You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 6, 2019

BOI Merges Two Promoted Activities into New International Business Centers

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

On December 11, 2018, the Board of Investment (BOI) issued two new announcements: one canceling the International Headquarters (IHQ) and International Trade Centers (ITC) categories of activities for investment promotion, and one introducing a new category called International Business Centers (IBCs). The IHQ and ITC categories had existed in some form for almost a decade (previously existing in slightly different forms as Regional Operating Headquarters and International Procurement Offices, until they were canceled and replaced by the IHQ and ITC categories for applications submitted in 2015 onward).   

This change is intended to make investment in Thailand more attractive to the global community by implementing new international tax standards under the OECD’s Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, which Thailand acceded to in June 2017. The framework encourages countries to adjust their tax measures to eradicate inadvertent “gaps and mismatches” in the tax regimes of different jurisdictions, effectively harmonizing tax rules between member jurisdictions. This is intended to prevent exploitation of these “gaps and mismatches,” which have long been used by savvy international tax structures that move capital from one jurisdiction to another, benefiting from favorable tax regimes along the way.    

Although the new IBC category is, in principle, merely a combination of the old IHQ and ITC schemes, in practice there are some key new changes that investors—especially those familiar with the old IHQ and ITC schemes—should be aware of.

Eligible Activities for an IBC

Registered Capital   

As with the IHQ and ITC, the paid-up registered capital of an IBC must be at least THB 10 million.

Employment   

Unlike the IHQ and ITC, an IBC is required to have at least 10 skilled employees. A limited exception is available to IBCs that only provide treasury center services to affiliated enterprises, for which the requirement is reduced to five. This is a new requirement and was not included under the IHQ or ITC categories.

IBC Privileges – Board of Investment   

The BOI privileges available to IBCs are generally the same as those under the IHQ and ITC schemes, and are mostly non-tax incentive privileges, such as the right to operate a business with a foreign majority structure, favorable work permit terms for foreign expatriates, the right to own land, etc.

Companies that apply for IBC privileges also enjoy an import duty exemption for machines imported for use in research and development or for training purposes. How- ever, a privilege for import duty on raw or essential materials used in manufacturing of exported products would not be available for IBCs, nor would merit-based privileges.

IBC Privileges – Revenue Department   

It is also possible for IBCs to benefit from tax incentives, although to do so they must notify the Revenue Department separately from their application with the BOI. To qualify as an IBC at the Revenue Department, in addition to meeting the requirements of the BOI, the applicant must spend at least THB 60 million, in each accounting period, to recipients in Thailand, and have paid-up capital of THB 10 million at the end of each accounting period. The applicant must also comply with any other criteria, methods, and conditions stipulated by the Director-General of the Revenue Department in the future.

If an IBC meets these requirements, it will be entitled to the following tax privileges:

  • Reduced corporate income tax rate of 8%, 5%, or 3%, based on expenditures in Thailand of at least THB 60 million, THB 300 million, and THB 600 million, respectively;
  • Exemption from corporate income tax on dividends received from an affiliate;
  • Exemption from specific business tax for income received from treasury center functions;
  • Reduced personal income tax rate of 15% for expatriates working for an IBC; and
  • Exemption from withholding tax for offshore affiliates receiving dividends or interest paid from an IBC.

Impact on Existing IHQs and ITCs   

Companies currently promoted under the BOI’s IHQ and ITC schemes will not be affected, and they will continue to enjoy the incentives under the BOI investment certificate granted to them. Those who registered with the Revenue Department as Regional Operating Headquarters (ROH1 and ROH2), IHQs, or ITCs may opt to convert to IBCs if they are qualified and meet the conditions, or continue to enjoy the tax incentives laid out by the precedent notification or announcement until the end of the relevant timeframe.   

Overall, the new IBC may be less attractive than the precedent ROH, IHQ, and ITC frameworks as a result of the minimum expenditure requirements and other conditions. However, a foreign business license may still be a favorable option for companies that fail to meet the new requirements, and the benefit of harmonization between the Thai investment framework and the international community is likely to promote Thailand as a destination for international offices and domestic affiliates of international corporations. While the new framework may be inconvenient for some, the overall effect on Thailand as an FDI location will likely be beneficial.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 20, 2026
Vietnam’s Law on Bankruptcy and Rehabilitation No. 142/2025/QH15, passed by the National Assembly on December 11, 2025, does something many regional counterparts do not yet attempt: it instructs parties and arbitral tribunals on exactly what happens to an arbitration once a debtor becomes insolvent. Together with the Law on Commercial Arbitration No. 54/2010/QH12, the new law improves upon what used to be an uncertain area of practice, now providing an explicit, mandatory sequence of procedures. Suspension and Termination of Arbitration Proceedings Under article 40(2) of the law, once a Vietnamese court accepts a bankruptcy petition, any arbitration that concerns the debtor’s financial obligations must be temporarily suspended as soon as the tribunal receives the court’s notification. If the court subsequently issues a decision commencing bankruptcy proceedings, article 59(2) takes a further step: the suspended arbitration is terminated outright, and the underlying case file is transferred to the court handling the insolvency for resolution. The two provisions work as a sequence: first suspension, then termination and transfer, rather than as independent triggers. Meanwhile, article 60(4) reinforces this effect by vesting the bankruptcy court with exclusive jurisdiction over all claims against the debtor from the date the petition is accepted. Notably, this mechanism operates automatically, without the need for the insolvency court to issue a separate anti-arbitration order. The tribunal simply suspends or terminates the proceeding by operation of law once notified; however, Vietnamese law currently provides no procedure by which a party can apply to the insolvency court for permission to continue the arbitration despite the statutory effect. Practitioners with a Vietnamese counterparty in arbitration should treat notification of a bankruptcy filing as something to flag to the tribunal immediately since continuing to arbitrate a claim that has become subject to article 40(2) or 59(2) risks producing an award vulnerable
Read More
August 20, 2026
Thai law contains no provision that speaks directly to what happens to an arbitration when one of the parties becomes insolvent. The interaction between arbitration and insolvency is derived instead from the general operation of two separately drafted laws: the Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940) and the Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002). Because Thai courts have had few opportunities to interpret how these two statutes apply together, the practical answer to many questions, such as who represents an insolvent party in arbitration, whether an award will be enforced, and what happens to a foreign proceeding, depends on inference from general principles of insolvency, arbitration, and procedural law rather than on settled rules. Liquidation and Restructuring The Bankruptcy Act governs both liquidation, which winds up a debtor’s affairs, and restructuring (rehabilitation), which aims to preserve a business. The consequences for arbitration differ accordingly. In liquidation, the debtor’s assets vest in the official receiver, who alone can conduct or continue any arbitration affecting the estate; the debtor loses the authority to act on its own behalf. In restructuring, the plan preparer or administrator takes over that role, but there is more room for the debtor to remain involved, since the objective of rehabilitation is to keep the business operational. Restructuring carries an automatic stay that takes effect once the Bankruptcy Court accepts the restructuring petition. This stay can halt an arbitration regardless of where it is seated. In contrast, liquidation does not work through a stay; instead, the debtor’s loss of authority over its own assets and disputes is what constrains the arbitration. Neither proceeding provides a party a formal route to apply for permission to continue arbitrating—the Bankruptcy Act contains no such mechanism—though in restructuring cases the Bankruptcy Court may allow proceedings to continue where doing so will not prejudice
Read More
August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.
Read More
August 18, 2026
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) is seeking public comment on proposed amendments that would significantly expand know-your-customer (KYC) and customer due diligence (CDD) requirements for cash-related transactions at financial institutions (FIs) and specialized financial institutions (SFIs). Released on August 5, 2026, the proposed regulation would supersede BOT Notification No. 16/2569, which focused primarily on cash withdrawal transactions. The public comment period is open through September 3, 2026. The amendments reflect concerns that FIs and SFIs may be used to facilitate the movement, concealment, and conversion of criminal proceeds, potentially damaging institutional operations and public confidence in the financial system. Expanded Scope of Covered Transactions The most significant change is the broadening of the definition of “cash-related transactions.” Previously, the regulation covered only cash withdrawals and uncrossed check withdrawals. The amended regulation extends coverage to include: Cash deposits, check deposits, or receipt of funds from the public not in the form of deposit accounts; Thai baht (THB) banknote exchange (different denominations); Receipt of cash for issuing checks and drafts; and Purchase, sale, or exchange of foreign banknotes. Mandatory Identity Verification and Risk Management For all cash-related transactions, FIs and SFIs must require customers, or authorized or delegated persons, to present identification or verify their identity before every transaction, including one-time (walk-in) transactions. Specific identification requirements vary by transaction type, customer nationality, and channel (branch vs. electronic). FIs and SFIs must also establish comprehensive risk management processes and procedures for cash-related transactions. These requirements include identifying customers or authorized representatives in accordance with transaction-specific verification standards, analyzing customer behavior, implementing risk-management measures proportionate to the customer’s risk profile, and recording abnormal behavior in relevant systems. The BOT also encourages institutions to proactively guide customers toward transaction channels that offer greater traceability than cash. For corporate customers in high-risk business sectors—including foreign
Read More