You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 9, 2024

Critical Updates to Vietnam’s Regulatory Framework for Intermediary Payment Services

Subscribe to Updates

As non-cash payments continue to surge in Vietnam, the requirement for strong security standards and a clear legislative framework for intermediary payment services (“IPS”) is becoming more and more critical. Recognizing this, the State Bank of Vietnam (“SBV”) has been working on a draft decree to supersede the outdated Decree No. 101/2012/ND-CP dated November 22, 2012, on non-cash payments (“Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree”), which will lay the groundwork for non-cash payments in general and the provision of IPS in particular.

Building upon this, the SBV recently issued a draft circular to replace Circular No. 39/2014/TT-NHNN dated December 11, 2014, on IPS (“Circular 39”) (“Draft IPS Circular”), which will offer more detailed guidance on the provision of IPS in Vietnam on top of the Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree. The Draft IPS Circular will be applicable to (i) IPS providers; (ii) foreign organizations providing IPS in Vietnam; and (iii) organizations and individuals involved in the provision of IPS.

Some key updates regarding the Draft IPS Circular are as follows:

Scope of Application

The Draft IPS Circular sets out further guidance for the provision of IPS as listed under the Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree, including: (i) electronic clearing services; (ii) electronic wallet (“e-wallet”) services; (iii) collection and payment support services; (iv) financial switching services; (v) international financial switching services; and (vi) electronic payment gateway services.

Notably, the Draft IPS Circular has explicitly excluded from its scope of application the provision of accounts by goods/service providers to their customers solely for the purpose of payment within the systems of such providers (e.g., cards/coupons or service/transaction accounts of online game service providers, transportation service providers, or securities companies, etc.).

Requirements on the Provision of IPS

Electronic Clearing Services: The Draft IPS Circular introduces regulations to cover certain elements of electronic clearing services that have not been explicitly outlined in Circular 39. This is done to ensure alignment with Circular No. 37/2016/TT-NHNN dated December 30, 2016, on the management, operation, and use of the national interbank electronic payment system, specifically:

  • Additional clarification is provided on the responsibilities of the “organization presiding over electronic clearing system,” which refers to an IPS provider licensed by the SBV to offer financial switching services and electronic clearing services. This organization is also permitted to directly participate in and connect with the interbank electronic payment system (“IEPS”) for the purpose of conducting electronic clearing settlements. To achieve this, the organization will have to construct and operate an Electronic Clearing System.
  • To send, receive, and process payment transactions, IPS providers need to be members of the Electronic Clearing System. This system consists of two types of memberships: settlement members and non-settlement members. Settlement members in the system have an established net debt limit within the system, maintain a payment account at the SBV Transaction Office, and are responsible for managing their own clearing settlements. Non-settlement members depend on settlement members to manage these tasks while still being able to send, receive, and process payment transactions within the system.
  • The conditions for becoming a settlement member include: (i) being a direct member of the IEPS; (ii) establishing, monitoring, and managing an electronic clearing limit; and (iii) having written commitments with the organization presiding over the Electronic Clearing System and the SBV Transaction Office regarding its payment ability.

E-Wallet Services: The Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree and the Draft IPS Circular tightly regulate e-wallet services in the same manner as other non-cash payment methods. Some notable requirements for the provision of e-wallet services include the following:

  • E-wallet customers: Pursuant to the Draft IPS Circular, e-wallet customers are individuals and organizations allowed to open and have payment accounts at banks and/or branches of foreign banks. E-wallet service providers are not allowed to open their own e-wallets.
  • E-wallet opening channels: E-wallet opening channels have been expanded, allowing customers to also register to open e-wallets directly at partnered banks or their online transaction channels according to the e-wallet service contracts/agreements between the e-wallet service providers and the partnered banks.
  • E-wallet transaction limit: The Draft IPS Circular prescribes the personal e-wallet limit at VND 100 million/month (about USD 400/month) for normal payment transactions (excluding transactions for goods and services serving the essential needs of consumers).
  • Linking e-wallets with owners’ payment accounts/debit cards: In order to maintain a strict management approach as reflected in the Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree as well as the SBV’s recent directions, the Draft IPS Circular does not allow e-wallet customers to use e-wallets in the absence of a connection with their payment accounts/debit cards.
  • E-wallet services payment capability assurance: The Draft IPS Circular requires that e-wallet service providers must maintain (i) a payment guarantee account specifically for e-wallet services; and (ii) segregation of account information, money flows, and the use of the payment guarantee account for e-wallet services, as well as for any collection and payment support services, if applicable.

Collection and Payment Support Services: The Draft IPS Circular sets forth several principles on the provision of collection and payment support services, including: (i) subjects allowed to use the services (i.e., customers having payment accounts or bank cards); (ii) requirements for an agreement or contract with the partnered banks, which are to contain regulations on payment guarantee measures for the provision of these services, including opening a payment guarantee account, maintaining deposits, or other guarantee measures.

IPS Containing International Elements: The Draft IPS Circular provides guidance on the provision of IPS containing international elements, specifically regarding (i) foreign IPS providers that offer IPS to customers who are non-residents and foreigners residing in Vietnam to perform payment transactions for goods and/or services in Vietnam; and (ii) Vietnamese IPS providers who allow customers to perform payment transactions for goods and/or services in foreign countries.

Electronic Payment Gateway Services: The Draft IPS Circular separates the obligations of financial switching service providers, international financial switching service providers, and electronic clearing service providers from those of electronic payment gateway service providers. This separation is made due to the distinct nature of the former services, which involve providing services to parties involved in the payment systems rather than directly to customers, as is the case with payment gateway services. The Draft IPS Circular also includes a section outlining the obligations of electronic payment gateway service providers, covering their responsibilities toward both their customers and their service provision partners, such as associated banks and merchants.

Short Transitional Period

The Draft IPS Circular is expected to take effect on July 1, 2024, with a transitional period until December 31, 2024, for IPS providers to review existing information, documents, procedures, etc., and implement necessary measures to ensure full compliance. Depending on the specific circumstances, failure to do so may subject the IPS providers to penalties such as enforced termination of service provision, termination of respective partnership contracts/agreements, or termination of partnership from January 1, 2025.

IPS-Related Issues Under Other Legal Instruments

In addition to the Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree and the Draft IPS Circular, several recently released and impending legal instruments also have the potential to reshape the legal landscape for the provision of IPS in Vietnam. These include the following:

  • Decision No. 2345/QD-NHNN of the SBV dated December 18, 2023, on the application of safety and security measures to online payment and card payment: Categorizes online transactions based on transaction value and imposes specific authentication measures on the respective transaction categories, especially including an authentication mechanism using biometric data for certain transactions. Also prescribes risk mitigation solutions in online payments applicable to IPS providers, including notably: (i) customer authentication for individual customers for their first transaction using mobile banking; (ii) notification of first log-in to internet banking/mobile banking applications; and (iii) storage of information about devices on which customers’ online transactions are carried out and transaction authentication logs.
  • Draft circular to replace Circular No. 46/2014/TT-NHNN of the SBV dated December 31, 2014, guiding non-cash payment services: Addresses the responsibilities of payment service providers when cooperating with IPS providers, including (i) the responsibility to have a written agreement that clearly stipulates the parties’ obligations regarding confidentiality of customer information, payment transactions, and liability for violations of this obligation; and (ii) the responsibility for coordinating with IPS providers in checking and comparing data, authenticating transactions, customer information, etc.
  • Draft circular to replace Circular No. 20/2018/TT-NHNN of the SBV dated August 30, 2018, on the supervision of payment systems: Regulates the supervision of activities related to the provision of IPS, including monitoring compliance with legal regulations and overseeing risk management activities. These activities encompass policy development, risk management processes, and implementation activities.
  • Draft circular to replace Circular 19/2016/TT-NHNN of the SBV dated June 30, 2016, on bank card operations: Addresses the cooperation between IPS providers and other parties in transactions related to bank cards, specifically in the electronic switching and clearing of these transactions.
  • Draft circular on payment agent services: Expands regulations to encompass certain activities that resemble those of IPS providers but are not legally considered IPS. These activities now may include the following on behalf of banks: (i) collecting and verifying documents to open accounts, (ii) receiving and verifying information for bank card issuance, and (iii) handling customer service, processing transactions, and receiving or paying cash for customers.

Conclusion

As part of a series of draft circulars under the regulatory development program of the SBV this year, the Draft IPS Circular encompasses a number of new and more stringent regulations on the provision of IPS. The Draft IPS Circular is expected to address the loopholes in the existing Circular 39 and usher in momentous changes to the legal framework governing IPS in Vietnam. Given the anticipated short transitional period for compliance, IPS providers should closely monitor the progress of this draft circular to ensure they are fully prepared to comply with its new requirements.

Related Professionals

Industries

Fintech

Technology

Practices

Banking and Finance

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 2, 2026
Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) released a new version of the draft Act on Artificial Intelligence on July 2, 2026, for a public hearing period expected to be approximately 30 days. The draft act adopts a risk-based regulatory approach modeled in part on international frameworks—particularly the EU’s AI Act—while incorporating provisions tailored to Thailand’s regulatory landscape and digital economy objectives. If enacted in its current form, the law would introduce extraterritorial obligations, a tiered risk classification system, strict liability for AI-related damages, and new transparency requirements for AI-generated content. Scope and Extraterritorial Application The draft act applies to AI development, deployment, or any other action affecting people in Thailand, even if the action occurs outside the country. Of note: This extraterritorial reach creates compliance obligations for global AI companies whose systems impact Thai residents or consumers, even if the provider has no physical presence in Thailand. Foreign AI providers serving Thai deployers or users must appoint a local coordinator or authorized representative. Depending on the type of AI system, the representative may need full authority to act on behalf of the provider without any limitation of liability. Certain activities are exempt from the draft act’s oversight, including AI used by natural persons solely for personal or household activities, AI for educational research conducted by higher education institutions with ethics committee approval, research and development activities conducted prior to distribution or service provision, and other AI systems prescribed by royal decree. Risk-Based Classification Framework The draft act establishes a tiered risk classification system with three main categories: Prohibited AI. The act outright prohibits AI systems employing cognitive-behavioral manipulation using subliminal techniques, AI systems causing unfair broad-scale discrimination from processing irrelevant data, and other categories of serious risk as determined by announcement of a forthcoming committee that will be responsible
Read More
June 25, 2026
On June 18, 2026, Thailand’s Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC) published two notifications in the Government Gazette establishing Thailand’s first formal certification framework for personal data protection standards under the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA). The notifications, which took immediate effect, introduce a voluntary certification framework aimed at promoting accountability, strengthening organizational data protection governance, and aligning Thailand more closely with international frameworks that recognize certification as a key compliance tool. Certification Criteria The first notification sets out the assessment criteria for organizations seeking certification. Applicants must undergo an evaluation against a framework comprising four assessment categories, 10 focus areas, and 128 assessment criteria covering key elements of a privacy management program. These include: Organizational oversight and internal policies and procedures. Human resource development, including staff training and awareness programs. Clearly defined operational processes and procedures covering data subject rights, transparency obligations, records of processing activities, and lawful basis management, as well as contractual safeguards such as data-processing and data-sharing agreements and risk assessments, including Data Protection Impact Assessments. Technical measures encompassing data security controls and breach response capabilities Based on the assessment results, organizations may be awarded either a PDPA Compliance Certificate or a higher-level PDPA Certificate accompanied by a certification mark. Application and Assessment Process The second notification establishes the application and assessment process for obtaining certification. Eligible applicants include government agencies and private-sector entities that demonstrate sufficient privacy governance maturity and meet the prescribed eligibility requirements. Applicants must submit their applications along with supporting documentation for review. Upon receiving an application, the Office of the PDPC will conduct a detailed evaluation, which may include both documentary review and on-site inspections. Incomplete applications may be rejected, though applicants are typically given a limited period to correct deficiencies before a final decision
Read More
June 23, 2026
On May 26, 2026, Thailand’s Department of Land Transport (DLT) published for public consultation a draft amendment to the Ministerial Regulation on Electronic Ride-Hailing Vehicles that would, for the first time, allow juristic persons (legal entities) to register vehicles as electronic ride-hailing cars—a right that currently belongs exclusively to natural persons, limited to one person per one vehicle. If finalized in its current form, the regulation would significantly expand the supply side of Thailand’s ride-hailing market by enabling corporate fleet operators to enter the space. The public comment period is open through June 24, 2026. Key Principles Under the Draft Regulation Under the proposed amendment, juristic persons that maintain a fleet of at least 50 vehicles will be permitted to register vehicles as electronic ride-hailing cars. This represents a fundamental shift from the current framework, which restricts registration to individual natural persons on a one-person-one-car basis. Vehicle Specifications Corporate-owned ride-hailing vehicles must meet the following requirements: Be brand new from the factory, or no more than two years old from first registration with no more than 20,000 km of use. Not be a vehicle that has been reconstructed or repaired after involvement in a serious accident affecting safety—a standard consistent with public transport vehicles (RorYor. 6). Be classified as small, medium, or large in accordance with ministerial or director-general specifications. The vehicles may be equipped with safety devices such as interior or exterior cameras (video/photo recording) and can retain the original factory color of the vehicle body (no mandatory color change is required). License Plates Corporate ride-hailing vehicles will use license plates of the same size, characteristics, and color as those for private passenger vehicles not exceeding seven seats (RorYor. 1), rather than public transport plates. Potential Impact The government has stated that the regulation is intended to: Promote
Read More
June 23, 2026
On May 14, 2026, Thailand published a ministerial regulation in the Government Gazette to prescribe measures for prevention and suppression of technology crimes. The regulation creates a comprehensive procedural framework for returning money and digital assets to victims of technology crimes. It will take effect 90 days after publication (in mid-August 2026), giving affected entities a limited window to prepare. Mandatory Reporting Obligations for Financial Institutions When a deposit account, e-money account, or digital asset wallet is frozen in connection with a technology crime, the relevant financial institution or business operator must report transaction data to the Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) via AMLO’s designated electronic system. Required data elements include account numbers (sender and receiver), names, identification or passport numbers, legal entity registration numbers, phone numbers, remaining balance, damage amount, transaction reference numbers, and the bank case ID. Institutions that already share data through the information-sharing system under the emergency decree are deemed to have satisfied this reporting obligation, creating an incentive for platform participation. When the Royal Thai Police or the Department of Special Investigation seize or freeze assets related to technology crimes, they must provide AMLO with investigation reports, complaint evidence, money-trail data, and account statements. Notification and Claims Process Once the AMLO secretary-general approves verified reports of a technology crime, the account information of persons connected to the crime will be published in the Government Gazette, triggering a 90-day window for victims to file claims and for related persons to file objections. Officers will also publish details on AMLO’s electronic media and send registered mail to identified victims, which will be deemed received after 7 days domestically or 15 days internationally. Victims have 90 days from the date the crime is published in the Government Gazette to file claims through AMLO’s electronic system. Claims must include
Read More