You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 11, 2021

BOI Extends Privileges to the Lending of Funds to Related Companies

Subscribe to Updates

On September 16, 2021, Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) published BOI Notification No. Sor. 3/2564, extending the scope of certain promoted activities to include lending money to related companies in Thailand and overseas.

The new notification brings these activities within the scope of “trade and investment support offices” (TISOs) and “international business centers” (IBCs)—two of the most popular categories of promoted activity under the BOI. Foreign-majority owned companies may now apply for either TISO or IBC promotion to cover lending funds to affiliates as an alternative to applying for a foreign business license, which can be less predictable. BOI-promoted companies that already have a BOI certificate in the TISO or IBC categories can amend the BOI certificate to cover this kind of lending activity.

The amended scope of the promoted activities for both TISO and IBC categories now provides more flexibility for BOI-promoted companies to provide financial services to their affiliates. Previously this was restricted—especially when foreign-majority-owned companies wished to lend money offshore.

Conditions

Under the new notification, promoted business activities under the TISO category now include lending to “affiliated and group companies,” while those under the IBC category now include lending to “associated enterprises.” These terms are defined separately in Thai laws and regulations, but in practice the definitions are very similar and generally refer to companies that share structural connections. Companies must check carefully to make sure that their proposed structure falls within the appropriate legal definition before applying to the BOI for investment promotion.

Lending business activities now permitted under the IBC and TISO categories include loans in foreign currencies to associated enterprises and affiliated and group companies located overseas, and loans in Thai baht to associated enterprises and affiliated group companies in Thailand. The new BOI notification also allows loans in Thai baht to associated enterprises and affiliated and group companies in Cambodia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, and Vietnam for trading or business investment purposes in those countries or in Thailand.

A promoted company cannot conduct lending business exclusively, but must conduct at least one other TISO business activity or IBC business activity (excluding treasury center and international trade business activities), depending on the category of the promoted company. The scope of the lending business must not fall under the scope of a treasury center business as defined by the BOI and the Bank of Thailand (BOT). Moreover, offshore lending must still comply with BOT exchange requirements.

The two categories differ in terms of tax incentives—no tax incentives are available for TISO lending activities, while tax incentives for IBC projects depend predominantly on the criteria for the special tax incentives scheme as laid out by the Revenue Department (RD), which has not yet recognized lending as an IBC business activity under its own IBC tax scheme. While the full impact of this is still unclear, it could mean that revenue from a promoted lending business might not be eligible for tax incentives under the RD’s IBC tax scheme.

Foreign-majority owned entities in Thailand may not engage in any financial service business activity, except for exempted money lending to affiliated and group companies in Thailand as prescribed by the relevant ministerial regulation issued under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999), unless they are granted either a foreign business license or a foreign business certificate for this purpose. The chances of obtaining either of these are low.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 29, 2025
In September 2019, the government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 75/2019/ND-CP on Administrative Sanctions in the Field of Competition (Decree 75) to address the urgent need for clear sanctioning mechanisms following the implementation of the new Law on Competition in July 2019. However, after five years of enforcement, various gaps and inconsistencies have been exposed that hinder its application. These shortcomings have reduced the deterrent effect of the sanctioning regime, and created legal uncertainty for market participants. A recent case involving Duc Giang – Lao Cai Chemicals’ acquisition of another chemical company—one of the first cases of economic concentration violation to be sanctioned by the National Competition Commission (NCC) since the Law on Competition took effect—highlights the practical difficulties under Vietnam’s competition law enforcement regime. In this case, although the transaction exceeded the statutory notification thresholds of economic concentration set out in the law, the parties failed to submit the required notification. This violation resulted in the NCC imposing aggregate fines of VND 1,423,982,880 (approximately USD 54,770) on the companies in September 2024. On appeal, Duc Giang – Lao Cai Chemicals argued that the chairman of the NCC was legally entitled to issue a warning as the key punishment instead of a monetary penalty. However, the chairman rejected the appeal, citing Article 14 of Decree 75, under which the specific penalty and level for “failure to notify economic concentration” is a fine, not a warning. While the chairman of the NCC is generally empowered to impose penalties, a warning cannot be applied if the specific regulation for a particular violation does not provide for it as a sanction. This example shows the inadequacy and inconsistency of the regulations on penalties for violations of competition law, and underscores the need for an amendment of Decree 75 to resolve such conflicts
Read More
September 26, 2025
As Vietnam accelerates its digital transformation, data centers have emerged as critical infrastructure supporting the shift toward a digital government, digital economy, and digital society. For businesses targeting Vietnam’s rapidly growing data center market, a clear understanding of the evolving regulatory landscape, compliance obligations, and government incentives is key to successful market entry and operation. This article provides a strategic overview of investment opportunities and key compliance requirements in Vietnam’s dynamic data center sector. Investment Incentives to Boost Data Center Growth Since July 1, 2024, organizations and individuals across all economic sectors have been encouraged to invest in and contribute to the development of data centers. By law, there are no restrictions on shareholding ratios, capital contributions, or foreign investor participation in data center and cloud computing services under business cooperation contracts. Currently, investment in AI data centers is classified as a specially incentivized industry, qualifying for preferential treatments and incentives in terms of investment, taxation, land use, and other related areas. Large-scale data centers, together with AI and cloud computing, are currently considered as strategic technologies and products for which Vietnam offers significant fiscal, tax, and land incentives to promote investment. Additionally, these large-scale projects may receive direct financial support from local development budgets for facility construction, technical infrastructure, and equipment procurement, subject to state budget provisions and applicable laws. AI data center construction projects also enjoy preferential treatment under customs regulations. Regulatory Approvals for Providing Data Center Services The 2023 Telecom Law and its guiding documents marked a significant milestone by classifying data center services as value-added telecom services. Under the law, a data center service is defined as a telecom service that enables users to process, store, and retrieve information via a telecom network through the leasing of part or all of a data center. A
Read More
September 19, 2025
Over the past two years—particularly since Thailand announced incentives for EVs, including tax exemptions and reductions—there has been a clear trend of manufacturers relocating their facilities to Thailand. This shift is reshaping the country’s industrial landscape and creating significant opportunities in the real estate sector for companies looking to establish or expand EV manufacturing operations in Southeast Asia. Incentive-Driven Market Transformation The government’s tax exemptions and reductions have proven effective in attracting foreign investment, with Chinese manufacturers currently dominating the market. Most EV parts and car manufacturers operating in Thailand are from China, reflecting the prominence of Chinese EV brands that have already established a presence in the country. The sector encompasses manufacturers of electrical equipment as well as companies seeking to establish facilities for producing electric vehicle components, parts, and accessories. The surge in activity is evident across Thailand’s EV manufacturing sector, with legal practices handling these transactions experiencing unprecedented demand. Industrial Real Estate Framework and Market Dynamics Thailand’s industrial real estate framework provides compelling advantages for foreign manufacturers, who typically face restrictions on foreign land ownership under the Land Code. However, foreign investors can benefit from exemptions to these restrictions if the land is located within industrial real estate zones designated by the Industrial Estate Authority of Thailand (IEAT) or they obtain investment promotion from the Board of Investment (BOI) if the land is located outside an industrial estate area governed by the IEAT. Both the IEAT and BOI provide special tax and nontax incentives, including foreign land ownership, with even greater incentives available for land situated within the country’s Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC). This regulatory advantage has sparked a parallel trend in land development. Industrial real estate developers in the EEC are actively consolidating land into large plots to develop new industrial estate projects, recognizing that
Read More
September 17, 2025
M&A specialists at Tilleke & Gibbins have contributed the Vietnam chapter to Private M&A 2025, a newly released guide from Lexology Panoramic. The publication provides practical insights into private mergers and acquisitions frameworks in jurisdictions worldwide. The Vietnam chapter addresses key aspects of private M&A transactions, including: Structure and process, legal regulation, and required consents Advisers, negotiation, and documentation Due diligence and disclosure obligations Pricing, consideration, and financing Conditions, preclosing covenants, and termination rights Representations, warranties, indemnities, and postclosing covenants Taxation of transfers Employees, pensions, and benefits Recent legal, regulatory, and market practice developments The chapter highlights how Vietnam’s legal framework governs private acquisitions and disposals, outlines typical transaction processes and structures, and provides guidance on common regulatory and practical considerations. It also notes recent trends, including increased scrutiny of merger control filings by the Vietnam Competition Commission and regulatory changes affecting M&A approvals. The full Vietnam chapter is available as a PDF through the button below. Readers can also gain 30 days of complimentary access to Private M&A 2025 and Lexology Panoramic’s full library of resources through this link.
Read More