You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 9, 2015

Capturing Opportunity: Myanmar’s Hotel and Tourism Boom

Informed Counsel

Since Myanmar liberalized its economy in 2011, the country has experienced a surge of foreign direct investment and visiting tourists. Official government figures show that tourist arrivals have risen from below 1 million in 2011 to over 3 million in 2014, with the Ministry of Hotels and Tourism setting an ambitious target of 4.5 to 5 million tourist arrivals in 2015.

Recognizing the need for international standard hotel facilities, funded by overseas investors, Myanmar’s government has worked to increase foreign investment by implementing laws and policies to encourage foreign market growth. This includes passage of the Foreign Investment Law 2012 and implementing regulations allowing for 100 percent foreign ownership of hotel projects rated three stars and above. In addition, the Asian Development Bank has unveiled plans to further promote regional investment in the hotel and tourism sector, and Myanmar has committed to launching a Tourism Development Bank to provide financial and technical assistance to entrepreneurs.

The response from investors has been positive—the number of hotel facility constructions has steadily increased since 2011. This has included numerous internationally-recognized hoteliers such as Accor, Hilton, Best Western, Shangri La, and Dusit International. Indeed, statistics from the Ministry of Hotels and Tourism show that the total number of registered hotels was 787 in 2012 and 923 in 2013, a dramatic increase that is expected to carry over into 2014. Yet, despite robust development, Myanmar’s hotel and tourism infrastructure has strained to keep up with the lightning pace of demand, highlighting the need for continued sector investment.

An important consideration in the development of Myanmar’s hotel industry is the country’s land laws. Since foreigners cannot own land in Myanmar, proper due diligence is a necessary first step to ensure that long-term land leases are viable under the Foreign Investment Law. There is no absolute freedom to lease—instead, all long-term leases are subject to the review and approval of the Myanmar Investment Commission, the primary authority responsible for the review of foreign investment applications under the Foreign Investment Law. This review process includes the vetting of all long-term lease agreements for hotel investment operations, along with an overall review of the investment application itself. If approved, the lease may be approved for an initial period of 50 years, renewable for two consecutive periods of 10 years each.

In addition to the Myanmar Investment Commission’s investment application review, both foreign and domestic hotel investment projects are vetted by the Ministry of Hotels and Tourism. Once a project has received the Ministry’s formal approval, the Directorate of Hotels and Tourism will grant a two-year renewable license for the hotel business. Although foreign investors may structure their investment under either the Myanmar Companies Act or the Foreign Investment Law, projects are almost always filed and approved under the Foreign Investment Law, which provides for a number of benefits that are currently not available under the Myanmar Companies Act, the most important being tax exemption qualifications and the ability to engage in long-term lease agreements.

For hotels, the Ministry has introduced a star rating system. This is an important review process, since 100 percent foreign investment is only permitted for projects approved at three stars and above. For investment in hotels rated below three stars, a joint venture with a Myanmar entity is the only viable business structure. Regardless of the classification contemplated, it is important that complete and adequate supporting materials are provided to the Ministry for the classification evaluation. It is also typical for the applicant’s counsel to consult with the Ministry to clarify applications under review. This can significantly reduce the time for rating qualifications and hotel license issuance. Once the Ministry has given its approval, the final review and investment permit decision is made by the Myanmar Investment Commission.

Myanmar is unique in the region in that it retains a colonial history in its architecture, something long ago lost to some of its regional neighbors. With hundreds of colonial properties in Yangon in need of restoration, opportunities exist for the right investors to collaborate on projects for hotel, restaurant, and retail service projects. The success of such projects can already be seen in a number of existing projects, such as the Strand Hotel and the Belmond Governor’s Residence, two of Yangon’s most prominent five-star hotel properties. Other projects are ongoing or contemplated, such as the long-anticipated restoration of the Secretariat Building, as well as the Yangon Railway Office Redevelopment Project, which will be downtown Yangon’s largest commercial project.

Although Myanmar is ripe for opportunity, development of the country’s hotel and tourism infrastructure will need to keep up with the pace of demand if its investors are to reap the benefits of long-term sustainability and success. Investors must also be wary of pitfalls that require measured guidance and evaluation, even in the midst of a market boom.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 19, 2025
Over the past two years—particularly since Thailand announced incentives for EVs, including tax exemptions and reductions—there has been a clear trend of manufacturers relocating their facilities to Thailand. This shift is reshaping the country’s industrial landscape and creating significant opportunities in the real estate sector for companies looking to establish or expand EV manufacturing operations in Southeast Asia. Incentive-Driven Market Transformation The government’s tax exemptions and reductions have proven effective in attracting foreign investment, with Chinese manufacturers currently dominating the market. Most EV parts and car manufacturers operating in Thailand are from China, reflecting the prominence of Chinese EV brands that have already established a presence in the country. The sector encompasses manufacturers of electrical equipment as well as companies seeking to establish facilities for producing electric vehicle components, parts, and accessories. The surge in activity is evident across Thailand’s EV manufacturing sector, with legal practices handling these transactions experiencing unprecedented demand. Industrial Real Estate Framework and Market Dynamics Thailand’s industrial real estate framework provides compelling advantages for foreign manufacturers, who typically face restrictions on foreign land ownership under the Land Code. However, foreign investors can benefit from exemptions to these restrictions if the land is located within industrial real estate zones designated by the Industrial Estate Authority of Thailand (IEAT) or they obtain investment promotion from the Board of Investment (BOI) if the land is located outside an industrial estate area governed by the IEAT. Both the IEAT and BOI provide special tax and nontax incentives, including foreign land ownership, with even greater incentives available for land situated within the country’s Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC). This regulatory advantage has sparked a parallel trend in land development. Industrial real estate developers in the EEC are actively consolidating land into large plots to develop new industrial estate projects, recognizing that
September 17, 2025
M&A specialists at Tilleke & Gibbins have contributed the Vietnam chapter to Private M&A 2025, a newly released guide from Lexology Panoramic. The publication provides practical insights into private mergers and acquisitions frameworks in jurisdictions worldwide. The Vietnam chapter addresses key aspects of private M&A transactions, including: Structure and process, legal regulation, and required consents Advisers, negotiation, and documentation Due diligence and disclosure obligations Pricing, consideration, and financing Conditions, preclosing covenants, and termination rights Representations, warranties, indemnities, and postclosing covenants Taxation of transfers Employees, pensions, and benefits Recent legal, regulatory, and market practice developments The chapter highlights how Vietnam’s legal framework governs private acquisitions and disposals, outlines typical transaction processes and structures, and provides guidance on common regulatory and practical considerations. It also notes recent trends, including increased scrutiny of merger control filings by the Vietnam Competition Commission and regulatory changes affecting M&A approvals. The full Vietnam chapter is available as a PDF through the button below. Readers can also gain 30 days of complimentary access to Private M&A 2025 and Lexology Panoramic’s full library of resources through this link.
September 10, 2025
Under Thai law, authorized directors stand as a company’s mind and will and, as such, may incur personal criminal liability for acts or omissions committed in the course of company business. When allegations surface, directors must be prepared for the practical reality that, before guilt or innocence is ever adjudicated, they could be deprived of liberty unless bail release is promptly achieved through the competent legal authority. When Bail Can Be Granted Two procedural moments trigger the need to consider bail. The first arises during the investigative phase, when a claim is lodged against a director with the competent law enforcement authorities. Upon receipt of a complaint, the assigned inquiry officer summons the director for questioning, compiles evidence, and ultimately forwards a prosecution or nonprosecution recommendation to the public prosecutor. Although the public prosecutor retains ultimate discretion to indict an accused director, the police or prosecutor may conclude that pretrial detention is necessary and may therefore apply to the court for an order to hold the director in court custody. The second moment occurs after a criminal case is filed directly with the court. This occurs once a court accepts a criminal case filed by a prosecutor against a director or, alternatively, when the court accepts a case filed by an individual for trial. For cases filed by individuals, the plaintiff presents prima facie evidence at the preliminary hearing, and the court will accept the complaint if it finds sufficient grounds, thereby conferring upon the director the status of a criminal defendant. Upon acceptance of the criminal case, the court then has the inherent authority to order custody pending trial unless the defendant secures bail release. Procedural Considerations Experienced litigants typically prepare bail security in advance and submit a bail petition at the earliest possible time. While there are
September 8, 2025
On September 1, 2025, Myanmar’s Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA) issued Directive No. 106/2025 to remind all companies and organizations registered under the Myanmar Companies Law of their obligation to strictly comply with the DICA registrar’s orders, directives, and procedures. This directive highlights the importance of legal and procedural compliance in corporate filings, governance changes, and operational conduct. It also signals increased scrutiny over documentation submitted during annual returns, share transfers, and director appointments or resignations. Public companies will be subject to closer regulatory attention, and new company registrations will involve vetting of proposed directors to ensure prior compliance with applicable laws. Compliance The directive emphasizes the following points: Companies must ensure full compliance with the Myanmar Companies Law and all directives issued by the registrar. This includes the proper submission of annual returns and adherence to updated requirements for share transfers and changes in directors. Companies and organizations must comply with all applicable laws, rules, directives, and procedures issued by relevant ministries and departments. If any authority takes action due to noncompliance, the registrar may also take appropriate measures. Noncompliance may result in regulatory sanctions, including restrictions on future company participation and vetting under anti–money laundering and counter–terrorism financing protocols. Prospective directors of newly registered companies will be vetted to confirm no prior violations of applicable laws. Entities must respond promptly and accurately to document requests from the registrar, both during initial registration and in subsequent filings. Companies are strongly advised to review their internal compliance frameworks and ensure readiness to meet DICA’s documentation and procedural expectations. In particular, companies must respond promptly and accurately to document requests from the registrar, whether during initial registration or in subsequent filings. For more information on this DICA announcement, or on any aspect of corporate registration, or assistance with