You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 14, 2020

Changing Employment Conditions during the COVID-19 Situation

Subscribe to Updates
Bangkok Post: Human Resources Watch

The COVID-19 crisis continues to have a serious impact on global economic conditions, and many employers are feeling the severe economic effects here in Thailand. In light of this situation, employers are making efforts to ensure that their businesses survive the crisis, often looking to cost reduction measures such as reducing employees’ wages and benefits in accordance with labour laws. In general, Thai labour laws permit employers to reduce employee wages and benefits either by negotiating with employees and receiving their consent for the reductions, or by carrying out the labour relations processes described below.

Under Thailand’s Labour Relations Act (LRA), the definition of “employment conditions” includes general working conditions, working days and times, wages, welfare, conditions for termination of employment, and other benefits received by employers or employees relating to their employment or work. Any employer who would like to change these employment conditions, such as by reducing wages or benefits, must comply with the LRA.

In accordance with the LRA, employers are entitled to submit a written labour demand to employees (or a labour union, if applicable) in order to change an employment condition. Similarly, employees are entitled to submit a written demand to their employer to change an employment condition if the demand is submitted jointly by at least 15 percent of the total number of employees, or if the demand is submitted by a labour union that has a membership of at least one-fifth of the total number of employees.

After the demand has been submitted by either the employer or the employees, the parties must begin negotiations within three days.

It is important for employers to note that, once formal labour demands have been made to the other party, the employer is temporarily barred from terminating or transferring the employees, employee representatives, committee members, members of the labour union, or members of the labour federation committee. The only exceptions that allow termination of one or more of those parties are when they commit one of the following acts:

  • Acting dishonestly or intentionally committing a criminal offence against the employer;
  • Intentionally causing damage to the employer;
  • Violating the employer’s work rules, regulations or lawful orders, after the employer has already given a written warning to the employee (for matters not deemed serious); or
  • Neglecting their duties for a period of three consecutive workdays without reasonable cause.

This prohibition remains in force throughout the course of negotiations and settlement, or arbitration of the labour dispute should one arise.

If the parties are able to settle, they must enter into a written agreement signed by their representatives. Within three days from signing the agreement, the employer must display the agreement at the workplace for a period of at least 30 days. The employer must also register the agreement with the Ministry of Labour within 15 days from the date of signing.

If the parties do not settle after negotiations, or if they fail to negotiate at all, the labour demand is designated a “labour dispute.” In this situation, the party who submitted the labour demand must give written notice to a mediator within 24 hours after the lapse of the three-day period or the failure of the negotiations. The mediator is then obliged to resolve the dispute within five days. If a settlement is reached, the employer must proceed with the same notice requirements as stated above. If the parties are unable to reach a settlement, the labour dispute becomes an “unsettled labour dispute.”

The parties then have the legal right to either appoint one or more labour arbitrators to resolve the dispute by binding arbitration (if agreed upon by both parties), the employer can order an employee lockout, or the employees can go on formal strike. If the employees plan to proceed with a strike, they must give written notice to the labour dispute mediator, and to the employer, at least 24 hours prior to the strike commencing. In the present situation, parties should note that if the government issues any relevant regulations under the Emergency Decree on Public Administration in Emergency Situation to prevent the COVID-19 outbreak, both parties must also comply with those measures.

If the employees follow all legal procedures prior to executing a strike, they will be protected under Thai labour law. For example, if the employer then terminates the employees for submitting the labour demand, the employees can lodge a complaint to the Labour Relation Committee (LRC). The complaint will allege that the employer committed an unfair labour practice and will ask the LRC to order the employer to reinstate the employees at the same position, wages, and benefits that they had before termination. If the LRC agrees that the employer committed an unfair labour practice, the court may order the reinstatement. If the employer disagrees with the LRC’s order, they are entitled to challenge the order by submitting a petition to the Central Labour Court to revoke the LRC’s order. If the employer fails to comply with the LRC’s order by the deadline, and fails to submit a petition to the labour court in order to revoke the LRC’s order, the employer and its directors will face criminal penalties, such as imprisonment for up to six months, a fine of up to THB 10,000, or both.

Although this process gives the employer one method of changing employment conditions, this article shows that it is not always a simple process. If negotiations go well and consent is forthcoming, labour demands can be an effective way of mitigating the effects of the COVID-19 crisis on some businesses. However, if the demand becomes a dispute, employers can find themselves in difficulty, and must be aware of the risk of criminal penalties if they fail to comply with any legal requirements or take disciplinary action against the employees during the dispute period.

 

This article was originally published in the Bangkok Post and is reproduced here with permission and thanks. The original story can be viewed on the Bangkok Post website.

Related Professionals

Practices

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 2, 2025
On August 26, 2025, the Thai cabinet approved a one-year postponement of mandatory contributions to the Employee Welfare Fund. Originally scheduled to take effect on October 1, 2025, the enforcement date has been deferred to October 1, 2026. The decision to delay the implementation stems from ongoing economic uncertainties in Thailand, driven by several external and domestic factors. These include increased trade tariffs imposed by the United States, the recent rise in the national minimum wage, and continued geopolitical tensions resulting from unresolved disputes with neighboring countries. These challenges have placed significant pressure on both businesses and the labor market, prompting the government to offer temporary relief through this deferral. As a result of the postponement, the following regulations will now come into effect on October 1, 2026: Royal Decree determining the Commencement Period for Savings and Contributions to the Employee Welfare Fund; Ministerial Notification specifying the Rates of Savings and Contributions; and Ministerial Notification outlining the Criteria and Procedures for Employers to Provide Assistance in Cases of Termination of Employment or Death. The Labour Welfare Fund Committee has formally endorsed the postponement. Contribution Rates Unchanged Although the implementation has been delayed, the contribution rates remain unchanged: October 1, 2026–September 30, 2031: Employers and employees each contribute 0.25% of the employee’s wage to the fund. From October 1, 2031, onward: Contributions increase to 0.5% of the employee’s wage for both parties. All other rules and conditions concerning the Employee Welfare Fund remain in full effect.
Read More
August 29, 2025
On August 15, 2025, Laos’ Immigration Police Department introduced a pilot online arrival registration system for foreign passport holders entering the country. Under the new system, visitors to Laos will be able to register their arrival online up to three days in advance and will be exempt from filling out paper forms at the border. Starting September 1, 2025, online registrations will be accepted at four major international border checkpoints: Wattay International Airport in Vientiane, Luang Prabang International Airport, Pakse International Airport in Champasak Province, and the First Lao-Thai Friendship Bridge linking Vientiane and Nong Khai Province in Thailand. Foreign passport holders arriving in Laos from this date onward will be able to complete the online registration via the official website of the Department of Immigration: http://www.immigration.gov.la/. Upon successful registration, travelers will receive a QR code valid for three days, which must be presented to border authorities upon arrival to verify the registration. During the pilot phase, which is expected to run until early 2026, travelers who have not registered online will still have the option to complete a paper form at the checkpoint. After the pilot phase, the online registration system will become mandatory nationwide, and paper forms will no longer be accepted. This initiative marks a significant step toward modernizing Laos’ immigration procedures. Transitioning from traditional paper-based entry forms to a streamlined digital system will greatly enhance efficiency at border checkpoints. The submission of traveler information ahead of arrival is expected to drastically reduce processing times and alleviate congestion at arrival counters, especially during peak travel periods.
Read More
August 20, 2025
On August 7, 2025, the government of Vietnam promulgated Decree No. 219/2025/ND-CP on foreign workers working in Vietnam (Decree 219), introducing substantial reforms to the management of foreign employees. Taking immediate effect upon issuance, and superseding earlier regulations on foreign employees under Decree No. 152/2020/ND-CP as amended by Decree No. 70/2023/ND-CP (collectively referred to as “Decree 152”), Decree 219 sets out clear timeframes and application requirements for work permit issuance, while adopting more flexible policies to support business operations. The key new provisions are as follows: 1. Relaxed Requirements Regarding Job-Posting Under Decree 152, employers were required to follow a complex process to apply for work permits or work permit exemption certificates for foreign employees. This included posting an advertisement for any position the employer wished to fill with a foreign employee on a designated online portal for a given amount of time, to demonstrate that the company tried, but failed, to find a suitable Vietnamese candidate for the position. This job-posting step now only applies when the foreigner will work in Vietnam under a local labor contract. Foreigners coming to Vietnam as intra-corporate transferees (i.e., as secondees) or working under service contracts are exempt. The job-posting period is also reduced from 15 calendar days to five business days. Employers may also now post the advertisements on multiple websites instead of only the online portal of the Ministry of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs (now the Ministry of Home Affairs after government restructuring) or the provincial-level employment service center. 2. Work Permit Application Dossier Previously, employers were required to complete a preapproval step, whereby they had to submit a dossier explaining their foreign labor demand that required approval from the labor authority. Once approval for the foreign labor demand was granted, the approval dossier was an integral part of
Read More
August 20, 2025
With the shift in US policy to discourage DEI programs among government and private-sector employers, some companies have been cutting back. But US companies should be cautious in eliminating their DEI programs globally, as some elements of these programs are obligations under local laws in Vietnam, Thailand, and Cambodia.
Read More