You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 10, 2012

Compensation in a Wrongful Death Case

Subscribe to Updates
Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

Wrongful death claims can result in the assessment of civil and criminal penalties on parties that may be far removed from the negligent actor. The impact could be seen on officers and directors, manufacturers and dealers, employees and employers, agents and principals, insured and insurers, among others. This article is written for corporations and their officers and directors and includes an overview of wrongful death actions, significant components of awards, and protection mechanisms.

Wrongful Death Actions

A wrongful death action is brought by close relatives of the decedent for damages incurred as a result of the victim’s death. Liability is based on the concept of a “wrongful act” under Thai law, which is essentially an action in tort akin to a claim of negligence in common law jurisdictions. Establishing liability requires that the plaintiff show that the defendant acted willfully, negligently, or unlawfully, resulting in the death of the victim.

The court has the discretion to determine the manner and the extent of compensation according to the circumstances and the gravity of the wrongful act and may award compensation for the following:

  • Funeral and other necessary expenses
  • Expenses for medical treatment and loss of earnings (where there existed a period between the incident and the death)
  • Support that would have been provided by the decedent (where the claimant is legally entitled to support)
  • Damages where the decedent was bound by contract to perform services for an employer or contractor

Importantly, non-pecuniary damages (or damages that cannot be measured in money, such as damages for pain and suffering of the victim) are not recoverable by heirs, except where the wrongdoer agrees to pay compensation to the heirs for such damages.

Significant Components of Awards

The law gives the courts the discretion to assess damages on a case-by-case basis. At the same time, the law does not give absolute freedom to the courts to determine damages, and the exercise of power is limited by the various provisions contained in the Civil and Commercial Code.

A significant component of damages is the maintenance that would have been provided by the decedent to persons entitled to support. In Thailand, children are bound to support their parents, and parents are generally bound to support their children until the age of adulthood (20 years). Husbands and wives shall maintain and support each other, according to their abilities and conditions in life.

Thus, the court may consider factors such as the decedent’s level of education, salary or potential salary, and age. The court may also review the plaintiff’s age, status, living expenses, occupation, and other sources of support. In a 2008 case decided by the Court of Appeals, the parents received 10 million baht in compensation for the death of their daughter, caused when she fell out of a bus due to a broken door. Among other factors, the court observed that the victim was about to pursue her master’s degree in Japan and, on completion, would have earned an average monthly salary of 46,000 baht for about 20 years.

In addition, courts in Thailand consider the ability of the defendant to pay the judgment. In a case decided in 2007 with similar facts to the above case, but where the defendant had fewer means, the parents of the decedent received less than 300,000 baht from the Supreme Court.

Another critical consideration is the amount requested by the plaintiff in the complaint. By law, courts cannot exceed the demand requested by the plaintiff. Note, however, that the court may allow the plaintiff to amend the complaint in order to seek greater sums from the defendant.

Protection

Given the disparity in awards for wrongful death claims and the likelihood that corporations and their officers and directors will be subject to awards on the high end of the spectrum, it is important to maintain good business practices. Active oversight and management, careful delegation of important responsibilities, and timely and appropriate responses to emergency situations will go far in avoiding or mitigating any damages incurred in wrongful death lawsuits. Directors and officers should also take care to only sit on a board of a company in which they are actively involved.

Management should also consider purchasing quality insurance. It is recommended that such insurance include coverage for legal fees, as it is often costly to defend wrongful death litigation. Finally, legal risks can be reduced by seeking the advice of competent counsel, in a proactive and timely manner, in order to adequately respond to an emergency situation or prevent the occurrence of such situations.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Dispute Resolution and Litigation

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 24, 2026
Significant economic challenges facing Thailand in recent years have placed financial pressure on both individuals and businesses. As a result, many debtors may find themselves unable to meet their repayment obligations, leading to bankruptcy proceedings. When an individual or corporate debtor in Thailand is subject to bankruptcy proceedings, the Thai Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940) provides a legal framework for collecting a debtor’s assets and using them to repay creditors. Under the Bankruptcy Act, creditors wishing to recover outstanding debts must file a debt repayment application (DRA), which is the primary mechanism for asserting claims in bankruptcy proceedings. However, the filing of a DRA is subject to specific legal requirements, procedural rules, deadlines, and supporting documentation. Failure to comply with these requirements may adversely affect a creditor’s ability to recover its claim. This article highlights the key considerations that creditors should be aware of when filing a DRA in a bankruptcy case in Thailand. Filing a DRA In a bankruptcy case, after the court issues an absolute receivership order, the debtor loses the authority to manage or dispose of its assets. Control over the debtor’s assets is transferred to the official receiver, a government official responsible for administering the bankruptcy estate in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act. Creditors seeking repayment of their debts must file a DRA with the official receiver within two months of the absolute receivership order being officially published in the Government Gazette. For creditors outside of Thailand, the official receiver may extend the filing period by up to an additional two months. These filing deadlines are strictly enforced. Failure to file within the prescribed period may result in the claim being barred, except in limited circumstances permitted by the Bankruptcy Act. Where a late filing is accepted due to force majeure, the creditor may only
Read More
August 20, 2026
Vietnam’s Law on Bankruptcy and Rehabilitation No. 142/2025/QH15, passed by the National Assembly on December 11, 2025, does something many regional counterparts do not yet attempt: it instructs parties and arbitral tribunals on exactly what happens to an arbitration once a debtor becomes insolvent. Together with the Law on Commercial Arbitration No. 54/2010/QH12, the new law improves upon what used to be an uncertain area of practice, now providing an explicit, mandatory sequence of procedures. Suspension and Termination of Arbitration Proceedings Under article 40(2) of the law, once a Vietnamese court accepts a bankruptcy petition, any arbitration that concerns the debtor’s financial obligations must be temporarily suspended as soon as the tribunal receives the court’s notification. If the court subsequently issues a decision commencing bankruptcy proceedings, article 59(2) takes a further step: the suspended arbitration is terminated outright, and the underlying case file is transferred to the court handling the insolvency for resolution. The two provisions work as a sequence: first suspension, then termination and transfer, rather than as independent triggers. Meanwhile, article 60(4) reinforces this effect by vesting the bankruptcy court with exclusive jurisdiction over all claims against the debtor from the date the petition is accepted. Notably, this mechanism operates automatically, without the need for the insolvency court to issue a separate anti-arbitration order. The tribunal simply suspends or terminates the proceeding by operation of law once notified; however, Vietnamese law currently provides no procedure by which a party can apply to the insolvency court for permission to continue the arbitration despite the statutory effect. Practitioners with a Vietnamese counterparty in arbitration should treat notification of a bankruptcy filing as something to flag to the tribunal immediately since continuing to arbitrate a claim that has become subject to article 40(2) or 59(2) risks producing an award vulnerable
Read More
August 20, 2026
Thai law contains no provision that speaks directly to what happens to an arbitration when one of the parties becomes insolvent. The interaction between arbitration and insolvency is derived instead from the general operation of two separately drafted laws: the Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940) and the Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002). Because Thai courts have had few opportunities to interpret how these two statutes apply together, the practical answer to many questions, such as who represents an insolvent party in arbitration, whether an award will be enforced, and what happens to a foreign proceeding, depends on inference from general principles of insolvency, arbitration, and procedural law rather than on settled rules. Liquidation and Restructuring The Bankruptcy Act governs both liquidation, which winds up a debtor’s affairs, and restructuring (rehabilitation), which aims to preserve a business. The consequences for arbitration differ accordingly. In liquidation, the debtor’s assets vest in the official receiver, who alone can conduct or continue any arbitration affecting the estate; the debtor loses the authority to act on its own behalf. In restructuring, the plan preparer or administrator takes over that role, but there is more room for the debtor to remain involved, since the objective of rehabilitation is to keep the business operational. Restructuring carries an automatic stay that takes effect once the Bankruptcy Court accepts the restructuring petition. This stay can halt an arbitration regardless of where it is seated. In contrast, liquidation does not work through a stay; instead, the debtor’s loss of authority over its own assets and disputes is what constrains the arbitration. Neither proceeding provides a party a formal route to apply for permission to continue arbitrating—the Bankruptcy Act contains no such mechanism—though in restructuring cases the Bankruptcy Court may allow proceedings to continue where doing so will not prejudice
Read More
August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.
Read More