You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

July 12, 2023

Circular 06 Sets Out Guidance for VOD Content Providers in Vietnam

Subscribe to Updates

On June 30, 2023, Vietnam’s Ministry of Information and Communications (MIC) issued Circular No. 06/2003/TT-BTTTT to provide implementing guidelines for Decree 71 on editing, ratings, and warnings for video on demand (VOD) sports and entertainment content provided over radio and TV services. Circular 06 will take effect on August 15, 2023.

Because Decree 71 allows VOD providers to self-edit and self-rate this type of content, it is important for them to know how the process is regulated in order to fully comply before providing VOD sports and entertainment programs to Vietnamese users.

Under Circular 06, radio and TV service providers are required to display ratings and warnings on their programs, following the principles set out in the circular. These service providers must also compile dossiers in a stipulated form on the editing, ratings, and warnings of their programs for reporting to the authority and inspection.

The main contents of Circular 06 are as follows.

1. Content Editing

The main principles for editing VOD sports and entertainment programs include:

  • Protection of children and other vulnerable people from inappropriate or potentially harmful content.
  • Removal of all illegal/prohibited content, as well as content related to controversial issues or issues not recognized by Vietnamese law.
  • Removal of content or dialogue that disparages the origins of others or makes fun of others’ physical weaknesses, and content that is contrary to Vietnamese culture, morality and fine customs and traditions;
  • Removal of programs if it is discovered during the editing process that in the program or at the venue of the event, there are images or activities violating the prohibitions of the law, violating Vietnamese fine customs and traditions, or containing sensitive political elements.

In addition to compliance with the above-mentioned principles, sports and entertainment programs related to health, education, and online gaming must additionally meet the requirements of relevant specialized laws.

 

2. Content Ratings

Under Circular 06, the principles for rating of programs are based on the manner of expression; specific situations and contexts; interactivity; frequency; duration; level of detail of images, sound, lighting, and dialogue; and the level of impact of the program on the audience, in which the importance of the context and the level of impact on the audience are priority factors in rating of the programs.

The factors for rating programs include topic and content; violence; nudity and sex; drugs, stimulants and addictive substances; horror; vulgar images, sounds, and language; and dangerous behavior that is easy to imitate.

Programs are rated at a lower level when:

  • The program content is depicted verbally rather than visually; or
  • The images and words of the program have a low impact on the audience.

Programs are rated at a more stringent level when the program content:

  • Contains more details, including close-ups and slow motion;
  • Uses highlighting techniques such as lighting, perspective, and resolution;
  • Uses special effects such as light, sound, noise, resolution, color, image size, characteristics, and tones;
  • Is realistic instead of stylized; and
  • Encourages interaction.

There are six categories of program rating, based on the age range of the audience the program is eligible to be disseminated to:

  • P rated: All ages
  • K rated: Under 13 years old, provided that they are with their parents or guardians
  • T13 rated (13+): From 13 years old or older
  • T16 rated (16+): From 16 years old or older
  • T18 rated (18+): From 18 years old or older
  • C rated: Prohibited from dissemination on TV services

For programs at the borderline between levels, if the program has a way of handling situation and results which sends a message of education, humanity, praise of moral and social values, and/or has a positive impact on the audience, it will be considered to be rated at a lower level.

Further details on the program ratings are provided in an appendix to the circular.

Rating descriptors of programs are to be displayed according to the following principles:

  • The rating must be displayed clearly and prominently in the program introduction/display folder on the device’s screen interface so that the audience can make a decision to listen to or watch the program provided on the service.
  • For TV programs and audiovisual programs: The rating must continuously appear in the upper left or right corner of the screen during the program broadcast, ensuring that it does not overlap with the service icons or other icons.
  • For radio programs and audio-only programs: There is no need to display the rating during the program broadcast.

 

3. Content Warnings

Circular 06 provides the following principles for content warnings:

  • For programs rated from K to T18: Warnings must be displayed.
  • For entertainment programs that are reality TV shows; art performances; TV talent contests; exhibitions of risky and dangerous acts, with the risk of causing injury; or fictional TV shows, shows based on real-life events; sports programs in extreme sports, combat sports, and martial arts with violent or/and dangerous nature: A warning text must appear at least three seconds before the time of the act or content subject to the warning, and the text must be maintained throughout the act so that viewers do not imitate and follow the acts in these programs. The warning is to be displayed at the bottom of the screen of the device during broadcast, ensuring that it does not overlap with the service icons or other icons.

The display of warning text must be done immediately at the start of the broadcast and during the broadcast of the program using one or more appropriate methods, including but not limited to verbal or written warnings.

For TV programs and audiovisual programs, a written or verbal warning must be displayed/played no later than three seconds after the start of the broadcast; and display at least one more warning text during the broadcast for programs with a duration of less than 30 minutes, display the warning text at least two more times for programs with a duration of 30 minutes or more. The display position of the warning text is right below the rating icon of the programs.

For radio programs and audio-only programs, a verbal warning must be played immediately at the start of the broadcast.

 

4. Technical Measures

Radio and TV service providers must implement technical and technological measures to manage their content to comply with requirements. In particular, they are required to:

  • Control on the playout server programs that have been edited, rated, and had warnings attached and monitor viewers and listeners by mandatory login of personal information before listening to or viewing programs; allow listeners and viewers to control access by setting the right to restrict listening and viewing according to their needs.
  • Fully archive the provided programs on the storage device system for a period of 30 days to serve the purpose of authorities’ inspection.
  • Edit programs through a delayed server for entertainment programs that are broadcast at the same time as the original program.
Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 13, 2026
Vietnam’s Law on Intellectual Property (IP Law) has undergone continuous amendment in recent years, with the latest amendment issued at the end of 2025. Among the amended and supplemented provisions, the regulation that has perhaps attracted the most attention is a provision relating to the use of protected IP objects by artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Specifically, Article 7 of the 2025 IP Law introduces a completely new Clause 5, which reads in full as follows: “Organizations and individuals are permitted to use texts and data relating to intellectual property objects that have been lawfully published, and which the public is allowed to access, for the purposes of scientific research, experimentation, and training of artificial intelligence systems, provided that such use will not unreasonably affect the legitimate rights and interests of the authors and intellectual property rights holders in accordance with this Law. With respect to texts and data that are objects protected by copyright and related rights, the use of the texts and data as set forth herein must also be in accordance with the regulations of the Government.” Analyzing this newly added provision in the context of how it was conceived, as well as the challenges that still lie ahead, can provide some interesting insights. From Aspirations to Flight in Science and Technology From the end of 2024 and throughout 2025—the 50th anniversary of the country’s reunification—Vietnam witnessed numerous sweeping changes in many areas, including legislative development. It could be said that no sessions of the National Assembly have ever adopted as many laws, resolutions, and major policies as this one. The aspirations of the highest-level leadership have been concretized into major law and policy projects, which were drafted, developed, and passed at record speed. All of this was aimed at building a foundation for Vietnam to achieve
Read More
March 12, 2026
Thailand’s AI legislative framework took another step forward when the Office of the Consumer Protection Board (OCPB) issued a notification establishing guidelines for AI-generated advertising that may cause material misunderstanding about products or services. The notification, which is already in effect, was issued under the Consumer Protection Act B.E. 2522 (1979) and its amendments, which prohibit advertising that is unfair to consumers or may cause harm to society, including false or exaggerated statements and statements that may cause material misunderstanding about products or services. The notification addresses emerging advertising practices, including the use of images edited using software or AI to attract consumer interest or build credibility. The OCPB noted that such advertising may result in consumers misunderstanding the essential characteristics, condition, or usage of products, which violates consumer rights and causes damage. Key Requirements on AI-Generated or Digitally Manipulated Advertising Content For advertisements using still images or videos created or edited with software programs or AI tools that may cause the depicted product or service to differ from the actual product sold or service provided—which may cause misunderstanding regarding the condition, quality, quantity, or other essential aspects of the products or services—advertisers and business operators must comply with the following requirements: Prior authorization. Obtain approval from relevant regulatory authorities where required by law. Accurate representation. Ensure that the advertised size, quantity, volume, number, or composition matches the actual product or service being sold, whether in still images or videos. Mandatory AI disclosure labels. Display clear disclosures when AI or software is used to create or edit images, such as: “Real image or simulation edited using AI” “Photo from actual location or simulation edited using AI” “Photo from actual product or edited simulation” “Image created by AI” “Video created by AI” Clarity of disclosure. Ensure disclosures are clearly visible,
Read More
March 10, 2026
Thailand’s Ministry of Finance and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have issued regulations broadening the criteria for determining who qualifies as a “major shareholder” of licensed securities and digital asset business operators. Under relevant SEC regulations, major shareholders of a regulated entity must obtain regulatory approval and undergo screening by the SEC. The revised framework introduces both shareholding-based and control-based tests to determine which shareholders require regulatory approval for a wider range of indirect ownership structures and de facto control. The Ministry of Finance notification took effect on February 21, 2026, while the SEC’s clarifying rules took effect on March 4, 2026. These changes aim to enhance transparency around beneficial ownership and strengthen regulatory oversight of entities operating in Thailand’s capital markets. Expanded Definition Under the revised framework, a “major shareholder” now includes persons who directly or indirectly hold more than 10% of the voting rights in a regulated company, as well as persons who exercise control over the regulated company or its shares. This system of two separate tests, based on both shareholding and control, differs from the prior regime, which focused primarily on shareholding thresholds and applied a more limited method for determining indirect shareholdings. The two tests (detailed below) operate independently of each other, and any person identified by either of the tests will be deemed a major shareholder. Shareholding-Based Test Broadens Indirect Ownership Attribution For the shareholding-based test, the SEC recognizes two existing methods for identifying indirect ownership, together with a new proportional attribution method. Any person captured under these methods, which are described below, will be regarded as a major shareholder of the regulated company and must obtain SEC approval as a major shareholder. First, the existing framework continues to apply to both first-tier and chain ownership structures. Approval is required for (1) first-tier
Read More
March 6, 2026
Thailand’s Legislation Consideration Committee of the Ministry of Interior has ruled that in-game loot boxes in online games do not constitute gambling under the Gambling Act B.E. 2478 (1935). This first-of-its-kind ruling provides useful guidance for online game operators and digital entertainment companies operating in Thailand. Background The ruling came in response to an inquiry concerning an online role-playing game operator that launched a campaign featuring a loot box mechanism. The mechanism allowed players to purchase a token in exchange for the opportunity to receive a virtual loot box containing randomized in-game items. The key features of this were as follows: The items received were digital, noncash items usable only within the game. The items could not be exchanged, redeemed, or converted into cash with the game operator. Items may differ in rarity but remain purely virtual. The central question was whether paying money to obtain randomized in-game items constituted a risk-based activity involving the chance to receive money or property of monetary value, which would constitute gambling under the Gambling Act. Committee Ruling The committee reached the following conclusions regarding the characteristics of the game’s loot-box mechanism: No cash or monetary equivalent: Players did not receive cash or property that could be exchanged for cash. The in-game items were merely usage rights within the online game ecosystem. No real-world monetary valuation: There was no determination of item value in real currency, and no mechanism for redeeming or converting items into money with the game operator. Any off-platform trading of in-game items between players is irrelevant to online game operators, as any value arising from such transactions is determined by the market rather than by the operators themselves. Service fee characterization: Payments made by players purchasing in-game loot boxes constituted fees for online game services. Accordingly, the committee concluded
Read More