You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 13, 2020

COVID-19: Thailand Eases Provident Fund Requirements and Prohibits Strikes and Lockouts

In the latest of a suite of measures designed to help employers and employees weather the COVID-19 crisis, the Thai government has published legislation allowing the temporary cessation of provident fund contributions for employers and employees in crisis and preventing the use of strikes or lockouts in employment disputes while the government’s emergency decree is in force.

Provident Fund Measures

On May 5, 2020, the Announcement on Designation of Types of Business, Duration, and Conditions for Employees or Employers to Cease or Postpone the Submission of Savings or Contributions to the Provident Fund in Areas Affected by Economic Crisis, Disaster, or Other Severe Events Affecting Economic Conditions was published by the Ministry of Finance in the Government Gazette.

This announcement exempts both employers and employees from their duties to submit contributions to the provident fund between May 5 and December 31, 2020, subject to certain criteria and their agreement to make use of the exemption under the announcement. The provident fund membership status of employers and employees who avail themselves of these measures will not be affected.

In order to make use of the exemption under the announcement, employers will have to certify that they meet the following conditions:

  • The business is facing an operational crisis because of the COVID-19 pandemic; and,
  • The business is facing a financial crisis.

The exemption also requires a resolution of approval from either:

  • A resolution by a general meeting of the provident fund members, held in accordance with the fund’s regulations, resolved in accordance with the regulations for counting votes in general meetings or by at least half of the meeting attendees if the fund regulations are silent on vote counting; or,
  • A unanimous vote from all members of the fund committee if the meeting cannot be held for any reason.

In addition, if the provident fund is a pooled fund consisting of more than one employer, resolutions must be obtained from meetings of the members of each employer, or from the fund committee of each employer.

The employer or the fund committee must notify the registrar that they have resolved to make use of the exemption, attaching the following documents:

  • A certification, signed by the employer’s directors, certifying that the business is facing operational difficulties because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and is thus facing a financial crisis; and,
  • The meeting report for the resolution with details of the acknowledgement of the employer’s situation and details of the resolution to use the exemption (showing the decision on whether to cease or postpone contributions, and the decision on the duration of the cessation or postponement).

The employees and employer can resume their contributions to the provident fund before the end of the agreed period by jointly agreeing and notifying the registrar. In addition, during the temporary cessation or postponement of contributions by employers, employees can still submit their contributions to the provident funds. The employer has full discretion over whether to submit employer contributions in that circumstance. 

Strikes and Lockouts

In addition, on May 8, 2020, the Announcement on Determination of Unsettled Disputes to be Resolved by Labor Relations Committee and Forbidding Lock Outs or Strikes during the Announcement of Emergency Situation under the Law Regarding Public Administration in Emergency Situations, issued by the Labor Ministry, was published in the Government Gazette.

This announcement prohibits employees and employers from using strike or lockout measures under the Labor Relations Act B.E. 2518 (1975) during the emergency situation period announced under the Emergency Decree, currently set to expire on May 31, 2020 (subject to extension). The announcement also states that any strike or lockout that commenced before May 8, 2020, must end, and that all employees must return to work or employers must reinstate the employees. Any unsettled disputes under the Labor Relations Act that occurred during the emergency situation period must now be considered and resolved by the Labor Relations Committee.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

December 4, 2024
Thailand Legal Basics, a valuable primer for foreign investors, explores all aspects of living and doing business in Thailand. Written by specialists at Tilleke & Gibbins in Bangkok, it is the only comprehensive English-language guide to the Thai legal system with a focus on the concerns of foreign business and investment.
October 1, 2024
Three of Tilleke & Gibbins’ labor and employment specialists in Vietnam have contributed the Vietnam chapter to the newly issued Labor and Employment Disputes 2024, a comprehensive guide from Lexology Panoramic to labor and employment dispute resolution in various jurisdictions around the world. The Vietnam chapter covers the following topics: Pre-action considerations: Key requirements, third-party funding, contingency fee arrangements Issuing a claim: Forum, territorial jurisdiction, standing, commencing claims, fees, service Defendants and legal personality: Types of claims, time limits, counterclaims Case management: Procedure, rules, amendments to claims, adding parties to proceedings, consolidating proceedings Class and collective actions: Special considerations Evidence: Witnesses, tactical considerations Interim relief: Availability, requirements Trial: Hearings conduct and typical time frames, confidentiality and public access, media reporting Elements of successful claims and burden of proof Alternative dispute resolution: Available types, requirements and expectations Enforcement: Collective employment and labor rights, enforcement of collective rights, standing Remedies and enforcement: Available remedies, assessing compensation, enforcement mechanisms Appeals: Appeal procedure and time frames, other means of challenge Update and trends: Recent cases and developments, technology developments, other issues The Vietnam chapter was authored by Truc Thi Thanh, Linh Ngoc Nguyen, and Kien Trung Trinh. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia and Thailand chapters to Labor and Employment Disputes 2024.
October 1, 2024
Four of Tilleke & Gibbins’ labor and employment specialists in Bangkok have contributed the Thailand chapter to the newly issued Labor and Employment Disputes 2024, a comprehensive guide from Lexology Panoramic to labor and employment dispute resolution in various jurisdictions around the world. The Thailand chapter covers the following topics: Pre-action considerations: Key requirements, third-party funding, contingency fee arrangements Issuing a claim: Forum, territorial jurisdiction, standing, commencing claims, fees, service Defendants and legal personality: Types of claims, time limits, counterclaims Case management: Procedure, rules, amendments to claims, adding parties to proceedings, consolidating proceedings Class and collective actions: Special considerations Evidence: Witnesses, tactical considerations Interim relief: Availability, requirements Trial: Hearings conduct and typical time frames, confidentiality and public access, media reporting Elements of successful claims and burden of proof Alternative dispute resolution: Available types, requirements and expectations Enforcement: Collective employment and labor rights, enforcement of collective rights, standing Remedies and enforcement: Available remedies, assessing compensation, enforcement mechanisms Appeals: Appeal procedure and time frames, other means of challenge Update and trends: Recent cases and developments, technology developments, other issues The Thailand chapter was authored by Eric M. Meyer, Chusert Supasitthumrong, Pathanin Sornchangwat, and Chayathorn Kruatao, all in the Thailand dispute resolution and litigation team. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia and Vietnam chapters to Labor and Employment Disputes 2024. The full Thailand chapter is available below as a PDF.
August 14, 2024
Myanmar has once again made significant amendments to its minimum-wage framework by introducing additional allowances for both public- and private-sector workers. On August 9, 2024, the National Committee for Setting the Minimum Wage issued Notification No. 1/2024, which entitles private-sector workers to a new additional daily allowance of MMK 1,000 (approximately USD 0.48). This increase is on top of the MMK 1,000 additional daily allowance introduced last year. As a result, workers at private-sector employers with more than 10 employees are now entitled to the base minimum wage of MMK 4,800 plus additional allowances of MMK 2,000, for a total of MMK 6,800 (approximately USD 3.20) per day for an eight-hour workday, effective August 1, 2024. A similar additional allowance had been announced for workers in government departments and organizations on July 26, 2024. Background The MMK 4,800 (approximately USD 2.29) minimum wage for an eight-hour workday (equivalent to MMK 600 per hour) was established in May 2018 for all workers, irrespective of location or job type. In September 2023, the Ministry of Planning and Finance announced an additional daily benefit of MMK 1,000 for workers in government departments and organizations, and on October 9, 2023, the National Committee for Setting the Minimum Wage extended this benefit to workers at private-sector employers with more than 10 employees, bringing the effective minimum daily wage to MMK 5,800 (approximately USD 2.77). These changes took effect on October 1, 2023. Applicability of Additional Allowances for Private-Sector Workers The latest announcement also entitles employees to the base minimum wage and additional allowances for days used from their entitlement to leave and holidays, in accordance with the 1951 Leave and Holidays Act. However, the daily allowances—totaling MMK 2,000—are not to be included when calculating overtime payments. Instead, overtime payments must be calculated based on