You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 13, 2020

COVID-19: Thailand Eases Provident Fund Requirements and Prohibits Strikes and Lockouts

Subscribe to Updates

In the latest of a suite of measures designed to help employers and employees weather the COVID-19 crisis, the Thai government has published legislation allowing the temporary cessation of provident fund contributions for employers and employees in crisis and preventing the use of strikes or lockouts in employment disputes while the government’s emergency decree is in force.

Provident Fund Measures

On May 5, 2020, the Announcement on Designation of Types of Business, Duration, and Conditions for Employees or Employers to Cease or Postpone the Submission of Savings or Contributions to the Provident Fund in Areas Affected by Economic Crisis, Disaster, or Other Severe Events Affecting Economic Conditions was published by the Ministry of Finance in the Government Gazette.

This announcement exempts both employers and employees from their duties to submit contributions to the provident fund between May 5 and December 31, 2020, subject to certain criteria and their agreement to make use of the exemption under the announcement. The provident fund membership status of employers and employees who avail themselves of these measures will not be affected.

In order to make use of the exemption under the announcement, employers will have to certify that they meet the following conditions:

  • The business is facing an operational crisis because of the COVID-19 pandemic; and,
  • The business is facing a financial crisis.

The exemption also requires a resolution of approval from either:

  • A resolution by a general meeting of the provident fund members, held in accordance with the fund’s regulations, resolved in accordance with the regulations for counting votes in general meetings or by at least half of the meeting attendees if the fund regulations are silent on vote counting; or,
  • A unanimous vote from all members of the fund committee if the meeting cannot be held for any reason.

In addition, if the provident fund is a pooled fund consisting of more than one employer, resolutions must be obtained from meetings of the members of each employer, or from the fund committee of each employer.

The employer or the fund committee must notify the registrar that they have resolved to make use of the exemption, attaching the following documents:

  • A certification, signed by the employer’s directors, certifying that the business is facing operational difficulties because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and is thus facing a financial crisis; and,
  • The meeting report for the resolution with details of the acknowledgement of the employer’s situation and details of the resolution to use the exemption (showing the decision on whether to cease or postpone contributions, and the decision on the duration of the cessation or postponement).

The employees and employer can resume their contributions to the provident fund before the end of the agreed period by jointly agreeing and notifying the registrar. In addition, during the temporary cessation or postponement of contributions by employers, employees can still submit their contributions to the provident funds. The employer has full discretion over whether to submit employer contributions in that circumstance. 

Strikes and Lockouts

In addition, on May 8, 2020, the Announcement on Determination of Unsettled Disputes to be Resolved by Labor Relations Committee and Forbidding Lock Outs or Strikes during the Announcement of Emergency Situation under the Law Regarding Public Administration in Emergency Situations, issued by the Labor Ministry, was published in the Government Gazette.

This announcement prohibits employees and employers from using strike or lockout measures under the Labor Relations Act B.E. 2518 (1975) during the emergency situation period announced under the Emergency Decree, currently set to expire on May 31, 2020 (subject to extension). The announcement also states that any strike or lockout that commenced before May 8, 2020, must end, and that all employees must return to work or employers must reinstate the employees. Any unsettled disputes under the Labor Relations Act that occurred during the emergency situation period must now be considered and resolved by the Labor Relations Committee.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Vientiane have contributed the Laos chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Laos chapter was prepared by associates Naiyane Xaechao and Sayphin Singsouvong. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Laos chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
Read More
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Phnom Penh have contributed the Cambodia chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Cambodia chapter was authored by Jay Cohen, partner and director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Phnom Penh office, and Chanvisal Lok, associate. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Cambodia chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
Read More
January 14, 2026
Employers operating in Thailand can enforce post-employment noncompete covenants, but success depends on precise drafting and strong evidentiary support. Thai courts will uphold restraints that protect legitimate employer interests and are fair and reasonable in duration, geographic reach, and substantive scope. Overbroad covenants, however, draw judicial skepticism and may fail unless they are drafted in severable, defensible components tied to the employee’s actual role. This article synthesizes recent trends in Thai case practice, explains how Thai courts assess reasonableness in employment restraints, and provides a practical litigation-focused framework for drafting enforceable covenants, preparing evidence, and pursuing relief through the Labor Court. The Legal Framework and Its Practical Implications Thai courts evaluate noncompete covenants under general principles of contract enforceability and public policy, with particular focus on whether a restraint is necessary to protect a legitimate employer interest and proportionate to that objective. In employment matters, this analysis is shaped by the employee-protective tenor of Thai labor law and by the Labor Court’s equitable discretion in determining appropriate remedies. The practical takeaway is that standardized or broadly drafted covenants rarely survive scrutiny. Courts look for a demonstrable nexus between the employee’s actual exposure to confidential information, trade secrets, or customer relationships and the scope of the restraint. Where that nexus is weak or the restraint operates as a blanket prohibition, courts are inclined to decline enforcement or limit relief to a narrowly tailored prohibition. The employer interests most commonly recognized as legitimate in Thai practice include the protection of trade secrets, confidential business information, and goodwill tied to identifiable customer segments or territories. Courts are more likely to enforce restraints where employers can clearly document what information is at risk, why particular customer relationships matter, and how the employee was involved with those assets. Judges also look closely at the
Read More
December 19, 2025
On December 12, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Labor published a ministerial regulation prescribing the minimum and maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions. The regulation, which takes effect on January 1, 2026, sets a flat minimum base wage of THB 1,650 per month and a phased increase of the maximum base wage over the following six years, as outlined in the table below. Impact on Social Security Benefits Not only will monthly contributions increase as a result of the adjustment to the maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions, but the maximum benefits available to insured persons will also be enhanced, as shown in the next table. Employer Obligations From January 1, 2026, employers must correctly withhold wages and remit social security contributions for both the employer’s and employees’ portions in compliance with the revised thresholds. Failure to comply may expose employers to penalties under the Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990). Employers should ensure that payroll systems are updated as necessary to reflect these changes to the wage ceiling used for social security contribution calculations.
Read More