You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 10, 2026

Changes in Nutrition Labeling Requirements in Indonesia

Subscribe to Updates

On June 17, 2026, Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 on Nutritional Information on Processed Food Labels.

The new regulation, which revokes three previous nutrition labeling regulations, introduces several notable changes affecting food and beverage manufacturers, importers, and distributors. These changes range from updated nutrient reference values and serving-size requirements to the introduction of the Nutri-Level front-of-pack labeling system for certain beverage products. Businesses operating in Indonesia should carefully review these developments and assess their products’ compliance with the new requirements during the transition period.

Implementation of the Nutri-Level Labeling System

To implement the recently issued decree on Nutri-Level labeling, BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 stipulates the requirements to implement the Nutri-Level labeling system on the front-of-pack. Under the new framework, ready-to-drink beverages, powdered beverages, and liquid or solid concentrates are required to display Nutri-Level labeling on the front label of their packaging.

The Nutri-Level labeling system classifies products into color-coded levels A through D based on their sugar, sodium, and total fat content. The applicable Nutri-Level is determined based on the lowest level measured in the assessment of sugar, sodium, and total fat content.

For products classified as level C or D, the Nutri-Level label must be accompanied by information on the relevant sugar, sodium, and total fat content per 100 ml of the ready-to-consume product. Products classified as level A or B may either display only the Nutri-Level designation or display the Nutri-Level together with the relevant nutritional information per 100 ml.

Minimum Vitamin and Mineral Content Required for Declaration

BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 introduces a stricter threshold for the declaration of vitamins and minerals in the nutritional value information section (ING).

Vitamins or minerals may only be declared if they are present at a level of at least 5% of the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) per serving, per 100 g, per 100 ml, or per package, in accordance with the inclusion of the ING table, except for processed foods that declare vitamins or minerals claims in accordance with certain laws and regulations. This represents a significant change from the previous regime under the now-revoked BPOM Regulation No. 26 of 2021, under which vitamins and minerals could be declared when present at a level of at least 2% of the RDA per serving.

Revised Serving Size Requirements

While serving size declarations were already required under BPOM Regulation No. 26 of 2021, BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 introduces additional technical guidance on serving-size determination and presentation. The new regulation expressly requires serving sizes to be rounded to the nearest half-unit, providing a standardized approach to serving-size calculations across product categories. An exception applies to products classified under food category 11.6 (sweeteners, including table-top sweeteners and high-intensity sweeteners), which may require businesses to review and, where necessary, update their existing nutrition labeling.

In addition, an appendix to Regulation No. 10 of 2026 sets out updated serving-size references for a wide range of food categories. As a result, food business operators should review the revised category-specific serving-size references to determine whether their existing nutrition information tables, nutrient calculations, and serving-size declarations remain compliant under the new framework. Although serving-size requirements were already regulated under BPOM Regulation No. 26 of 2021, the 2026 regulation provides greater technical detail and updated references that may necessitate label revisions for certain products.

Updated Nutrient Reference Values

BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 updates the nutrient reference values previously set forth in BPOM Regulation No. 9 of 2016 to correspond with the current development of scientific knowledge in health. Several reference values have been revised from those in BPOM Regulation No. 9 of 2016 (e.g., for total fat, vitamin B1, vitamin B2, vitamin B12, magnesium, potassium, and various other vitamins and minerals). As these values are used to calculate the percentage of RDA displayed in nutrition information tables, the revisions may affect the nutrient percentage calculations currently appearing on product labels.

The regulation also introduces updated nutrient reference methodologies and conversion factors. In particular, vitamin B3 may now be expressed in niacin equivalents (NE), folate may be expressed in dietary folate equivalents (DFE), and revised conversion factors have been adopted for vitamins A, D, and E. These changes are intended to align nutrition labeling requirements with current nutritional science and may require food business operators to reassess existing nutrient declarations and label calculations.

Updated Nutritional Value Information Table Formats

BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 updates the standardized formats for the nutritional value information (ING) table. The regulation continues to allow both vertical and horizontal formats and now provides clearer templates for use on product labels.

For horizontal presentation, businesses may use either a three-column tabular format, which provides more space for displaying nutrient information and additional vitamins or minerals, or a two-column tabular format, which offers a simplified layout suitable for products with limited label space.

 

Three-column per-serving tabular format

 

Two-column per-serving tabular format

 

Three-column per-package tabular format

 

Two-column per-package tabular format

 

BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 also introduces specific flexibility for micro-enterprises regarding the ING table. If analytical results are unavailable and the value of a processed food nutrient has not yet been established by the head of BPOM, the values in the ING table should be declared based on calculation results. The procedure for calculating the nutrient content for processed foods produced by micro-enterprises was established by the head of BPOM in 2026 and involves mostly traditional Indonesian food products.

Transition Period

BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 provides a 24-month transition period to facilitate compliance with the new requirements, so processed foods that had already obtained distribution permits before the regulation entered into force, as well as products that were undergoing registration at that time, must be brought into compliance with the new regulation by June 17, 2028. Similar transitional provisions apply to the implementation of Nutri-Level labeling requirements for affected beverage products. As a result, food business operators are afforded additional time to review product portfolios, update nutritional information, and revise product labels where necessary.

Business Impact

The new regulation will require many food and beverage businesses to review their existing nutrition labeling practices in order to comply with the new requirements. In particular, companies should assess the impact of the revised nutrient reference values, updated serving-size requirements, and Nutri-Level labeling requirements on their products.

The Nutri-Level requirements will be especially relevant for beverage manufacturers. Businesses should therefore begin evaluating their product portfolios and preparing any necessary label updates to ensure compliance before the expiry of the 24-month transition period.

Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 18, 2021
As you will no doubt know, on February 1, 2021, the Myanmar military declared a state of emergency in Myanmar for a period of one year. State Counsellor Daw Aung Sang Su Kyi was detained, as were the president and various significant political and civil leaders. Min Aung Hlaing, commander-in-chief of the Tatmadaw (Myanmar armed forces) has installed himself as chairman of the State Administration Council, the current administration. New sanctions The reaction of the Biden administration has been swift. On February 10, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14014, which provides bases to impose sanctions on individuals and companies deemed by the US to, among other things: operate in the defense sector of Myanmar; be responsible for policies that undermine democratic processes in Myanmar; have taken actions to undermine democratic processes or institutions, or prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of free speech, in Myanmar; or be a spouse or child of the foregoing. On the next day, February 11, the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), imposed sanctions under the new executive order on ten individuals—including General Min Aung Hlaing—and three companies, including Cancri Gems & Jewelry Co, Myanmar Imperial Jade Co, and Myanmar Ruby Enterprise.  All such individuals and companies have now been designated on the US list of specially designated nationals (SDNs). Effect of sanctions As a result of such sanctions, the property of these individuals or companies that is located in the US or is under the possession or control of US companies and citizens is frozen, and US companies and citizens are generally prohibited from dealing deal with any such property.  Reportedly, roughly USD 1 billion of funds belonging to the individuals and companies blocked on February 11 are located in the US and thus now frozen. The SDN list As many
Read More
February 1, 2021
The latest edition of Practical Law’s Life Sciences Global Guide features contributions from Tilleke & Gibbins attorneys in the firm’s Yangon office. One of the sections they have provided for the Myanmar chapter of this Q&A-style guide to life sciences regulatory frameworks worldwide is “Medicinal Product Regulation and Product Liability in Myanmar.” The section includes discussion of a range of regulatory issues related to the marketing and selling of pharmaceutical products, including the following topics: Regulatory overview: Authorities, scope, and general procedures for pharmaceuticals, biologicals, and medical devices and health care IT Pricing, government funding, and reimbursement: National health care system, price regulation, and reimbursement Clinical trials Manufacturing and distribution Marketing: Authorization for marketing medicinal products, parallel imports and cross-border trade in medicines Restrictions on dealings with health care professionals Selling restrictions Advertising and promotion Data privacy Packaging, labeling, and tracking Product safety, quality, and liability Local establishment, representation, and residency requirements Reform The full “Medicinal Product Regulation and Product Liability in Myanmar” section can be accessed on the Practical Law website. Practical Law, produced by Thomson Reuters, is the world’s leading legal know-how resource for business lawyers, publishing a huge range of guides covering hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. Tilleke & Gibbins also supplied “Pharmaceutical IP and Competition Law in Myanmar,” which was published in the Life Sciences Global Guide  at the same time.
Read More
February 1, 2021
Attorneys from Tilleke & Gibbins in Myanmar have contributed to the latest edition of Practical Law’s online Life Sciences Global Guide. The guide is a Q&A-style overview of the regulatory frameworks for the life sciences industry across multiple jurisdictions worldwide, and this year the Myanmar chapter includes two sections, one of which is “Pharmaceutical IP and Competition Law in Myanmar.” This section runs through the country’s legal and regulatory environment for patents and trademarks—particularly as they relate to pharmaceutical business in the jurisdiction. The section then turns to IP and competition law issues, with questions and answers focusing on how the country’s competition laws and regulations affect the pharmaceutical sector. Readers are also given information on how to properly comply with Myanmar law on competition, including when it comes to licensing of medicines and pharmaceutical technology. The full Pharmaceutical Intellectual Property and Competition Law in Myanmar guide can be accessed on the Practical Law website. Practical Law, produced by Thomson Reuters, is the world’s leading legal know-how resource for business lawyers, publishing a huge range of guides covering hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. Tilleke & Gibbins also supplied the “Medicinal Product Regulation and Product Liability in Myanmar,” which Practical Law published in its Life Sciences Global Guide  at the same time.
Read More
January 15, 2021
Following the recent delisting of almost all parts of the hemp plant from Thailand’s list of prohibited narcotics (see here for further details), the Ministry of Public Health has issued a notification allowing hemp to be used in cosmetics. Prior to this development, this use of hemp (whether from natural or synthetic sources) was not allowed, as it fell under the definition of narcotics under the Notification Re: Ingredients Not Allowed for Use in Cosmetics B.E. 2559 (2016). Under the Ministerial Notification Re: Use of Hemp in Cosmetics B.E. 2564 (2021), which was published in the Government Gazette on January 11, 2021, domestic manufacturers are now allowed to produce cosmetics containing hemp seed oil or hemp seed extract, provided the cosmetics do not have a THC level exceeding 0.2% by weight. To register such products with the Thai FDA, applicants must submit a certificate of analysis, safety data sheet, and label for the agency’s evaluation. The timeline for approval of the registration (notification) of a cosmetic containing hemp seed oil or hemp seed extract is three business days. The applicant (i.e., manufacturer or toll manufacturer) must declare the amount of hemp seed extract or hemp seed oil used in the cosmetic in their notification application. Cosmetics must not use a name for the product that evokes an association with hemp flowers or narcotics, and the name of the product must be within the scope of cosmetics. For example, names containing “inflorescence,” “flower,” “CBD,” “THC” or similar will not be allowed. It should also be noted that Thailand does not yet allow the importation of cosmetics containing hemp seeds or hemp seed extract, and this regulation only applies to domestically produced hemp products—a business currently restricted to individuals or companies with Thai nationality. For more details on this development, or
Read More