You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 20, 2018

Cambodia’s Recently Launched Corporate Bond Market

Informed Counsel

In 2007, Cambodia enacted the Law on the Issuance and Trading of Non-Governmental Securities (“2007 Securities Law”), which paved the way for corporations to issue both debt and equity securities to the public and contributed to steady progress in the Cambodian equity market, with the country’s first initial public offering in 2012 and a total of three state-owned enterprises and two corporations currently listed on the Cambodia Securities Exchange (CSX), the sole securities market operator in Cambodia.

The debt market, however, has been inactive, partly due to the absence of additional subordinating regulations to enforce the 2007 Securities Law. Without a robust securities market, Cambodian businesses had to resort to the more costly conventional financing options offered by commercial banks.

In the past few months, the corporate bond market’s regulatory landscape has quickly developed, with the Securities Exchange Commission of Cambodia (SECC), the governmental agency tasked with regulating the securities sector, issued a series of Prakas (ministerial regulations), including:

  • Prakas 009 on Public Offering of Debt Securities, dated August 17, 2017
  • Prakas 010 on Accreditation of Bondholder Representatives, dated August 17, 2017
  • Prakas 011 on Accreditation of Credit Ratings Agencies, dated August 17, 2017
  • Prakas 016 on Implementation of Listing Rules for Debt Securities of CSX, dated December 26, 2017
  • Prakas 017 on Implementation of Market Operating Rule of CSX, dated December 26, 2017

Cambodia is pushing its corporate bond market ahead of its sovereign bond market. These regulations enable corporations to publicly offer debt securities and subject them to the SECC’s tight regulatory oversight.

Defining “Public Offering” and “Debt Securities”

A “public offering” of debt securities is defined by Prakas 009 as any offering of debt securities that is not considered as a “private placement,” which refers to an offering of debt securities that is made in less than 12 months to no more than 30 people and is not publicly announced in any form or by any means.

The 2007 Securities Law defines “debt securities” broadly to include any instrument that evidences the money deposited with or owed by the person issuing the instrument. However, as the Cambodian corporate bond market is in the early stages, Prakas 009 only introduces three fairly simple debt securities, as follows:

  • Plain bond. A bond that has a fixed coupon rate and a specified maturity date. A plain bond does not have enhancements, additional calls, or put options and is not secured or guaranteed.
  • Secured bond. A bond that is secured with an asset, excluding asset-backed securities.
  • Guaranteed bond. A bond with interest and principal payments guaranteed by a third party.

Other types of debt securities, such as a convertible bond, can only be issued to the public with prior approval from the SECC, or if permitted by a separate regulation.

Requirements for Public Offering of Debt Securities

Under Prakas 009, a company wishing to make a private placement of debt securities must file related documents to the SECC both prior to and upon completion of the debt securities offering.

On the other hand, a company wishing to make a public offering of debt securities must be registered as a public limited company with the Ministry of Commerce and comply with various corporate governance, disclosure, minimum capital, and other requirements set by the SECC in Prakas 009 and by the CSX in Prakas 016.

Under Prakas 016, the company must have a minimum equity of KHR 2 billion (approx. USD 500,000), except in the case of the issuance of secured bonds. The total amount of debt-securities to be issued must be at least KHR 1 billion (approx. USD 250,000), or at least KHR 500 million (approx. USD 125,000) for secured bonds. The company would also need to hire an underwriter and a range of advisors.

In September 2017, the National Bank of Cambodia (NBC) adopted Prakas B7-017-300 on Conditions for Banking and Financial Institutions to be Listed on the Cambodian Securities Exchange. The Prakas sets additional requirements for banks and financial institutions that intend to issue securities to the public, including requiring prior approval from the NBC and minimum equity of KHR 60 billion (approx. USD 15 million), and prohibiting the issuing of equity securities equal to more than 20 percent of their voting shares or debt securities worth more than 20 percent of their total assets.

Accreditation of Bondholder Representatives and Credit Rating Agencies

Prakas 010 and Prakas 011 set accreditation procedures for bondholder representatives and credit ratings agencies, and impose requirements and obligations on them. These two Prakas complement Prakas 009, which requires companies intending to make public offerings of debt securities to obtain a credit rating from an accredited credit rating agency and to appoint a bondholder representative to obtain SECC approval.

Under Prakas 010, only commercial banks, securities firms, securities registrars, securities transfer agents and paying agents, and custodian banks are permitted to apply for accreditation from the SECC to become a bondholder representative.

Under Prakas 011, any local company can apply to become a credit ratings agency, provided it meets the minimum capital, corporate governance, and other requirements. The SECC will issue and publish a list of international credit rating agencies that are qualified to provide credit rating services in the Cambodian securities sector.

Prakas 009 also includes transitional provisions that provide alternative solutions to avoid a regulatory deadlock in the event that there are no accredited bondholder representatives and/or credit rating agencies.

The spate of new banking regulations in 2017 are a promising sign for Cambodia’s nascent banking industry, laying the groundwork for a robust corporate bond market, which is the latest in a series of measures aimed at driving the country’s fast-paced economic development.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 28, 2025
On October 25, 2024, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Circular No. 49/2024/TT-NHNN (“Circular 49”) amending and supplementing certain provisions of Circular No. 11/2022/TT-NHNN dated September 30, 2022, on bank guarantees (“Circular 11”). However, shortly thereafter, the SBV replaced both Circular 11 and Circular 49 with Circular No. 61/2024/TT-NHNN (“Circular 61”) dated December 31, 2024, which incorporates most of the updates from Circular 49 while introducing further amendments to bank guarantee regulations to align with the 2024 Law on Credit Institutions and 2023 Law on Real Estate Business. Circular 61 has an effective date of April 1, 2025. Below, we highlight some new regulations on bank guarantees under Circular 61, including those that were adopted from Circular 49. Updated Definitions Circular 61 broadens the definition of “customer” in bank guarantee relationships, introducing the possibility of a fourth party. Traditionally, a customer would request a credit institution to guarantee its obligations. Under the revised framework, a customer may also request the credit institution to issue a guarantee for another party, such as a parent company requesting a guarantee for its subsidiary. This change establishes a broader scope of parties involved in a bank guarantee relationship, which now includes the customer, the guarantor, the guaranteed party, and the beneficiary. Circular 61 also updates the definitions of “bank guarantee”, “cross-guarantee”, and “guaranteed party” to align with the term “bank guarantee” as defined in the 2024 Law on Credit Institutions. This includes requirements on mandatory debt acknowledgement. Bank Guarantees for Sale of Off-Plan Housing Circular 61, in alignment with Circular 49, the Law on Credit Institutions, and the Law on Real Estate Business, allows foreign bank branches and commercial banks (the “Guarantor”) to guarantee off-plan housing with a detailed procedure. The guarantee agreement between the Guarantor and the real estate project investor
March 21, 2025
Vietnam’s Law on Securities of 2019 was one of several laws amended (“Amended Securities Law”) under the wide-ranging Law No. 56/2024/QH15 passed by the National Assembly on November 29, 2024. The amendments came into force on January 1, 2025, with certain provisions related to professional securities investors and the eligibility criteria for public companies becoming effective on January 1, 2026. Below are some of the key points of the Amended Securities Law. Changes to Professional Securities Investors Professional securities investors (PSIs) are investors who have adequate financial capacity or securities qualifications and can participate in private placements and private funds, among other investment activities. Under the Amended Securities Law, foreign investors, including individuals and organizations, are now automatically classified as PSIs, without having to meet any requirements regarding financial capacity. This loosening of requirements is expected to attract more foreign investment. However, from January 1, 2026, individual PSIs will only be able to purchase, trade, and transfer privately placed corporate bonds that: (i) have been given credit ratings and are secured by collateral, or (ii) have been given credit ratings and covered by payment guarantees from credit institutions. Meanwhile, institutional PSIs will not be bound by these restrictions relating to privately placed corporate bonds. Protecting Shareholders in Private Securities Issuance The Amended Securities Law introduces additional conditions for private issuance of shares, convertible bonds, and warrant-linked bonds by public companies, and revises the required contents in the issuance plans from “criteria and number of investors” to “number of shares, offering price, or principles for determining the offering price.” This change promotes shareholder supervision and protects minority shareholders from overly powerful boards of directors. Expanded Powers of SSC The Amended Securities Law grants the State Securities Commission (SSC) new powers to suspend and cancel private placements of securities and adds
March 19, 2025
On January 1, 2025, the Department of Business Development (DBD) in Thailand’s Ministry of Commerce implemented new stringent corporate registration screening measures in collaboration with several other government agencies to prevent entities from opening corporate mule accounts to commit criminal activities in Thailand. The DBD’s Order of the Office of Central Company and Partnership Registration No. 3/2024 stipulates a new method for registering the establishment of partnerships and limited companies for people who have been involved in underlying crimes or who are owners of bank accounts that are being used for underlying crime, as per the notification of the Anti-Online Scam Operation Center (AOC) to the Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) and the collated AMLO list of such persons. The order establishes the following key requirements: Managing partners and directors of partnerships and limited companies, respectively, whose names have been listed by the AMLO as a person who is involved in an underlying offense, or as the owner of a bank account being used for the underlying offense, must appear before the registrar in person. The concerned persons cited on the AMLO list must provide valid documentation of their identity to the DBD registrar (e.g., national identification card, government official identification card, government or state enterprise employee identification card, alien identification card, passport, document used in lieu of a travel document, or other similar documents with photo identification). This collaboration between the DBD and various relevant government agencies aims to eradicate the problem of fraudsters using mule accounts set up under legally established entities to deceive the public. It also seeks to enhance checks and screening of corporate mule accounts that are used to carry out criminal activities such as money laundering or cybercrime. These actions are part of the Thai government’s broader policy to suppress economic crimes. For more
March 14, 2025
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has published the Draft Guidelines for Digital Fraud Management, which aim to help financial service providers tackle digital fraud and ensure safety and trust in the Thai financial system. These draft guidelines, which are available for public comment until March 18, 2025, provide a comprehensive framework for financial service providers, covering prevention, detection, management, and resolution of digital fraud, as well as support for customers affected by fraud. The BOT tentatively plans to implement these draft guidelines on April 1, 2025, along with circular letters on the minimum required measures for tackling “mule accounts” (deposit or e-money accounts used as tools to receive and transfer funds obtained through the commission of any offense) and measures to strengthen Thailand’s customer due diligence and enhanced due diligence procedures. Under the draft guidelines, “financial service providers” include financial institutions and special financial institutions under the Financial Institution Business Act and payment providers under the Payment Systems Act. Commercial banks, special financial institutions, and operators of transferable e-money services must adhere to every requirement in the draft guidelines. Other financial service providers (e.g., payment providers other than operators of transferable e-money services) can implement the draft guidelines as deemed appropriate to their services, products, and service channels. Digital Fraud Management Requirements The draft guidelines establish the following key requirements: Policy and oversight. Directors and senior executives of financial service providers must set and adopt appropriate “end-to-end” fraud management policies and KPIs to manage digital fraud, covering prevention, monitoring, detection, management, resolution, and support for affected customers. Fraud management processes. Financial service providers must establish a clear framework for managing digital fraud throughout the customer lifecycle, from customer onboarding to service termination, according to industry standards at a minimum and covering at least the following processes: Know your customer