You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 11, 2021

BOI Extends Privileges to the Lending of Funds to Related Companies

Subscribe to Updates

On September 16, 2021, Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) published BOI Notification No. Sor. 3/2564, extending the scope of certain promoted activities to include lending money to related companies in Thailand and overseas.

The new notification brings these activities within the scope of “trade and investment support offices” (TISOs) and “international business centers” (IBCs)—two of the most popular categories of promoted activity under the BOI. Foreign-majority owned companies may now apply for either TISO or IBC promotion to cover lending funds to affiliates as an alternative to applying for a foreign business license, which can be less predictable. BOI-promoted companies that already have a BOI certificate in the TISO or IBC categories can amend the BOI certificate to cover this kind of lending activity.

The amended scope of the promoted activities for both TISO and IBC categories now provides more flexibility for BOI-promoted companies to provide financial services to their affiliates. Previously this was restricted—especially when foreign-majority-owned companies wished to lend money offshore.

Conditions

Under the new notification, promoted business activities under the TISO category now include lending to “affiliated and group companies,” while those under the IBC category now include lending to “associated enterprises.” These terms are defined separately in Thai laws and regulations, but in practice the definitions are very similar and generally refer to companies that share structural connections. Companies must check carefully to make sure that their proposed structure falls within the appropriate legal definition before applying to the BOI for investment promotion.

Lending business activities now permitted under the IBC and TISO categories include loans in foreign currencies to associated enterprises and affiliated and group companies located overseas, and loans in Thai baht to associated enterprises and affiliated group companies in Thailand. The new BOI notification also allows loans in Thai baht to associated enterprises and affiliated and group companies in Cambodia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, and Vietnam for trading or business investment purposes in those countries or in Thailand.

A promoted company cannot conduct lending business exclusively, but must conduct at least one other TISO business activity or IBC business activity (excluding treasury center and international trade business activities), depending on the category of the promoted company. The scope of the lending business must not fall under the scope of a treasury center business as defined by the BOI and the Bank of Thailand (BOT). Moreover, offshore lending must still comply with BOT exchange requirements.

The two categories differ in terms of tax incentives—no tax incentives are available for TISO lending activities, while tax incentives for IBC projects depend predominantly on the criteria for the special tax incentives scheme as laid out by the Revenue Department (RD), which has not yet recognized lending as an IBC business activity under its own IBC tax scheme. While the full impact of this is still unclear, it could mean that revenue from a promoted lending business might not be eligible for tax incentives under the RD’s IBC tax scheme.

Foreign-majority owned entities in Thailand may not engage in any financial service business activity, except for exempted money lending to affiliated and group companies in Thailand as prescribed by the relevant ministerial regulation issued under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999), unless they are granted either a foreign business license or a foreign business certificate for this purpose. The chances of obtaining either of these are low.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 30, 2025
Recent events at a Thai listed company, where a proposal to remove the director was not successful, amid claims that a competitor was attempting to gain control of the company, illustrate how disputes over corporate control can unfold differently at the board level and shareholder level. At the board level, removing directors of a listed company mid-term to gain corporate control is not an easy task under Thai law, as it requires a higher threshold than appointing a new director, which typically only requires a simple majority vote in a listed company. At the shareholder level, Thailand’s tender offer and competition regimes add complexity where different shareholder groups act in concert to remove opposing board representatives or otherwise influence control. In this article, we will explore why the attempted removal of a director may fail, and how the tender offer regime may apply. Key Issues at a Glance Shareholder groups may seek to convene meetings to propose changes to board composition or company authority. Such proposals can be delayed or complicated by regulatory requirements and the need for additional disclosures. Regulatory authorities and minority shareholders may raise concerns when major shareholders coordinate to influence board control, especially if such actions could trigger tender offer or merger control obligations. Companies often respond by seeking further information on shareholder relationships and potential conflicts before proceeding. Why the Director Removal Failed Under Section 76 of the Public Limited Companies Act B.E. 2535 (as amended), the early removal of a director requires two conditions to be satisfied at the same meeting of shareholders: Headcount test: At least 75% of shareholders attending and entitled to vote must vote in favor. If multiple shareholders appoint the same person as proxy, each proxy is counted as a separate head for the purpose of the headcount test,
Read More
October 24, 2025
On October 22, 2025, the Thai government posted a directive not to grant gambling licenses for gambling involving poker nationwide to crack down on illegal gambling activities. The directive was issued by Thailand’s Ministry of Interior to align with government policies to prevent the legalization of all types of gambling businesses, including poker as a sporting activity. This will result in the revocation of poker activities as sport and institute a strict ban on such activities nationwide. Businesses should note the new government’s strict approach toward gambling activities as the legal situation regarding gambling in the country continues to draw close attention.
Read More
October 1, 2025
In September 2025, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused a company listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), including its current and former directors, of concealing material information in connection with its filing registration and draft prospectus. This recent enforcement action demonstrates the serious consequences of making false statements or appearing to conceal material information in IPO filings and ongoing disclosures. In addition to being subject to criminal penalties, such actions can impact the eligibility of directors and executives to serve and may cause lasting reputational damage. Key Legal Risks The Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (as amended) imposes strict liability for making false statements or concealing material information in IPO registration statements and draft prospectuses. In such cases, investors can claim for damages, and there are also criminal penalties, including imprisonment for up to five years and substantial fines, may apply to the company, its directors, and responsible officers. However, misstatements or omissions in IPO filings do not, by themselves, disqualify directors or executives from holding office, whether arising from an SEC accusation or even a final court judgment. In contrast, for ongoing disclosures after listing, such as financial statements, annual reports, and meeting notices, false or misleading statements or concealment of material information can result in not only criminal liability but also immediate disqualification of directors and executives. If the SEC accuses a listed company or its directors or executives of such misstatements or omissions, those directors or executives are immediately disqualified from their positions, even before a final court judgment. Director and Executive Qualifications Directors and executives must meet the SEC’s specified standards of trustworthiness, as set out in the relevant rules. The SEC clearly defines characteristics that are considered to demonstrate a lack of trustworthiness. For ongoing disclosures, being involved in
Read More
September 30, 2025
Vietnam’s higher education system is at a pivotal stage of reform, with the government taking decisive steps to strengthen its policy and regulatory framework. In response to obstacles encountered during the implementation of the Law on Higher Education, issued in 2012 and amended in 2018, the third draft of the amended Law on Higher Education (Draft Law) is scheduled for submission to the National Assembly in October 2025. The Draft Law reflects the state’s commitment to aligning the education sector with international standards while addressing persistent structural challenges. The Draft Law emphasizes clarifying institutional mandates, enhancing accountability, and modernizing governance models to enable higher education institutions to operate with greater autonomy and efficiency. Against this backdrop, we outline below several notable provisions of the third draft and their potential implications for higher education institutions (HEIs) in Vietnam. Applicable Entities In addition to HEIs as defined and covered under existing legislation, the Draft Law extends its scope of applicable entities. The current Law on Higher Education does not regulate training institutions under state agencies, the armed forces, or political and social organizations, nor does it provide specific provisions for institutions offering only postgraduate education. To address this, the Draft Law introduces the term “institutions with higher education activities,” expanding its scope to include: (a) academies and research institutes established by the prime minister, mandated to provide doctoral-level training; (b) educational institutions affiliated with state agencies, political organizations, socio-political organizations, and the people’s armed forces, authorized to offer higher education programs in their specialized fields; and (c) institutions established pursuant to international treaties or by decision of the prime minister, with authorization to deliver certain levels of higher education. The inclusion of “institutions with higher education activities” represents a significant development both legally and institutionally. In an increasingly diversified higher education
Read More