You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 10, 2026

Changes in Nutrition Labeling Requirements in Indonesia

Subscribe to Updates

On June 17, 2026, Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 on Nutritional Information on Processed Food Labels.

The new regulation, which revokes three previous nutrition labeling regulations, introduces several notable changes affecting food and beverage manufacturers, importers, and distributors. These changes range from updated nutrient reference values and serving-size requirements to the introduction of the Nutri-Level front-of-pack labeling system for certain beverage products. Businesses operating in Indonesia should carefully review these developments and assess their products’ compliance with the new requirements during the transition period.

Implementation of the Nutri-Level Labeling System

To implement the recently issued decree on Nutri-Level labeling, BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 stipulates the requirements to implement the Nutri-Level labeling system on the front-of-pack. Under the new framework, ready-to-drink beverages, powdered beverages, and liquid or solid concentrates are required to display Nutri-Level labeling on the front label of their packaging.

The Nutri-Level labeling system classifies products into color-coded levels A through D based on their sugar, sodium, and total fat content. The applicable Nutri-Level is determined based on the lowest level measured in the assessment of sugar, sodium, and total fat content.

For products classified as level C or D, the Nutri-Level label must be accompanied by information on the relevant sugar, sodium, and total fat content per 100 ml of the ready-to-consume product. Products classified as level A or B may either display only the Nutri-Level designation or display the Nutri-Level together with the relevant nutritional information per 100 ml.

Minimum Vitamin and Mineral Content Required for Declaration

BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 introduces a stricter threshold for the declaration of vitamins and minerals in the nutritional value information section (ING).

Vitamins or minerals may only be declared if they are present at a level of at least 5% of the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) per serving, per 100 g, per 100 ml, or per package, in accordance with the inclusion of the ING table, except for processed foods that declare vitamins or minerals claims in accordance with certain laws and regulations. This represents a significant change from the previous regime under the now-revoked BPOM Regulation No. 26 of 2021, under which vitamins and minerals could be declared when present at a level of at least 2% of the RDA per serving.

Revised Serving Size Requirements

While serving size declarations were already required under BPOM Regulation No. 26 of 2021, BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 introduces additional technical guidance on serving-size determination and presentation. The new regulation expressly requires serving sizes to be rounded to the nearest half-unit, providing a standardized approach to serving-size calculations across product categories. An exception applies to products classified under food category 11.6 (sweeteners, including table-top sweeteners and high-intensity sweeteners), which may require businesses to review and, where necessary, update their existing nutrition labeling.

In addition, an appendix to Regulation No. 10 of 2026 sets out updated serving-size references for a wide range of food categories. As a result, food business operators should review the revised category-specific serving-size references to determine whether their existing nutrition information tables, nutrient calculations, and serving-size declarations remain compliant under the new framework. Although serving-size requirements were already regulated under BPOM Regulation No. 26 of 2021, the 2026 regulation provides greater technical detail and updated references that may necessitate label revisions for certain products.

Updated Nutrient Reference Values

BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 updates the nutrient reference values previously set forth in BPOM Regulation No. 9 of 2016 to correspond with the current development of scientific knowledge in health. Several reference values have been revised from those in BPOM Regulation No. 9 of 2016 (e.g., for total fat, vitamin B1, vitamin B2, vitamin B12, magnesium, potassium, and various other vitamins and minerals). As these values are used to calculate the percentage of RDA displayed in nutrition information tables, the revisions may affect the nutrient percentage calculations currently appearing on product labels.

The regulation also introduces updated nutrient reference methodologies and conversion factors. In particular, vitamin B3 may now be expressed in niacin equivalents (NE), folate may be expressed in dietary folate equivalents (DFE), and revised conversion factors have been adopted for vitamins A, D, and E. These changes are intended to align nutrition labeling requirements with current nutritional science and may require food business operators to reassess existing nutrient declarations and label calculations.

Updated Nutritional Value Information Table Formats

BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 updates the standardized formats for the nutritional value information (ING) table. The regulation continues to allow both vertical and horizontal formats and now provides clearer templates for use on product labels.

For horizontal presentation, businesses may use either a three-column tabular format, which provides more space for displaying nutrient information and additional vitamins or minerals, or a two-column tabular format, which offers a simplified layout suitable for products with limited label space.

 

Three-column per-serving tabular format

 

Two-column per-serving tabular format

 

Three-column per-package tabular format

 

Two-column per-package tabular format

 

BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 also introduces specific flexibility for micro-enterprises regarding the ING table. If analytical results are unavailable and the value of a processed food nutrient has not yet been established by the head of BPOM, the values in the ING table should be declared based on calculation results. The procedure for calculating the nutrient content for processed foods produced by micro-enterprises was established by the head of BPOM in 2026 and involves mostly traditional Indonesian food products.

Transition Period

BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 provides a 24-month transition period to facilitate compliance with the new requirements, so processed foods that had already obtained distribution permits before the regulation entered into force, as well as products that were undergoing registration at that time, must be brought into compliance with the new regulation by June 17, 2028. Similar transitional provisions apply to the implementation of Nutri-Level labeling requirements for affected beverage products. As a result, food business operators are afforded additional time to review product portfolios, update nutritional information, and revise product labels where necessary.

Business Impact

The new regulation will require many food and beverage businesses to review their existing nutrition labeling practices in order to comply with the new requirements. In particular, companies should assess the impact of the revised nutrient reference values, updated serving-size requirements, and Nutri-Level labeling requirements on their products.

The Nutri-Level requirements will be especially relevant for beverage manufacturers. Businesses should therefore begin evaluating their product portfolios and preparing any necessary label updates to ensure compliance before the expiry of the 24-month transition period.

Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 2, 2021
The cannabis plant has fascinated many civilizations, societies, and individuals through the centuries with its unique properties, and many have learned how to benefit from these, finding a variety of therapeutic and industrial uses of the plant that, in turn, enhanced domestic economies worldwide. In Thailand, cannabis plants and their derivatives have been used since ancient times as treatment for many diseases, and the plant forms a key ingredient in many Thai traditional medicinal remedies. However, over the past few decades, cannabis usage was seen to change in a way that became incrementally more abusive, resulting in outright prohibition in almost all countries. Thailand was no exception, and in 1979 the Thai government officially enacted the Narcotics Act forbidding the use of cannabis and listing cannabis plants and their derivatives—most notably marijuana (cannabis with psychoactive properties) and hemp (cannabis with limited or no psychoactive properties)—as category 5 narcotics (i.e., prohibited substances). Despite these restrictions, many Thais continued to use cannabis illegally, and some urged the government to legalize personal and commercial use of cannabis plants and their derivatives. Eventually, some in the Thai government agreed that it was time to consider steps toward legalization, As a result, the government has been taking action to delist cannabis plants from the list of prohibited narcotics since 2018, when a regulation allowed the cultivation of hemp for industrial and non-commercial purposes, such as household cooking and research and development. The next significant step came in February 2019, when the Narcotics Act (No. 7) was amended, legalizing medical marijuana within certain limitations. In national elections the following month, the Bhumjaithai political party, whose election campaign included a pledge to decriminalize and legalize cannabis plants, won substantial support in parts of the country and chose to join the coalition government, with the Bhumjaithai party
Read More
February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension
Read More
February 22, 2021
Following the recent imposition of sanctions on Myanmar individuals and companies by the US, the UK and Canada have now imposed new sanctions. As with the US sanctions, these new measures impact UK and Canadian citizens and companies, and non-UK and non-Canadian companies and citizens with interests in those jurisdictions. The EU has indicated that it is planning to issue similar sanctions in the near future. New UK Sanctions In addition to the 16 individuals already sanctioned by the UK government, on February 18, 2021, the UK government announced that three individuals have been sanctioned for serious human rights violations and are now subject to asset freezes and travel bans. The full list of Myanmar individuals and companies sanctioned by the UK is available on the website of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. Breaches of UK financial sanctions are criminal offences punishable in the UK by up to 7 years imprisonment and heavy fines. New Canadian Sanctions Also on February 18, timed to coincide with the UK sanctions, new Canadian sanctions were imposed on nine individuals. As with the UK, Canada already had a number of individuals in the Myanmar military on its sanctions list, and the new additions bring the total number of individuals sanctioned by Canada to 54. All assets of these individuals in Canada are now frozen, and they are banned from travelling to Canada. Canadian businesses or entities may not do business with any of the 54 individuals. Full details of the impact of the sanctions are available on the Government of Canada’s website, as is a database of the Myanmar individuals and companies subject to them. Breach of Canadian sanctions carries with it up to 5 years’ imprisonment in Canada and/or a large fine. Other Countries The EU is reportedly drawing up sanctions
Read More