You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 9, 2024

Critical Updates to Vietnam’s Regulatory Framework for Intermediary Payment Services

Subscribe to Updates

As non-cash payments continue to surge in Vietnam, the requirement for strong security standards and a clear legislative framework for intermediary payment services (“IPS”) is becoming more and more critical. Recognizing this, the State Bank of Vietnam (“SBV”) has been working on a draft decree to supersede the outdated Decree No. 101/2012/ND-CP dated November 22, 2012, on non-cash payments (“Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree”), which will lay the groundwork for non-cash payments in general and the provision of IPS in particular.

Building upon this, the SBV recently issued a draft circular to replace Circular No. 39/2014/TT-NHNN dated December 11, 2014, on IPS (“Circular 39”) (“Draft IPS Circular”), which will offer more detailed guidance on the provision of IPS in Vietnam on top of the Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree. The Draft IPS Circular will be applicable to (i) IPS providers; (ii) foreign organizations providing IPS in Vietnam; and (iii) organizations and individuals involved in the provision of IPS.

Some key updates regarding the Draft IPS Circular are as follows:

Scope of Application

The Draft IPS Circular sets out further guidance for the provision of IPS as listed under the Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree, including: (i) electronic clearing services; (ii) electronic wallet (“e-wallet”) services; (iii) collection and payment support services; (iv) financial switching services; (v) international financial switching services; and (vi) electronic payment gateway services.

Notably, the Draft IPS Circular has explicitly excluded from its scope of application the provision of accounts by goods/service providers to their customers solely for the purpose of payment within the systems of such providers (e.g., cards/coupons or service/transaction accounts of online game service providers, transportation service providers, or securities companies, etc.).

Requirements on the Provision of IPS

Electronic Clearing Services: The Draft IPS Circular introduces regulations to cover certain elements of electronic clearing services that have not been explicitly outlined in Circular 39. This is done to ensure alignment with Circular No. 37/2016/TT-NHNN dated December 30, 2016, on the management, operation, and use of the national interbank electronic payment system, specifically:

  • Additional clarification is provided on the responsibilities of the “organization presiding over electronic clearing system,” which refers to an IPS provider licensed by the SBV to offer financial switching services and electronic clearing services. This organization is also permitted to directly participate in and connect with the interbank electronic payment system (“IEPS”) for the purpose of conducting electronic clearing settlements. To achieve this, the organization will have to construct and operate an Electronic Clearing System.
  • To send, receive, and process payment transactions, IPS providers need to be members of the Electronic Clearing System. This system consists of two types of memberships: settlement members and non-settlement members. Settlement members in the system have an established net debt limit within the system, maintain a payment account at the SBV Transaction Office, and are responsible for managing their own clearing settlements. Non-settlement members depend on settlement members to manage these tasks while still being able to send, receive, and process payment transactions within the system.
  • The conditions for becoming a settlement member include: (i) being a direct member of the IEPS; (ii) establishing, monitoring, and managing an electronic clearing limit; and (iii) having written commitments with the organization presiding over the Electronic Clearing System and the SBV Transaction Office regarding its payment ability.

E-Wallet Services: The Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree and the Draft IPS Circular tightly regulate e-wallet services in the same manner as other non-cash payment methods. Some notable requirements for the provision of e-wallet services include the following:

  • E-wallet customers: Pursuant to the Draft IPS Circular, e-wallet customers are individuals and organizations allowed to open and have payment accounts at banks and/or branches of foreign banks. E-wallet service providers are not allowed to open their own e-wallets.
  • E-wallet opening channels: E-wallet opening channels have been expanded, allowing customers to also register to open e-wallets directly at partnered banks or their online transaction channels according to the e-wallet service contracts/agreements between the e-wallet service providers and the partnered banks.
  • E-wallet transaction limit: The Draft IPS Circular prescribes the personal e-wallet limit at VND 100 million/month (about USD 400/month) for normal payment transactions (excluding transactions for goods and services serving the essential needs of consumers).
  • Linking e-wallets with owners’ payment accounts/debit cards: In order to maintain a strict management approach as reflected in the Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree as well as the SBV’s recent directions, the Draft IPS Circular does not allow e-wallet customers to use e-wallets in the absence of a connection with their payment accounts/debit cards.
  • E-wallet services payment capability assurance: The Draft IPS Circular requires that e-wallet service providers must maintain (i) a payment guarantee account specifically for e-wallet services; and (ii) segregation of account information, money flows, and the use of the payment guarantee account for e-wallet services, as well as for any collection and payment support services, if applicable.

Collection and Payment Support Services: The Draft IPS Circular sets forth several principles on the provision of collection and payment support services, including: (i) subjects allowed to use the services (i.e., customers having payment accounts or bank cards); (ii) requirements for an agreement or contract with the partnered banks, which are to contain regulations on payment guarantee measures for the provision of these services, including opening a payment guarantee account, maintaining deposits, or other guarantee measures.

IPS Containing International Elements: The Draft IPS Circular provides guidance on the provision of IPS containing international elements, specifically regarding (i) foreign IPS providers that offer IPS to customers who are non-residents and foreigners residing in Vietnam to perform payment transactions for goods and/or services in Vietnam; and (ii) Vietnamese IPS providers who allow customers to perform payment transactions for goods and/or services in foreign countries.

Electronic Payment Gateway Services: The Draft IPS Circular separates the obligations of financial switching service providers, international financial switching service providers, and electronic clearing service providers from those of electronic payment gateway service providers. This separation is made due to the distinct nature of the former services, which involve providing services to parties involved in the payment systems rather than directly to customers, as is the case with payment gateway services. The Draft IPS Circular also includes a section outlining the obligations of electronic payment gateway service providers, covering their responsibilities toward both their customers and their service provision partners, such as associated banks and merchants.

Short Transitional Period

The Draft IPS Circular is expected to take effect on July 1, 2024, with a transitional period until December 31, 2024, for IPS providers to review existing information, documents, procedures, etc., and implement necessary measures to ensure full compliance. Depending on the specific circumstances, failure to do so may subject the IPS providers to penalties such as enforced termination of service provision, termination of respective partnership contracts/agreements, or termination of partnership from January 1, 2025.

IPS-Related Issues Under Other Legal Instruments

In addition to the Draft Non-Cash Payment Decree and the Draft IPS Circular, several recently released and impending legal instruments also have the potential to reshape the legal landscape for the provision of IPS in Vietnam. These include the following:

  • Decision No. 2345/QD-NHNN of the SBV dated December 18, 2023, on the application of safety and security measures to online payment and card payment: Categorizes online transactions based on transaction value and imposes specific authentication measures on the respective transaction categories, especially including an authentication mechanism using biometric data for certain transactions. Also prescribes risk mitigation solutions in online payments applicable to IPS providers, including notably: (i) customer authentication for individual customers for their first transaction using mobile banking; (ii) notification of first log-in to internet banking/mobile banking applications; and (iii) storage of information about devices on which customers’ online transactions are carried out and transaction authentication logs.
  • Draft circular to replace Circular No. 46/2014/TT-NHNN of the SBV dated December 31, 2014, guiding non-cash payment services: Addresses the responsibilities of payment service providers when cooperating with IPS providers, including (i) the responsibility to have a written agreement that clearly stipulates the parties’ obligations regarding confidentiality of customer information, payment transactions, and liability for violations of this obligation; and (ii) the responsibility for coordinating with IPS providers in checking and comparing data, authenticating transactions, customer information, etc.
  • Draft circular to replace Circular No. 20/2018/TT-NHNN of the SBV dated August 30, 2018, on the supervision of payment systems: Regulates the supervision of activities related to the provision of IPS, including monitoring compliance with legal regulations and overseeing risk management activities. These activities encompass policy development, risk management processes, and implementation activities.
  • Draft circular to replace Circular 19/2016/TT-NHNN of the SBV dated June 30, 2016, on bank card operations: Addresses the cooperation between IPS providers and other parties in transactions related to bank cards, specifically in the electronic switching and clearing of these transactions.
  • Draft circular on payment agent services: Expands regulations to encompass certain activities that resemble those of IPS providers but are not legally considered IPS. These activities now may include the following on behalf of banks: (i) collecting and verifying documents to open accounts, (ii) receiving and verifying information for bank card issuance, and (iii) handling customer service, processing transactions, and receiving or paying cash for customers.

Conclusion

As part of a series of draft circulars under the regulatory development program of the SBV this year, the Draft IPS Circular encompasses a number of new and more stringent regulations on the provision of IPS. The Draft IPS Circular is expected to address the loopholes in the existing Circular 39 and usher in momentous changes to the legal framework governing IPS in Vietnam. Given the anticipated short transitional period for compliance, IPS providers should closely monitor the progress of this draft circular to ensure they are fully prepared to comply with its new requirements.

Related Professionals

Industries

Fintech

Technology

Practices

Banking and Finance

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 15, 2026
The surge in AI development has led to a desperate demand for large, high-quality training data. However, real-world data can be expensive to collect, difficult to access, and often subject to strict privacy and regulatory constraints. Synthetic data, which consists of artificially generated records that replicate the statistical properties of real-world data without reproducing specific individuals’ information, provides an appealing solution by generating artificial datasets at scale without relying on identifiable personal information. It combines speed, cost efficiency, and regulatory compliance, making it a sensible alternative for organizations seeking to reduce risks while maintaining data utility. When properly anonymized, synthetic datasets may fall outside the scope of laws such as the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA), reducing compliance burdens while still supporting high-quality model training. However, relying on synthetic data without rigorous legal due diligence could be a strategic mistake. It replaces one set of known risks (scraping, direct privacy liability) with a new set of complex liabilities. The narrative that synthetic data is a “silver bullet” for privacy and IP compliance is dangerous and could be misleading. While synthetic data addresses data scarcity, it also introduces new legal uncertainties. Legal counsel should anticipate downstream risks arising from compromised data sources. Models trained on unlawfully obtained data may need to be decommissioned, even if their outputs appear lawful. What is synthetic data? Synthetic data refers to artificially generated information created using AI techniques such as deep learning and generative models. Instead of copying real records, it reproduces the statistical patterns and relationships found in the original dataset. Synthetic data generally falls into three categories: Fully synthetic data – Entirely new data points generated from learned patterns. The model studies the structure of the original data and produces records that resemble real-world
Read More
June 11, 2026
Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) has released a revised draft Electronic Transactions Act (ETA) for public hearing from May 12, 2026, to June 15, 2026. This is not merely an amendment to certain provisions of the current ETA, but a comprehensive redrafting of the entire act. The revised draft ETA introduces several significant changes from the current framework, with practical implications for businesses operating in Thailand. Unified Coverage of Public and Private Sectors The current law segregates government transactions into a separate chapter with distinct rules. The draft ETA eliminates this division, defining “transaction” to encompass civil and commercial juristic acts as well as administrative procedures, administrative contracts, and other acts of government agencies. Enhanced E-Signature Definition The definition of “electronic signature” is broadened to expressly include biometric data and refocused on identifying the signatory and demonstrating intent regarding the content of the electronic data. Shift in Burden of Proof When a party challenges the reliability of electronic data created using a “trusted electronic method” or a method prescribed by the ETDA, the burden of proof and the cost of proving unreliability shifts to the challenger. Introduction of New Digital Method Concepts The draft ETA introduces several new digital method concepts that are not currently recognized under the existing ETA framework. These include: Electronic timestamping (e-timestamp) Electronic registered delivery Electronic company seals Electronic stamp duty compliance Electronic identity authentication and verification Electronic transferable records (electronic bills of lading, promissory notes, and similar negotiable instruments) Recognition of Automated Systems and Electronic Contracting The draft ETA expressly recognizes the legal validity and enforceability of contracts formed through automated systems, including contracts concluded entirely between automated systems or between an automated system and a person. A party may not deny the binding effect of such contracts solely because no human review
Read More
June 5, 2026
Vietnam’s AI regulatory framework has reached an important milestone. While the Law on Artificial Intelligence No. 134/2025/QH15 (AI Law) established the foundation for AI governance, many practical compliance requirements were left to implementing regulations. On April 30, 2026, the government issued Decree No. 142/2026/ND-CP (Decree 142), which took effect on May 1, 2026, and provides the first detailed guidance on the implementation of the AI Law. Although an official list of high-risk AI systems is still pending from the prime minister, Decree 142 provides valuable insight into how Vietnam’s risk-based AI regulatory framework will operate in practice. Risk Classification Framework The AI Law adopts a risk-based approach under which AI systems are classified as high-risk, medium-risk, or low-risk. Decree 142 builds on this framework by providing detailed guidance on how these classifications are determined. High-risk AI systems are determined based on factors such as (i) their potential impact on life, health, property, human rights, public interests, or national security; (ii) the sector in which they are deployed; and (iii) the scale of affected users or integration with critical infrastructure. The latest draft list of high-risk AI systems appears to follow these same principles. Medium-risk AI systems generally include systems that may mislead, influence, or manipulate users, particularly where users may not realize they are interacting with AI or AI-generated content. The focus is therefore on transparency and authenticity risks rather than broader societal or safety concerns. Low-risk AI systems are those that do not meet the criteria for either high-risk or medium-risk classification. Importantly, Decree 142 seeks to avoid over-classification. Certain systems may fall outside the high-risk or medium-risk regimes, including internal-use systems, office-support tools, technical editing applications, certain back-end processing systems, and AI systems used in artistic, gaming, cinematic, or other creative contexts. Providers must also review and
Read More
June 5, 2026
On May 11, 2026, Thailand’s Ministry of Social Development and Human Security released a draft Child Protection Act (“CPA”) for public review. The draft CPA would completely repeal and replace the current Child Protection Act B.E. 2546 (2003). This represents the most comprehensive overhaul of Thailand’s child protection framework in over two decades, reflecting the government’s stated objective of modernizing the law to address evolving social challenges—including those arising from digital technology—and to promote greater coordination among government agencies, local authorities, and civil society. The public review period closes on June 9, 2026. Key changes introduced by the draft CPA that could have significant implications for businesses, particularly online platform providers, media companies, and entities operating child-related services in Thailand, are set out below. Expanded Definition of “Child” Under the current CPA, a “child” is defined as a person under the age of 18, excluding those who have attained legal majority through marriage. The draft CPA removes the marriage exception entirely, broadening the scope of the law’s protections to include all individuals under 18 without exception. Replacement of “Abuse” with Broader Concept of “Violence” The current CPA uses the term “abuse/cruelty,” which covers acts causing harm to a child’s liberty, body, or mind; sexual offenses against children; and using children in harmful or immoral activities. The draft CPA replaces this with the broader concept of “violence,” which encompasses any act or omission causing harm to a child’s body, mind, or development; abandonment or neglect; improper exploitation; and sexual abuse. Notably, the new definition adds developmental harm as a recognized category of injury and captures all forms of misconduct regardless of the child’s consent. New Standalone Definition of Sexual Abuse, Including Online Conduct One of the most significant additions in the draft CPA is the introduction of a standalone definition
Read More