomized mechanism may each raise different regulatory considerations in Thailand. Thai FDA Requirements for Nonfood Objects Packaged with Food The main food regulatory consideration is Ministry of Public Health Notification No. 310 B.E. 2551 (2008), which regulates food packaged together with things or objects that are not food. Under Notification No. 310, certain nonfood objects may be packaged together with food where they fall within specified exceptions, including objects that serve the following purposes: Maintaining the quality or standard of the food, such as a desiccant or oxygen absorber; Serving as a seasoning or as part of food preparation, such as chili powder sachets or seasoning sachets contained in instant noodle packages; or Functioning as an eating or food-preparation utensil, such as a spoon or fork included with instant noodles. Other nonfood objects that do not fall within these categories generally should not be placed inside the food container together with the food. Where a toy, collectible, or other nonfood object is intended to be sold together with a food product, businesses should therefore carefully consider the nature of
Read More