You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 9, 2015

Capturing Opportunity: Myanmar’s Hotel and Tourism Boom

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

Since Myanmar liberalized its economy in 2011, the country has experienced a surge of foreign direct investment and visiting tourists. Official government figures show that tourist arrivals have risen from below 1 million in 2011 to over 3 million in 2014, with the Ministry of Hotels and Tourism setting an ambitious target of 4.5 to 5 million tourist arrivals in 2015.

Recognizing the need for international standard hotel facilities, funded by overseas investors, Myanmar’s government has worked to increase foreign investment by implementing laws and policies to encourage foreign market growth. This includes passage of the Foreign Investment Law 2012 and implementing regulations allowing for 100 percent foreign ownership of hotel projects rated three stars and above. In addition, the Asian Development Bank has unveiled plans to further promote regional investment in the hotel and tourism sector, and Myanmar has committed to launching a Tourism Development Bank to provide financial and technical assistance to entrepreneurs.

The response from investors has been positive—the number of hotel facility constructions has steadily increased since 2011. This has included numerous internationally-recognized hoteliers such as Accor, Hilton, Best Western, Shangri La, and Dusit International. Indeed, statistics from the Ministry of Hotels and Tourism show that the total number of registered hotels was 787 in 2012 and 923 in 2013, a dramatic increase that is expected to carry over into 2014. Yet, despite robust development, Myanmar’s hotel and tourism infrastructure has strained to keep up with the lightning pace of demand, highlighting the need for continued sector investment.

An important consideration in the development of Myanmar’s hotel industry is the country’s land laws. Since foreigners cannot own land in Myanmar, proper due diligence is a necessary first step to ensure that long-term land leases are viable under the Foreign Investment Law. There is no absolute freedom to lease—instead, all long-term leases are subject to the review and approval of the Myanmar Investment Commission, the primary authority responsible for the review of foreign investment applications under the Foreign Investment Law. This review process includes the vetting of all long-term lease agreements for hotel investment operations, along with an overall review of the investment application itself. If approved, the lease may be approved for an initial period of 50 years, renewable for two consecutive periods of 10 years each.

In addition to the Myanmar Investment Commission’s investment application review, both foreign and domestic hotel investment projects are vetted by the Ministry of Hotels and Tourism. Once a project has received the Ministry’s formal approval, the Directorate of Hotels and Tourism will grant a two-year renewable license for the hotel business. Although foreign investors may structure their investment under either the Myanmar Companies Act or the Foreign Investment Law, projects are almost always filed and approved under the Foreign Investment Law, which provides for a number of benefits that are currently not available under the Myanmar Companies Act, the most important being tax exemption qualifications and the ability to engage in long-term lease agreements.

For hotels, the Ministry has introduced a star rating system. This is an important review process, since 100 percent foreign investment is only permitted for projects approved at three stars and above. For investment in hotels rated below three stars, a joint venture with a Myanmar entity is the only viable business structure. Regardless of the classification contemplated, it is important that complete and adequate supporting materials are provided to the Ministry for the classification evaluation. It is also typical for the applicant’s counsel to consult with the Ministry to clarify applications under review. This can significantly reduce the time for rating qualifications and hotel license issuance. Once the Ministry has given its approval, the final review and investment permit decision is made by the Myanmar Investment Commission.

Myanmar is unique in the region in that it retains a colonial history in its architecture, something long ago lost to some of its regional neighbors. With hundreds of colonial properties in Yangon in need of restoration, opportunities exist for the right investors to collaborate on projects for hotel, restaurant, and retail service projects. The success of such projects can already be seen in a number of existing projects, such as the Strand Hotel and the Belmond Governor’s Residence, two of Yangon’s most prominent five-star hotel properties. Other projects are ongoing or contemplated, such as the long-anticipated restoration of the Secretariat Building, as well as the Yangon Railway Office Redevelopment Project, which will be downtown Yangon’s largest commercial project.

Although Myanmar is ripe for opportunity, development of the country’s hotel and tourism infrastructure will need to keep up with the pace of demand if its investors are to reap the benefits of long-term sustainability and success. Investors must also be wary of pitfalls that require measured guidance and evaluation, even in the midst of a market boom.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Real Estate

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 1, 2025
In September 2025, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused a company listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), including its current and former directors, of concealing material information in connection with its filing registration and draft prospectus. This recent enforcement action demonstrates the serious consequences of making false statements or appearing to conceal material information in IPO filings and ongoing disclosures. In addition to being subject to criminal penalties, such actions can impact the eligibility of directors and executives to serve and may cause lasting reputational damage. Key Legal Risks The Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (as amended) imposes strict liability for making false statements or concealing material information in IPO registration statements and draft prospectuses. In such cases, investors can claim for damages, and there are also criminal penalties, including imprisonment for up to five years and substantial fines, may apply to the company, its directors, and responsible officers. However, misstatements or omissions in IPO filings do not, by themselves, disqualify directors or executives from holding office, whether arising from an SEC accusation or even a final court judgment. In contrast, for ongoing disclosures after listing, such as financial statements, annual reports, and meeting notices, false or misleading statements or concealment of material information can result in not only criminal liability but also immediate disqualification of directors and executives. If the SEC accuses a listed company or its directors or executives of such misstatements or omissions, those directors or executives are immediately disqualified from their positions, even before a final court judgment. Director and Executive Qualifications Directors and executives must meet the SEC’s specified standards of trustworthiness, as set out in the relevant rules. The SEC clearly defines characteristics that are considered to demonstrate a lack of trustworthiness. For ongoing disclosures, being involved in
Read More
September 30, 2025
Vietnam’s higher education system is at a pivotal stage of reform, with the government taking decisive steps to strengthen its policy and regulatory framework. In response to obstacles encountered during the implementation of the Law on Higher Education, issued in 2012 and amended in 2018, the third draft of the amended Law on Higher Education (Draft Law) is scheduled for submission to the National Assembly in October 2025. The Draft Law reflects the state’s commitment to aligning the education sector with international standards while addressing persistent structural challenges. The Draft Law emphasizes clarifying institutional mandates, enhancing accountability, and modernizing governance models to enable higher education institutions to operate with greater autonomy and efficiency. Against this backdrop, we outline below several notable provisions of the third draft and their potential implications for higher education institutions (HEIs) in Vietnam. Applicable Entities In addition to HEIs as defined and covered under existing legislation, the Draft Law extends its scope of applicable entities. The current Law on Higher Education does not regulate training institutions under state agencies, the armed forces, or political and social organizations, nor does it provide specific provisions for institutions offering only postgraduate education. To address this, the Draft Law introduces the term “institutions with higher education activities,” expanding its scope to include: (a) academies and research institutes established by the prime minister, mandated to provide doctoral-level training; (b) educational institutions affiliated with state agencies, political organizations, socio-political organizations, and the people’s armed forces, authorized to offer higher education programs in their specialized fields; and (c) institutions established pursuant to international treaties or by decision of the prime minister, with authorization to deliver certain levels of higher education. The inclusion of “institutions with higher education activities” represents a significant development both legally and institutionally. In an increasingly diversified higher education
Read More
September 29, 2025
In September 2019, the government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 75/2019/ND-CP on Administrative Sanctions in the Field of Competition (Decree 75) to address the urgent need for clear sanctioning mechanisms following the implementation of the new Law on Competition in July 2019. However, after five years of enforcement, various gaps and inconsistencies have been exposed that hinder its application. These shortcomings have reduced the deterrent effect of the sanctioning regime, and created legal uncertainty for market participants. A recent case involving Duc Giang – Lao Cai Chemicals’ acquisition of another chemical company—one of the first cases of economic concentration violation to be sanctioned by the National Competition Commission (NCC) since the Law on Competition took effect—highlights the practical difficulties under Vietnam’s competition law enforcement regime. In this case, although the transaction exceeded the statutory notification thresholds of economic concentration set out in the law, the parties failed to submit the required notification. This violation resulted in the NCC imposing aggregate fines of VND 1,423,982,880 (approximately USD 54,770) on the companies in September 2024. On appeal, Duc Giang – Lao Cai Chemicals argued that the chairman of the NCC was legally entitled to issue a warning as the key punishment instead of a monetary penalty. However, the chairman rejected the appeal, citing Article 14 of Decree 75, under which the specific penalty and level for “failure to notify economic concentration” is a fine, not a warning. While the chairman of the NCC is generally empowered to impose penalties, a warning cannot be applied if the specific regulation for a particular violation does not provide for it as a sanction. This example shows the inadequacy and inconsistency of the regulations on penalties for violations of competition law, and underscores the need for an amendment of Decree 75 to resolve such conflicts
Read More
September 26, 2025
As Vietnam accelerates its digital transformation, data centers have emerged as critical infrastructure supporting the shift toward a digital government, digital economy, and digital society. For businesses targeting Vietnam’s rapidly growing data center market, a clear understanding of the evolving regulatory landscape, compliance obligations, and government incentives is key to successful market entry and operation. This article provides a strategic overview of investment opportunities and key compliance requirements in Vietnam’s dynamic data center sector. Investment Incentives to Boost Data Center Growth Since July 1, 2024, organizations and individuals across all economic sectors have been encouraged to invest in and contribute to the development of data centers. By law, there are no restrictions on shareholding ratios, capital contributions, or foreign investor participation in data center and cloud computing services under business cooperation contracts. Currently, investment in AI data centers is classified as a specially incentivized industry, qualifying for preferential treatments and incentives in terms of investment, taxation, land use, and other related areas. Large-scale data centers, together with AI and cloud computing, are currently considered as strategic technologies and products for which Vietnam offers significant fiscal, tax, and land incentives to promote investment. Additionally, these large-scale projects may receive direct financial support from local development budgets for facility construction, technical infrastructure, and equipment procurement, subject to state budget provisions and applicable laws. AI data center construction projects also enjoy preferential treatment under customs regulations. Regulatory Approvals for Providing Data Center Services The 2023 Telecom Law and its guiding documents marked a significant milestone by classifying data center services as value-added telecom services. Under the law, a data center service is defined as a telecom service that enables users to process, store, and retrieve information via a telecom network through the leasing of part or all of a data center. A
Read More